Cognistop: Utilizing Cognitive Friction to Mitigate Habitual Social Media Scrolling among Pre-Service Teachers in the College of Teacher Education

This study investigates the effectiveness of CogniStop, a custom-developed Android application designed to mitigate habitual social media scrolling among pre-service teachers through the implementation of cognitive friction. Grounded in Dual Process Theory (Kahneman, 2011), the Ludic Loop (Schüll, 2012), and Cognitive Friction Theory (Alter, 2017), the intervention introduces arithmetic challenges and intention declarations to disrupt automatic behavior associated with “Digital Autopilot.”
A mixed-method explanatory sequential design was employed, involving purposively selected participants from the College of Teacher Education. Behavioral data were collected through application logs during a 14-day protocol consisting of a baseline phase and an intervention phase. Quantitative results revealed no significant change in app launch frequency (p = .230), but a highly significant reduction in usage density (p = .004). The intervention achieved a deterrence rate of 57.83% and significantly improved perceived digital self-control (p < .001).
These findings confirm that cognitive friction effectively reduces mindless scrolling and enhances metacognitive awareness without restricting user autonomy. The study contributes to the development of ethical digital wellbeing tools that promote self-regulation through deliberate cognitive engagement.

Cognitive Friction; Digital Self-Control; Mindless Scrolling; System 1 and System 2 Thinking; Digital Wellbeing

1. Alter, A. (2017). Irresistible: The rise of addictive technology and the business of keeping us hooked. Penguin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chen, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, H., & Wang, J. (2026). The impact of short-form video consumption on attention span and executive control: A longitudinal study. Journal of Behavioral Neuroscience, 45(2), 123–138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kim, S., Park, J., & Lee, H. (2022). Interrupting habitual smartphone use through cognitive tasks: The effectiveness of arithmetic-based interventions. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Lorenz-Spreen, P., Lewandowsky, S., Sunstein, C. R., & Hertwig, R. (2020). How behavioural sciences can promote truth, autonomy and democratic discourse online. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1102–1109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0889-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lyngs, U., Lukoff, K., Slovak, P., Schofield, G., & Gellersen, H. (2020). Self-control in cyberspace: Applying dual systems theory to a review of digital self-control tools. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376850 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Newport, C. (2019). Digital minimalism: Choosing a focused life in a noisy world. Portfolio. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Schüll, N. D. (2012). Addiction by design: Machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study