International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI)

Submission Deadline-23rd January 2025
First Issue of 2025 : Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline-04th February 2025
Special Issue on Economics, Management, Sociology, Communication, Psychology: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline-20th February 2025
Special Issue on Education, Public Health: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now

Gender Roles and Labor Dynamics in Household Composting Practices in Ndeiya, Kiambu County, Kenya

  • Rhodah Njeri
  • Muthoni Mainah
  • Pacificah Okemwa
  • Nadia Guettou
  • 778-782
  • Jan 21, 2025
  • Sociology

Gender Roles and Labor Dynamics in Household Composting Practices in Ndeiya, Kiambu County, Kenya

*Rhodah Njeri1,2, Muthoni Mainah1, Pacificah Okemwa1, Nadia Guettou3

1Department of Sociology, Gender and Development Studies, Kenyatta University, P. O. Box 43844-00100; Nairobi, Kenya

2International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), East Africa Hub, Nairobi, Kenya

3Alliance of Bioversity and CIAT

*Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2024.11120069

Received: 10 December 2024; Accepted: 20 December 2024; Published: 21 January 2025

ABSTRACT

Composting is an agroecological practice that is commonly adopted by small-scale farmers in different food systems. It not only aided in reduced reliance on chemical inputs, in improving soil health but also in waste management within households. The division of labor and task allocation for household members in the composting process was however often accompanied by traditional gender norms. This resulted in unequal distribution of roles and imbalanced agricultural productivity as a ripple effect. This study examined the gender roles and labor dynamics in household composting practices among small-scale farmers who adopted compost manure in Ndeiya, Kiambu County, Kenya. This research used key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and questionnaires to identify: specific gender-related responsibilities in composting activities; challenges associated with these roles; and implications for gender equity and agricultural productivity. The findings of this study indicated that men were more involved in physically demanding tasks like turning large compost heaps and pushing wheelbarrows carrying compost manure to the farm. In the same vein, women were overburdened with tasks that demanded much of their time, such as gathering raw materials and daily compost management. The cumulative workload on women often led to reduced efficiency in the composting process and, by extension, impacted soil quality and crop yield negatively. These roles also not only reflected but also reinforced gender inequities in household and agricultural labor. This highlighted the need for equitable labor distribution at the household level.

Keywords: Gender Roles, Agroecology, Gender Division of Labor, Composting, Gender Equity

INTRODUCTION

In agricultural production, the gender division of labor fluctuated according to the size of the farmland, the farming system, household wealth, and the technology adopted. Women lacked technical support that could enhance efficiency in the composting process (Ogolla et al., 2022; Waweru et al., 2023). On average, women made up 43% labor force in agriculture worldwide. They offered unremunerated labor on family farms and as paid/ unpaid workers on other farms, engaging in both crop and livestock production. Compared to men, women farmers were more likely to engage in subsistence farming rather than commercial farming (Ingabire et al., 2018).

Globally, food systems encountered uncalled-for challenges which included but were not limited to climate change, soil degradation, unsustainable agricultural practices, and loss of biodiversity. Since food is a crucial subject worldwide, all aspects of how it is produced, processed, distributed, and accessed are increasingly coming under sharp and serious scrutiny.

These issues threatened food security and required transformative approaches to achieve sustainable and resilient food systems. Therefore, agroecology as one of the transformative approaches was presented as a solution to transforming food systems.

Over the years, agroecology as a broad impression gained prominence in the fields of agriculture, politics, and science. It was championed as being able to promote agricultural practices that were environmentally sustainable and socially just (Brym & Reeve, 2016). This was by applying ecological principles to agriculture and ensuring the regenerative use of natural resources (Nicolétis et al., 2019). Agroecology aligned with and was anchored on its thirteen principles which were; recycling, input reduction, soil health, animal health, biodiversity, synergy, economic diversification, co-creation of knowledge, social values and diets, fairness, connectivity, land and natural resource governance and participation (Wezel et al., 2020). Composting as one of agroecology’s practices was a critical practice in smallholder agriculture, often offering an affordable, eco-friendly method to manage organic waste and improve soil fertility (Paracchini et al., 2020).

In Ndeiya, Kiambu County, Kenya, the adoption and effective application of compost manure mirrored entrenched social norms regarding the gender division of labor within households in the composting process (Mapedza, 2024). This study focused on understanding the distinct gender-related responsibilities in composting activities, challenges associated with these roles, and implications for gender equity and agricultural productivity.

