Academic Self-Efficacy as a Mediator of the Effect of Personalized Learning on Academic Achievement among Chinese University Students

This study examined academic self-efficacy as a mediator of the effect of personalized learning on academic achievement among graduate students in China. A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was employed. Data were collected from 450 graduate students in China through an electronic questionnaire, and 446 valid responses were retained after Mahalanobis distance screening. The research instrument consisted of 30 items measuring personalized learning, academic self-efficacy, and perceived academic achievement. Data were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The measurement model showed satisfactory reliability and validity, with outer loadings above .70, Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from .930 to .934, composite reliability values ranging from .941 to .944, and AVE values ranging from .615 to .628. The structural model explained 66.0% of the variance in academic achievement and 57.4% of the variance in academic self-efficacy. The results showed that personalized learning had a significant positive direct effect on academic achievement (β = .329, t = 6.413, p < .001) and academic self-efficacy (β = .758, t = 31.583, p < .001). Academic self-efficacy also significantly predicted academic achievement (β = .534, t = 10.856, p < .001). Mediation analysis confirmed that academic self-efficacy significantly mediated the relationship between personalized learning and academic achievement (β = .405, t = 10.115, p < .001). The findings suggest that personalized learning improves graduate students’ academic achievement not only by providing flexible and adaptive learning support, but also by strengthening students’ confidence in their academic abilities.

Personalized learning; academic self-efficacy

1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bernacki, M. L., Greene, M. J., & Lobczowski, N. G. (2021). A systematic review of research on personalized learning: Personalized by whom, to what, how, and for what purpose(s)? Educational Psychology Review, 33, 1675–1715. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dumont, H., & Ready, D. D. (2023). On the promise of personalized learning for educational equity. npj Science of Learning, 8, Article 26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2022). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Major, L., Francis, G. A., & Tsapali, M. (2021). The effectiveness of technology-supported personalised learning in low- and middle-income countries: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(5), 1935–1964. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., & Hamilton, L. S. (2015). Continued progress: Promising evidence on personalized learning. RAND Corporation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., Hamilton, L. S., & Pane, J. D. (2017). Informing progress: Insights on personalized learning implementation and effects. RAND Corporation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261–288. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2022). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101832. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study