Perceptions of Parents, Speech Language Pathologists on Telepractice Effectiveness in Communication Difficulties among Children at Kenya Institute of Special Education

Tele practice has become a vital method of offering speech and language therapy, this method is especially more popular in low-income households where there are challenges such as limited financial resources, distance barriers, which makes it difficult to access in person therapy sessions. This study investigated the level at which different stakeholders such as parents; caregivers and speech and language pathologists rated the use of tele practice as an alternative in helping children with communication difficulties at the Kenya institute of Special Education (KISE). This study was anchored on Giddens's theory of Modernity. The study made use of the mixed methods approach which amalgamated different numbers from records of attendance, satisfaction ratings and results of therapy given with the views collected by the use of interviews. The study findings noted that majority of the participants had a positive view of tele practice, highlighting that it offers convenience, is cheaper as compared to in person sessions and is accessible from anywhere. Some of the disadvantages were noted which included unstable network connectivity in some areas, the attention span of children is limited during the online sessions and the lack of the personal touch that can only be afforded by physical interaction during therapy. Those involved noted that it was satisfactory with a 40% mark, 20% were not satisfied, while 13% remained neutral, and 27% were very satisfied. The regression analysis done pointed out that articulation improvement, quality as highlighted by participants and the need to recommend teletherapy were the greatest indicators of tele practice success (F-2.871, P- 0.042). The study concluded that Tele practice is practical and a very effective method of helping address communication difficulties but the challenges highlighted should be addressed.

Tele practice, teletherapy, communication difficulties, articulation disorder, speech therapy

1. Alvares, R., Lin, L., & Higgins, C. (2022). Family engagement in telepractice: Collaborative models for pediatric speech-language intervention. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(3), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2022.2048976 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Behl, D., Houston, K., Guthrie, W., & Guthrie, N. (2017). Tele-intervention in early childhood communication disorders: Family and service provider perspectives. Journal of Early Intervention, 39(4), 292–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815117724161 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Boisvert, M., Lang, R., Andrianopoulos, M., & Boscardin, M. L. (2010). Telepractice in the assessment and treatment of individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Developmental neurorehabilitation, 13(6), 423-432. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cohn, E., Goldstein, L., & Ryan, L. (2022). Mediated intimacy: Relational dynamics in telehealth rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(9), 1472–1484. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. DiFabio, D., Moodie, S., O’Hagan, R., Pardal, S., & Glista, D. (2023). Barriers and facilitators to paediatric caregivers’ participation in virtual speech, language, and hearing services: A scoping review. Digital health, 9, 20552076231216684. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Douglas, S. N., Biggs, E. E., Meadan, H., & Bagawan, A. (2021). The effects of telepractice to support family members in modeling a speech-generating device in the home. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30(3), 1157-1169. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dunst, C. J., & Trivette, C. M. (2009). Capacity-building family-systems intervention practices. Journal of Family Social Work, 12(2), 119–143. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fairweather, G., Lincoln, M., & Ramsden, R. (2021). Caregiver experiences in speech-language teletherapy: A mixed-method systematic review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 56(5), 1121–1136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Foran, J. (2019). The kinesthetic dimension of speech sound intervention: Challenges in virtual environments. Journal of Speech Therapy Practice, 33(2), 84–96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Grogan-Johnson, S., Schmidt, A., Schenker, J., Alvares, R., Rowan, L., & Taylor, J. (2011). A comparison of speech sound intervention delivered by telepractice and side-by-side service delivery models. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 32(3), 162–172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Grogan-Johnson, S., Alvares, R., Rowan, L., & Creaghead, N. (2010). A pilot study comparing the effectiveness of speech language therapy provided by telemedicine with conventional on-site therapy. Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 16(3), 134-139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Karim, N., Hamid, R., & Wong, A. (2022). Barriers and facilitators to teletherapy in speech and language services: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 28(6), 394–406. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Law, J., Dornstauder, M., Charlton, J., & Gréaux, M. (2021). Tele‐practice for children and young people with communication disabilities: Employing the COM‐B model to review the intervention literature and inform guidance for practitioners. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 56(2), 415-434. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lowe, R., O’Neill, R., & Hough, M. (2020). Meta-analysis of telepractice efficacy in speech-language pathology. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(4), 1974–1991. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. McCarthy M, Leigh G, Arthur-Kelly M. Telepractice delivery of family-centred early intervention for children who are deaf or hard of hearing: A scoping review. J Telemed Telecare. 2019 May;25(4):249-260. doi: 10.1177/1357633X18755883. Epub 2018 Feb 13. PMID: 29439624. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mugo, R., Njoroge, P., & Were, V. (2023). Digital inclusion and access disparities in Kenya: Implications for health and education. African Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nthiga, P. M., & Nyamasyo, E. A. (2023). Speech-Language Therapy in Kenya: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities. Handbook of Speech-Language Therapy in Sub-Saharan Africa: Integrating Research and Practice, 179-195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Shankar V, Ramkumar V, Kumar S. Understanding the implementation of telepractice in speech and language services using a mixed-methods approach. Wellcome Open Res. 2022 May 26;7:46. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17622.2. PMID: 36158869; PMCID: PMC9490278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Sutherland, R., Trembath, D., Hodge, M. A., Rose, V., & Roberts, J. (2019). Telehealth and autism: Are telehealth language assessments reliable and feasible for children with autism?. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 54(2), 281-291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Taylor, R., Booth, A., & Harper, G. (2022). Clinician competence and innovation in telehealth delivery: Adapting traditional skills to virtual platforms. Journal of Allied Health, 51(1), 58–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wales, D., Skinner, L., & Hayman, M. (2017). The efficacy of telehealth-delivered speech-language intervention for primary school-aged children: A systematic review. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 9(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests