AI Tools for Supporting Students with ADHD in Higher Education in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) States: A Systematic Literature Review
Authors
English Language Instructor, University of Buraimi, Buraimi (Oman)
Lecturer in English the University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Punjab (Pakistan)
Lecturer in English, University of Buraimi, Buraimi (Oman)
English Language Instructor, University of Buraimi, Buraimi (Oman)
English Language Instructor, University of Buraimi, Buraimi (Oman)
English Language Instructor, University of Buraimi, Buraimi (Oman)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500083
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 1251-1264
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-27
Accepted: 2026-05-04
Published: 2026-05-23
Abstract
Although a considerable number of states in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and nationally stipulated AI strategies have a high prevalence of ADHD, there is no peer-reviewed data on AI-aided ADHD interventions in higher education in the GCC. This systematic review will answer three research questions namely: transferability of evidence to GCC settings; ethical, cultural, linguistic and privacy concerns to GCC deployment; priorities of a specific research agenda to the GCC (RQ3). This review, which is embedded in a 63-source corpus obtained based on systematic bilingual search (k = 0.84) was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 with JBI critical appraisal. The transferability assessment matrix of GCC was designed on the technological, linguistic, cultural, and structural planes. The analysis of the ethical results was systematic using a concern-to-investigation gap analysis, and thematic synthesis was based on the Thomas and Harden (2008) structure. The lack of peer-reviewed studies in any GCC state was zero, which validates evidence vacuum of a systematic character. Transferability testing demonstrated high technological portability; low linguistic transferability, as the 63 tools were all English-only and Arabic NLP capacity remains a domain of underdevelopment; moderate cultural transferability, which involves the ability to port interventions based on core executive functions, but where family processes and stigma need to be culturally adjusted; and low structural transferability since GCC disability models were immature. Applicable ethical dimensions, five of which are identified as GCC-specific implications, and a proposal of an eight-priority research agenda was identified. The GCC evidence vacuum captures convergent influences of the stigma of ADHD, suppression of disclosure, the Western epistemic hegemony, and the infrastructure gap in the disability area. Reducing this gap necessitates Arabic AI co-design, disclosure-free support models, epidemiological baseline studies, as well as culturally modified implementation frameworks.
Keywords
ADHD · Higher Education · AI Tools · GCC · Systematic Review
Downloads
References
1. Akel, M., Salameh, P., Malaeb, D., Obeid, S., Hallit, S., & Fekih-Romdhane, F. (2024). Exploring ADHD understanding and stigma: Insights from an online survey in Lebanon. PLOS ONE, 19(11), e0310755. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310755 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alayba, A. (2025). Arabic natural language processing (NLP): A comprehensive review of challenges, techniques, and emerging trends. Computers, 14(11), 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14110497 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Albanna, A., Soubra, K., Benayoun, D., Alloub, Z., AlOlama, F., Hammerness, P., Lakshmanan, J., & Hechtman, L. (2023). Effectiveness of collaborative tele-mental health care for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in United Arab Emirates. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 29(9), 742–748. https://doi.org/10.26719/emhj.23.076 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Albous, M. R., Stephens, M., & Al-Jayyousi, O. R. (2025). Artificial intelligence and the Gulf Cooperation Council workforce: adapting to the future of work. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05984-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Benayoune, A., Slimi, Z., & Al Habsi, A. (2026). Artificial intelligence policy challenges and institutional readiness in Omani higher education. Discover Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01188-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Aljadani, A. H., et al. (2023). Prevalence and risk factors of ADHD in the Saudi population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences, 11(2), 126-134. https://doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_528_22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Almojarthe, B. M. (2023). Prevalence of ADHD in the Arab Gulf countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 10(2), 833-841. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20230247 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Alotaibi, N. S., & Alshehri, A. H. (2023). Prospers and obstacles in using artificial intelligence in Saudi Arabia higher education institutions, The potential of AI-based learning outcomes. Sustainability, 15(13), 10723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310723 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Al-Yateem, N., Slewa-Younan, S., Halimi, A., Saeed, S. A., Tliti, D., Mohammad, M., Ridwan, M., Zeidan, R., Hammash, M. H., Ahmed, F. R., Dias, J. M., Rahman, S. A., Subu, M. A., Hijazi, H., & Yeganeh, F. (2024). Prevalence of undiagnosed attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in the young adult population of the United Arab Emirates: A national cross-sectional study. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, 14(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-023-00167-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Atcheson, A., Khan, O., Siemann, B., Jain, A., & Karahalios, K. (2025, April). " I'd Never Actually Realized How Big An Impact It Had Until Now": Perspectives of University Students with Disabilities on Generative Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-22). https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3714121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Berrezueta-Guzman, S., Kandil, M., Martin-Ruiz, M.-L., Pau de la Cruz, I., & Krusche, S. (2024). Future of ADHD care: Evaluating the efficacy of ChatGPT in therapy enhancement. Healthcare, 12(6), Article 683. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12060683 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Butcher, L., & Lane, S. (2025). Neurodivergent student experiences of access and inclusion in higher education: An ecological systems theory perspective. Higher Education, 90, 243-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01319-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Carik, B., Ping, K., Ding, X., & Rho, E. H. (2025). Exploring large language models through a neurodivergent lens: use, challenges, community-driven workarounds, and concerns. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3720469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Dias, J. M., et al. (2025). Unraveling mental health stigma: A qualitative study in the UAE. Public Health Nursing, 42(5), e70007. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.70007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Dumitru, C., Abdulsahib, G. M., Khalaf, O. I., & Bennour, A. (2025). Integrating AI in supporting students with disabilities in higher education. Technology and Disability. https://doi.org/10.1177/10554181251355428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Dumitru, C., Abdulsahib, G. M., Khalaf, O. I., & Bennour, A. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence in supporting students with disabilities in higher education: An integrative review. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/10554181251355428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. El Morr, C., Kundi, B., Mobeen, F., Taleghani, S., El-Lahib, Y., & Gorman, R. (2024). AI and disability: A systematic scoping review. Health Informatics Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241285743 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. El Naggar, A., Gaad, E., & Inocencio, S. A. M. (2024). Enhancing inclusive education in the UAE: Integrating AI for diverse learning needs. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 147, 104685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104685 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Elyamani, R., et al. (2021). Mental health literacy in Arab states of the GCC: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 16(1), Article e0245156. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Fuermaier, A. B. M., & Niesten, I. J. M. (2025). ChatGPT helps students feign ADHD: An analogue study. Psychological Injury and Law, 18, 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-025-09538-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. García-López IM and Trujillo-Liñán L (2025) Ethical and regulatory challenges of Generative AI in education: a systematic review. Front. Educ. 10:1565938. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1565938 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Gray, L., McNeill, B., Pecora, L., Whitelaw, C., Heyworth, M., Doyle, N., & Lawson, W. (2025). Navigating neurodivergence: A scoping review for health professions educators. Medical Education, 59(10), 1037-1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15676 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Hyatt, S. E., & Owenz, M. B. (2024). Using universal design for learning and artificial intelligence to support students with disabilities. College Teaching, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2024.2313468 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Liao, Y., Li, Y., & Xu, D. (2025). The potential of generative AI in supporting neurodiversity in higher education: A systematic review. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1331 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Mallary, K. J., Moore, E. J., & McClain, A. L. (2025). Artificial intelligence and universal design for learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2025(188), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.70016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. McDowall, A., & Kiseleva, M. (2024). A rapid review of supports for neurodivergent students in higher education. Journal of Inclusive Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/27546330241291769 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, Article 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Peters, M. D. J., et al. (2020). Chapter 11: Scoping reviews. In JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Pinto, A., Quilter, E., Vasikaran, J., Koerner, S., Chimonas, T., Nielsen, E. E., ... & O'Hara, K. (2025, November). " A little bit of a life raft”–Exploring the Use and Experiences of ChatGPT as a Support Tool among Adults with ADHD. In Proceedings of the 37th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 50-67). https://doi.org/10.1145/3764687.3764713 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Qayyum, A., Saeed, A., Bibi, A., Tanveer, B., & Qureshi, A. H. (2026). Harnessing Ethical and Inclusive AI in Early Years Education: Teachers’ PsyCap and Neurodiverse Children’Social-Emotional Development. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 4(1), 651-668. https://doi.org/10.59075/dyk0yg62 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Tatlow-Golden, M., Prihodova, L., Gavin, B., Cullen, W., & McNicholas, F. (2016). What do general practitioners know about ADHD? Attitudes and knowledge among first-contact gatekeepers: systematic narrative review. BMC family practice, 17(1), 129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0516-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Tricco, A. C., et al. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Visser, M. J., Peters, R. M. H., & Luman, M. (2025). Unmet needs of children and young adults with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547241297876 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Wilder, T. L., & Stratchan, N. E. (2025). AI-enhanced interview success: Eye-tracking and cognitive measures for college students with ADHD. Education Sciences, 15(2), Article 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020165 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Xu, Z., Liu, F., Xia, G., Duan, Y., & Yu, L. (2025). A scoping review of inclusive and adaptive human-AI interaction for neurodivergent users. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2579822 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Zhao, X., Cox, A., & Chen, X. (2025). The use of generative AI by students with disabilities in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 66, Article 101014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Zhu, H., Sun, Y., & Yang, J. (2025). Towards responsible artificial intelligence in education: a systematic review on identifying and mitigating ethical risks. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05252-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study