METHODOLOGY

The data was collected in Kiambu County, which is one of the 47 counties in Kenya. The capital of Kiambu County was Kiambu town with Ruiru Constituency being its largest town. The county  had an area of 8,169.8 square kilometers and was divided into twelve constituencies namely; Limuru, Gatundu North, Gatundu South, Juja, Thika Town, Githunguri, Kiambu, Lari, Kikuyu, Kiambaa, Kabete, and Ruiru. The county’s population was 2,417,735 according to the 2019 census. The area was purposively selected because the agroecology project was being implemented at Limuru Constituency, Ndeiya Ward. The host center for the agroecology initiative was the Community Sustainable Agriculture and Healthy Environment Program (CSHEP) in Ndeiya ward. CSHEP was a registered Community Based Organization that worked with small-scale farmers to build food security and generate capital in agroforestry.

A mixed-method approach was employed to investigate the gender roles and labor dynamics in household composting practices. Different categories of small-scale farmers made up the study’s target population. The study population mainly targeted small-scale farmers who used compost manure aged 20 to 35 years (youths) and 35 to 65 years (women and men). The study focused on both probability and non-probability sampling methods to select a sample consisting of different categories of women, men, young women, and young men farmers. The sample size was determined following Bartlett et al. (2001) formula:

N0=p∙q∙Z2/e2 ………………………………………………………….(1)

Where;

No = the required sample size
p = the estimated proportion of an attribute that is present in the population (0.3)
q = 1-p, e= is the level of precision,
Z = the standard normal deviation at 95% confidence level (1.96).
E= desired level of precision (0.05)

the N0=(0.3)∙(1-0.3)∙1.962/0.052 =262 …………………………………………………….(2)

This sample size (262) was reduced slightly since the population size was small using the following formula. This is because a given sample size provided proportionately more information for a small population than for a large population. Where N was the number of active farmers in the study area.

No=262
N=800

This gave a sample size of 183 farmers.

Table 1

Men Ratio selected Women Ratio selected Young women Ratio selected Young men Ratio selected
400/800×183 92 300/800×183 69 50/800×183 11 50/800×183 11

Qualitative data were collected through key informant interviews, and focus group discussions while quantitative data were collected using questionnaires on composting activities. A total of 32 participants were involved in the FGDs. Therefore, there were 4 FGDs (one comprising 8 women, another one 8 men, 8 young women, and 8 young men). 2 key informants were interviewed based on their involvement with farmers in different activities around agriculture and their vast knowledge and experience in sustainable agriculture. Interview questions focused on task allocation, time spent on composting activities, and perceived challenges. Ethical considerations were followed and ethical approval for the research was obtained from the NACOSTI body, in Kenya. Data were checked, cleaned, and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 29.

RESULTS

The results revealed clear gender-based differences in composting tasks. Women predominantly handled routine tasks such as organic waste collection, sorting, and maintaining optimal compost moisture, which required frequent attention and consistency. These roles were generally time-consuming, with women reporting significant overlap between composting duties and other domestic responsibilities. In contrast, in the composting process, men were more likely to engage in activities such as compost pile turning and the transportation of finished compost, activities that demanded more physical strength but were typically less time-intensive. The following sentiment was captured in an FGD of men (35 years and above) who had the following to say; in the composting process, there are specific activities and roles attached to either women or men based on their strength, ability, and knowledge. (FGD; 03/08/2024).

The study also identified challenges linked to this division of labor. Women reported experiencing time constraints and physical fatigue due to their dual responsibilities of composting and household chores. Men, while engaged in fewer composting tasks, indicated that their involvement was often limited by other agricultural duties, leading to delays in physically demanding tasks, which can affect compost quality and efficiency.

Table 2: Roles of women, men, young women, and young men in the composting process

Older women Older men Female youth Male youth
frequency % frequency % frequency % frequency %
Digging the compost pit 12 6.40% 20 10.70% 9 4.80% 43 23.00%
Burying compost 16 8.60% 20 10.70% 11 5.90% 39 20.90%
Looking for water 99 52.90% 25 13.40% 86 46.00% 40 21.40%
Looking for twigs or grass 123 65.80% 59 31.60% 88 47.10% 59 31.60%
Turning the compost manure occasionally 76 40.60% 114 61.00% 54 28.90% 122 65.20%
Constantly adding water 98 52.40% 67 35.80% 60 32.10% 65 34.80%
Checking the temperature 92 49.20% 83 44.40% 33 17.60% 56 29.90%
Carrying the compost to the farm 107 57.20% 120 64.20% 144 77.00% 168 89.80%

DISCUSSION

The findings above indicated that labor divisions not only reflected but also reinforced gender inequities in household and agricultural labor. The results were in line with Oduro et al., 2022 who noted that women in the composting process often engaged in raw materials collection, sorting, and routine compost maintenance. Men on the other hand were assigned tasks that involved more physical strength, such as huge compost manure pile turning or transporting finished compost using wheelbarrows or shoulders. The cumulative workload on women often resulted in reduced efficiency in the composting process and, by extension, impacted soil quality and crop yield (Zerssa et al., 2021). For instance, consistency in compost production and application among women was affected due to less time affecting the quality of the compost manure.

The study’s findings highlighted the need for more equitable task allocation and support for women in composting activities. Interventions such as composting training programs that included both men and women and the introduction of low-cost, labor-saving composting tools could alleviate some of the physical and time burdens experienced by women. Encouraging shared responsibilities between men and women in composting tasks may lead to improved productivity and a more balanced household workload. Introduction of the “family farming approach” could also help reduce the labor burden on women as agricultural labor is divided among all household members (Suess et al., 2016).

Intersectional gender differentials in people’s behavioral change towards agroecology continued to pose great interest to researchers and policymakers around Sub-Saharan Africa and the world at large. Addressing intersectional gender differentials in agroecology is predicted to achieve sustainable development in the long run. This is by increasing agricultural productivity, reducing poverty and hunger, promoting gender equity in agriculture, and promoting economic growth. The main proposition underlying this interest is that the contributions and efforts of women farmers in particular have been ignored in agriculture and agroecology (Zaremba et al., 2021).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study underscored the need for a more equitable division of labor in the composting process to improve both household productivity and gender equity in rural settings. Reassessing task allocation, providing targeted support, and promoting shared responsibilities in composting may address some of the significant challenges associated with gendered labor roles in Ndeiya. Addressing these disparities by promoting more equitable labor practices and supporting women in composting could enhance the efficiency of household composting and promote gender equity in rural agricultural communities. Future studies could expand on these findings by exploring labor-saving technologies and interventions tailored to rural composting.

REFERENCES

  1. Brym, Z. T., & Reeve, J. R. (2016). Agroecological principles from a bibliographic analysis of the term agroecology. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews: Volume 19, 203-231.
  2. Herren, B. G., Kerr, R. B., Barrios, E., Gonçalves, A. L. R., & Sinclair, F. (2020). Agroecological principles and elements and their implications for transitioning to sustainable food systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 40, 1-13.
  3. Ingabire, C., Mshenga, P. M., Amacker, M., Langat, J. K., Bigler Luhm, C., & Birachi, E. A. (2018). Agricultural transformation in Rwanda: Can gendered market participation explain the persistence of subsistence farming? Gender and Women’s Studies, 2(1), 1-18. World Bank Group. (2021). Marine plastic management: The Gender Dimensions.
  4. Mapedza, E. (2024). Gender norms and social transformation of agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Circular and Transformative Economy (pp. 159-174). CRC Press.
  5. Nicolétis, É., Caron, P., El Solh, M., Cole, M., Fresco, L. O., Godoy-Faúndez, A., … & Zurayk, R. (2019). Agroecological and other innovative approaches for sustainable agriculture and food systems that enhance food security and nutrition. A report by the High-Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security.
  6. Oduro, A., Antwi, M., & Danso, A. (2022). Gender inequalities in household agricultural practices. African Journal of Social Sciences, 17(4), 223–238.
  7. Ogolla, K. O., Chemuliti, J. K., Ngutu, M., Kimani, W. W., Anyona, D. N., Nyamongo, I. K., & Bukachi, S. A. (2022). Women’s empowerment and intra-household gender dynamics and practices around sheep and goat production in South East Kenya. Plos one, 17(8), e0269243
  8. Paracchini, M. L., Justes, E., Wezel, A., Zingari, P. C., Kahane, R., Masden, S., … & Nègre, T. (2020). Agroecological practices supporting food production and reducing food insecurity in developing countries (Doctoral dissertation, Joint Research Center, Commission Européenne).
  9. Rachel, B. K., Liebert, J., Moses, K., & Kpienbaareh, D. (2022). Human and social values in agroecology. Elementa, 10(1).
  10. Suess-Reyes, J., & Fuetsch, E. (2016). The future of family farming: A literature review on innovative, sustainable and succession-oriented strategies. Journal of rural studies, 47, 117-140.
  11. Wezel, A., Herren, B. G., Kerr, R. B., Barrios, E., Gonçalves, A. L. R., & Sinclair, F. (2020). Agroecological principles and elements and their implications for transitioning to sustainable food systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 40, 1-13.
  12. Zerssa, G., Feyssa, D., Kim, D. G., & Eichler-Löbermann, B. (2021). Challenges of smallholder farming in Ethiopia and opportunities by adopting climate-smart agriculture. Agriculture, 11(3), 192.

Article Statistics

Track views and downloads to measure the impact and reach of your article.

0

PDF Downloads

27 views

Metrics

PlumX

Altmetrics

GET OUR MONTHLY NEWSLETTER