A Study on the Influence of Culture and Tradition on Family and Relationships in Jhumpa Lahiri’s the Namesake

A Study on the Influence of Culture and Tradition on Family and Relationships in Jhumpa Lahiri’s the Namesake

Dr. Arul K

Faculty of Science and Humanities, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Vadapalani Campus, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.120500101

Received: 21 May 2025; Accepted: 28 May 2025; Published: 12 June 2025

ABSTRACT

Jhumpa Lahiri’s “The Namesake” intricately explores the themes of family and traditions within the context of the immigrant experience, particularly through the lens of the Ganguli family. This paper delves into the various elements that Lahiri uses to illustrate the themes such as intergenerational dynamics, cultural preservation, family bonds and the significance of rituals and customs. The novel highlights how the Gangulis, as Bengali immigrants in America, navigate the complexities of preserving their cultural identity while adapting to their new environment. It also showcases the generational conflicts and understanding between immigrant parents and their American-born children, emphasizing the tension and harmony that arise from their differing cultural experiences. This Paper underscores how these elements shape the characters’ identities and their navigation of life in a foreign land. The enduring power of family bonds, the resilience of cultural traditions and the evolving nature of identity within the immigrant experience are key focal points, offering a profound understanding of the challenges and triumphs faced by immigrant families.

Keywords: Intergenerational Dynamics, Cultural Preservation, Family Bonds, Rituals, Customs

INTERGENERATIONAL DYNAMICS

An Intergenerational Dynamics play a crucial role in the story, highlighting the tensions and connections between Ashoke and Ashima Ganguli, who strive to maintain their Bengali heritage, and their children, particularly Gogol, who grapples with his identity in a predominantly American context. This dynamic illustrates the challenges faced by first-generation immigrants and their descendants in balancing cultural expectations with personal aspirations.

Ashoke and Ashima Ganguli represent the first generation of immigrants, bringing with them the traditions and values of their Bengali heritage. Their move to the United States is marked by a determination to preserve their cultural identity amidst an alien landscape. This is poignantly illustrated in their efforts to celebrate Bengali festivals, cook traditional foods, and maintain their native language within the household.

Ashima’s sense of loss and dislocation is a recurring theme, as she longs for the familiarity of her homeland. Lahiri writes, “For being a foreigner, Ashima is beginning to realize, is a sort of lifelong pregnancy—a perpetual wait, a constant burden, a continuous feeling out of sorts.” This metaphor encapsulates the ongoing struggle that Ashima faces as she tries to retain her cultural identity while adapting to a new world.

The generational divide between the parents and their children is evident in their differing attitudes towards cultural identity. Gogol, born and raised in the United States, finds himself caught between the expectations of his Bengali heritage and the reality of his American upbringing. His struggle with his name symbolizes this conflict. Initially, Gogol rejects his name and the cultural heritage it represents, opting for a more American identity.

Lahiri captures this tension, writing, “He hates having to live with the name, a name that is both absurd and obscure, that has no meaning in Bengali or English, no identity at all.” Gogol’s rejection of his name is symbolic of his rejection of his cultural heritage and the expectations of his parents.

As Gogol grows older, his journey towards self-identity becomes a central theme. His relationships, career choices, and social interactions reflect his struggle to reconcile his dual identity. The intergenerational dynamics are further complicated by his romantic relationships, particularly with Maxine, who represents the world he yearns to be part of, and Moushumi, who brings him back to his Bengali roots.

Lahiri writes, “He prefers this version of his life to the one he leads with his parents, in which he is still Gogol, the dutiful son who does as he is told.” This duality in Gogol’s identity reflects the broader theme of assimilation and the challenges faced by second-generation immigrants in navigating their cultural heritage and their adopted homeland.

The expectations of the older generation often come into conflict with the aspirations of the younger generation. Ashoke and Ashima’s hopes for their children to uphold Bengali traditions and values are met with resistance from Gogol, who seeks to forge his own path. This conflict is a source of tension but also of growth and understanding.

