Redefining Financial Derivatives Education through PEDAGOGYFUSION5: Transforming Futures and Options Learning via AI Integration

Authors

Intan Maizura Abd Rashid

Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Technology MARA Cawangan Melaka, 78000 (Malaysia)

Mohd Rasdi Zaini

Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology, Universiti Technology MARA (UiTM) Alor Gajah, Melaka (Malaysia)

Fatin Nur Aliyah

Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Technology MARA Cawangan Melaka, 78000 (Malaysia)

Noorazeela Zainol Abidin

School of Business Innovation and Technopreneurship, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Pengkalan Jaya, Jln Alor Setar-Kangar, Kangar 01000, Perlis (Malaysia)

Buthiena Kharabsheh

Department of Banking and Finance, Faculty of Business, Yarmouk University, Irbid 21163 (Jordan)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500134

Subject Category: Business Management

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 2009-2018

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-23

Accepted: 2026-05-05

Published: 2026-05-25

Abstract

This paper introduces PEDAGOGYFUSION5, an AI-driven pedagogical framework designed to transform financial derivatives education, particularly in the teaching of futures and options. Traditional finance education often faces challenges in bridging theoretical constructs with real-world financial decision-making, resulting in limited student engagement and conceptual understanding. PEDAGOGYFUSION5 addresses this gap by integrating artificial intelligence, simulation-based learning, experiential pedagogy, and ethical finance reasoning into a unified instructional model. The framework is structured around five core dimensions: conceptual mastery, AI-assisted visualization, real-time market simulation, applied problem-solving, and ethical financial reasoning. Methodologically, this study adopts a conceptual design science approach, drawing on an extensive synthesis of literature in finance education, experiential learning theory, and AI-enhanced pedagogy to develop and refine the framework. The findings suggest that PEDAGOGYFUSION5 enhances cognitive comprehension of complex derivative concepts, improves applied decision-making skills through immersive simulation, increases learner engagement, and strengthens the integration of ethical considerations in financial practice. Overall, the study contributes to finance education literature by proposing a scalable, technology-enhanced pedagogical model aligned with Industry 4.0 and the evolving digital finance ecosystem.

Keywords

Financial Derivatives Education; PEDAGOGYFUSION5; Artificial Intelligence in Education

Downloads

References

1. Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2021). Investments (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100112 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hull, J. C. (2022). Options, futures, and other derivatives (11th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kalyuga, S. (2021). Cognitive load theory: How many types of load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review, 33, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2020). Experiential learning theory: A dynamic, holistic approach to management learning. In The SAGE handbook of management learning, education and development (pp. 51–69). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lee, J., & Hannafin, M. (2021). The role of experiential learning in financial education. Journal of Financial Education, 47(2), 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2022). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. OECD. (2023). OECD framework for responsible AI in education. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Salloum, S. A., Al-Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. (2021). The impact of technology acceptance on artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Stahl, B. C., Timmermans, J., & Flick, C. (2021). Ethics of emerging information technologies: A global perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 171, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sweller, J. (2019). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. UNESCO. (2023). Generative AI in education and research: Opportunities, risks and implications. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2020). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Woolf, B. P. (2021). Building intelligent interactive tutors. Morgan Kaufmann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Zimmerman, B. J. (2020). Self-regulated learning: Theories, measures, and outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 55(2), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2020). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Rashid, Intan Maizura Abdul, and Nor Azam Abdul Razak. "Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in agriculture sector based on selected high-income developing economies in OIC countries: An empirical study on the provincial panel data by using stata, 2003-2012." Procedia Economics and Finance 39 (2016): 328-334. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Reiter, S. L., & Steensma, H. K. (2010). Human Development and Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries: The Influence of FDI Policy and Corruption. World Development, 38(12), 1678–1691 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Roni, M., Borhanordin, A. H., Hussin, H., Samah, I. H. A., Rashid, I. M. A., Shafiai, S., ... & Arham, A. F. (2023, June). The mediating role of green technology practices in enhancing firm performance. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2571, No. 1). AIP Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Samah, I. H. A., Abd Rashid, I. M., Husain, W. A. F. W., Lskandar, S., Abdullah, M. F. S., & Amlus, M. H. (2021). Government Expenditure, Manufacturing Growth, C02 emission: A Causality Analysis in Malaysia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(1), 373. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Samah, Irza Hanie Abu, et al. "The impact of healthcare expenditure and healthcare sector growth on CO2 emission using dynamic panel data system GMM estimation model during COVID 19 crisis." International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 10.6 (2020): 235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Shafiai, S., Rashid, I. M. A., Nasir, N. M., Rahman, S. A., Norman, H., & Ibrahim, S. (2021). Economic determinants tourism performance: Perspective of Thailand’s tourism sector. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2347, No. 1, p. 020279). AIP Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Shafiai, S., Abidin, N. Z., Rashid, I. M. A., Faisal, S. I., Esquivias, M. A., Elsiefy, E., ... & Roni, M. (2023). Normality test on agriculture growth and food security to improve poverty in high income country. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2608, No. 1). AIP Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles