Leadership Support and Staff Competence on the Effectiveness of ISO 21001:2018 Implementation in a Private Higher Education Institution

ISO 21001:2018 is an international standard that helps academic institutions improve the quality of their educational services and management systems. This study examined how middle-level managers’ leadership support and staff competence influence the implementation of ISO 21001:2018. It employed a descriptive-correlational design and was conducted in a private higher education institution in Ozamiz City, Philippines. The respondents were 121 non-teaching personnel identified through census sampling. Leadership Support, Staff Competence, and ISO 21001:2018 Implementation. Questionnaires were used in gathering the data. Weighted mean, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (Pearson r), and multiple regression analysis were used in analyzing the data. Middle-level managers provide very adequate support, and staff demonstrate very high competence in implementing ISO 21001:2018. The standard is implemented to a great extent within the institution. Leadership support is associated with implementation effectiveness, and staff competence is likewise associated with it. Furthermore, attitudes and work values, knowledge and understanding of ISO standards, and communication and engagement emerged as key predictors of effective implementation. The study concludes that effective ISO 21001:2018 implementation is driven by strong leadership support, high staff competence, and these key factors. It is recommended that the institution sustain leadership support and enhance staff competence through continuous leadership development, targeted training, and strengthened quality assurance practices.

attitudes, ISO 21001:2018, leadership support, quality management,

1. Abdulghani, Z. F. (2025). The possibility of applying the requirements of the educational institutions management system according to the iso 21001: 2018 specification using the 8d methodology: A case study in the college of economics and business. https://sl1nk.com/VS3tB [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Acheampong, E., & Agyemang, F. G. (2021). Enhancing academic library services provision in the distance learning environment with mobile technologies. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), 102279.https://tinyurl.com/2s4dtdj2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adu-Gyamfi, et,al. (2021). Effects of internal CSR activities on social performance: The employee perspective. Sustainability, 13(11), 6235.https://tinyurl.com/epkufjr9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ahli, R., et al. (2024). The influence of leadership dynamics and workplace stress on employee performance in the entrepreneurial sector and the moderating role of organizational support. Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), 6(3), 300-313.https://tinyurl.com/4d6j8tek [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://tinyurl.com/yjhhc75y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human behavior and emerging technologies, 2(4), 314-324. https://tinyurl.com/46x3rzyw [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Alifana, F. T., et al. (2025). Implementing ISO-Based Educational Reform: ISO 21001: 2018 Effectiveness in Enhancing State Islamic University Services. Al-Tanzim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 9(3), 723-735. https://tinyurl.com/yup25v7r [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Anam, M. K., et al. (2025). Designing A Strategic Quality Assurance Framework In Education: Insights From ISO 21001: 2018 Implementation. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 1(2), 175-189. https://tinyurl.com/3xkmb2a6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499. https://tinyurl.com/k235pa7b [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ashfaq, F., et al. (2021). Impact of ethical leadership on employee engagement: role of self-efficacy and organizational commitment. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(3), 962-974.https://tinyurl.com/3kkr35vy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire (TM). Mind Garden, Inc. Menlo Park, CA, 1-10. https://tinyurl.com/5859wajt [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Awashreh, R. (2025). Leadership strategies for managing change and fostering innovation over private higher education: Academic institutions in Oman. In Evolving strategies for organizational management and performance evaluation (pp. 399-422). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.https://tinyurl.com/5924fuf7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bass, B. M., & Bass Bernard, M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations (Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 481-484). New York: Free press. https://tinyurl.com/2exp4s4z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://tinyurl.com/24txpy8t [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Bhandari, P. (2021). Correlational research| When & how to use. Retrieved from Scribbr: https://tinyurl.com/y2yb982j [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Bryan, T. K., et al. (2021). Conducting and utilizing evaluation for multiple accountabilities: A study of nonprofit evaluation capacities. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 31(3), 547-569.https://tinyurl.com/4mtp2jfj [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row. https://tinyurl.com/y7hpphkv [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://tinyurl.com/mwhe4dac [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Cheng, E. C., & Wang, T. (2022). Institutional strategies for cybersecurity in higher education institutions. Information, 13(4), 192.https://tinyurl.com/4w83mb5p [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Chi, H., et al. (2023). How financial and non–financial rewards moderate the relationships between transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and job performance. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2173850.https://tinyurl.com/5ewjfkdc [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Chiu, C. Y., et al. (2021). Leading the team, but feeling dissatisfied: Investigating informal leaders' energetic activation and work satisfaction and the supporting role of formal leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(4), 527-550. https://tinyurl.com/478fx8r8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Cox, A. (2023). How artificial intelligence might change academic library work: Applying the competencies literature and the theory of the professions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(3), 367-380.https://tinyurl.com/d5vzp3r2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://tinyurl.com/2wht42zp [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Fitri, A. Z., & Muhajir, A. A. (2025). Model of A Quality Assurance System Based On ISO 21001: 2018 And Its Application In Education. International Journal of Education Management and Religion, 2(2), 126-140. https://tinyurl.com/nhz5cjmf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Gbobaniyi, O., et al. (2023). The mediating effect of perceived institutional support on inclusive leadership and academic loyalty in higher education. Sustainability, 15(17), 13195. https://tinyurl.com/3fm2fjkc [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Hagger, M. S., et al. (2020). A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity. Psychology & Health, 17(1), 27–48.https://tinyurl.com/5yhc2pn6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Harvey, L., & Williams, J. (2020). Fifteen years of quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 26(1), 1–18. https://tinyurl.com/3p83zw5r [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hillberry, J., et al. (2025). ISO9001: 2015 and ISO21001: 2018 Certification Opportunities for Quality Education at the Naval Postgraduate School (Doctoral dissertation, Acquisition Research Program). https://tinyurl.com/3nsnrct9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Kaur, G., et al. (2024, January). A Study on Employee Competency Management System. In 2024 IEEE 1st Karachi Section Humanitarian Technology Conference (KHI-HTC) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.https://tinyurl.com/ydcytene [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Khassawneh, O., & Elrehail, H. (2022). The effect of participative leadership style on employees’ performance: The contingent role of institutional theory. Administrative Sciences, 12(4), 195.https://tinyurl.com/kj4x94wb [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Koch, C., & Fehlmann, F. (2025). Beyond digital literacy: Exploring factors affecting digital performance of university staff. Media and Communication, 13.https://tinyurl.com/b69e9s5m [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Leithwood, K., et al. (2006). Successful school leadership: What it is and how it influences pupil learning. Research Report RR800. Department for Education and Skills.https://tinyurl.com/vae9v446 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Maulana, M. Z. (2025). Analysis of the implementation of ISO 21001 surveillance audit in strengthening the education quality management system: A case study at Nurul Jadid University. Al-Mudabbir: Journal Of Islamic Education Management, 1(1), 37-44. https://tinyurl.com/yft74jcr [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Nie, Q., et al. (2023). Leader expectations facilitate employee pro‐environmental behavior. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(2), 555-569.https://tinyurl.com/5azb83v7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Nimran, U., et al. (2024). Empowerment effect on competence and organizational commitments: Organizational learning culture as moderating. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(2), 2024038-2024038.https://tinyurl.com/2rkawp7k [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Noe, R. A. (2020). Employee training and development (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.https://tinyurl.com/4u74bb94 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Özkan, F. Z. (2025). Analysis of motivation and communication aspects in universities through iso 21001: 2018 management system standard and total quality management. International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., 10(5), 2.https://tinyurl.com/ynmykuc9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Owusu-Agyeman, Y. (2021). Transformational leadership and innovation in higher education: A participative process approach. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(5), 694-716.https://tinyurl.com/ffmyrh2u [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Ramese, W. K. D., et al. (2024). Adopting ISO 9001: 2015 & ISO 21001: 2018 EOMS to the Sri Lankan Higher Educational Institutions: A Review of Literature. KDU Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 6(1).https://tinyurl.com/yc2fnd69 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Rosiawan, M. (2022, December). Implementing outcome-based education in accordance with ISO 21001 Requirements. In Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Management (INSYMA 2022) (pp. 1067-1077). Atlantis Press. https://repository.ubaya.ac.id/43835/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Rusmiati, E., et al. (2023). Readiness Analysis of Politeknik STMI Jakarta Towards Implementation and Certification of ISO 21001: 2018. Indonesian Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management. https://tinyurl.com/56w26s86 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Sakka, F., et al. (2022). Human resource management in the era of artificial intelligence: future HR work practices, anticipated skill set, financial and legal implications. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1-14. https://tinyurl.com/bd6kev8y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Salas, E., et al. (2021). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(2), 74–101.https://tinyurl.com/3uydyu83 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Singh, S., & Jasial, S. S. (2021). Moderating effect of perceived trust on service quality–student satisfaction relationship: evidence from Indian higher management education institutions. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 31(2), 280-304.https://tinyurl.com/3j3sv4by [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Vorobyova, O., et al. (2022). ISO standards as a quality assurance mechanism in higher education. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 14(2), 73-88. https://tinyurl.com/3kt9u5ze [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Wang, X., et al. (2022). Multi-objective competency-based approach to project scheduling and staff assignment: Case study of an internal audit project. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 81, 101182.https://tinyurl.com/hd7w492x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Understanding Academic Leadership: Theory, Practice and Future Horizons
• A Literature Review on Leadership and Cultural Evolution of Adventism in East Africa Region
• Unlocking Employee Creativity Through Empowering Leadership: The Dynamic Interplay of Trust and Engagement
• The Integration of Preachers’ Leadership Competencies in Empowering Preachers for the Orang Asli Community in Malaysia
• Traditional Authority vs. Legacy Leadership: A Comparative Literature Review from the Arab World