After Ashoke’s death, Gogol’s perspective begins to shift. He gains a deeper appreciation for his father’s sacrifices and the cultural heritage he once rejected. Lahiri writes, “He remembers the funeral, how his father had been carried out of their house, in his shoes, and this image of his father recedes in his mind, blending with the sights and sounds of the city around him.”

By the end of the novel, there is a sense of reconciliation between the generations. Gogol’s journey towards self-discovery leads him to a greater understanding of his parents’ experiences and sacrifices. This reconciliation is not just personal but also symbolic of the broader immigrant experience—the blending of old and new, tradition and modernity.

Lahiri concludes, “These events, good and bad, are all part of his life, not just the dates but the facts themselves, and they will be with him always, inextricable, written down in the book that is his past, that is his story, even though he will never bring them to mind again.” This realization reflects the theme of intergenerational dynamics, where the past and present, the old and new, come together to shape one’s identity.

CULTURAL PRESERVATION IN JHUMPA LAHIRI’S “THE NAMESAKE”

The Cultural Preservation is depicted through the Ganguli family’s efforts to uphold their Bengali traditions despite the influences of their new environment. From celebrating Bengali festivals to preparing traditional foods, these practices serve as a means of maintaining their cultural identity and creating a sense of continuity amidst the changes brought about by immigration.

Ashoke and Ashima’s move to the United States marks the beginning of their struggle to preserve their Bengali heritage. Ashima, in particular, feels the weight of cultural displacement. Lahiri writes, “For being a foreigner, Ashima is beginning to realize, is a sort of lifelong pregnancy—a perpetual wait, a constant burden, a continuous feeling out of sorts.” This metaphor encapsulates the perpetual state of being an outsider and the continuous effort required to maintain cultural identity.

The Gangulis’ commitment to their cultural practices and rituals is a cornerstone of their life in America. They celebrate Bengali festivals such as Durga Puja and observe traditional customs, like the rice ceremony for their children. These rituals are not just about maintaining traditions but also about creating a sense of continuity and connection to their homeland.

For example, during Gogol’s annaprasan (rice ceremony), Ashima prepares traditional dishes, and they invite Bengali friends to participate in the ceremony. Lahiri describes this scene, emphasizing the importance of these rituals: “For the party, Ashima has prepared an elaborate meal of curries, so delicate, the food disappears within moments, only to be replaced by more.” This event highlights how food and communal gatherings are essential for cultural preservation.

Language is another critical aspect of cultural preservation in “The Namesake.” Ashoke and Ashima speak Bengali at home and encourage their children to learn it. However, as Gogol and his sister Sonia grow older, they become more fluent in English and less proficient in Bengali. This shift in language reflects the broader struggle between maintaining their cultural roots and assimilating into American society.

Lahiri illustrates this tension through Gogol’s reluctance to use his given name. He finds it easier to adopt an American name, “Nikhil,” to fit in. This change symbolizes a broader shift away from his Bengali heritage. Lahiri writes, “He is afraid to be Nikhil, someone he doesn’t know. Who doesn’t know him.” The use of language here underscores the complexities of identity and cultural preservation.

The theme of cultural preservation also manifests in the intergenerational conflict between Ashoke and Ashima and their children. The parents’ adherence to Bengali customs often clashes with their children’s desire to assimilate. This conflict is particularly evident in Gogol’s rejection of his name, which represents his parents’ cultural heritage.

Ashima struggles to understand Gogol’s need to fit in and his rejection of their traditions. Lahiri writes, “It’s not such a terrible thing, what her son has chosen to do with his life. His success in school, his achievements. But that he has done it on his own terms, in this place that she has refused to learn, this place she will never call home.” This passage highlights the emotional complexity of cultural preservation and the generational divide it creates.

Food plays a significant role in the Ganguli family’s cultural preservation. Ashima’s cooking is a way to keep her culture alive and to connect with her past. The preparation of traditional Bengali dishes becomes a ritual that anchors the family in their heritage.

Lahiri frequently describes the meticulous preparation of Bengali dishes, emphasizing their importance. For instance, after Ashoke’s death, Ashima continues to cook traditional meals, finding solace in these familiar practices. This act of cooking becomes a means of coping with loss and maintaining a connection to her roots.

While the Gangulis strive to preserve their culture, they also adapt and transform in response to their new environment. This adaptation is not a rejection of their heritage but a way to navigate the complexities of their bicultural existence. Gogol’s journey towards accepting his name and heritage symbolizes this transformation. After his father’s death, he begins to appreciate the significance of his name and the cultural legacy it represents. Lahiri writes, “He remembers the funeral, how his father had been carried out of their house, in his shoes, and this image of his father recedes in his mind, blending with the sights and sounds of the city around him.” This realization marks a turning point in Gogol’s understanding of cultural preservation.

In “The Namesake,” Jhumpa Lahiri masterfully explores the theme of cultural preservation through the experiences of the Ganguli family. The novel delves into the complexities of maintaining cultural identity amidst the challenges of immigration and assimilation. Through rituals, language, food, and intergenerational dynamics, Lahiri illustrates the intricate balance of preserving one’s heritage while adapting to a new environment.

FAMILY BONDS IN “THE NAMESAKE”

The Family Bonds are portrayed as both a source of support and conflict, reflecting the complexities of familial relationships within the immigrant context. The novel delves into the strength of these bonds, particularly in times of crisis and loss, demonstrating how family ties can provide a sense of belonging and resilience.

It is portrayed as both a source of support and a point of contention. The novel delves into the ways in which family relationships evolve in response to cultural displacement, generational differences, and personal growth.

At the heart of the novel are Ashoke and Ashima Ganguli, whose marriage and family life form the foundation of the story. Their relationship, initially arranged, grows into a deep bond that provides stability and comfort in a foreign land. Ashima’s sense of isolation and her reliance on Ashoke underscore the importance of their partnership. Lahiri writes, “Ashima never calls out for Ashoke, never asks if he’s there. It is not her habit, as it is for so many American wives, to do such a thing.” This passage illustrates the unspoken understanding and mutual dependence that characterize their relationship.

Ashoke and Ashima’s efforts to instill Bengali values in their children, Gogol and Sonia, are central to the theme of family bonds. They strive to maintain their cultural heritage through language, food, and traditions. This is evident in their celebration of Bengali festivals and their adherence to customs, such as Gogol’s rice ceremony and their observance of mourning rituals.

Lahiri captures this commitment to cultural preservation when she writes, “Ashoke and Ashima are distressed at the prospect of Gogol being called anything other than the name they have chosen for him, a Bengali name, a name that carries their family heritage.” This dedication to cultural identity reflects the parents’ desire to preserve their roots and pass them on to their children.

The generational divide between parents and children is a recurring source of tension in the novel. Gogol’s struggle with his name symbolizes his broader conflict with his cultural identity and his parents’ expectations. He initially rejects his name and the cultural heritage it represents, seeking to assimilate into American society.

This tension is poignantly expressed when Gogol legally changes his name to Nikhil. Lahiri writes, “Without people in the world to call him Gogol, Gogol Ganguli will, once and for all, vanish into oblivion.” This act of renaming signifies Gogol’s attempt to distance himself from his family and their traditions, highlighting the generational conflict over identity and cultural preservation.

Despite the conflicts, family bonds remain a source of strength and resilience. After Ashoke’s sudden death, Gogol gains a deeper understanding of his father’s sacrifices and the significance of their cultural heritage. He begins to appreciate the importance of family and the connections that tie him to his past.

Lahiri illustrates this shift in perspective, writing, “He remembers the funeral, how his father had been carried out of their house, in his shoes, and this image of his father recedes in his mind, blending with the sights and sounds of the city around him.” This moment of reflection marks a turning point in Gogol’s relationship with his family and his cultural identity.

Food is a powerful symbol of family bonds and cultural continuity in “The Namesake.” Ashima’s cooking represents a link to her homeland and a means of preserving her heritage. Family meals become a way to reinforce cultural traditions and provide a sense of belonging.

After Ashoke’s death, Ashima continues to cook traditional Bengali dishes, finding solace in these familiar practices. Lahiri describes this, noting, “For Ashima, preparing these foods is a way of keeping her family’s traditions alive, of connecting to her past.” Food serves as a tangible representation of the family’s cultural heritage and a way to nurture family bonds.

The novel also explores the dynamics of marriage and romantic relationships within the context of cultural expectations and family obligations. Gogol’s relationships, particularly with Maxine and Moushumi, reflect his ongoing struggle with his cultural identity and the influence of his family.

His relationship with Maxine represents his desire to escape his cultural heritage and embrace a fully American identity. However, this relationship ultimately fails because it distances him from his family. In contrast, his marriage to Moushumi, another Bengali American, initially seems to align with his parents’ cultural expectations but eventually unravels due to their individual struggles with identity and assimilation.

Lahiri writes, “In the end, it is her rebelling against the very life he sought to give her that creates the rift between them.” This passage underscores the complexities of balancing personal desires with familial and cultural expectations.

By the end of the novel, there is a sense of reconciliation and growth within the Ganguli family. Gogol’s journey towards self-discovery leads him to a greater appreciation of his parents’ experiences and sacrifices. He comes to understand the importance of family bonds and the cultural heritage they represent.

Lahiri concludes, “These events, good and bad, are all part of his life, not just the dates but the facts themselves, and they will be with him always, inextricable, written down in the book that is his past, that is his story, even though he will never bring them to mind again.” This realization reflects Gogol’s acceptance of his dual identity and the enduring significance of family bonds.

CULTURAL PRACTICES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE

Rituals and Customs underscores the importance of cultural practices in the Ganguli family’s life. These rituals, whether they involve naming ceremonies, religious observances, or mourning practices, connect the family to their heritage and help them navigate their lives in a foreign land.

The Gangulis’ commitment to their cultural practices and rituals is a cornerstone of their life in America. These practices serve as a link to their homeland and a means of preserving their cultural identity. From naming ceremonies to religious festivals, the novel meticulously portrays the family’s adherence to Bengali customs.

One of the most significant rituals in the novel is the naming ceremony, or “annaprasan,” for Gogol. This ceremony is a traditional Bengali custom where a child is given their name. For the Gangulis, naming is not just a formality but a way to connect their son to his heritage. Lahiri writes, “The tradition of the rice ceremony was important to her… it was one of the few things, along with the memorial plaque for Gogol’s grandfather, that she had to cling to.” This emphasis on naming underscores the importance of identity and cultural continuity.

The celebration of Bengali festivals, such as Durga Puja, is another way the Ganguli family maintains their cultural heritage. These festivals are depicted as vibrant, communal events that reinforce cultural bonds and provide a sense of belonging. Lahiri describes the festivities in detail, noting, “Every year they celebrate Durga Puja in a rented hall, with a stage erected at one end, and idols of Durga and her children brought in a van from New Jersey.” These celebrations are not just about religious observance but also about fostering community among Bengali immigrants. They create a space where the Gangulis and their friends can collectively remember and honor their traditions, even while living in a foreign land.

Food is a powerful symbol of cultural identity in “The Namesake.” Ashima’s cooking represents a link to her past and a means of preserving her heritage. The preparation of traditional Bengali dishes becomes a ritual that anchors the family in their culture. Lahiri frequently describes the meticulous preparation of these dishes, emphasizing their importance in maintaining cultural continuity.

For example, during the celebration of Gogol’s naming ceremony, Ashima prepares an elaborate meal of curries, highlighting the significance of food in their cultural practices. Lahiri writes, “For the party, Ashima has prepared an elaborate meal of curries, so delicate, the food disappears within moments, only to be replaced by more.” This scene underscores how food and communal gatherings are essential for cultural preservation.

The novel also explores rituals of mourning and remembrance, particularly following the death of Ashoke. These customs serve as a means of honoring the deceased and reinforcing cultural connections. When Ashoke dies, the family observes traditional Bengali mourning practices, such as fasting and performing religious rites.

Lahiri describes these practices in detail, noting, “Ashima sits cross-legged on the floor of her apartment, repeating the prayers for the dead, the mantras for the departed soul, while her children, dressed in white, stand beside her.” These rituals provide solace and a sense of continuity, helping the family navigate their grief while staying connected to their cultural roots.

The theme of rituals and customs is also explored through the intergenerational dynamics within the Ganguli family. While Ashoke and Ashima are deeply committed to their traditions, their children, Gogol and Sonia, often struggle with these customs, feeling torn between their American upbringing and their Bengali heritage.

Gogol’s reluctance to embrace his name and cultural identity is a significant source of tension in the novel. His parents’ insistence on observing Bengali customs often clashes with his desire to assimilate into American society. Lahiri captures this conflict, writing, “He hates having to live with the name, a name that is both absurd and obscure, that has no meaning in Bengali or English, no identity at all.” This tension reflects the broader struggle faced by many second-generation immigrants in balancing their cultural heritage with their new identity.

As the novel progresses, the characters’ relationship with rituals and customs evolves, reflecting their personal growth and changing identities. Gogol’s journey towards accepting his name and heritage symbolizes his reconciliation with his cultural identity. After Ashoke’s death, Gogol begins to appreciate the significance of the rituals and customs he once rejected. He gains a deeper understanding of his parents’ experiences and the cultural legacy they have passed down to him. Lahiri writes, “He remembers the funeral, how his father had been carried out of their house, in his shoes, and this image of his father recedes in his mind, blending with the sights and sounds of the city around him.” This moment of reflection marks a turning point in Gogol’s understanding of cultural preservation and the importance of rituals in shaping his identity.

CONCLUSION

The novel  Namesake delves into the complexities of maintaining cultural identity amidst the challenges of immigration and assimilation. Through rituals, language, food, and intergenerational dynamics, Lahiri illustrates the intricate balance of preserving one’s heritage while adapting to a new environment. This narrative is a poignant reminder of the resilience of immigrant families and the enduring significance of cultural preservation, underscoring the importance of heritage in shaping identity.

Family bonds are highlighted for their strength and complexity within the context of immigration and cultural assimilation. Through the experiences of the Ganguli family, the novel delves into the intergenerational dynamics, cultural preservation, and the evolving nature of identity. The narrative underscores the resilience of family ties and the importance of heritage in shaping one’s sense of self. Lahiri’s portrayal of the Ganguli family’s journey offers a profound understanding of the immigrant experience and the enduring power of family bonds.

Lahiri skillfully explores the theme of intergenerational dynamics, highlighting the tensions and understanding between immigrant parents and their American-born children. Through the lens of the Ganguli family’s experiences, the novel delves into the complexities of cultural identity, assimilation, and familial expectations. It is a poignant reminder of the enduring impact of heritage and the evolving nature of identity within the immigrant experience.

The theme of rituals and customs is also masterfully explored, highlighting their significance in maintaining cultural identity and navigating the immigrant experience. Through the experiences of the Ganguli family, the novel delves into the complexities of cultural preservation, intergenerational conflict, and the evolving nature of identity. The narrative underscores the resilience of cultural traditions and the role they play in providing a sense of belonging and continuity. Lahiri’s portrayal of the Ganguli family’s journey offers a profound understanding of the immigrant experience and the enduring power of rituals and customs in shaping one’s sense of self.

REFERENCES

1. Lahiri, Jhumpa. “The Namesake.” Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2003.
2. High, Peter B. “An Outline of American Literature.” Longman, 1986.
3. Chowdhury, Enakshi, and Sayeedur Rahman. “Cultural Clash and Identity Crisis in Jhumpa Lahiri’s ‘The Namesake’.” Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 6, no. 2, 2018, pp. 72-79.
4. Roshni, Rekha. “Exploring the Cultural Dilemma in Jhumpa Lahiri’s ‘The Namesake’.” Indian Journal of Comparative Literature and Translation Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, 2015, pp. 55-64.