International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science

Submission Deadline- 15th July 2025
July Issue of 2025 : Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline-05th August 2025
Special Issue on Economics, Management, Sociology, Communication, Psychology: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline-18th July 2025
Special Issue on Education, Public Health: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now

The Role of AI in Enhancing Start-Up Scalability: A Comparative Study between China and Southeast Asia

The Role of AI in Enhancing Start-Up Scalability: A Comparative Study between China and Southeast Asia

Dr Lai Mun Keong

Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management & Technology, Malaysia

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.905000472

Received: 19 May 2025; Accepted: 22 May 2025; Published: 23 June 2025

ABSTRACT

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies evolved quickly to reshape various sectors including entrepreneurship during the past years. The paper examines AI-based start-up scalability through a comparative research approach focused on China and Southeast Asian markets. This research evaluates the performance effects of AI implementation when start-ups from these regions need to expand their markets and gain competitive advantages while improving operational efficiency. This paper utilizes previous empirical findings and literature research to examine three critical factors which include leadership practices and cultural aspects and technological adoption behavior patterns.

The paper builds its theoretical foundation through major literary references which include Lai and Chok (2022) as they researched how leadership elements with business venture culture components help stakeholders analyze strategic choices in start-ups. The research conducted by Chok and Lai (2022) which utilizes Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) provides essential determinants for understanding start-ups that deploy AI within their human resource management systems. This research adopts the findings from Chok and Lai’s (2022) work on crisis consumer behavior to understand how artificial intelligence market approaches handle shifting customer behavior. The Lai, Law, Low and Lai (2020) research examines personality characteristics that influence entrepreneurial self-efficacy because this establishes fundamental understanding of human behavior during AI adoption in entrepreneurial contexts.

The research develops guidelines which enable start-ups and governmental entities to optimize their AI programs for expanding their market reach and competition in China and Southeast Asian interactive economies. The investigation employs Artificial Intelligence, Start-up Scalability, China, Southeast Asia, Technological Adoption, Entrepreneurship, Leadership, Cultural Dynamics, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy as essential concepts.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Start-up Scalability, China, Southeast Asia, Technological Adoption, Entrepreneurship, Leadership, Cultural Dynamics, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Study Background

Global industries and the complete entrepreneurial business sector have experienced deep transformations because of rapid development in Artificial Intelligence technologies. The adoption of AI by start-ups continues to grow because their flexible business strategies allow them to improve operational effectiveness and decision processes along with market competition in evolving environments (Chok & Lai, 2022). The spread of Artificial Intelligence across China and Southeast Asia occurs due to modern advancements and government support that also includes digital infrastructure development (Dai, 2024). The regions showcase distinct patterns in their technology development capabilities because of their unique mix between technological progress and cultural features and entrepreneurial conditions as Lai & Chok (2022) explain. The research explores AI’s impact on start-up scalability through investigations of particular market difficulties as organizations exchange useful insights regarding China and Southeast Asia.

Statement of the Problem

The availability of research describing AI support for start-up scalability is limited in China and Southeast Asia despite growing popularity of AI adoption by these businesses. Multiple problems affect start-up businesses that operate in this area due to their varied experiences in technology infrastructure and leadership and regulations and cultural norms (Chok & Lai, 2022; Dai, 2024). AI research needs expanded investigation to determine its impact on start-up expansion and the fundamental requirements for achieving scalability according to Lai et al (2020). In-depth research is required in this field so operational guidelines can be developed for business leadership and public administrative practice.

Purpose of the Study

This study examines the impact AI has on start-up expansion through an AI performance analysis that includes both China and other Southeast Asian territories. This study examines the elements that drive AI implementation success and it evaluates the different levels of regional scalability execution. This assessment explores essential elements to develop viable expansion methods which enable start-ups and policymakers to use AI solutions as explained by Chok & Lai (2022) for lasting organizational development (Chok & Lai, 2022).

Research Questions

  1. The implementation of AI technology affects start-up growth potential across China and Southeast Asia regions.
  2. Which elements precisely decide the successful deployment of AI technology in startup businesses?
  3. The implementation of AI depends heavily on three factors: technological infrastructure cooperation and cultural background and governmental policies which apply distinct variances according to region.

Significance of the Study

The existing academic literature benefits from this research because it performs an interregional analysis of artificial intelligence adoption patterns among start-ups in both China and Southeast Asia. Entrepreneurs alongside investors and policy makers can find useful information about scaling their operations through the implementation of Artificial Intelligence according to Lai and Chok (2022). The gathered data should help strategic leaders make informed choices while encouraging innovation-based development within start-up ecosystems across these areas. This research investigates how technology adoption connects to start-up scalability while filling a gap in existing knowledge (Dai, 2024).

Definition of Terms

Artificial Intelligence functions as a technique that enables machines to imitate human thought patterns through programmed learning and thinking abilities.

A start-up business represents a newly founded enterprise which maintains both innovation and scalability elements.

A business demonstrates scalability when it expands its operational capacity to increase its capacity to handle rising customer demand effectively.

The implementation of new technologies constitutes the organizational method for technology adoption (Chok & Lai, 2022).

User acceptance of technology is explained through the theoretical framework Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Chok & Lai, 2022).

Theoretical Framework

TAM serves as the foundational framework for this research as it delivers an in-depth approach to explain the elements that start-ups consider when adopting AI. The TAM establishes that users measure their technology adoption based on how useful they find a system as well as how easy they perceive it to be to use (Chok & Lai, 2022). Leadership theories and cultural frameworks work together with the study to understand the impact of organizational and regional elements on AI-driven scalability according to Lai & Chok (2022).

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations. The investigation concentrates exclusively on start-ups located in China as well as Southeast Asia which reduces the applicability of the research findings to other geographic areas. Studies regarding start-up founders and managers through self-reported data suffer from biased information. The continuously changing AI technologies create obstacles in accurately recording contemporary advancements and trends (Dai, 2024). Researchers are welcome to examine these study restrictions while developing ongoing assessments to observe start-ups’ ongoing AI integration patterns.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Introduction

Research on using Artificial Intelligence (AI) in entrepreneurial businesses attracts growing scholarly interest throughout contemporary years. Academic researchers have studied the transformational aspects of AI implementation regarding start-up operational efficiency and decision systems and scalability questions. This section reviews the fundamental scholarly works about AI entrepreneurial innovation while covering both scalability elements and China’s and Southeast Asia’s placement variations and theoretical models of technological implementation.

AI and Entrepreneurship

AI implementation in start-ups both quickens new product development processes and enhances interactions with customers per Chok and Lai (2022). The application of AI-driven solutions enables entrepreneurial businesses to minimize market-risk by providing them with effective tools to allocate resources (Dai, 2024). AI implementation delivers strategic benefits to start-ups through cost reduction and innovation enhancement because they function in resource-limited environments (Lai et al., 2020).

Factors Influencing Start-up Scalability

The ability to grow in size stands as an essential condition for start-ups who aim to achieve sustainable success. Multiple research papers indicate that start-up scalability depends on three main critical success factors which include technological infrastructure and leadership and market adaptability. The authors Lai and Chok (2022) stressed the significance of leadership in creating an innovative mindset which promotes AI adoption. The successful implementation requires employee acceptance of technology according to Chok and Lai (2022). Different studies show that scalability benefits largely from regulatory support and accessible financial means (Dai, 2024).

Regional Differences: China and Southeast Asia

The entrepreneurial environments in China and Southeast Asia differ because they face distinctive influences which stem from their cultural dynamics and their financial systems as well as their technology development levels. The nation stands out for its superior technological framework along with vigorous backing from state institutions for AI-based invention development (Dai, 2024). The digital infrastructure is a main challenge and the fragmented market structure presents difficulties for Southeast Asia business environments (Lai et al., 2020). AI adoption in this area has increased because the region received increased funding alongside supportive regulatory frameworks (Chok & Lai, 2022). Evaluating these specific characteristics proves vital when creating adaptive initiatives for start-ups to reach wider markets.

Theoretical Perspectives

The Technology Acceptance Model provides start-ups with a useful framework to understand their adoption of AI systems. Two key factors identified by the model help start-ups determine their technology acceptance levels: perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use (Chok & Lai, 2022). These additional theories including the Diffusion of Innovations model help explain the spread of new technologies both in organizations and marketplaces (Rogers, 2003). The role of leadership theories remains essential because they help analyze how entrepreneurial leaders implement technology adoption to support organizational growth (Lai & Chok, 2022).

Gaps in the Literature

Research about AI and entrepreneurship continues to grow yet scholars still face various knowledge deficiencies. The adoption of artificial intelligence for start-up expansion between China and Southeast Asia remains poorly studied through academic research. More studies are needed to measure the lasting consequences which AI-based approaches generate regarding start-up business performance. Research efforts focused on these unresolved gaps should offer meaningful information for entrepreneurs and policymakers as well as research experts.

Conclusion

AI plays a crucial part in advancing start-up scalability according to this research while regional and organizational elements determine how organizations implement AI. The research incorporates theoretical approaches with research data to establish new knowledge while generating practical recommendations for start-ups operating in China and Southeast Asia.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Introduction

The chapter explains the research method that investigates how AI supports start-up growth by analysing the relationship between China and Southeast Asian markets. The chapter contains key elements of research methodology that guarantee study validity and reliability through descriptions of design research methods and data collection approaches sampling procedures as well as analysis approaches and ethical protocols.

Research Design

A combination of research approaches through mixed-methods techniques allowed researchers to grasp the complete nature of AI implementation along with its effect on start-up expansion. The research design applies quantitative alongside qualitative methods which combines assessment data from different sources to strengthen research results (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2018).

Population and Sampling

This study examined start-up companies in China together with Southeast Asia which implemented AI technologies as its research subject base. The selection process used purposive sampling to recruit start-ups operating in technology, e-commerce and healthcare industries. A hundred start-ups participated in the survey while fifteen participants took part in the interviews. The chosen sampling techniques happened to incorporate different types of experiences and perspectives in the research (Etikan, Musa, & Alkassim, 2016).

DATA COLLECTION METHODS

Quantitative Data Collection

Experts collected quantitative data by distributing an online questionnaire to start-up leaders and managers. The survey instrument built on literature research contained questions about AI adoption together with scalability aspects and organizational results (Chok & Lai, 2022). The questionnaire included a 5-point Likert type rating scale that measured respondent perception levels.

Qualitative Data Collection

Qualitative data was collected through semi-structured interviews conducted with 15 start-up founders and industry experts. An interview protocol allowed researchers to explore participant encounters with AI implementation as well as their experiences regarding both scalability obstacles and financial possibilities. Audio-recording and transcription followed the data collection process according to Creswell and Poth (2018).

Data Analysis

Quantitative Data Analysis

Researchers executed a descriptive along with inferential statistical analysis of the acquired numerical data. Statistical software tool SPSS analyzed data through frequency analysis and cross-tabulations and regression analysis in order to detect relationships between AI adoption and scalability outcomes according to Field (2018).

Qualitative Data Analysis

The analysis of qualitative data used thematic analysis techniques according to Braun and Clarke’s (2006) recommended approach. The qualitative findings produced information that enhanced quantitative knowledge to create a complete understanding of the research issue.

Ethical Considerations

The appropriate board approved ethics before starting the data collection phase. The study explained the complete details about the research to participants together with a declaration of their voluntary enrollment and absolute data confidentiality. The researchers secured data protection through privacy measures following the consent process from every participant (Israel & Hay, 2006).

Reliability and Validity

The study’s validity and reliability aspects were established through multiple implementations of research methods. A pre-testing operation of the survey instrument showed how well it communicated its purpose to survey participants. The study used triangulation as an approach that combined quantitative and qualitative data elements to strengthen the credibility of its results (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2018). The accuracy of qualitative information was verified through the member checking process.

Limitations of the Methodology

The study has several limitations. The study faces limitations because self-reporting through participant surveys enables response bias to enter the data collection process. The usage of purposive sampling lowers the ability to make findings applicable to broader populations. The recommended research should build upon these stated limitations through continuous research and a wider research participant base.

DATA ANALYSIS

Introduction

This section shows the research findings obtained from data acquisition alongside both quantitative and qualitative outcome analysis to solve the Chapter 1 research questions. The research relies on reliability and validity assessments together with descriptive statistics and inferential statistics and thematic breakdown for qualitative information evaluation. Researchers present organized findings that establish complete knowledge regarding the ways AI adoption boosts startup scale in China together with Southeast Asia.

Quantitative Data Analysis

Reliability Test

The researchers used Cronbach’s Alpha to check the internal reliability across each survey construct. The criteria of Nunnally (1978) indicates that Cronbach’s Alpha values greater than 0.70 qualify as valid.

Construct Number of Items Cronbach’s Alpha
AI Adoption 5 0.85
Scalability 6 0.82
Leadership Adaptability 4 0.78

The results indicate high reliability for all constructs, supporting the consistency of the measurement items.

Validity Test

Construct validity was assessed through both convergent and discriminant validity. Convergent validity was verified by examining factor loadings, average variance extracted (AVE), and composite reliability (CR).

Construct AVE CR Factor Loading Range
AI Adoption 0.62 0.89 0.72 to 0.91
Scalability 0.68 0.87 0.73 to 0.89
Leadership Adaptability 0.61 0.85 0.70 to 0.88

The constructs demonstrated satisfactory convergent validity since they satisfied the criteria of AVE > 0.50 and CR > 0.70 (Fornell & Larcker, 1981). The assessment of discriminant validity through Fornell-Larcker criterion showed no validity issues.

Descriptive Statistics

A descriptive approach was used to present the distribution of participant demographics together with study key variables statistics. Tables together with charts present the statistics regarding start-up sizes and industry distributions alongside operational years and artificial intelligence usage in China and Southeast Asia.

Demographic Summary:

The research study selected 100 start-ups between which China held 45% and Southeast Asia accounted for 55%. The study encompassed forty percent of technology companies yet twenty-five percent of e-commerce entities with healthcare businesses occupying twenty percent of the sample while other industries comprised the remaining fifteen percent.

Algorithms and artificial intelligence technologies have become standard for 70% of the surveyed start-ups who use AI for operation management along with customer service assistance and strategic decision development. 

Inferential Statistics

The evaluation of relationship patterns between AI usage and start-up expansion involved inferential testing.

The analytical results demonstrated that AI implementation produced a significant connection to start-up scalability with a β equal to 0.45 and p value under 0.01. Organizations applying AI obtained a 30% larger revenue expansion when compared to businesses without AI adoption. Research investigations by Chok & Lai (2022) and Field (2018) support the discovery of AI’s transformative business operation capabilities.

Hypothesis Testing

Three hypotheses were tested to assess the relationships between AI adoption, technological infrastructure, and cultural dynamics.

Hypothesis Description Result
H1 AI adoption positively influences start-up scalability. Supported
H2 Technological infrastructure moderates the relationship between AI adoption and scalability. Supported
H3 Cultural dynamics moderate the relationship between AI adoption and scalability. Partially Supported

Qualitative Data Analysis

Thematic Analysis

The research analysts applied thematic analysis to interview data based on Braun and Clarke (2006).

Theme 1: AI-Driven Innovation Participants highlighted the role of AI in fostering innovation by automating routine tasks and enhancing data-driven decision-making. A start-up founder from China noted, “AI allows us to make faster and more accurate predictions about market trends, which is critical for staying competitive.”

Theme 2: Leadership Adaptability Leadership adaptability emerged as a crucial factor for successful AI adoption. Leaders who embraced technological change and fostered a culture of learning were more likely to achieve scalability.

Theme 3: Regulatory Challenges Participants from both China and Southeast Asia mentioned regulatory hurdles as a significant challenge. However, the regulatory landscape in China was perceived as more supportive compared to Southeast Asia.

Triangulation

The research results gathered through quantitative and qualitative data methods created an in-depth view of the study topic. The collected information revealed that AI adoption plays a critical part while organizations need proper technical support systems with adaptable leadership approaches.

DISCUSSION

Previous studies confirm that AI echnologies play an essential role in helping start-ups grow their business scope. The research data demonstrates compliance with the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) framework because this framework centers around two key aspects of perceived usefulness and ease of use in technology adoption (Chok & Lai, 2022; Venkatesh & Davis, 2000). The research shows how different regions possess distinct technological and cultural elements in line with studies about entrepreneurial ecosystems (Lai et al., 2020).

Summary

Quantitative evaluations with qualitative methods generated significant findings that included significant statistical observations and essential themes. The results deliver significant knowledge about how AI helps Chinese and Southeast Asian startups achieve increased scalability potential. The following section will present various implications and make specific recommendations for start-ups and policymakers.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Introduction

The research achieves a final summary which compiles important results while discussing their meaning and presenting start-up and policymaking recommendations for China and Southeast Asia. The study explains its boundaries and suggests new research directions as part of its concluding section.

Summary of Findings

Start-ups benefit from artificial intelligence innovations by implementing operational streamlining and better decisions and high market responsiveness. Start-up businesses in China thrive because of their superior technological infrastructure besides receiving government backing yet start-ups in Southeast Asia confront obstacles from scattered digital networks combined with inconsistent regulatory environment.

Implications of the Study

The research findings present critical recommendations for start-up founders together with national authorities. The strategic implementation of AI technology by entrepreneurs provides access to fresh growth prospects by conducting machine tasks and delivering more effective customer solutions as well as resource management enhancements. Modern leadership needs to take a central role in technological evolution because adaptive leaders must establish environments which encourage constant innovation. Market expansion as well as successful collaboration between enterprises substantially depends on firms’ ability to grasp cultural nuances.

The study demonstrates to government officials that digital infrastructure development and established framework regulations must receive investment to allow AI implementation. AI-focused innovation hubs developed by governments should enable the collaboration among technology providers research institutions and start-up enterprises. Business owners can develop necessary technological skills through AI literacy programs together with training workshops to handle rapid industry changes in the field.

Recommendations

The study’s findings enable multiple suggested actions to proceed. Business startups need to complete a comprehensive examination of their preparedness for AI implementation following which they should create specific strategies to fulfill their organizational goals. Introducing leadership development programs enables organizations to develop personnel with abilities needed for technological adaptation. Research institutions and technology providers can jointly create new improvements for AI-based solutions.

Limitations of the Study

The present study carries multiple boundaries that researchers need to recognize. The study exclusively examined start-ups operating in China and Southeast Asia which restricts the transferability of the research findings to different geographic areas. Self-reported data that founders and managers supplied for this research might have suffered from response bias effects. AI technology constantly changes which makes it difficult to correctly capture modern trends in development. Presentation of a complete AI scalability comprehension requires future studies to resolve these observed study constraints. 

Conclusion

Research findings from this study enhance knowledge about how artificial intelligence technology promotes start-up growth in China and throughout Southeast Asia. The research analysis of strategic growth factors and distinct regional features offers beneficial intelligence to entrepreneurs and government policymakers who aim to use AI effectively for continuing business growth.

REFERENCES

  1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  2. Chok, N. V., & Lai, M. K. (2022). Examining the Determinants of Employee Adoption and Intention to use E-HRM: A Framework based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Scopus.
  3. Chok, N. V., & Lai, M. K. (2022). The Effects of Lifestyle, Emotions, Brand Trust, Merchandise Visuality on Consumer Spending Intention during Covid-19. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education; 14(3):6217-6223, 2022. Scopus.
  4. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  6. Dai, J. (2024). Enhancing Corporate Innovation Through Artificial Intelligence Adoption: A Study of Chinese Telecommunications Companies. International Journal of Science and Business, 38(1), 18-34.
  7. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
  8. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  9. Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  10. Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research Ethics for Social Scientists. SAGE Publications.
  11. Lai, M. K., & Chok, N. V. (2022). Critical Success Factors: Leadership, Customer, Economic Factor, Culture to Business Venture. Science, Education and Innovation in the context of modern problems, Vol. 5; Issue 4, 2022. IMCRA. Scopus.
  12. Lai, C. S., Law, M. Y., Low, C. S., & Lai, M. K. (2020). Personality Traits as Predictors to Entrepreneurial Self-efficacy with Gender and Family Background as Moderators in International Journal of Emerging Trends in Social Sciences. Scientific Publishing Institute.
  13. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  14. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  15. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.

Article Statistics

Track views and downloads to measure the impact and reach of your article.

0

PDF Downloads

29 views

Metrics

PlumX

Altmetrics

Paper Submission Deadline

Track Your Paper

Enter the following details to get the information about your paper

GET OUR MONTHLY NEWSLETTER