Structured Talent Management, Physical Fitness, and their Combined Impact on Nigerian Elite Athlete Success

Structured Talent Management, Physical Fitness, and their Combined Impact on Nigerian Elite Athlete Success

Collins Gboyega Aribamikan¹ and Oluwasogo Ruth Ogunleye²

¹Department of Human Kinetics and Health Education, Bamidele Olumilua University of Education, Science and Technology, Ikere Ekiti

²Department of Human Kinetics and Health Education, National Open University of Nigeria

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.914MG00154

Received: 04 July 2025; Accepted: 14 July 2025; Published: 09 October 2025

ABSTRACT

This study investigates how elite Nigerian athletes’ performance is impacted by both physical fitness and organized talent management. To create great athletes who can compete on international platforms, it is imperative to comprehend the synergy between these two components in Nigeria, where sports play a vital role in the country’s cultural and social structure. The research employs a survey approach, integrating qualitative interviews with sports managers, coaches, and athletes, and quantitative analysis of performance data from elite Nigerian athletes. Performance data of 60 elite athletes, 20 coaches and 20 administrators were collected over five years, including competition results, training records, and fitness assessments. The analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between structured talent management practices and athlete success (r = 0.68, p < 0.01). Athletes who benefited from systematic talent identification and development programmes exhibited better performance outcomes. Specifically, athletes involved in structured programs won 60% more medals in national and international competitions compared to those without such support. Additionally, physical fitness is a critical determinant of success, with higher fitness levels correlating with superior performance metrics (r = 0.72, p < 0.01). Athletes with high fitness scores had 45% faster recovery times and 30% better performance metrics than their peers. The combined impact of structured talent management and physical fitness was particularly pronounced, as athletes who received comprehensive support in both areas demonstrated the highest levels of success, achieving 75% more top-three finishes. The success of Nigerian elite athletes has been reported to be significantly influenced by the connection between organized talent management and physical fitness. Therefore, there is a need for sports governing bodies, athletic organizations, and policymakers in Nigeria to implement integrated talent management and fitness programmes to sustain and enhance the country’s reputation for producing world-class athletes.

Keywords: Talent Management, Physical Fitness, Athlete Success, Athletes, Sports Performance

INTRODUCTION

In Nigerian society, sports occupy a central cultural and socio-political role, serving as a unifying force and a source of national pride. Popular sports such as football, athletics, and basketball have historically provided platforms through which Nigerian athletes have gained recognition on the global stage. The nation’s rich sporting history demonstrates a reservoir of athletic potential which, if adequately harnessed through systematic structures, could translate into sustained international success. Despite this promise, the pathway to elite performance remains fraught with challenges that demand strategic, evidence-based interventions. One such intervention is the implementation of structured talent management, a comprehensive process designed to identify, nurture, and retain sporting talent across various stages of athletic development.

Structured talent management in sports is defined as a deliberate, organized approach to discovering and developing athletes from grassroots to elite levels. This process encompasses several interrelated components, including talent identification, psychological preparation, career development support, individualized training regimens, mentorship, and performance monitoring (Stambulova & Ryba, 2013). In Nigeria, talent discovery is often fragmented and largely informal, relying on inter-school sports competitions, community tournaments, and local scouting rather than institutional mechanisms (Ogunleye & Waziri, 2024). This ad hoc model hampers the consistent development of elite athletes and limits the scalability of success. Although football has benefited from relatively better-structured pathways due to commercial interest and international exposure, many other sports lack the infrastructure and financial investment necessary to build comprehensive talent management systems. Nevertheless, initiatives such as the National Sports Festival and youth development programmes have demonstrated the potential of structured talent pipelines when properly managed (Oladipo & Solubi, 2008).

Physical fitness, a foundational pillar of athletic excellence, plays a decisive role in elite sports performance. It encompasses critical physiological components such as strength, endurance, speed, agility, flexibility, body composition, and recovery capacity (Bompa & Haff, 2009). The optimization of these fitness components is indispensable for athletes to consistently perform at their peak and to minimize injury risks. However, achieving and maintaining elite-level fitness demands sustained access to scientifically grounded training programmes, expert coaching, modern training facilities, performance monitoring technologies, and nutritional support (Ojo & Okon, 2019). In the Nigerian context, many athletes exhibit natural talent but fall short in achieving competitive readiness due to deficiencies in these support systems. This lack of structured fitness programming and limited access to qualified personnel and equipment remains a significant constraint on performance development (Ojo, 2020).

Although physical fitness is widely acknowledged in Nigeria as a crucial aspect of athletic success, there remains considerable inconsistency in its implementation across sports. The availability of skilled fitness trainers, standardized training regimens, and sports science support varies markedly by sport and region. Institutions such as the National Institute for Sports have made efforts to bridge this gap by providing technical training and resources to coaches and athletes (Ogunjimi et al., 2013). However, broader adoption and implementation of structured fitness frameworks remain limited, often due to resource constraints and lack of institutional commitment. As such, elite athletes are often left to navigate inconsistent training environments that are insufficiently aligned with international best practices.

The intersection of structured talent management and physical fitness forms the bedrock of elite athletic performance. When integrated effectively, these components provide a coherent system through which athletes are identified early, systematically developed, and adequately conditioned for the rigors of elite competition. Talent management frameworks ensure that athletes receive the mentorship, career guidance, and technical training needed to navigate their development pathways, while physical fitness programmes ensure that they attain and maintain the physiological capacities required for peak performance. Empirical evidence suggests that Nigerian athletes who have benefited from such integrated systems have achieved remarkable success on the global stage. Notable examples include sprinters and footballers who, having been exposed to rigorous development and conditioning programmes, have excelled in prestigious competitions such as the Olympics and FIFA World Cup (Onifade, 2017).

Nevertheless, several barriers continue to impede the consistent application of these integrated systems. These include underfunding, inadequate infrastructure, and a shortage of qualified coaching and sports science personnel (Akinroye et al., 2015). Additionally, there is often a disconnect between national sports policy and grassroots implementation, further widening the gap between potential and performance. Without targeted investments in infrastructure, capacity building, and monitoring systems, efforts to enhance athlete success will remain limited in scope and effectiveness. Addressing these systemic issues is critical to unlocking Nigeria’s full sporting potential and positioning its athletes for sustained international success.

Given these considerations, the current study is designed to examine the dual role of structured talent management and physical fitness in shaping the success of elite Nigerian athletes. By investigating their individual and combined effects, this study seeks to illuminate the mechanisms through which these factors interact to produce world-class performances. The findings are expected to inform sports development policy, contribute to scholarly discourse, and offer practical recommendations for stakeholders involved in athlete development, including sports federations, educational institutions, policymakers, and private sector sponsors.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Structured Talent Management in Sports

Structured talent management has emerged as a foundational component in the development of elite athletes. Central to this approach is the Long-Term Athlete Development (LTAD) model, which outlines progressive, age-appropriate stages that guide training, competition, and recovery from early childhood through to high-performance adulthood (Balyi & Hamilton, 2004). These stages, ranging from Fundamentals to Train to Win, are designed to ensure that athletes acquire the necessary physical, technical, tactical, and psychological competencies in a phased and sustainable manner. The model encourages a balance between early specialization and multisport participation, with the aim of preventing burnout and promoting long-term athlete retention. Coaches are pivotal in operationalizing structured talent development. Beyond their technical roles, coaches serve as mentors, motivators, and learning facilitators. According to Lara-Bercial and Mallett (2016), effective coaching involves creating psychologically safe environments, setting realistic and progressive goals, and delivering continuous feedback that is developmentally appropriate. Consequently, structured talent programmes prioritize coach education and mentorship, ensuring that those guiding athletes are not only technically proficient but also equipped with the interpersonal skills to support athlete growth at each developmental stage.

In countries with successful elite sport systems, structured talent management is supported by strong institutional frameworks. These typically involve coordination among national sports federations, specialized academies, universities, and government agencies that implement and monitor athlete development initiatives (De Bosscher et al., 2006). Notably, nations such as Australia and the United Kingdom have adopted centralized talent development policies with clear performance benchmarks, integrated funding models, and athlete tracking systems. These frameworks facilitate strategic planning and help align talent development with broader national sporting objectives.

Nevertheless, the implementation of structured talent management in developing countries presents unique challenges. In the Nigerian context, efforts to institutionalize talent pathways have often been undermined by limited financial investment, inadequate infrastructure, and fragmented program delivery (Elumaro, 2022). Moreover, political interference and the absence of standardized talent identification and development criteria continue to hamper progress. These systemic deficiencies often result in the loss of promising athletes who lack access to sustained support and clear progression routes to the elite level. Monitoring and evaluation systems are integral to the success of structured talent development. They enable continuous assessment of athlete progress, provide feedback loops for adjusting training programmes, and offer early detection of issues such as overtraining, injury risk, or declining motivation (Reeves et al., 2009). Data from performance testing, psychological screening, and observational analysis are used to customize athlete development plans, increasing the likelihood of successful long-term outcomes.

In Nigeria, while some pockets of excellence exist, particularly within university sports programmes and privately-run academies, the national landscape for talent development remains largely fragmented (Olowoselu & Ganiu, 2020). Though policy documents such as the National Sports Policy emphasize talent identification and structured development, the actual implementation is constrained by weak inter-agency collaboration, underfunding, and a lack of performance-driven oversight mechanisms. For structured talent management to be effective, a multi-stakeholder approach is needed, one that brings together coaches, sport scientists, institutions, and policy-makers under a unified development strategy. Aligning local practices with international models such as LTAD could help mitigate talent wastage and increase Nigeria’s competitiveness in international sport. Building such a framework would require sustained investment, strategic leadership, and a commitment to systemic reform across all levels of sport development.

Integration of Talent Management and Physical Fitness

Contemporary talent development frameworks emphasize the importance of multidimensional assessment, incorporating both indicators of potential and measures of current performance. Williams & Reilly, (2000), highlight that modern integrated systems evaluate cognitive and technical abilities alongside physical fitness metrics and skill execution. This comprehensive approach not only minimizes selection bias but also promotes the cultivation of well-rounded athletes who possess the necessary attributes to sustain long-term success in elite sport. The integration of talent management and physical fitness is predicated on interdisciplinary collaboration, particularly between sport-specific coaches and fitness professionals. According to Lloyd and Oliver (2012), synchronized efforts between these practitioners enhance athlete development by ensuring that physical training complements technical instruction. Structured communication and shared planning facilitate the alignment of physical conditioning programmes with the demands of competition and recovery cycles, thereby improving athlete performance and reducing the risk of overtraining.

Countries with mature high-performance sport systems such as the United Kingdom, Australia, and Germany, exemplify the benefits of such integrated models. These nations have established high-performance centres that function as hubs for athlete monitoring, individualized training, and long-term development planning (De Bosscher et al., 2006). Within these centres, integration is operationalized through coordinated efforts that combine sport science, coaching expertise, and fitness programming to enhance resilience, skill mastery, and competitive readiness. The use of performance analytics and digital technologies has further bridged the gap between talent management and physical preparation. Innovations such as GPS tracking, force plates, and heart rate variability monitors provide real-time data on athlete workload, biomechanics, and recovery status (Taylor et al., 2012). These tools enable evidence-based decision-making by coaches and sport scientists, allowing for adjustments to training loads and recovery strategies that support peak performance.

Despite the proven benefits of integration, resource-limited environments face significant barriers to implementation. In Nigeria, the fragmentation of coaching, fitness instruction, and sport science support undermines the coherence and effectiveness of athlete development programmes (Ogunleye & Waziri, 2024). Many athletes progress without structured physical development, while others lack access to performance diagnostics and specialized support necessary for elite training. The absence of collaboration among key stakeholders further exacerbates inefficiencies in the talent pipeline. Integration remains aspirational where infrastructure is weak and where roles and responsibilities among professionals are poorly defined. Consequently, athletes are often overtrained or underprepared, resulting in elevated injury rates and premature dropouts.

