OGBASA: Practices, Challenges, and Strategies of Reading Teachers Implementing Reading Programs for Ata-Manobo Students

Reading proficiency is fundamental to learners’ academic success and lifelong learning; however, persistent gaps remain, particularly among Indigenous learners in the Philippines. Despite ongoing reading initiatives, limited research has examined how reading teachers implement reading programs within culturally diverse contexts such as that of Ata-Manobo students. This study aimed to explore the practices, challenges, and strategies of reading teachers implementing reading programs for Ata-Manobo learners. Anchored in a qualitative case study design within a social constructivist framework, the study involved purposively selected reading coordinators and teachers. Data were generated through in-depth interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings revealed that reading teachers implemented contextualized reading practices, including remedial and enhancement programs, structured procedures, and learner-centered approaches. However, they encountered significant challenges such as weak parental support, low student participation due to socio-economic demands, and limited instructional resources. In response, reading teachers employed adaptive strategies, including interactive and collaborative pedagogies, contextualization or indigenization of materials, principle-based instructional approaches, and personal initiatives such as home visitation and use of self-funded resources. The study underscores the need for culturally responsive and context-sensitive reading programs, strengthened school-community partnerships, and sustained institutional support to address structural and resource-related constraints. These findings contribute to improving reading program implementation for Indigenous learners and inform policy and practice in inclusive education.

reading programs, reading teachers, practices, challenges, strategies

1. Abad, D. J. V. (2020). Designing a contextualized and culture-based reading material for indigenous learners. Pal.Arch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(1), 153-163. http://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/1024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abeberese, A. B., Kumler, T. J., & Linden, L. L. (2011). Improving reading skills by encouraging children to read: A randomized evaluation of the Sa Aklat Sisikat reading program in the Philippines (IZA Discussion Paper No. 5812). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1877625 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Abeberese, A. B., Kumler, T., & Linden, L. (2014). Improving reading skills by encouraging children to read in school: A randomized evaluation of the Sa Aklat Sisikat reading program in the Philippines. The Journal of Human Resources, 49(3), 611-633. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2014.0020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Abejuela, H. J. M., Akut, K., Rosario, A. S. D., & Balane, C. T. (2023). Assessment of the reading curriculum in basic education in the Philippines context. International Journal of Language Education, 7(1), 26-45. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v1i1.23641 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Adao, L., Relleve, C. C. O., Salazar, J. F., Macawile, K. F., & Chavez, M. (2023). Teachers’ challenges, capabilities, and needs in teaching learners with reading difficulties. Journal of Science and Education, 3(3), 221-231. https://doi.org/10.56003/jse.v3i3.173 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. ALNehabi, N. (2023). An Empirical Study on Enhancing English Reading Skills among Female Middle School Students in Government Schools in Saudi Arabia and its Direct Impact on Academic Achievement. English Language Teaching, 17(1), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v17n1p121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Aquino, J., & Tingson, J. (2021). Addressing reading comprehension difficulties in printed modular distance learning: A case study. International Journal of English Language Studies, 3(10), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2021.3.10.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1968-35017-000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bibat, D. M., & Baguio, J. B. (2026). Success stories of best pedagogical practices of elementary teachers in teaching reading to indigenous learners. International Journal of Transformative Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(2), 148-157. https://doi.org/10.66074/de09fr87 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(6), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Boyce, C.M., & Neale, P.R. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Pathfinder International Tool Series, Monitoring and Evaluation 2. https://nyhealthfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/m_e_tool_series_indepth_interviews-1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv26071r6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bruner, J. S. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A. Sinclair, R. Jarvella, & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.), The Child’s Conception of Language (pp. 241–256). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67155-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Canuto, P. P., Lumidao, Y., Ballagan, A., Calya-en, P. Jr., Laoyan, R. K., & Oplas, A. (2024). Enhancing elementary students’ oral reading fluency through repeated reading and big books. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 23(4), 376-393. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.4.20 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64(8), 723–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146816306400801 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1988), S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Chaiklin, H. (1991). Case study research: Design and methods. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 179(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Charreire-Petit, S., & Huault, I. (2008). From practice-based knowledge to the practice of research: Revisiting constructivist research works on knowledge. Management Learning, 39(1), 73-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507607085173 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Doronio, F., Lemana, H., Llaneta, G. M., Amarado, J., Bucag, A. L., & Comeros, M. J. (2023). Exploring the teacher experience: A phenomenological inquiry into DepEd’s Drop-Everything-And-Read (DEAR) program. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(1), 62-72. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8313435 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Gasis, O. (2025). Benchmarking reading proficiency: Evaluating reading levels among grade 6 pupils of Pagbilao Central Elementary School. Aloysian Interdisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, Education, and Allied Fields, 1(9), 575-581. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17304064 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Gutierrez, K. D., Morales, P. Z., & Martínez, D. C. (2009). Re-mediating Literacy: Culture, difference, and learning for students from nondominant communities. Review of Research in Education, 33(1), 212-245. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x08328267 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ignacio, M. A. (2026). Assessing teachers’ capacity in reading instruction: Evidence from Laparay Elementary School. Eureka Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 108-117. https://doi.org/10.56773/ejer.v4i1.83 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Jugador, C. V., & Tampus, D. J. (2025). Reading remediation programs implemented in the indigenous people intensive secondary schools in Jabonga District, Agusan del Norte. Pantaō International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 2218–2228. https://doi.org/10.69651/pijhss0403206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Labo-Popoola, S. O. (2018). Reading habits amongst university undergraduates: Implications for academic performance. International Journal of Learning and Development, 8(2), 114-129. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v8i2.13102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Loewen, J., Kinshuk, K., Suhonen, J., & Chen, N. (2017). I-SLATE: Designing a culturally relevant framework for authentic learning. Smart Learning Environments, 4(2017), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-017-0048-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Macario, J. H., & Villocino, R. P. (2025). Effective teaching practices and reading performance of public elementary school learners. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(4), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.53385 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Marcq, K., & Braeken, J. (2025). From framework to functionality: A cross-country analysis of PISA 2018 reading assessment framework’s item features as determinants of item difficulty. Large-Scale Assessments in Education,13(2025), Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-025-00261-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Misanes, C. & Pascual, E. (2023). Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) performance of grade 8 students: Basis for a reading intervention program. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8320946 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Rayon, L. J. D. (2017). Task-based approach as an effective tool for pragmatic competence development. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 27(1), 112-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v27i1.461 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Rillo, A. L. J. A. (2025). Lived experiences of teachers implementing reading programs in secondary schools of Pudtol District. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(1), 376-391. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i11756 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become. Charles Merrill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts. https://doi.org/10.1037/11256-000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tomas, M. J. L., Villaros, E. T., & Galman, S. M. A. (2021). The perceived challenges in reading of learners: Basis for school reading programs. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9(5), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.95009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Utto, S., & Lumogdang, M. (2025). Identity, challenges, and experiences of Maguindanaon frustrated readers in English (A case study). Pantao, International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 199-211. https://doi.org/10.69651/pijhss040221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Visuyan, E. B. (2024). Reading intervention through “Brigada Sa Pagbasa”: Viewpoint of primary grade teachers. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(5), 556-558. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24may679 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Zucker, D. R. (2014). The Belmont Report. In N. Balakrishnan, T. Colton, B. Everitt, W. Piegorsch, F. Ruggeri and J.L. Teugels (Eds.), Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat06924 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study