Beyond Aristotle: Re-Theorizing Tragedy through the Ozidi Saga in Dialogue with Hamlet

This study interrogates the adequacy of Aristotle’s Classical theory of tragedy through a comparative analysis of Hamlet and the Ozidi Saga. While Aristotelian Poetics locates tragedy in individual error (hamartia) and its cathartic resolution, this paper argues that such framework is insufficient for interpreting non-western dramatic traditions. Drawing on the Roman tragic model associated with Seneca the Younger and the African metaphysical perspective articulated by Wole Soyinka, the study develops a four-layer theoretical framework that re-conceptualizes tragedy as an evolving and culturally contingent form. Through close textual and comparative analysis, it demonstrates that Hamlet reflects a hybrid tragic structure shaped by Aristotelian and Senecan elements, particularly in its emphasis on psychological conflict, revenge, and moral hesitation. In contrast, the Ozidi Saga redefines tragedy through communal obligation, ritual enactment, and supernatural determinism, where the hero’s actions are governed less by personal flaw than by ancestral and cosmic necessity. The study concludes that tragedy should be understood not as a universal genre grounded in individual experience, but as a dynamic continuum shaped by cultural, philosophical, and metaphysical forces. This reconceptualization contributes to ongoing efforts to decolonize literary theory and to develop more inclusive frameworks for the study of world drama.

Revenge Tragedy, African Oral Literature

1. Andujar, Rosa. “Greek Tragedy and Perforance”. The Classical Review, Vol. 73, no.1, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aristotle. Poetics. Translated by Malcolm Heath, Penguim Books, 1996. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Babcock, Kimberly J. Modern Dramatic Tragedy and Aristotle’s Poetics : A Comparison. College of William & Mary, 1987. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bowers, Fredson. Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy 1587 – 1642. Princeton UP, 1940. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bradley, A.C. Shakespearean Tragedy. Macmillan, 1904. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Clark, J.P. The Collected Plays 1962-2000. University Press, Plc, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Clark-Bekederemo, J.P. The Ozidi Saga. University Press PLC. 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Shakespearean Criticism, Volume I. Edited by Thomas Middleton Raysor, J.M. Dent, 1961. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Feingold, Michael, and Spring, Michael. William Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 1984. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton UP, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Greenblatt, Stephen. Hamlet in Purgatory. Princeton UP, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ihidero, Victor. “Ijaw Mythology and New Humanist Tragedy: Theorizing Drama from the Delta”. Journal of African cultural studies, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Irele, Abiola. The African Imagination: Literature in Africa and the Black Diaspora. Oxford UP, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jeyifo, Biodun. The Truthful Lie: Essays in a Sociology of African Drama. New Beacon Books, 1985. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Johnson, John William. The Epic of Son – Jara: A West African Tradition. Indiana UP, 1986. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Birth of Tragedy. Translated by Walter Kanfmann, Vintage Books, 1967. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Nugent, Louise, et al., editors. Affect, Belief, and the Arts. Routledge, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Okpewho, Isidore. The Epic in Africa : Toward a Poetics of the Oral Performance. Columbia UP, 1979. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rhan, Thi T.H., et al. “Rituals, Grief, and Meaning – Making : Cultural Perspectives on Bereavement”. Frontiers in Sociology, Vol. 10, 2025, article 1620016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Roberts, Nicholas, and Ali Qahri – Saremi. “Tragedy, Truth, and Technology : A Cognitive Process Perspective”. Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 38, no.2, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Saxo Grammaticus. The History of the Danes. Translated by Peter Fisher, edited by Hilda Ellis Davidson, D.S. Brewer, 1979. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Seember, T.S. and J. Ndung’u. “Impact of Bereavement Rituals on Psychological Wellbeing among the Tiv People of Benue State, Nigeria”. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, Vol. 8, no.3, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Seneca. Seneca’s Tragedies. Translated by Emily Wilson, Oxford UP, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Edited by Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor, Arden Shakespeare, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Soyinka, Wole. Myth, Literature and the African World. Cambridge University Press, 1976. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Exploring Gender Narratives: Femininity and Masculinity in Health and Commercial Advertising in the Philippines
• Gendered Dimensions of Marital Celebrations: A Comparative Analysis of Women's and Men's Experiences and Perceptions
• Assessing the Impact of Gender Mainstreaming Policies and Programs on Gender Equality in Caraga Region, Philippines: A Quantitative Survey-Based Analysis
• Gendered Coping Patterns: Advancing Healthy Help-Seeking Behaviours in Men
• From Panoptic Control to Quiet Resistance: Navigating Gendered Childhoods and Emerging Agency in Rajshahi, Bangladesh