Pupils’ Cursive Handwriting in Cervantes District: Inputs to the Development of the Sequential Cursive Handwriting Tool

Cursive handwriting is a style of writing in which letters are connected in a continuous and flowing manner to improve writing speed, efficiency, and fluency. This skill plays an important role in early education by helping develop fine motor skills, cognitive abilities, and memory retention (Marano et al., 2025). When learners practice the continuous strokes of cursive writing, they improve hand–eye coordination, spatial awareness, and neural connections in the brain (Askvik et al., 2020). Regular practice of cursive writing also enhances spelling accuracy and reading fluency (Downing & Caravolas, 2023). Brain studies further reveal that handwriting activates areas of the brain responsible for thinking, language, and working memory more effectively than typing (Van der Weel & van der Meer, 2023). Because of these benefits, cursive handwriting remains an important foundational skill that supports literacy development, discipline, and creativity among learners (Graham & Harris, 2024).
The importance of cursive handwriting is further reflected in global educational priorities, particularly Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4: Quality Education, which emphasizes ensuring that all children complete free, equitable, and quality primary and secondary education with relevant and effective learning outcomes (United Nations, 2015). As a foundational literacy skill, cursive handwriting contributes to these learning outcomes by strengthening neural pathways, improving reading fluency, and supporting written expression—capabilities essential for quality education. According to UNESCO (2020), foundational literacy skills such as handwriting remain crucial for inclusive and equitable education. Moreover, in communities where access to digital technology is limited, handwriting continues to serve as a practical and inclusive form of communication (World Bank, 2022). Wiley and Rapp (2021) also noted that handwriting often represents a child's first meaningful interaction with literacy, beginning with writing their name and gradually developing into a tool for academic learning and personal expression.

Cursive Handwriting, Handwriting Skills, Elementary Education, Sequential Handwriting Tool, Pupils’ Writing Development

