Navigating the New Digital Landscape: The Role of ICT Accessibility and Competency in Enhancing Educational Quality in Cambodian Public Higher Education

Authors

Samean Phon

School of Business and Management, Lincoln University College, Selangor (Malaysia)

Dhakir Abbas Ali

School of Business and Management, Lincoln University College (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.120800259

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 12/9 | Page No: 2923-2933

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-09-03

Accepted: 2025-09-09

Published: 2025-10-04

Abstract

Cambodia’s expanding digital economy has positioned the modernization of higher education as a pivotal force in national development. Within this transformation, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is indispensable; however, prior research has largely centered on access issues, often termed the “first-level digital divide.” Addressing this gap, the present study offers empirical evidence from Cambodian public universities by examining and comparing the roles of ICT accessibility and ICT competency in shaping students’ perceptions of educational quality. The primary objective was to determine both their individual and relative contributions.
Employing a quantitative methodology, data were obtained through surveys administered to 306 students from five public universities. Data analysis using SmartPLS 3.0 and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) involved validation of the measurement model and hypothesis testing. Results confirm that ICT accessibility (β = 0.255, p < 0.001) and ICT competency (β = 0.309, p < 0.001) exert significant positive effects on perceived educational quality, with competency showing a stronger influence. This finding highlights the “second-level digital divide,” where disparities in skills outweigh those of access. The structural model demonstrated an explanatory power of 15.3% for the variance in educational quality.
The study contributes theoretically by substantiating the second-level digital divide and practically by providing evidence-based guidance for higher education development in Cambodia. Specifically, it underscores the necessity of a dual-focus strategy: continued investment in digital infrastructure alongside systematic initiatives to strengthen digital competencies. Such an integrated approach is vital to advancing educational quality and, ultimately, supporting Cambodia’s broader socio-economic development agenda.

Keywords

ICT Accessibility, ICT Competency, Quality Education, Digital Divide, Cambodian Higher Education,

Downloads

References

1. Bindu CN. (2016). Impact of ICT on Teaching and Learning: A Literature Review. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 4(1), 24–31. www.researchpublish.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bong, W. K., & Chen, W. (2024). Increasing faculty’s competence in digital accessibility for inclusive education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1937344 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 295–336). https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=2eV4AgAAQBAJ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Second Edition (2nd ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. D Amutha. (2020). The role and impact of ICT in improving the quality of education. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3585228 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dang, T. D., Phan, T. T., Vu, T. N. Q., La, T. D., & Pham, V. K. (2024). Digital competence of lecturers and its impact on student learning value in higher education. Heliyon, 10(17), e37318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37318 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gorghiu, G., Gorghiu, L. M., & Pascale, L. (2018). ENRICHING THE ICT COMPETENCES OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS-A KEY FACTOR FOR THEIR SUCCESS AS FUTURE TEACHERS. In Journal of Science and Arts Year (Vol. 18, Issue 1). www.josa.ro [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hair, J. F. ., Hult, G. T. M. ., Ringle, C. M. ., & Sarstedt, Marko. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed). Sage. https://eli.johogo.com/Class/CCU/SEM/_A%20Primer%20on%20Partial%20Least%20Squares%20Structural%20Equation%20Modeling_Hair.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382/FULL/PDF [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Henseler, J., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00180-012-0317-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hoy, W., & Adams, C. (2015). Quantitative research in education: A primer. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=hI87CgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Quantitative+Research+in+Education:+A+Primer+by+Wayne+K.+Hoy,+published+in+2010+by+SAGE+Publications&ots=Y0krpO-ZHz&sig=1GcDRuctILF7p2qw9ZxQ97rkRp4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hu, L., a, P. B.-S. equation modeling:, & 1999, undefined. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Taylor & FrancisL Hu, PM BentlerStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999•Taylor & Francis, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. JC Nunnally. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. In Springer. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2490-4_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Krejcie, R., & DW Morgan. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Journals.Sagepub, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lawrence Neuman, W. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches W. Lawrence Neuman Seventh Edition. www.pearsoned.co.uk [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. MoEYS. (2024). EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLAN 2024-2028. https://moeys.gov.kh/storage/uploads/documents/67316f9d3a57f.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. R Likert. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Psycnet.Apa.OrgR LikertArchives of Psychology, 1932•psycnet.Apa.Org. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1933-01885-001/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Saravanakumar, A. R. (2018). Role of ICT on Enhancing Quality of Education. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 3. www.ijisrt.com717 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Tokareva, E., Malysheva, O., Smirnova, Y., & Orchakova, L. (2021). Predictors of the Use of ICTS in Higher Education: Relevance and Readiness of Universities for Their Implementation. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(4), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i14.20047 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Yeşilyurt, E., & Vezne, R. (2023). Digital literacy, technological literacy, and internet literacy as predictors of attitude toward applying computer-supported education. Education and Information Technologies 2023 28:8, 28(8), 9885–9911. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-022-11311-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Zou, X., Noh, N., Knowledge, M. P.-J. of e-L. and, & 2024, undefined. (2024). Global perspectives on Teacher ICT Competencies: diversity and commonalities in eight representative frameworks. Je-Lks.Org, 20(2), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135977 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles