Implementation of English-Medium Education Reform in Kazakhstan: A Comparative Case Study of Teacher Perspectives in International and Public Secondary Schools

This study explores the implementation of English-Medium Education (EME) reform in Kazakhstan’s secondary schools, focusing on teachers’ perspectives on policy interpretation, practice challenges, and support needs. Using a qualitative comparative case-study design with semi-structured interviews as the core research method, 12 teachers from two contrasting schools (an elite international school and a mainstream public school) in Almaty were interviewed. Data analysis revealed three key findings: (1) Teachers in international schools interpret EME as a “global integration tool” aligned with international curricula, while public school teachers view it as a “pragmatic requirement” and adapt via code-switching and material translation; (2) Public school teachers face systemic barriers including limited English proficiency, inadequate CLIL training, and scarce English-language materials, whereas international school teachers encounter minor cultural adaptation challenges; (3) Both groups need context-specific professional support, with public school teachers prioritizing basic language training and resources, and international school teachers seeking cross-cultural teaching guidance. This study concludes that EME reform in Kazakhstan is unevenly implemented partly due to resource and training inequalities. To promote greater equity, policymakers may consider targeted funding for public schools and differentiated professional development programs. The research contributes to understanding teacher experiences in multilingual education reform and offers practical insights for EME policy refinement.

English-Medium Education; EME reform

1. Ball, S. J., Magrath, C., Braun, A., Perryman, J., & Hoskins, K. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bekmyrza, K., Aubakirova, G., & Kassymova, G. (2020). Challenges of implementing trilingual education in Kazakhstani secondary schools. Journal of Language Education, 6(3), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Brock-Utne, B. (2019). Language of instruction and inclusive education in Africa. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(10), 1047–1060. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dearden, J., & Macaro, E. (2016). Higher education EMI: Global perspectives and local realities. British Council. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Igamberdiyeva, G., & Kim, Y. Y. (2021). Policy borrowing and adaptation in trilingual education: The case of Kazakhstan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 42(7), 615–628. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kunanbayeva, S. S. (2013). Contemporary methodology of foreign language education. Kazakh University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Macaro, E., Akincioglu, A., & Kim, Y. (2018). Teacher competencies for English medium instruction in higher education. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(9), 789–803. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2022). Guidelines for implementing trilingual education. MOESRK Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2023). Standard curriculum for English-medium instruction. MOESRK Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. National Statistical Bureau of Kazakhstan. (2024). Education statistics 2023. Astana: National Statistical Bureau. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nikula, T., Moore, P., & Cabrera, N. (2013). Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from current research. Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Prochner, L., & Tiwari, A. (n.d.). English medium instruction in India: Equity and access issues. Comparative Education, 53(3), 345–359. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Pun, J., & Macaro, E. (2020). Analyzing English-medium instruction in Asian contexts: Issues and policy implications. System, 89, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sarsenbayeva, A. (2022). Resource inequalities in English medium education: A case study of urban schools in Kazakhstan. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 30(56), 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.|（注：文档部分内容可能由 AI 生成） [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study