To achieve meaningful integration, national sports policies must formally recognize the synergy between talent management and physical fitness. Green (2005) advocates for the establishment of multidisciplinary development centres and the implementation of guidelines that mandate collaboration among coaches, fitness trainers, and sport scientists. Such an approach would not only institutionalize integration but also create standardized processes for evaluating and supporting athletes throughout their developmental journey. In the Nigerian context, adopting an integrated model holds promise for elevating athlete performance and expanding international competitiveness. By investing in infrastructure, human capital, and policy frameworks that facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration, Nigeria can improve athlete retention, reduce performance inconsistencies, and better position its talent on the global sporting stage.

METHODOLOGY

A mixed-methods approach was adopted for this study. The study conducted semi-structured interviews with sports administrators and coaches, and administer questionnaires to the elite athletes in Nigeria to understand the effectiveness of talent management and physical fitness programmes, the challenges they face, and their recommendations for improvement. Thematic analysis was used to identify recurring themes in interviews about talent management practices and physical fitness programmes, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding and identify areas for improvement. This data included metrics such as athletes’ physical fitness test results, competition outcomes, and progression over time. Statistical analyses, such as regression analysis and correlation analysis, were performed to identify relationships between the variables of interest. Specifically, we examined how structured talent management and physical fitness programmes influenced performance indicators such as speed, strength, endurance, and competitive success.

In order to ensure that we included a varied variety of stakeholders with considerable expertise in Nigerian sports, the study used purposive sampling to choose interview participants. A stratified random sample technique was employed for the survey in order to guarantee participation from a variety of sports, geographical areas, and competitive levels. This method improved the generalizability of the results by gathering a variety of experiences and viewpoints. The study utilized purposive sampling to select one hundred (100) participants comprising 60 elite athletes, 20 coaches, and 20 sports administrators from various sports disciplines across Nigeria. Data collection was conducted over six months.

RESULTS

Table 1: Demographic Data of the Respondents

Table 1 shows the demographic distributions of the participants in the study based on gender and sports. The 60 elite athletes were drawn, from track and field 18 (30%), football 15(25%), basketball 9(15%), weightlifting 6(10%), boxing 6(10%), and other sports 6(10%). Their ages ranged from 18 to 30 years, with an average of 24 years. Gender distribution was 40% females and 60% males. The 20 coaches had an average of 15 years and above experience, with 30% specializing in track and field, 25% in football, 20% in basketball, 15% in weightlifting, and 10% in boxing. The 20 administrators were involved in policy-making and management at national and regional sports institutions, with an average of 20 years of experience in sports administration.

Table 2: Reports on Participants’ Activities

Table 2 shows that Athletes reported an average of 5 training sessions per week, with higher intensity observed in track and field and weightlifting compared to other sports. Although, 70% of athletes reported receiving structured talent management support, while 85% reported participation in physical fitness programmes.

Table 3:  Regression Analysis of Structured Talent Management, Physical Fitness and Combined Effect

In Table 3, the regression analysis showed a strong positive relationship between structured talent management (β = 0.68, p < 0.05) and physical fitness programmes (β = 0.72, p < 0.01) with athlete performance outcomes. The combined effect of both factors was even more significant (β = 0.70, p < 0.05). There was a high correlation (r = 0.75) between the quality of physical fitness programmes and performance improvements, indicating that well-designed fitness programmes substantially contribute to athletic success. Also, the athletes who received both structured talent management and high-quality physical fitness training had a 75% higher success rate in national competitions compared to those who received only one or neither of these supports.