1. Abidogun, I. (2024). Automaticity in letter writing and written output efficiency. Journal of Educational Literacy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Advanced Therapy Clinic. (2025, July 17). The impact of occupational therapy on handwriting readiness. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alghazo, E. M., & Hassan, Z. (2021). Teacher experience and instructional strategies in elementary literacy classrooms. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(4), 63–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. American Experiment. (2025, November 4). Is handwriting the key for cognitive development? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Arasyid, A., Rochmiati, A., & Ardiyatno, Y. (2022). Project-based learning models in improving cursive handwriting proficiency. International Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 11(2), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Aragon, L. (2024). Curriculum innovation and evidence-based classroom practice. Cervantes Education Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Askvik, E. O., van der Weel, F. R. R., & van der Meer, A. L. H. (2020). The importance of cursive handwriting over typewriting for learning in the classroom: A high-density EEG study of 12-year-old children and young adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1810. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Álves, R. A., Limpo, T., Salas, N., & Guilbert, J. (2024). Handwriting and writing: Relationships and contributions. Reading and Writing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bartov, E., Avitzour, M., & Rosenblum, S. (2024). Handwriting and keyboarding functions among students with developmental coordination disorder. Reading and Writing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bayat, M., & Sural, M. (2022). The effect of teacher professional development on writing instruction in elementary schools. Journal of Education for Teaching, 48(2), 241–256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bergland, C. (2020, October 4). Cursive handwriting and other education skills are being forgotten. Psychology Today. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K. B., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Rogan, L. W., Brooks, A., Reed, E., & Graham, S. (1998). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 292–304. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.292 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Botte, M. (2023). Creative tools for motivating handwriting in elementary learners. Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 12(1), 33–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Brainspring. (2025). How the science of reading links to handwriting skills. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Brainspring. (2025, February 27). The importance of proper letter formation in handwriting. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Brindle, M., & Koutsoulis, M. (2024). Teacher training and implementation of cursive handwriting instruction: A comparative study. Journal of Educational Practice, 12(4), 307–324. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Cabrillas, A. C. (2025). Development and validation of instructional material in electricity and magnetism for technology course. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Cantrell, M. A. (2011).Demystifying the research process: Understanding a descriptive comparative research design. Pediatric Nursing, 37(4), 188–189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Case-Smith, J., & Holland, T. (2023). Foundations of pediatric practice for the occupational therapy assistant (3rd ed.). Slack Incorporated. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. CEUfast. (2026). Fine motor skills and handwriting: They go hand in hand. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Chameleon Creator. (2025, September 10). Instructional design best practices for 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Christensen, C. A., & Jones, D. (2019). Handwriting: An underestimated skill in the development of written language. Handwriting Today, 2, 56–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Collins, S. (2026, January 27). Unlocking handwriting: Why teaching cursive, core stability, & purposeful practice transforms kids' writing. The Brainy Moms Podcast. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Datchuk, S. M., & Kubina, R. M., Jr. (2020). Novice teachers' development in writing instruction: Challenges and strategies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 92, 103078. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Datchuk, S. M. (2024). Handwriting: Beneficial to reading and often misunderstood. Iowa Reading Research Center. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. De Guzman, R. T. (2022). Effects of regular cursive writing integration on writing fluency among elementary pupils in Mindanao. Philippine Journal of Language Education, 9(1), 22–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Demir, S., & Deniz, M. (2024). Effects of handwriting fluency on student attitudes and literacy outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(1), 77–93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Demir, S., & Deniz, M. (2024). The impact of cursive handwriting on spelling accuracy and learner attitudes. Journal of Literacy and Cognitive Development, 9(1), 12–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 basic education curriculum guide – English. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Department of Education. (2023). MATATAG curriculum guide: Reading and writing competencies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Department of Education. (2025). Department Memorandum No. 003, s. 2025: Inclusion of cursive writing tasks from Grades 2–10 under the MATATAG Curriculum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Department of Education. (2023). MATATAG K to 10 curriculum of the K to 12 program. Republic of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Dewey, J., & Brown, T. (2021). Democracy and education: The progressive approach in modern classrooms (Revised ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Digital Learning Institute. (2023, November 2). Mayer's 12 principles of multimedia learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Doug, L. (2019). Handwriting interventions in Grades 4–6: Implications for fluency and motivation. Journal of Literacy Studies, 23(3), 112–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Downing, C., & Caravolas, M. (2023a). Evaluating the Spelling and Handwriting Legibility Test (SaHLT): A tool for the concurrent assessment of spelling and handwriting. Reading and Writing, 36(1), 1–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Education Week. (2024). The state of cursive writing instruction in U.S. schools. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Education Week. (2023, January 17). 4 ways reading and writing interlock: What the research says. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Edutopia. (2025). Teaching handwriting in early childhood classrooms. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Edutopia. (2026, January 22). Teaching handwriting to older students. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Elearning Industry. (2025, November 14). Beyond the hype: What instructional designers really need to master in 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Falardeau, E., Guay, F., Dubois, P., & Pelletier, D. (2024). Effects of teacher-implemented explicit writing instruction on the writing self-efficacy and writing performance of 5th grade students. Journal of Writing Research, 16(1), 1–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Firdaus, S., & Yamin, M. (2024). Teacher pedagogical knowledge and literacy teaching practices in Indonesian primary schools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(6), 312–329. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Fitjar, R. B., Solheim, O. J., & Tonnessen, F. E. (2021). The impact of writing speed on orthographic errors in handwriting of Norwegian first graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(6), 443–453. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Florida Senate. (2026). SB 444: Cursive writing proficiency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Gargot, T., et al. (2023). Concurrent and predictive validity of a cycloid loops copy task to assess handwriting disorders in children. Children, 10(2), 305. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Gillespie Rouse, A., Smith, B., & Thomas, L. (2021). Veteran teachers' instructional expertise in literacy development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, 103291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Gosse, K., Van Reybroeck, M., & Demeuse, L. (2021). Exploring the relationship between handwriting and spelling in elementary grades. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 638427. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Graham, S. (2020). The sciences of reading and writing must become more fully integrated. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S35–S44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Graham, S. (2024). Structured literacy and handwriting: Explicit instruction of an essential skill. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 50(1), 58. International Dyslexia Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2023). Evidence-based recommendations for teaching writing: Younger students 5–11. Reading & Writing Quarterly. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2024). Evidence-based writing instruction: Why explicit teaching still matters for writing. SRSD Online. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2024). Evidence-based writing instruction: Why explicit teaching still matters for writing. SRSD Online. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Adkins, M. (2021). The impact of handwriting fluency on writing quality in typically developing and disabled writers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 37(2), 123–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Fink, B. (2022). Consistency of handwriting practice and writing achievement in primary grades. Journal of Literacy Research, 54(3), 389–409. (Institutional access required) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2024). Reading for writing: A meta-analysis of the impact of reading and reading instruction on writing [Meta-analysis]. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 243–284. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Graham, S., Kiuhara, S. A., & MacKay, M. (2020). The effects of writing on learning in science, social studies, and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 179–226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Guilbert, J., & Fernandez, J. (2024). The use of lined paper in child education: Impact of line presence on handwriting quality. Reading and Writing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Gunther, M. (2020). Rethinking handwriting instruction in the digital age. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 21(3), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Handwriting Heroes. (2025, December 23). Letter formation: Why it matters and how it shapes strong writers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Handwriting Solutions. (2024, August 15). How does cognitive load affect handwriting challenges? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2022). School leadership and educational change in a post-pandemic world. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003180005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Hayes, R., Titheradge, D., Allen, K., Allwood, M., Byford, S., Edwards, V., Hansford, L., Longdon, B., Norman, S., Norwich, B., Russell, A. E., Price, A., Ukoumunne, O. C., & Ford, T. (2020). The Incredible Years® Teacher Classroom Management programme and its impact on teachers' professional self-efficacy, work-related stress, and general well-being: Results from the STARS randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 330–348. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Hsiang, H. L., Chang, Y. T., & Liang, C. H. (2020). Balancing traditional and digital instruction: Teacher practices in literacy classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 3039–3056. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Hutchinson, L. R., McArthur, K. L., & Britt, J. R. (2023). Cursive handwriting and literacy gains in early grades: Longitudinal evidence. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 36, 1515–1534. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Iowa Reading Research Center. (2024, June 25). Research article of the month: June 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. James, K. H. (2020). Neuroscience of handwriting: Why penmanship matters in digital classrooms. Cognitive Development, 53, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. James, K. H., & Engelhardt, L. (2022). The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in pre-literate children. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 28, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Kadar, S., Puranik, C., & Mayer, R. (2020). Dual coding in handwriting instruction: Cognitive and literacy benefits. Learning and Instruction, 68, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Kelly, H. (2020). What is burnout and how can teachers and school leaders overcome it? Dr. Helen Kelly. https://drhelenkelly.com/articleDEV.php?id=14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Kidsense Therapy Group. (2023). Kinesthetic learning and multisensory approaches to handwriting. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Kim, Y. S., & Schatschneider, C. (2021). Handwriting, automaticity, and writing quality in children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1137–1153. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Kim, Y. S. G., Wolters, A., & Lee, J. W. (2024). Reading and writing relations are not uniform: They differ by the linguistic grain size, developmental phase, and measurement. Review of Educational Research, 94(3), 311–342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2024). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003445104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. König, J., Bremerich-Vos, A., Gold, B., Krepf, M., & Schmitz, A. (2024). Correlates of teachers' classroom management self-efficacy. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2), 1–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Kuo, L. J., & Anderson, R. C. (2023). Why cursive instruction is fading: Causes and consequences. Educational Review, 75(2), 145–160. (Institutional access required) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Landmark School Outreach. (2021). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Handwriting instruction resources and strategies. Landmark School. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. https://www.landmarkoutreach.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Lazo, R. (2020). Teacher technology adoption and traditional instructional methods in Philippine classrooms. Philippine E-Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 18–31. (Local journal; access via Philippine E-Journals database) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Learning Without Tears. (2024). Handwriting Without Tears: Multisensory handwriting activities for kids. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Lee, A. L., & Lape, J. E. (2020). A cognitive, self-monitoring intervention for handwriting with second-grade students. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2020.1716683 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Limpo, T., Alves, R. A., & Fidalgo, R. (2024). The impact of handwriting fluency on bursts of written language and text quality in undergraduates. Reading and Writing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Longcamp, M., Boucard, C., & Velay, J. L. (2023). Neuroeducational perspectives on handwriting and literacy development. Brain Sciences, 13(5), 683. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. López, S. C., González, J. P., & Díaz, M. (2021). Indicators of handwriting proficiency in primary education: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Psychology and Evaluation, 15(3), 210–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Lumiere Child. (2020, August 5). Handwriting and motor memory, what's the connection? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Mahinay, S. F. (2022). The effectiveness of handwriting interventions: An action research in Philippine classrooms. DepEd National Capital Region Action Research Journal. (Local institutional paper; upload via institutional repository) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. Malpique, A., Valcan, D., Pino-Pasternak, D., Ledger, S., Asil, M., & Teo, T. (2023, August). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Student and classroom-level predictors of keyboard-based writing in early primary [Conference paper]. European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) Conference, Thessaloniki, Greece. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. Marin Waldorf School. (2026). Research: The cognitive benefits of handwriting. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. Marano, G., Borro, L., & Marino, G. (2025). The neuroscience behind writing: Handwriting vs. typing—Who wins the battle? Life, 15(3), 345. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. Maurer, M. N., Truxius, L., Sägesser Wyss, J., & Eckhart, M. (2023). From scribbles to script: Graphomotor skills' impact on spelling in early primary school. Children, 10(12), Article 1886. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. Mayer, R., Kadar, S., & Puranik, C. (2023). Visual-motor integration in handwriting instruction: Implications for literacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 75, 102–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. McCarroll, H. (2024). [Research on handwriting resources and teacher preparation]. Texas Woman's University. Cited in Education Week (2024), How to teach handwriting. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

101. McKinley, A., Marshall, T., & Tamayo, P. (2023). Teacher perspectives on handwriting instruction in the age of digital literacy. Educational Review International, 75(6), 875–890. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

102. MN Neuropsychology. (2025, August 22). Dysgraphia: Why writing is hard and what can help. h [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

103. Montclair State University. (2026, February 6). [Letter to the editor on cursive instruction]. In USA Today. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

104. Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2021). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 32(9), 1315–1326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

105. MyCursive.com. (2025). States that require cursive writing in public schools. MyCursive. https://mycursive.com/states-that-require-cursive-writing/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

106. Nature. (2025, October 24). Proposing a material selection indicator for the design of extended lifespan products. Scientific Reports. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

107. NCES. (2022). Characteristics of 2020–21 public and private K–12 school teachers in the United States. U.S. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

108. New Jersey Department of Education. (2026, February 11). Cursive handwriting instruction: Broadcast memo. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

109. Nindi, N., & Azkiya, A. (2024). Multi-sensory instruction and handwriting fluency development in early learners. International Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 12(3), 105–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

110. Nwosu, C. (2024). The neurological benefits of cursive handwriting. African Journal of Educational Research, 22(1), 78–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

111. OCDSB. (2025, August 22). Cursive writing resources. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

112. OECD. (2022). Teacher professional identity: How to develop and support it in times of change. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

113. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world (PISA). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/21st-century-readers_a83d84cb-en.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

