Conceptual Difficulties and Instructional Challenges in Teaching and Learning Genetics Concepts

Genetics is widely recognized as one of the most conceptually challenging areas in secondary science because many of its key ideas are abstract and difficult for students to visualize. This study identified the conceptual difficulties of secondary students and examined the instructional challenges encountered by teachers in teaching genetics concepts. Using a descriptive research design, the study involved students from selected public secondary schools in Iligan City, Philippines, who completed a 30-item needs assessment test. In addition, five (5) in-service science teachers answered a needs assessment questionnaire to provide qualitative data on classroom difficulties and instructional strategies related to genetics. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze quantitative data, while thematic analysis was applied to the teachers’ responses.
The findings revealed that 83.75% of students falls below the passing mark of 75%. The results demonstrated low mastery of students in competencies related to non-Mendelian inheritance, mitosis and meiosis, and molecular processes involving DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis. Teachers likewise identified recurring instructional challenges, including the sequential complexity of genetics lessons, the abstract nature of molecular concepts, students’ limited prior knowledge, and inadequate instructional resources. These findings suggest the need for more visual, scaffolded, and context-based approaches to improve students’ understanding of genetics.

conceptual difficulties, genetics concepts

1. Ahmad, F., Ahmed, Z., Obaid, I., Shaheen, M., Rahman, H., Singh, G., & Anjum, M. J. (2025). Motivation, engagement, and performance in two distinct modes of brain games: A mixed methods study in children. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(15), 9652-9666. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2426915 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alotaibi, M. S. (2024). Game-based learning in early childhood education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in psychology, 15, 1307881. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1307881 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Balan, H. R. (2018). Use of study guide as intervention tool in enhancing students' motivation in grade 8 genetics concepts. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.29924 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Borja, E. A., & Mutya, R. C. (2024). Enhancing student's conceptual understanding on the patterns of mendelian genetics through task-based learning. Journal of Biological Education Indonesia (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 10(1), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.29924 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. National Academies Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Science Education Institute, Department of Science and Technology, & University of the Philippines National Institute for Science and Mathematics Education Development. (2011). Science framework for Philippine basic education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cardozo, L. T., Miranda, A. S., Moura, M. J. C. S., & Marcondes, F. K. (2016). Effect of a puzzle on the process of students' learning about cardiac physiology. Advances in physiology education, 40(3), 425-431. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00043.2016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Degracia, J. A. (2022). Science engagement, interest and performance of Grade 9 students. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 4(1), 45–51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Duncan, R. G., & Reiser, B. J. (2007). Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: Students' understandings of molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 938-959. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ecle, E. G. G., & Barquilla, M. B. (2026). Utilization of AVL with OLS on students’ motivation and common misconceptions in cell division. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 20(2), 848-856. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v20i2.22374 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Eren, N. B. (2025). The use of puzzles as a teaching technique in nursing education. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 31(4), e70118. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Focant, I., Rezsöhazy, R., & De Kesel, M. (2025). Secondary school students’ misconceptions in genetics: Obstacles to learning and to address complexity. Journal of Biological Education, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2025.2574579 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Guiritan, A. F., Salic-Hairulla, M., Adamat, L., Bagaloyos, J., & Malayao Jr., S. (2023). Utilization of developed learning packet on students’ conceptual understanding in biodiversity [Master’s thesis, Mindanao State University–Iligan Institute of Technology]. MSU-IIT, College of Education, Research Repository. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kindfield, A. C. (1994). Biology diagrams: Tools to think with. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0301_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Knippels, M. C. P., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2005). Design criteria for learning and teaching genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 108-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2005.9655976 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lewis, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance-do students see any relationship?. International journal of science education, 22(2), 177-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289949 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2000). Students' cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena. Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 200-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655718 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Navarro, C., Arias-Calderón, M., Henríquez, C. A., & Riquelme, P. (2024). Assessment of student and teacher perceptions on the use of virtual simulation in cell biology laboratory education. Education Sciences, 14(3), 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030243 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ogundare, S. A., Alabi, A. J., & Jebson, S. R. (2024). Impacts of digital puzzle game-based learning on undergraduate students’ growth mindset in integrated science education in North-East, Nigeria. Journal of Educational Review, 15(1), 154-169. https://doi.org/10.4314/jer.v15i1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ojo, A. T. (2024). Examination of secondary school students’ conceptual understanding, perceptions, and misconceptions about genetics concepts. Pedagogical Research, 9(1), em0185. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14095 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ouyang, F., & Xu, W. (2024). The effects of educational robotics in STEM education: A multilevel meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00469-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Stoten, D. W. (2017). Tarsia: An interactive and engaging activity that promotes consolidation of knowledge. Management Teaching Review, 2(3), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298117697000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tsui, C. Y., & Treagust, D. F. (2004a). Conceptual change in learning genetics: an ontological perspective. Research in Science & Technological Education, 22(2), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00469-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tsui, C. Y., & Treagust, D. F. (2004b). Motivational aspects of learning genetics with interactive multimedia. The American Biology Teacher, 66(4), 277-285. https://doi.org/10.2307/4451670 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study