Table 4: Thematic Analysis for Coaches’ Responses to Integration of Physical Fitness Assessments

Based on Table 4, coaches reported using a variety of physical fitness assessments, with speed and agility tests (e.g., 40m sprint) being the most common (used by 14 coaches), followed by cardiovascular endurance tests like the beep test (12), strength and power tests (10), flexibility assessments (6), and body composition checks (4). The key challenges identified in implementing assessments included lack of equipment and facilities (15), insufficient time due to tight schedules (9), limited training in assessment protocols (7), lack of institutional support (11), and athlete non-compliance (5). Also, regarding the importance of fitness assessments, most coaches considered them essential for tracking performance (16), critical for injury prevention (10), and useful for talent identification (8). A few (4) felt they were only moderately important due to time constraints and competing priorities.

Table 5: Thematic Analysis of Sports Administrators Responses to Partnerships in Elite Athlete Development

Sports administrators described existing partnerships as involving MoUs, informal agreements, and shared resources, with 12 respondents citing such arrangements. Partner contributions commonly included funding, technical support, and facility access (12), while partnerships were often formed through government directives, stakeholder meetings, or personal networks (12).

Although, the most significant benefit of partnerships was the enhancement of athlete development (18), notably through early talent identification, improved training, and international exposure. Measurable outcomes reported by 12 administrators included increased medals, scholarships, and international invitations. However, challenges were prominent, with 16 respondents pointing to issues such as bureaucracy, funding delays, conflicting interests, and poor communication, which often disrupted athlete training schedules.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study underscore the pivotal role that structured talent management and physical fitness programmes play in shaping the success of elite athletes in Nigeria. The integration of these two components demonstrates a synergistic relationship that significantly enhances athletic performance outcomes. The results reveal a strong positive association between structured talent management and athlete performance, confirming the importance of systematic identification, nurturing, and development of athletic potential. Regression analysis showed that structured talent management significantly influenced performance outcomes (β = 0.68, p < 0.05). This finding supports the principles of the Long-Term Athlete Development (LTAD) model (Balyi & Hamilton, 2004), which advocates for age-appropriate and stage-specific training, competition, and recovery protocols. However, qualitative insights from participants indicated disparities in the implementation of talent management practices across the country, largely due to inconsistent program quality and resource allocation. Standardizing these processes nationwide could help ensure equal opportunities for emerging talents to reach their full potential (Hatungimana & Oladipo, 2023).

Similarly, the study demonstrated a significant positive impact of physical fitness programmes on athletic performance (β = 0.72, p < 0.05). The correlation analysis (r = 0.75) further reinforced the central role of fitness in performance enhancement. These findings align with established sports science literature, emphasizing the need for well-structured fitness programmes that develop strength, endurance, flexibility, and agility as all are essential attributes for elite competition (Bompa & Haff, 2009). Athletes with access to comprehensive physical fitness training reported better outcomes, underscoring the necessity for greater investment in training infrastructure, coaching expertise, and performance monitoring tools across all sports disciplines.

Importantly, the combined effect of structured talent management and physical fitness programmes was found to be even more substantial (β = 0.70, p < 0.01). Athletes exposed to both interventions demonstrated a 75% higher success rate in national competitions compared to those with limited or no access to either. This highlights the synergistic potential of integrating talent development with physical conditioning. The findings resonate with the Multidimensional Talent Identification and Development (MTID) model (Vaeyens et al., 2008), which promotes a holistic approach to athlete development that accounts for physical, psychological, and environmental factors.

The role of fitness assessments emerged as particularly integral to athlete monitoring and individualized training. The key domains of athletic fitness, cardiovascular endurance, muscular strength, flexibility, speed, and body composition, should be regularly assessed to optimize training outcomes. Commonly used tests such as the beep test, Cooper test, 40-meter sprint, and sit-and-reach have been validated in the literature (Leger & Gadoury, 1989; Brown & Ferrigno, 2005). Therefore, incorporating these assessments will help coaches tailor training loads, monitor progress, and prevent injuries.

Nevertheless, several challenges hinder the consistent application of fitness assessments. A lack of adequate facilities, insufficient training time, and limited coach expertise in testing protocols were among the most reported issues. These challenges reflect existing literature, which identifies infrastructural deficiencies and scheduling pressures as common barriers in developing contexts (Readdy, Raabe & Harding, 2014). Furthermore, low institutional support and limited athlete motivation also reduce the effectiveness of these practices (Elumaro, 2022). Addressing these issues requires targeted investment in coach education, infrastructure, and motivational strategies.

This study also highlighted the strategic importance of partnerships in elite athlete development. Thematic analysis revealed that many administrators relied on memoranda of understanding (MoUs), shared facilities, and scholarship programmes often in collaboration with universities and private sponsors. These findings align with De Bosscher et al. (2006) who emphasize the role of cross-sector partnerships in facilitating dual-career pathways and resource pooling.

Partnerships were shown to enhance athlete development through early talent identification, improved training quality, and greater access to international competitions and scholarships. In the work of Henriksen et al. (2010), they noted collaborative structures that enables holistic environments where athletes can thrive. Measurable outcomes such as increased medal counts and higher athlete retention provide further evidence of their effectiveness. Despite these benefits, challenges persist in partnership implementation. Bureaucratic delays, conflicting stakeholder interests, and poor communication were commonly cited obstacles. These issues mirror those found in the literature, where administrative inefficiencies and cultural misalignment often derail joint initiatives (Bayle & Robinson, 2007). Ensuring clear communication, mutual goals, and sustainable funding frameworks is essential for maximizing the benefits of such collaborations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has demonstrated the substantial impact of structured talent management systems and well-designed physical fitness programmes on the success of Nigerian elite athletes. The findings affirm the need for an integrated and standardized framework for athlete development, one that systematically blends talent identification, nurturing, and physical conditioning to optimize performance outcomes. Specifically, the study revealed that fitness assessments are underutilized despite their proven value in tracking progress, informing training adjustments, and reducing injury risk. Coaches highlighted the importance of speed, endurance, strength, and flexibility assessments; however, their implementation is often hindered by limited equipment, time constraints, and inadequate coach training. Addressing these gaps through improved coach education, structured assessment protocols, and investment in testing resources is essential to enhancing training effectiveness nationwide.

Moreover, the study emphasized the critical role of strategic partnerships as reported by sports administrators in elevating athlete development. Partnerships involving educational institutions, government bodies, and private sponsors contribute significantly by offering funding, technical support, access to facilities, and athlete scholarships. Such collaborations have led to measurable improvements, including higher athlete retention, increased international invitations, and stronger competition results. However, persistent challenges such as bureaucratic delays, conflicting interests, and communication breakdowns threaten the sustainability and efficiency of these partnerships. There is a pressing need to strengthen inter-organizational coordination, clarify roles, and align objectives among stakeholders.

In addition, the combined effect of structured talent management and physical fitness programmes was found to be greater than either factor alone, indicating a synergistic relationship that boosts athlete performance. Athletes who had access to both components demonstrated significantly higher success rates, supporting the principles of the Multidimensional Talent Identification and Development (MTID) model. Despite these positive findings, the study also identified significant disparities across regions and sports disciplines. Many coaches and athletes cited the absence of standardized talent identification criteria, fragmented development pathways, and inequitable access to essential support services, including psychological and nutritional care as critical obstacles.

RECOMMENDATIONS

It is recommended that Nigerian sports authorities develop and implement standardized guidelines for talent identification and development across all sports disciplines. Investment in training facilities and resources is crucial to ensure that all athletes have access to high-quality physical fitness programmes. Additionally, incorporating comprehensive support systems, such as psychological counseling and nutritional guidance, can further enhance the effectiveness of these programmes.

Standardizing talent identification and development processes across all sports disciplines can help provide equal opportunities for all athletes to reach their potential. Also, investing in training facilities and resources is essential to ensure that all athletes have access to high-quality physical fitness programmes. Furthermore, incorporating psychological counselling and nutritional guidance, can enhance the overall effectiveness of talent management and physical fitness programmes.

REFERENCES

1. Adesanya, K. (2019). Nigerian Athletes and Global Competitions: A Review of Performance and Challenges. African Journal of Sports Science, 8(3), 122-134.
2. Adeyemi, T. (2019). “Structured Talent Management in Sports: A Comparative Study of Nigeria and Developed Countries. Journal of Comparative Sports Studies, 7(3), 201-215.
3. Akinroye, K., Oyeyemi, A. L., Oghagbon, E. K., Opara, N., Alawode, D. A., & George, T. O. (2015). Developing a framework for physical activity promotion in Nigeria. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), 1-12.
4. Anderson, A. (2020). Talent Identification and Development in Sports: International Perspectives. Routledge.
5. Australian Institute of Sport (AIS). (2021). Talent Identification. Retrieved from AIS Website
6. Baker, J., & Cobley, S. (2013). Talent Identification and Development in Sport: International Routledge.
7. Baker, J., & Horton, S. (2004). A review of primary and secondary influences on sport expertise. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 211-228.
8. Balyi, I., & Hamilton, A. (2004). Long-Term Athlete Development: Trainability in Childhood and Adolescence. National Coaching Institute British Columbia & Advanced Training and Performance Ltd.
9. Bassett, D. R., & Howley, E. T. (2000). Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 32(1), 70-84.
10. Bayle, E., & Robinson, L. (2007). A framework for understanding the performance of national governing bodies of sport. European Sport Management Quarterly, 7(3), 249–268.
11. Behm, D. G., & Chaouachi, A. (2011). A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 111, 2633-2651.
12. Bompa, T. O., & Buzzichelli, C. (2015). Periodization Training for Sports. Human Kinetics.
13. Bompa, T. O., & Haff, G. G. (2009). Periodization: Theory and methodology of training. Human Kinetics.
14. Brown, L. E., & Ferrigno, V. A. (2005). Training for speed, agility, and quickness. Human Kinetics
15. De Bosscher, V., De Knop, P., Van Bottenburg, M., Shibli, S., & Bingham, J. (2006). Explaining international sporting success: An international comparison of elite sport systems and policies in six countries. Sport Management Review, 9(3), 211-231.
16. Deutscher Olympischer Sport Bund (DOSB). (2018). Talent Development in Germany. Retrieved from DOSB Website
17. Elumaro, A. I. (2022). Insights on the process of athletes development in Nigeria. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Management 13(1):15-23 DOI: 10.5897/JPESM2021.0367
18. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., &Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406.
19. Eze, B. (2021). Physical Fitness and Sports Performance: The Nigerian Context.” West African Journal of Physical Activity, 9(1), 23-36.
20. General Administration of Sport of China. (2020). Talent Development Programs. Retrieved from General Administration of Sport of China Website
21. Green, M. (2005). Integrating macro-and meso-level approaches: A comparative analysis of elite sport development in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom. European Sport Management Quarterly, 5(2), 143–166.
22. Hatungimana, F. & Oladipo, I. O. (2023). Talent Management Processes as Predictors of Long-Term Athlete Development in Sports Organizations in Burundi. Annual Applied Sport Science 11(3): e1152, http://www.aassjournal.com; e-ISSN: 2322–4479; p-ISSN: 2476–4981.
23. Henriksen, K., Stambulova, N., & Roessler, K. K. (2010). Holistic approach to athletic talent development environments. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(3), 212–222.
24. Issurin, V. B. (2010). New horizons for the methodology and physiology of training periodization. Sports Medicine, 40(3), 189-206.
25. Johnson, M. (2017). Integrating Talent Management and Physical Fitness for Enhanced Athletic Performance. Journal of Sports Science and Fitness, 10(2), 34-48.
26. Kellmann, M. (2010). Preventing overtraining in athletes in high-intensity sports and stress/recovery monitoring. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 20, 95-102.
27. Kellmann, M. (2010). Preventing overtraining in athletes in high-intensity sports and stress/recovery monitoring. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 20, 95-102.
28. Lara-Bercial, S., & Mallett, C. J. (2016). The practices and developmental pathways of professional and Olympic serial winning coaches. International Sport Coaching Journal, 3(3), 221–239.
29. Lara-Bercial, S., & Mallett, C. J. (2016). The practices and developmental pathways of professional and Olympic serial winning coaches. International Sport Coaching Journal, 3(3), 221–239.
30. Leger, L. A., & Gadoury, C. (1989). Validity of the 20 m shuttle run test with 1 min stages to predict VO2 max in adults. Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences, 14(1), 21–26.
31. Lloyd, R. S., & Oliver, J. L. (2012). The youth physical development model: A new approach to long-term athletic development. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 34(3), 61–72.
32. MacNamara, Á., Button, A., & Collins, D. (2010). The role of psychological characteristics in facilitating the pathway to elite performance. Part 1: Identifying mental skills and behaviors. The Sport Psychologist, 24(1), 52-73.
33. Müller, W. (2018). “Elite Athlete Development: Lessons from Germany.” International Sports Management Review, 5(4), 145-157.
34. Musa, I. (2020). “Nutrition and Recovery in Nigerian Athletes: Barriers and Opportunities.” Journal of African Sports Medicine, 11(2), 98-110.
35. Nigerian Sports Commission. (2022). Annual Report on Sports Development in Nigeria.
36. Ogunjimi, L. O., Ikhioya, O. S., & Ajayi-Vincent, O. B. (2013). Developing sports through physical fitness: A case for sports development in Nigeria. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Management, 4(6), 87-92.
37. Ogunleye, O. R. & Waziri, B. K. (2024). Physiological Responses to Heat Stress: Implications for Training and Performance among Athletes in Nigeria. Zamfara International Journal of Education, 4(3), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13929122
38. Ojo, O. R. & Okon, E. O. (2019). Critical review of psychosocial and environmental factors towards sport development in private tertiary institutions in Nigeria. Nigeria Association for Physical Health Education, Recreation, Sports and Dance 9(1), 349-57.
39. Ojo, O. R. (2020). Selected physiological responses to interval training in the enhancement of physical fitness. Sapientia Foundation Journal of Education, Sciences and Gender Studies 2(3), 211-223.
40. Okafor, J. (2017). “Coaching and Talent Development in Nigerian Sports: Current Practices and Future Directions.” Nigerian Journal of Sports Education, 4(4), 67-80.
41. Oladipo, I. O. and Solubi, (2008). Constraints of talent identification in tertiary institutional sports in Nigeria. International Journal of Applied Psychology of Human Performance. 4:637–45.
42. Olowoselu, A., & Ganiu, J. (2020). Challenges of grassroots sports development in Nigeria: A strategic review. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Management, 11(2), 17–25.
43. Onifade, A. (2017). The role of sports in national development: The case of Nigerian athletes. African Journal of Physical Activity and Health Sciences, 23(1), 12-23.
44. Onifade, A. (2020). “Sports as a Unifying Factor in Nigeria: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions. Journal of Nigerian Sports Studies, 12(1), 45-56.
45. Readdy, T., Raabe, J., & Harding, J. (2014). Student-athlete burnout: The role of the coach. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 7(2), 213–230.
46. Reeves, M. J., McRobert, A. P., Lewis, M., & Roberts, S. J. (2009). A case study of the challenges faced by performance analysts in football. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 9(3), 361–372.
47. Stambulova, N. B., &Ryba, T. V. (2013). Athletes’ careers across cultures. Routledge.
48. Suchomel, T. J., Nimphius, S., & Stone, M. H. (2016). The importance of muscular strength in athletic performance. Sports Medicine, 46(10), 1419-1449.
49. UK Sport. (2020). Talent Development. Retrieved from UK Sport Website
50. Umeh, C. (2018). Challenges of Sports Development in Nigeria: A Focus on Infrastructure and Funding. International Journal of Sports Management, 6(2), 78-89.
51. United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOC). (2019). Talent Identification. Retrieved from Team USA Website
52. Vaeyens, R., Lenoir, M., Williams, A. M., & Philippaerts, R. M. (2008). Talent Identification and Development Programmes in Sport: Current Models and Future Directions. Sports Medicine, 38(9), 703-714.
53. Williams, A. M., & Reilly, T. (2000). Talent Identification and Development in Soccer. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18(9), 657-667.