114. Opportunity Village. (2024, January 22). 5 signs of dysgraphia and how to get help. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

115. OT4ADHD. (2025, November 4). Handwriting is not a behavior: So why are kids getting in trouble for it? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

116. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

117. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

118. Paivio, A. (2021). Dual coding theory. [Theoretical framework]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

119. Pérez, G., Ruiz, M., & López, A. (2025). The impact of handwriting fluency on text quality and composition. Reading and Writing, 38, 2929–2954. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

120. Prunty, M., & Barnett, A. L. (2020). Understanding handwriting difficulties in children with developmental coordination disorder. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 7(3), 131–140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

121. PsyPost. (2024, December 19). Handwriting activates broader brain networks than typing, study shows. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

122. Puntambekar, S. (2021). Distributed scaffolding: Scaffolding students in classroom environments. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 451–472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

123. Ramaila, S. (2026). Teacher education in a global context: Challenges and innovations. In Comparative Education - A Global Perspective (Working Title). IntechOpen. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

124. Ray, K., Dally, K., Rowlandson, L., Tam, K. I., & Lane, A. E. (2022). The relationship of handwriting ability and literacy in kindergarten: A systematic review. Reading and Writing, 35(5), 1119–1155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

125. Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

126. Revelo, J. C. (2022). Enhancing Grade Two pupils' cursive writing skills through SeWriMa (Self-Made Writing Materials) [Unpublished master's thesis]. [University Name], Philippines. https://www.scribd.com/document/716793486/REVELO-JANICE-C-Enhancing-Grade-Two-Pupils-Cursive-Writing-Skill [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

127. Richards, T., McGuire, K., & Anderson, B. (2021). Interdependence of cognitive and motor skills in handwriting development. Learning and Instruction, 72, 101359. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

128. Rosenblum, S., & Parush, S. (2024). Handwriting proficiency: Legibility, speed, and fluency measures in school-aged children. Journal of Child Neurology, 39(2), 145–155. (Institutional access required) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

129. Saavedra, A., & Barredo, C. (2020). Factors that contribute to the poor writing skills in Filipino and English of the elementary pupils. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

130. Salvan, M. L. T., & Hambre, M. M. (2020). Involvement in school-based programs and instructional leadership of public elementary school teachers. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 5(4), 1184–1193. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.54.49 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

131. Santangelo, T., & Graham, S. (2022). A comprehensive meta-analysis of handwriting instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 225–265. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

132. Santangelo, T., Knight, T., & Graham, S. (2023). Developmental trajectories of handwriting automaticity in elementary school. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 36, 2235–2254. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

133. Santos, L. M., & Villanueva, J. P. (2021). Teacher attitudes toward foundational literacy skills: A rural schooling perspective. Philippine Journal of Literacy Research and Practice, 3(1), 59–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

134. Sasidharan, D., & Kotian, S. (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

135. Handwriting in the age of digital learning: Pedagogical challenges and solutions. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 30(2), 50–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

136. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.30-Issue2/Ser-7/I3002075058.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

137. Scordella, A., et al. (2022). New methods for unraveling imitation accuracy differences between children with autism and typically developing peers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 129(6), 1749–1774. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

138. Sensible Senco. (2025, July 8). The decline of fine motor skills: From early years to GCSE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

139. Singh, A., Mohamad, A., & Ismail, R. (2024). The impact of cursive writing on spelling and memory among Year 3 students. ASEAN Journal of Education, 9(2), 12–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

140. Skill Point Therapy. (2025, August 7). How handwriting struggles hurt school performance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

141. Springer Learning Disabilities. (2025). An occupational therapist's perspective on supporting students' graphomotor skills. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

142. Structural Learning. (2022, January 17). Cognitive Load Theory: A teacher's guide. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

143. Superioridad, A. (2023). Teacher-led handwriting interventions aligned with the MATATAG curriculum: Evidence from Digos City, Philippines. Philippine E-Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 33–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

144. Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

145. Sweller, J. (2025). Cognitive load theory: Emerging trends and innovations. Education Sciences, 15(4), Article 458. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

146. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2020). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years of research. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

147. Tao Testing. (2025, February 12). Bridging the digital divide: Enhancing access and equity in education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

148. Tarrayo, V. N., Potestades, J. A., & Tugade, M. T. G. (2022). Teachers' challenges in academic writing instruction in Philippine public elementary schools. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 31, 44–59. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2022.31.04 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

149. Teach Starter. (2023, May 13). Handwriting teaching resources. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

150. The 74 Million. (2026, February 19). Cursive handwriting is set for a comeback in Pennsylvania schools. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

151. The 74 Million. (2025, October 24). The power of handwriting: Improved reading, thinking, memory and learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

152. Tirado-Morueta, R., García-Ruíz, R., Hernando-Gómez, Á., Contreras-Pulido, P., & Aguaded-Gómez, J. I. (2023). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

153. The role of teacher support in the acquisition of digital skills associated with technology-based learning activities: The moderation of the educational level. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18, 10.https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

154. Toffoli, S., et al. (2025). Preliminary validation of a cursive handwriting reconstruction algorithm from a sensorized ink pen. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2025, 1-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

155. TPI-US. (2020, October 12). Transforming literacy instruction in teacher preparation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

156. TRS Warriors. (2026, January 8). Digital success: Bridging the divide in education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

157. Tutor Time. (2022, February 14). How fine motor skills affect academic skills. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

158. UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and equity in education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

159. UNESCO. (2021). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

160. United Nations. (2015). Sustainable development goals: Goal 4 – Quality education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

161. USA Today. (2026, February 28). Cursive handwriting is making a big comeback. Here's why. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

162. Van der Weel, F. R., & Van der Meer, A. L. H. (2024). Handwriting but not typewriting leads to widespread brain connectivity: A high-density EEG study with implications for the classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1219945. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

163. Van der Meer, A. L. H., & Van der Weel, F. R. (2023). The importance of cursive handwriting over digital tools for brain development. [Journal of Educational Neuroscience / Source details as found in recent 2024 educational reports]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1219391 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

164. Vandermeulen, N., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2023). Writing process feedback based on keystroke logging and comparison with exemplars: Effects on the quality and process of synthesis texts. Written Communication, 40(1), 90–144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

165. Vinci-Booher, S., & James, K. H. (2021). Visual-motor functional connectivity in preschool children emerges after handwriting experience. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 25, 100174. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

166. Wagner, R. K., Puranik, C. S., & Lonigan, C. J. (2021). The role of handwriting automaticity in writing quality and cognitive load. Reading and Writing, 34, 239–260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

167. Waldorf Education. (2025). Back to basics: The enduring value of handwriting. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

168. Wang, L., Chen, X., & Zhou, Y. (2025). Handwriting fluency and text quality in early writers: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 117(3), 412–428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

169. Wiley, D. (2021). Literacy and technology: A Finnish perspective on handwriting instruction. European Journal of Education, 56(4), 489–505. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

170. Wiley, R. W., & Rapp, B. (2021). The effects of handwriting experience on literacy learning. Psychological Science, 32(7), 1086–1103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

171. World Bank. (2022). Education and digital inclusion: Low-tech literacy strategies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

172. Writing Teachers. (2025). Current trends in penmanship instruction: The impact of foundational teacher education on classroom practice. [Journal of Pedagogy and Educational Research / Publication Title needed]. https://www.writingteachers.org/research/2025/direct-instruction-trends [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

173. Zaner-Bloser. (2020). How do primary grade teachers teach handwriting? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

174. Zaner-Bloser. (2021). Handwriting in early education: Research and practice. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

175. Zaner-Bloser. (2025). Zaner-Bloser Handwriting © 2025: K–6 manuscript & cursive. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study