Integrating Culture into Education for Sustainable Development at Tertiary Level: Challenges and Opportunities.

Education for sustainable development is widely recognized as essential for building a resilient and equitable future. However, its effectiveness depends not only on policies and curricula but also on its grounding in culture. This paper explores the challenges and opportunities of integrating culture into education for sustainable development at tertiary level in Zimbabwe. Drawing on an interpretive paradigm and qualitative methods, through a idiographic, including interviews and focus group discussions that were held with thirty participants. The study highlights barriers such as resistance to change, linguistic diversity, resource constraints, gender inequality, and entrenched social hierarchies. At the same time, it identifies opportunities of preserving indigenous knowledge, enhancing student engagement, promoting diversity and global citizenship, ethical grounding through cultural philosophies such as Ubuntu, resilience against globalization, and stronger connections between global sustainability goals and local realities. The findings suggest that culturally responsive curricula, inclusive language policies, equitable resource allocation, and community engagement are critical for transforming ESD into a holistic and impactful framework. By embracing cultural diversity, tertiary institutions can ensure that sustainability is not perceived as an external imposition but as a lived practice rooted in identity and heritage.

Education for Sustainable Development

1. Bukunmi, D. A. (2024). Ubuntu and the philosophy of community in African thought: An exploration of collective identity and social harmony. Journal of African Studies and Sustainable Development, 7, (3), ISSN Online: 2630-7073, ISSN Print: 2630-7065. www.apas.africa/journals.php [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chaudhari, K. B. (2018). The Dynamics of Caste Identity and Social Mobility in Contemporary India. International Journal of Social Impact, 3, (4), DOI: 10.25215/2455/0304016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Churchland, P. S., & Churchland, P. M. (2013). What are beliefs? In F. Krueger & J. Grafman (Eds.), The neural basis of human belief systems. New York: Psychology Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cole, N. L. (2023). What Is Culture? What Does It Do? What Should It Do? Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304818111_What_Is_Culture_What_Does_It_Do_What_Should_It_Do [accessed Nov 15 2023]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Edelmann, A. & Mohr, W. (2018). Formal studies of culture: Issues, challenges, and current trends Meaning and Significance of Culture Poetics 68(1) DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2018.05.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Frame, A. (2017). What Future for the Concept of Culture in the Social Sciences? Epistémè, (17), 151 172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Goraya, S. S. (2020). How Does Caste Affect Entrepreneurship? Birth vs Worth. hUniversitat Pompeu Fabra. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hicks, R. (2010). Personality and Individual Differences: Current Directions. Durham: Australian Academic Press https://books.google.co.zw/books?id=Ql-icQAACAAJ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hofstad, H. (2023). Well understood? A literature study defining and operationalising community social sustainability. Local Environment, 28(9), 1193–1209. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v5i1.3279 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kish-Gephart, J. J., & Campbell, J. T. (2015). You don’t forget your roots: The influence of CEO social class background on strategic risk taking. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1614–1636. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1204 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Limthanakom, N., Lauffer, W., Mujtaba, B. G. & Murphy, E. (2011). The Ranking of Terminal and Instrumental Values by Working Professionals in Thailand, Singapore and The United States: What Is Important And How Do They Impact Decision-Making? International Business & Economics Research Journal, 7, DO - 10.19030/iber.v7i4.3245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mbibeh, L. (2013). Implementing Inclusive Education in Cameroon: Evidence from the Cameroon Baptist Convention Health Board. International Journal of Education, 5, 52-68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lunn-Rockliffe, S., Derbyshire, S. & Hicks, D. (2019). Material culture, analysis of. In Atkinson, P., Delamont, S., Cernat, A., Shakshaug, J. & Williams, R. (eds.). Research Methods Foundations. SAGE doi: 10.4135/9781526421036843497 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Malapane, O. L., Chanza, N.& Musakwa, W. (2024). Transmission of indigenous knowledge systems under changing landscapes within the vhavenda community. South Africa, Environmental Science and Policy, 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103861. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mazumdar, H. T. (1966). Grammar of Sociology: Man, in Society. Asia Publishing House. ISBN-13: ‎ 978-0210269879 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mintz, L. (2017). Becoming Cliterate: Why Orgasm Equality Matters--And How to Get It San Francisco: Harper One publishers, ISBN 0062484389 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mohan, C. M. (2024). Indigenous Knowledge System; Preserving Culture Heritage and Promoting Sustainability. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 13, (3), 118-125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Naikal, A. & Chandra, S. (2013). Organisational Culture: A Case Study. International Journal of Knowledge Management and Practices, 7 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260094253_Organisational_Culture_A_Case_Study. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nepal, T. (2024). The Role of Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Environmental Stewardship: Beyond Poverty and Necessity. DOI - 10.20944/preprints202406.1838.v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pauw, J. B., Gericke, N., Olsson, D., & Berglund, T. (2015). The Effectiveness of Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 7(11), 15693-15717. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71115693. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Phatak, A., Bhagat, R. & Kashlak, R. (2009). International Management: Managing in a Diverse and Dynamic Global Environment. ISBN 13: 9780073210575 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Roberts, J. (2025). Evaluating Culture: Pros and Cons of Standardized Curriculum https://prospluscons.com/pros-and-cons-of-standardized-curriculum/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Starkey, J. (2023). Effective strategies for building and sustaining a positive school culture and climate. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 27(2), 1-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Taciano, L. Milfont, P. Wesley, S. (2016). Culture and the natural Environment. Current Opinion in Psychology. 8, 194-199, ISSN 2352-250X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Terrana, A. & Al-Delaimy, W. (2023). A systematic review of cross-cultural measures of resilience and its promotive and protective factors. Transcult Psychiatry. 60(4):733-750. doi: 10.1177/13634615231167661. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Toit-Brits, C. (2022). Exploring the importance of a sense of belonging for a sense of ownership in learning. South African Journal of Higher Education. 36, DO - 10.20853/36-5-4345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Tom, M.N., Sumida Huaman, E. & McCarty, T.L. (2019). Indigenous knowledges as vital contributions to sustainability. International Review of Education, 65, 1–18 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09770-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, (1), 97–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Uchiyama, Y. (2025). Sustainable shared mobility as social common capital: Conceptual framework and case analysis. Mobilities, 20, (6), 1126–1146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. UNESCO. (2025). Unleashing the power of culture to achieve sustainable development. MONDIACULT 2025 | UNESCO [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Verick, S. (2025). Female Labour Force Participation and Development. IZA World of Labour, 3, 87 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Wang, L. (2019). The Research of the Non-Material Cultural Heritage Live Better in the Present. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2, (3), 138-142. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.040083. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study