EFL Learners' Perceptions and Practices of Integrating Patriotism into Bilingual Materials at UD-UFLS: A Project-Based Approach

This study examines EFL learners’ perceptions and practices regarding the integration of patriotism into bilingual materials at University of Foreign Language Studies, the University of Danang (UD-UFLS). Grounded in Project-Based Learning (PBL) and Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), the study features the implementation of a student-led project in which students designed and developed a digital platform, THE PATRIO, offering content-rich bilingual materials embedding themes of Vietnamese patriotism. A mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected through two rounds of questionnaires administered to 451 and 429 students, respectively. Qualitative insights were gathered via a semi-structured interview with 25 students evaluating user experience and perceived effectiveness of the platform, and learner reflections on their experience in conducting the project. The findings reveal strong awareness of patriotic content and high demands for culturally integrated bilingual materials from the part of EFL learners, acknowledging limited availability of such resources. Students also expressed positive perceptions of THE PATRIO, noting improvements in both patriotic awareness and language competence, particularly in reading and vocabulary development. The study highlights the potential of promoting student-led, project-based digital platforms with culturally dense bilingual materials to bridge resource gaps and to enhance both language competence and national awareness in English language education.

bilingual materials; patriotism; EFL learners; digital learning platform; project-based learning; cultural integration; language proficiency; THE PATRIO

1. REFERENCES [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agapova, G. V. (2008). Historical aspects of patriotic education and features of the development of patriotism in foreign countries. Vestnik TGU (Tomsk State University Bulletin), 1, 240–243. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Borg, S. (2006). The distinctive characteristics of foreign language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 3-31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence (pp. 1-30). UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cabau, B. (2016). Language and content courses: A plea for synergy in academic programmes. Interface—Journal of European Languages and Literatures, 1, 5-29. https://doi.org/10.6667/interface.1.2016.25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cenoz, J. (2015). Content-based instruction and content and language integrated learning: The same or different? Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 8-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000922 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chang, Y., Choi, J., & Şen-Akbulut, M. (2024). Undergraduate Students’ Engagement in Project-Based Learning with an Authentic Context. Education Sciences, 14(2), 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020168 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Coyle, D. (2018). The Place of CLIL in (Bilingual) Education. Theory Into Practice, 57(3), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1459096 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2018). Educational research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Du, Y. (2003). Constructing a Educational Mechanism Integrating Patriotism Education and College English Teaching. International Journal of New Developments in Education, 5(5), 29-32. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2023.050506. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hamdamovich, K. T. (2026). THE ROLE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN EDUCATING YOUTH IN THE SPIRIT OF PATRIOTISM. Modern American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 1-6. https://usajournals.org/index.php/3/article/view/1773 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hu, D., Chen, J., Li, Y., & Wang, M. (2025). Technology-enhanced content and language integrated learning: A systematic review of empirical studies. Educational Research Review, 47, 100677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100677 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jalolovna. M. N. (2025). The role of culture in English language teaching. International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research and Development, 12(2), 552-555. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kosterman, R., & Feshbach, S. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10(2), 257. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791647 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications. Beverly Hills, CA: Laredo Publishing Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Larmer, J., & Mergendoller, J. R. (2010). Seven essentials for project-based learning. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 34–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lee, J. H., Lee, H., & Lo, Y. Y. (2023). Effects of EMI-CLIL on secondary-level students’ English learning: A multilevel meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 317–345. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Luneva, E. V., Khomutnikova, E. A., Khripunova, O. G., Berg, L. N., Bagretsov, D. N., & Golishev, E. V. (2019). Patriotic education of young people by means of Internet projects: domestic and foreign experience. Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific Practical Conference “the Individual and Society in the Modern Geopolitical Environment” (ISMGE 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/ismge-19.2019.65 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lyster, R., & Ballinger, S. (2011). Content-based language teaching: Convergent concerns across divergent contexts. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 279-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811401150 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. May, S. (2017). Bilingual education: What the research tells us. In S. May (Ed.), Bilingual and multilingual education (pp. 81-100). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02258-1_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. McKay, S. L. (2003). Toward an appropriate EIL pedagogy: Re-examining common ELT assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., & Hays, T. (2008). In-depth interviewing: Principles, techniques, analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson Education Australia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mohamad, F., Azuar, N. F. F. S., Kadir, Z. A., Rathi, N. a. M., & Rais, H. (2021). Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions towards Cultural Elements in Literary Texts. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i11/11691 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016). 20 years of autonomy and technology: How far have we come and where to next? Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44466 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Shi, X., & Gopal, R. (2024). Heritage and high-tech: Exploring the influence of cultural heritage education on students’ learning engagement and language acquisition in digital environments. Journal of Educational Technology & Cultural Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Shrestha, K. N. (2017). Role of Culture in English Language Teaching. NELTA Conference Proceedings, 111-114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Soto-Corominas, A., Roquet, H., & Segura, M. (2024). The effects of CLIL and sources of individual differences on receptive and productive EFL skills at the onset of primary school. Applied Linguistics, 45(2), 364–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Tevdovska, E. S. (2016). Literature in ELT setting: Students attitudes and preferences towards literary texts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Why is project-based learning important? (2007, October 19). Edutopia. Retrieved April 15, 2026, from https://www.edutopia.org/project-based-learning-guide-importance [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Zheng, G., & Han. S. (2025). Distinct psychological and neural constructs of patriotism and nationalism. Cerebral Cortex, 35(9). https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaf268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study