Students’ Acceptability and Experiences in Using Language Mastery Remedial Workbook for Hospitality Management

Authors

Lord Mark Jayson B. Ilarde

Cagayan State University- Andrews, Tuguegarao City (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400613

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 8769-8783

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-29

Accepted: 2026-05-04

Published: 2026-05-20

Abstract

Communication is the lifeline of hospitality service, and when students cannot use it confidently, their readiness for professional practice is directly compromised. This study determined the students’ acceptability and experiences in using the Language Mastery (LM) Remedial Workbook as a contextualized communication material for Hospitality Management students. Specifically, it assessed the level of acceptability of the workbook in terms of content quality, organization and structure, engagement and motivation, language clarity, relevance to hospitality services, and usability and design. It also explored the students’ experiences in using the workbook as a remedial tool for workplace-related communication. The study employed a mixed-methods research design involving 136 third-year Hospitality Management students from Cagayan State University–Sanchez Mira Campus during the second semester of Academic Year 2025–2026. Quantitative data were gathered through a validated workbook acceptability survey and analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were obtained through a semi-structured interview guide and focus group responses and analyzed through thematic analysis. Findings revealed that the LM Remedial Workbook was rated highly acceptable, with an overall mean of 4.74. All six dimensions also obtained Highly acceptable ratings, indicating that the workbook was perceived as clear, organized, engaging, relevant, and easy to use. Qualitative findings further revealed six major themes: relevance and contextualized learning, increased confidence and reduced anxiety in communication, perceived improvement in communication skills, engagement and learner independence, continuing difficulties in grammar, writing, and speaking, and the need for continued practice and feedback. The study concludes that the LM Remedial Workbook is a relevant, learner-centered, and practical remedial communication material for Hospitality Management students, particularly in strengthening workplace-related English communication in front office, housekeeping, and food and beverage service contexts.

Keywords

acceptability, contextualized learning, hospitality management, remedial communication, student experiences

Downloads

References

1. Akay, E., Karakaş, A., & Baş, G. (2025). A CLIL-based model proposal for a solution to English-speaking anxiety of gastronomy and culinary arts students. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 36, 100559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2025.100559 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aldosari, M. S., & Alsager, H. N. (2023). A step toward autonomy in education: Probing into the effects of practicing self-assessment, resilience, and creativity in task supported language learning. BMC Psychology, 11, Article 434. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01478-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alhusna, A., & Suparmi, S. (2025). Bridging vocational students’ needs and industry demands: Designing authentic English learning materials for hotel services. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 9(4), 515–533. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.9.4.515-533 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Malki, E. A. A., Javid, C. Z., Farooq, M. U., Algethami, G. F., & Al-Harthi, A. A. (2022). Analysis of the English language needs of the Saudi tourism workforce: A first step into designing ESP teaching materials. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(2), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.2.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Aramaki, T. (2024). Investigating collaborative oral task repetition as a language anxiety reduction strategy. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2367306. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2367306 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bui, H. P. (2022). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective ESP teaching. Heliyon, 8(9), e10628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10628 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bui, P. T., & Cheng, Y.-H. (2024). English needs analysis of food & beverage employees: A case study of a 5-star resort in Vietnam. English for Specific Purposes, 76, 74–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.07.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chang, P., Zhou, L., & Zhang, L. J. (2024). The roles of task-specific self-efficacy and enjoyment in EFL learners’ development of speaking CALF: A longitudinal study. System, 125, 103539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103539 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. East, M. (2021). Foundational principles of task-based language teaching. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003039709 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fan, N. (2023). Exploring the effects of automated written corrective feedback on EFL students’ writing quality: A mixed-methods study. SAGE Open, 13(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231181296 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lertchalermtipakoon, P., Wongsubun, U., & Kawinkoonlasate, P. (2021). Need analysis: English language use by students in the tourism and hospitality and industry. English Language Teaching, 14(3), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n3p59 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Li, X., & Hu, W. (2024). Peer versus teacher corrections through electronic learning communities and face-to-face classroom interactions and EFL learners’ passion for learning, speaking fluency, and accuracy. Heliyon, 10(4), Article e25849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25849 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Miqawati, A. H., Wijayanti, F., Al Mujib, I. H., Kadhafi, A., & Devy, I. (2024). Identifying English communication competence for front office of hotel industries. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Social Science, Humanity and Public Health (ICoSHIP 2023). EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-11-2023.2342571 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), e3292. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3292 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nguyen, D. T. (2025). English proficiency requirements for hotel front-desk staff by the Vietnam Tourism Occupational Standards: Implications for ESP curriculum in Vietnam. Educational Process: International Journal, 18, Article e2025491. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.18.491 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Purwanto, M. B., Despita, D., & Auliana, N. U. (2024). Task-based language teaching in hospitality training. Asian Journal of Applied Education, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.55927/ajae.v3i4.11777 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Souzandehfar, M., & Ahmed Abdel-Al Ibrahim, K. (2023). Task-supported language instruction in an EFL context: Impacts on academic buoyancy, self-esteem, creativity, and language achievement. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00218-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Vo, H. (2023). Giving choices or making tasks relevant? Classroom practices that foster L2 learner engagement. System, 116, Article 103098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103098 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Wei, R., & Zhao, X. (2024). Effects of task-based language teaching on functional adequacy in L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 60, 100838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100838 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Xu, Y., & Xie, Z. (2024). Exploring the predictors of foreign language anxiety: The roles of language proficiency, language exposure, and cognitive control. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, Article 1492701. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1492701 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Yang, L., Zhang, L. J., & Dixon, H. R. (2023). Understanding the impact of teacher feedback on EFL students’ use of self-regulated writing strategies. Journal of Second Language Writing, 60, Article 101015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Zhang, M., Yi, N., & Zhou, D. (2023). The effects of task repetition schedules on L2 fluency enhancement. Languages, 8(4), Article 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8040252 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles