Juvenile Justice Initiatives: An Analysis of Local Government Strategies in Lagawe

This study examined the effectiveness of juvenile justice initiatives implemented by local government units in Lagawe, Hingyon, and Lamut, with a focus on programs for the prevention of delinquency and reduction of recidivism among children in conflict with the law (CICL). Using a qualitative research design, data were collected through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with selected stakeholders, including social workers, barangay officials, and law enforcement personnel. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis, which identified key themes related to program implementation, challenges encountered, and coping strategies. Findings revealed that local government units implement various community-based and rehabilitative programs such as psychosocial counseling, diversion and community-based rehabilitation, parenting seminars, and youth development activities. These programs address the emotional, behavioral, and social needs of juveniles and serve both preventive and corrective functions. However, challenges such as limited financial resources, insufficient trained personnel, and inconsistencies in program delivery affect the overall effectiveness of these initiatives. Despite these limitations, stakeholders employ strategies such as strengthening coordination, maximizing available resources, and promoting community participation to sustain program implementation. The study concludes that while juvenile justice programs are relevant and aligned with rehabilitative principles, their effectiveness depends on consistent implementation, adequate support, and strong collaboration among stakeholders. It is recommended that local government units enhance resource allocation, strengthen inter-agency coordination, and institutionalize sustainable mechanisms to improve program effectiveness and long-term impact.

juvenile justice, delinquency prevention, recidivism, community-based intervention programs

1. Akers, R. L. (2017). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129587 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bazemore, G., & Umbreit, M. (2001). A comparison of four restorative conferencing models. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. https://ojp.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/184738.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Howell, J. C. (2003). Preventing and reducing juvenile delinquency. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Labajo, M. C., & Lucero, C. D. (2017). Evaluation of juvenile diversion programs in the Philippines. Journal of Criminal Justice Policy and Research, 9(1), 77–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Republic Act No. 9344. (2006). Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006. https://lawphil.net [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Republic Act No. 10630. (2013). An act strengthening the juvenile justice system. https://lawphil.net [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Siegel, L. J., & Welsh, B. C. (2017). Juvenile delinquency: Theory, practice, and law (12th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. UNICEF Philippines. (2020). Children in conflict with the law. https://www.unicef.org/philippines [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. United Nations. (1985). United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (The Beijing Rules). https://www.un.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. https://www.ohchr.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2014). Handbook on juvenile justice. https://www.unodc.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Good Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Net Relative Run-Ratio Method (NRRR), a Foolproof Technique to Replace the Net Run Rate (NRR) Method in Evaluating the Authority of Match-Wins
• Statistical Role of CB-SEM Vs PLS-SEM in the Field of Social Science
• Predictive Modelling and Statistical Analysis of Housing Prices in Lagos State, Nigeria
• Collocational Patterns of Guru in American Business vs. Spiritual Discourse
• A Comparative Analysis of Heuristic and Dynamic Algorithms for Route Optimization in Johor’s Delivery Hubs