Sustainable Policy Approaches in Environmental Ethics Education: A Narrative Review of Active Learning and Digital Innovation
Authors
Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, 21300 Kuala Nerus (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400564
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 7927-7933
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-18
Accepted: 2026-04-23
Published: 2026-05-19
Abstract
Environmental ethics education has become increasingly important in response to climate change, environmental degradation, biodiversity loss, and the growing need for sustainable development. Higher education institutions are now expected not only to deliver environmental knowledge but also to cultivate ethical awareness, responsible behaviour, and sustainable decision-making among students. This narrative review examines the role of active learning methods and digital innovation in environmental ethics education, with particular emphasis on sustainable policy implications for higher education institutions. The review synthesises previous literature on active learning, instructional design, technology-enhanced learning, and environmental ethics education. It highlights the use of innovative digital tools such as applications, gamification, virtual learning environments, and collaborative technologies in improving students’ understanding of environmental values, ethics, and professional practices. The review also explores the integration of conventional learning methods with digital approaches to create a more holistic and sustainable educational framework. The findings suggest that active learning methods, supported by technology, significantly improve student engagement, critical thinking, environmental awareness, and problem-solving skills. Furthermore, sustainable educational policies are necessary to support infrastructure, digital accessibility, curriculum integration, lecturer training, and long-term institutional commitment. This article proposes that environmental ethics education should be embedded within sustainable higher education policy frameworks to ensure the development of environmentally responsible graduates.
Keywords
environmental ethics, sustainability policy, active learning, digital innovation, environmental education, higher education
Downloads
References
1. Braxton, J. M., Bronico, J. M., & Looms, S. S. (1995). Institutional impediments to effective instruction in the community college: A survey of faculty perceptions. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 19(4), 291–302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Capecchi, I., Borghini, T., Bellotti, M., & Bernetti, I. (2025). Enhancing education outcomes integrating augmented reality and artificial intelligence for education in nutrition and food sustainability. Sustainability, 17(5), 2113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Chan, C. G., Embi, M. A. B., & Hashim, H. (2019). Primary school teachers’ readiness towards heutagogy and peeragogy. Asian Education Studies, 4(1), 11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Chen, F., Xiang, S., & Fan, M. (2024). Enhancing environmental awareness through integrated curriculum in China. Research and Advances in Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Cruickshank, D. K. (1991). The act of teaching. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O’Hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Using game design elements in non-gaming contexts. In CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2425–2428). Association for Computing Machinery. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Jonassen, D. H. (2021). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 283–305. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Khalif Muammar A. Harris. (2022). Prinsip-prinsip umum falsafah dan etika alam sekitar menurut perspektif Islam. Journal of Islam and the Contemporary World, 15(1), 69–106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Liu, Q., Cheng, Z., & Chen, M. (2019). Effects of environmental education on environmental ethics and literacy based on virtual reality technology. The Electronic Library, 37(5), 860–877. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Moorthy, R., & Akwen, G. T. (2020). Environmental ethics through value-based education. Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics, 11(2), 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2019). Student engagement in online learning: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 140, 103607. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Rahman, A. A., Airis, B., Mohamed, H., & Zaleha, N. M. Z. (2014). Flipped classroom dalam konteks Malaysia. Konvensyen Antarabangsa Jiwa Pendidik, 7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Siemens, G., & Downes, S. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Zahra, A., Khong, K., Waheed, Z., & Fatima, T. (2024). Leveraging technology for environmental awareness: Insights from experimental research with middle school students in Malaysia. RMLE Online, 47, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Ching, G. S., & Liang, C. (2023). Exploring the effectiveness of gamified learning in sustainability education: A quasi-experimental study. Sustainability, 15(3), 2481. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Karahan, E., Roehrig, G., & Guzey, S. S. (2022). Integrated STEM education for environmental sustainability: A systematic review. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Leal Filho, W., Salvia, A. L., Paivão Fritzen, L., & Brandli, L. L. (2023). Active learning methodologies for sustainability: Case studies from higher education institutions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 391, 136154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2022). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Warwick, P., & Henriksen, D. (2024). Digital technology, sustainability, and ethics education: A framework for responsible integration. Environmental Education Research, 30(2), 215–234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study