English Language Proficiency among Grade 12 Students in Private and Public Schools

Authors

Aralene G. Balalilhe

Mount Carmel College of Escalante, Inc. (MCCEI) (Philippines)

Rolene T. Bantilan

Mount Carmel College of Escalante, Inc. (MCCEI) (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500115

Subject Category: English

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 1704-1716

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-29

Accepted: 2026-05-04

Published: 2026-05-23

Abstract

English language proficiency remains a critical competency for senior high school students in the Philippines, yet disparities persist across educational contexts. This quantitative comparative study examined and contrasted the English language proficiency of Grade 12 students from one private and one public senior high school in a component city in Negros Occidental, Philippines. Using stratified random sampling, 218 students (n = 137 private, n = 81 public) completed a validated English Proficiency Test measuring listening, reading, speaking, and writing. Independent-samples t-tests were used to compare proficiency levels across school types, and descriptive statistics identified contributing factors and preferred improvement strategies.
Results indicated that students overall were Proficient in receptive skills—listening (M = 3.90, SD = 0.62) and reading (M = 3.83, SD = 0.68)—but only Moderately Proficient in productive skills—speaking (M = 3.47, SD = 0.75) and writing (M = 3.46, SD = 0.71). Private school students scored significantly higher than public school students in reading, writing, and speaking, with large effect sizes (d = 0.79–0.91), though no significant difference emerged in listening. Students identified access to English media and teacher quality as the strongest contributors to proficiency. They expressed the strongest preference for speaking and listening practice and technology-supported instruction as improvement strategies.

Keywords

English language proficiency, private school, public school, senior high school

Downloads

References

1. Aisyah, S., Rasyid, M. N. A., Nasrum, N., Djamereng, J., & Asnur, S. M. (2024). Exploring EFL students’ perspectives on improving their English productive skills: Existing competencies and encountered challenges. Elite: English and Literature Journal, 11(1), 33–51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alisoy, H. (2024). ESL teaching methods and approaches: Essential strategies for encouraging effective language acquisition. Global Spectrum of Research and Humanities, 1(1), 3–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Apichat, B., & Fatimah, N. (2022). Difficulties and strategies in English-speaking skills among Thai EFL students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 84–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Azzolini, D., Campregher, S., & Madia, J. (2022). Formal instruction vs informal exposure. What matters more for teenagers’ acquisition of English as a second language? Research Papers in Education, 37(2), 153–181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bernardo, A. B. I., Cordel, M. O., Lapinid, M. R. C., Teves, J. M. M., Yap, S. A., & Chua, U. C. (2022). Contrasting profiles of low-performing mathematics students in public and private schools in the Philippines: Insights from machine learning—Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), Article 61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bin-Hady, W. R. A., & Al-Tamimi, N. O. M. (2021). The use of technology in informal English language learning: Evidence from Yemeni undergraduate students. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 17(2), 107–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cadiz-Gabejan, A. M. (2022). A comparative study on the English proficiency of students from public and private schools. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4(3), 10–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chen, Y., Ren, W., & Lin, C. (2020). English as a lingua franca: From theory to practice. Language Teaching, 53(1), 63–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Department of Education. (2019). K to 12 Basic Education Program: Age-grade level standards. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Esteron, J. J. (2021). English in the church escape: Exploring a religious linguistic landscape in the Philippines. Discourse and Interaction, 14(2), 82–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fauziah, F., & Diana, N. (2023). Exploring students’ informal digital learning of English (IDLE) and self-regulated language learning from a sociocultural perspective. Indonesian TESOL Journal, 5(2), 197–214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gurunathan, S., & Sahayaraj, M. V. (2024). Public vs private: Winning the education race in Tamil Nadu. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hoesny, M. U., Cahyani, H., & Aziz, I. N. (2023). The correlation among speaking self-efficacy, speaking proficiency, and gender in an ESP context. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(2), 191–199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jabbar, A. A., & Mubarak, R. A. (2023). English as a global lingua franca: Implications for education and industry. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 10(2), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Karhina, N. (2023). Using interactive teaching methods in English lessons. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology, 9(1), 45–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kim, T. (2021). Age culture, school-entry cutoff, and the choices of birth month and school-entry timing in South Korea. Journal of Demographic Economics, 87(1), 33–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Manuel, J. B. (2022). English language proficiency of senior high school students. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, 9(1), 71–86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Muñoz, C., & Cadierno, T. (2021). How do differences in exposure affect English language learning? A comparison of teenagers in two learning environments. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 185–212. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nguyen, H. T. T. (2022). Psychological factors affecting English-speaking skills among Vietnamese students. Journal of Science: Social Science, 67(4), 153–162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Palma, B., Pido, R., Peralta, F., Gente, E. D., & Baga-An, A. (2020). Speaking and listening proficiency of AB English students: Basis for instructional material development. The Palawan Scientist, 12(1), 141–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Rabidas, S. (2022). A comparative study on English language skills of secondary school students in public and private schools. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Translation Studies, 9(1), 112–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Romeo, R. R., Leonard, J. A., Robinson, S. T., West, M. R., Mackey, A. P., Rowe, M. L., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2018). Beyond the 30-million-word gap: Children’s conversational exposure is associated with language-related brain function. Psychological Science, 29(5), 700–710. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Salvador, R. (2023). Communicative competence of senior high school students: A basis for a remedial program in English. SSRN. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Shenbagam, R. (2024). English as a lingua franca in global media and research: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Language and Culture Studies, 8(1), 22–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Usop, J. L. (2024). Socio-cultural, educational, and psychological barriers in ESL learning: A qualitative study of senior high school students. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 5(3), 1004–1010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wenz, A., Baghal, T. A., & Gaia, A. (2021). Language proficiency among respondents: Implications for data quality in a longitudinal face-to-face survey. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 9(1), 73–93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wilang, J. D. (2022). Mindsets of high school students in English language learning. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 152–175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wulandari, N. H. S., & Halim, A. (2024). Gamified learning: Evaluating the impact of Duolingo on language retention and academic performance in secondary school students. Borneo Educational Journal, 6(2), 160–179. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zhang, C. (2024). Analysis of classroom environmental factors and teaching strategies for foreign language learning anxiety. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 7(3), 261–263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles