The Efficacy of Ubuntu-Based Governance Frameworks in Combating Systemic Corruption in Africa: A Theoretical Discourse

The Efficacy of Ubuntu-Based Governance Frameworks in Combating Systemic Corruption in Africa: A Theoretical Discourse

¹Thelela Ngcetane-Vika (PhD), ²Mamello Puleng Pule

¹University of Witwatersrand

²South Valley University

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90400269

Received: 14 March 2025; Revised: 27 March 2025; Accepted: 02 April 2025; Published: 10 May 2025

ABSTRACT

This paper examines the potential of Ubuntu philosophy—a culturally rooted African ethos emphasizing communal values, interconnectedness, and ethical leadership—as a framework for combating systemic corruption in Africa. While corruption remains a pervasive challenge undermining governance and development, conventional anti-corruption measures often fail to address its root causes. By integrating Ubuntu principles such as communal accountability, restorative justice, and transparency into governance reforms, this study proposes a culturally resonant approach to fostering integrity and public trust. Methodologically, the paper employs qualitative content analysis, drawing on secondary data and theoretical lenses like Principal-Agent Theory, Institutional Theory, and Network Theory. Findings reveal that Ubuntu’s emphasis on collective welfare and ethical leadership can mitigate corruption by aligning governance with indigenous values. The study concludes with actionable recommendations, including policy reforms grounded in Africanism, capacity-building for public officials, and collaborative partnerships. This work contributes to the discourse on culturally sensitive governance models and offers a roadmap for sustainable anti-corruption strategies in Africa.

Keywords: Systemic Corruption, Governance Reforms, Ubuntu Philosophy, Africanism, Restorative Justice, Africanism

INTRODUCTION

Governance studies widely acknowledge that corruption is a pervasive and an existential threat, both in the public and private sectors in African countries (Budhram & Geldenhuys, 2018; Fagbadebo, 2005; Fagbadebo, 2019). Although Africa is endowed with rich mineral resources, the impact of corruption is so dire to the populace that it can simply be described as a ‘Biblical injunction’ as it robs society of what’s due to them, through service delivery and improvement of the quality of their lives. This paper is interested in exploring how the key tenets of Ubuntu, including community, interconnectedness, and reciprocity, can be translated into practical mechanisms for addressing corruption within African governance frameworks. Central to this discussion is the concept of Ubuntu, which underscores the notion that resources belong to the citizens of a country. This aligns with the views of prominent economists such as Adam Smith, who argue that the proper stewardship of resources is essential for fostering ethical leadership and governance. By drawing on the principles of Ubuntu, this paper asserts the importance of integrating these values into governance structures to effectively combat corruption and strengthen governance systems. Elsewhere, corruption poses alarming challenges across African countries undermining governance structures, development, socio economic progress and trust in public institutions by the citizenry. Among others, this has caused chronic decline of service delivery and untold suffering through ills of poverty, unemployment and underdevelopment.

On the other hand, it must be said that corruption is not the preserve of African countries but a worldwide phenomenon. Hitherto, on the socio-economic front, African countries are much more challenged. Corruption exists in various forms across the globe, manifesting in both developed and developing nations, albeit with differing intensities and impacts. Notwithstanding this, it stands to reason therefore, that the corruption challenges are instructive for African countries that have unique initial circumstances, including colonial legacy, developmental challenges like poor infrastructure and thus, corruption needs to be mitigated as it is a perennial problem with adverse effects. Of great concern, however, are observed and reported lapses in governance within the context of Africa as seen in the media and public discourse. Thus, dealing with corruption demands a holistic approach that incorporates African values and Ubuntu principles into governance reforms that can bring alternative insights that can be gleaned from. In tandem with the Ubuntu principles, African societies have always valued community principles, respect for elders and collective responsibility (Sefa Dei, 2020). Yet, the dynamic and complex nature of systemic corruption reiterates the importance of African frameworks. In this regard, the Ubuntu principles can be the scaffolding upon which African governance hinges upon, marshalling effective tools in curbing corruption.

From the foregoing discussion, these values promote honesty, integrity and accountability which could play an enormous role in combating corruption within governance systems. The Ubuntu philosophy, therefore, centres around interconnectedness and mutual obligation stressing the importance of empathy, kindness and the common welfare (Chigangaidze, et al., 2022). When these Ubuntu principles are integrated into governance reforms, they create a more coherent and culturally relevant approach to addressing corruption.  Instead of relying solely on external or Western-driven anti-corruption measures, incorporating Ubuntu values aligns these efforts with traditional cultural norms and societal frameworks, making them more accepted and sustainable. It thus can be argued that by enacting changes to enhance transparency, accountability and ethical conduct decision makers can cultivate an environment that’s less tolerant of corrupt practices and more effective, in preventing them. When leaders and public officials internalise and embody the principles of Ubuntu, they contribute to creating a system in which ethical behaviour becomes the norm, and corruption is actively rejected. This approach will not only help prevent corruption but will also support broader goals of development and inclusivity by ensuring that the benefits of governance are shared equitably among all members of society, thereby promoting social cohesion and fostering trust in public institutions (Heimstädt & Dobusch, 2020). Ubuntu offers a practical and culturally resonant model for governance reform that goes beyond punitive measures to address the deep-rooted societal values that fuel corrupt behaviour, ultimately creating a more just, transparent, and inclusive society

In exploring the role of Ubuntu in combating systemic corruption, it is important to understand that Ubuntu is not an isolated concept but is deeply rooted in the broader framework of Africanism. Africanism represents the overarching cultural, ethical, and philosophical values that shape African societies, including shared ideals of community, interconnectedness, and collective responsibility. These values provide the foundation upon which Ubuntu is built, offering a broader cultural context for the application of Ubuntu principles in governance. Thus, to fully comprehend the potential of Ubuntu in addressing corruption, we must recognise that it is intrinsically linked to the wider principles of Africanism, which include a deep respect for heritage, identity, and communal responsibility. In this study, Africanism is considered the mother body that nurtures Ubuntu, making it essential to examine both in tandem to explore their combined efficacy in combating corruption within African governance framework

Considering the above assertions, Africanism, therefore, underscores the significance of identity, values and cultural heritage in shaping governance frameworks (Karanja, 2016). It further advocates for governance models that align with the cultural context of societies. In the fight against corruption, Africanism can play a pivotal role by ensuring that policies and actions reflect the real-life experiences and traditional beliefs of the population, in this case African societies. By stressing responsibility, honesty and ethical leadership, Africanism offers a culturally relevant approach to combating corruption. It recognizes that aligning governance with indigenous values can enhance the legitimacy and effectiveness of anti-corruption measures. Therefore, Africanism can be instrumental, in promoting governance systems that not only combat corruption, but foster social unity, community empowerment and sustainable progress. By integrating Africanism alongside Ubuntu, this study explores how these interconnected principles can contribute to governance reforms that address corruption in African nations. The focus on these values highlights their potential to provide deeper insights into effective anti-corruption strategies and to create more inclusive, culturally resonant frameworks for governance reform.

Scholars like Fagbadebo, (2005) & Wang & Dickson, (2018) argue that corruption undermines governance, impedes social and economic progress, and erodes trust in institutions. Its pervasiveness has a lasting negative impact on the socio-economic development agenda (Haydaroğlu, 2020; Pillay, 2004). Musila (2019) draws attention to the fact that the consequences of corruption on the quality of life continue to be the focus of intensive research across various disciplines, including development studies, political science, international relations, public administration, and public policy. Corruption remains a deeply entrenched issue within African politics, often manifesting in highly visible scandals that attract significant attention. A key feature of this corruption is the persistence of powerful individuals who consolidate their control over political and economic systems, often enriching themselves at the expense of the public. These leaders manipulate governance structures to maintain power and secure personal gain, undermining the principles of transparency and accountability. Despite widespread condemnation of corruption within African states, the persistence of corrupt practices continues to be a challenge. Although international bodies have highlighted the issue, African countries have developed their own mechanisms, such as Anti-Corruption Legislation, National Anti-Corruption Agencies to address these systemic challenges. However, the continued prevalence of corruption in the region calls for a deeper examination of how local governance reforms, grounded in African values like Africanism and Ubuntu, can better address the root causes of corruption and promote more effective, community-driven solutions.

In the case of South Africa, the Zondo Commission on state capture which highlights high profile cases also indicates an urgent need to fight corruption. These cases underscore the necessity of anti-corruption measures then need to be implemented. some even argue that the Zondo Commission has limitations in its scope as corporate scandals such as Steinhoff have avoided prosecution, further strengthening discussions on selective prosecution of corruption cases (Mlambo, 2019). Crucially, it must also be noted, however, that corruption predates the Zondo Commission, as it was pervasive during the apartheid government (Mulinge & Lesetedi, 1998). The political weaponization of corruption to fight factional battles within governing parties poses a significant challenge, at least from a perception standpoint. With these caveats in mind, it becomes critical to argue that addressing this pervasive problem requires more nuanced strategies than traditional anti-corruption measures, which have had only relative success. The complexity of corruption, its deep-rooted nature, and its ability to adapt to new governance structures necessitate innovative and culturally resonant approaches that go beyond conventional methods.

In contrast, there have been several corruption scandals in West Africa related to the misappropriation of public funds-in countries like Nigeria where billions are said to be stolen from national treasury by healers such as former Petroleum Minister Diezani Alison-Madueke honour (Zakari & Button, 2021). The Kenyan economy was at one stage in the 1990, thrown off balance, when it emerged that some government officials were involved in a gold smuggling scam known as “Goldenberg Scandal” costing Kenya over $600 million which largely brought rampant corruption to lighted path (Bachelard et al., 2010). Similarly, in Zimbabwe, one of the SADC countries where journalistic investigative monitoring unveiled how unequal distribution and transfer pricing can result massive revenue leakages from the nation due to corrupt mining practices (Mupfumi 2017). These examples collectively underscore the systemic nature of corruption across the continent and the critical need for innovative governance frameworks that incorporate cultural values and community participation to effectively combat corruption.

In this era of globalization where there are direct trans-cultural contacts, African governance mirrors the complexity resulting from tradition and incorporation of a mixed multitude norm. This mutually refracted idea is clearest in Africa, which has retained a commitment to principles that contradict the oft-preached narrative of how democracy emerged from Europe’s breast alone. Traditionally, Africa was governed through some forms of democracy type governance such as amongst the Mongols among whom Genghis Khan used a similar system surrounding his followers and traditional African societies which had an informal structure that encouraged democratic elements (Cheeseman, 2015), hence it is argued by some critics that Westphalian & Western hegemonies erode this culture from Africa having locked Africans out of global democratized attention (Tshishonga & Sithole, 2022). This is reflected in, among others: traditional modes of governance that promote consensus and communal decision-making (e.g. the LEAF Programme), (Tshishonga & Sithole, 2022), constitutional frameworks which embed democratic principles and ensure fair legal processes while civil society organisations work to increased transparency through promoting accountable public service delivery. Furthermore, peaceful turnovers of political office through democratic elections and the ratification of international instruments such as African Charter on Democracy Elections and Governance are a testimony to Africa commitment to principles democracy (Engel, 2019).

The resilience of African governance is evident in its ongoing evolution, despite the rising challenges it faces, particularly in relation to corruption. Scholars such as Nasong’o (2019) and Harrison (2011) have extensively studied the impact of corruption on African governance, emphasising its detrimental effects on government structures and public trust. Corruption, due to its complex and hidden nature, makes it difficult to measure and fully understand its impact on governance. As studies by Hood (1983) and Peters (1996) indicate, good governance—defined by efficiency, transparency, accountability, and law enforcement—is crucial in the fight against corruption. However, tackling corruption effectively requires a dual approach that combines traditional African philosophies with modern governance principles.

The interplay between corruption and governance has been a focal point of scholarly inquiry within this context. Thus, David Maillu’s analysis of pre-colonial African governance systems present them as embodying a “cultural definition,” essentially describing these traditions as rooted in communal harmony and mutual support, which can provide indigenous solutions to contemporary governance challenges (Malachi, 2018). In contrast to Western governance models imposed during colonialism, African governance traditions offer a cultural framework that can address today’s issues of corruption. Despite the challenges of measuring corruption, these frameworks, when combined with effective governance practices, promote transparency, accountability, and the rule of law, thus offering innovative avenues for reform and combating corruption in Africa.

Historical context and evolution: Pre-colonial, Colonial and Post Colonial Eras

Of further importance, the fragmentation of Africa by European powers during the Scramble for Africa in the 1884 Berlin Conference further exacerbated governance challenges (Pakenham, 1991). These include fragmentation of African states with artificial borders that were drawn with little or no regard for ethnic, linguistic, or cultural boundaries, leading to divided communities and fragmented governance structures (Sithole, 2010). The imposition of foreign governance systems disrupted indigenous political and social organizations, undermining traditional authority and community cohesion. Post-colonial African states inherited these fragmented structures, which often resulted in weak institutions and governance systems ill-suited to the diverse needs of their populations (Malachi, 2018).

The economic control exerted by Nkrumah during the colonial era was never fully dismantled, as economic power remained concentrated in the hands of former colonial powers and local elites (Mlambo et al., 2023). This entrenchment of economic inequality has perpetuated corruption, with those in power using any means necessary, including corrupt practices, to maintain their positions. As globalization has further exacerbated the divide between the rich and the poor, the need for capable and effective states has become even more critical. States must mobilise and allocate resources in a way that balances the imperatives of high-end economic growth with the need for low-end social empowerment (Kuznets, 2019). South Africa’s 1996 Constitution introduced a complex governance framework that spans social, political, administrative, and economic spheres (Heywood, 2021). It emphasises decentralisation, with powers divided across local, provincial, and national levels of government. Each level has distinct responsibilities—such as national defence and local sanitation—while sharing concurrent duties like education and healthcare decision-making (Kotzé, 1996). This interdependence between the spheres requires strategic collaboration to ensure effective governance and the proper functioning of the system as a whole.

Figure 1.1 below illustrates the evolution of governance in Africa across three significant eras: Pre-Colonial, Colonial, and Post-Colonial.

Figure 1.1: Evolution of Governance

The historical context of Africa’s economic legacy, coupled with ongoing socio-economic challenges, underscores the imperative for Africa to adopt inclusive governance reforms. By integrating traditional African values of communal accountability and contemporary democratic principles, Africa can navigate towards sustainable development and equitable prosperity. This approach not only honours Africa’s diverse cultural heritage but also enhances the legitimacy and effectiveness of governance in tackling persistent socio-economic inequalities.

Conceptual analysis and Theoretical Underpinnings of this paper

This review highlights & supports the use of Ubuntu philosophy as a central theoretical perspective, and it peripherally advances principal-agent theory (PAT), Institutional Theory (IE) and Network Approach (Klijn & Koppenjan, 2012). In African societies, ubuntu philosophy offers a distinctive way to conceptualize and tackle corruption. It is a value-based organisation and promotes values of empathy, solidarity as well as collective responsibility which are needed to create integrity perspective in governance (Letseke, 2011).  Policy implementers who uphold the principles of Ubuntu end up building a culture that is transparent and accountable, markings against corruption instances encouraging holistic development (Mbigi, 1997).

Corruption and its relationship with good governance are both complex realities that have serious implications on the way societies operate as well as citizens lead their lives (Swartz & Davies 1997). Scholars and policymakers frequently employ theoretical frameworks to disentangle these issues, gaining a deeper understanding of the dynamics at play behind particular topics. The following frameworks shed light on corruption and governance dynamics in many contexts.

Figure 2.1.1.1 Theoretical Framework: Systemic Approaches to Combating Corruption in South Africa: Africanism, and Ubuntu Principles in Governance Reforms

This illustration highlights how Africanism & Ubuntu philosophy, alongside Principal agent theory, Institutional Theory and Network Theory, contribute to analyzing and addressing corruption within South Africa’s governance framework.

Conceptualization of systematic corruption

Systematic corruption remains a prominent feature of African politics, with numerous scandals garnering widespread attention (Mulinge & Lesetedi, 1998). Political leaders and their parties often promote exclusivist political participation, reinforcing a dynamic where they hold the sole legitimacy to rule (Apata, 2018). This relationship frequently fosters an entitlement ethos within the political sphere. Political patronage, acknowledged as a crucial tool for exerting influence over public policy, is widely practiced but lacks effective institutional safeguards. Consequently, it often leads to discriminatory behaviour by political patrons and their favoured cronies. The prevalence of corruption in African governments finds its roots in longstanding cultural and political traditions cantered on patronage, exacerbated by a sense of entitlement. Bribery (Fernandez, et al., 2023) is a common manifestation of corruption on the continent, ranging from individuals offering bribes to government officials for accessing public services or influencing decisions, to foreign companies paying bribes to secure contracts or access resources. The study highlights that corruption often involves practices such as bribery, kickbacks, irregular spending, collusion in bidding, price fixing, and market sharing. Broadly, corruption is defined as the abuse of entrusted power for private gain. Specifically, political corruption consists of illegal and unethical practices where individuals exploit their public office for personal benefit (Yagboyaju, 2017).

Sub-Saharan Africa’s corruption has deep historical roots, stemming from the colonial experience. Colonial powers systematically used material inducements to compel African chiefs and administrators to collaborate, offering financial rewards, privileges, and other incentives in exchange for cooperation. This collaboration laid the foundation for enduring practices that persisted even after colonial rule ended. (Mkhize, et al., 2024). On the other hand, Robb (1992) argues that the very initial historical basis for the emergence of corruption appears to have been the industrial revolution of the nineteenth century. The financial growth accompanying this historical event directly contributed to the birth of white-collar crime, of which corruption is a part. The industrial revolution gave rise to a complex economy characterized by increasing dependence on finance and investment, leading to the proliferation of enormous banking networks, stocks, credit systems, and a complicated legal framework (Mulinge & Lesetedi, 1998). These developments provided fertile ground for corrupt practices to take root and flourish. In examining the global landscape of anti-corruption efforts, it becomes evident that while certain organizational approaches have yielded success in combating corruption in various parts of the world, the persistent challenge of leadership involvement in corrupt practices presents a formidable obstacle to effective anti-corruption mechanisms in Africa. (Fagbadebo, 2019)

Etymology and Conceptual analysis of Ubuntu as an African Philosophy

A word from Nguni Bantu languages, Ubuntu is a lexical situation that exemplifies the communitarian and integrated ideals of many African cultures (Batibo, 2015). A Zulu aphorism from different effects, which signifies “I am because we are,” and in this manner Ubuntu means the conviction that a cooperative conduct breeds goodwill (Batibo, 2015). This philosophy inculcates a view that human subjects emerge and develop their identity through social relations — embodied interactions, i.e. with others (Mugumbate, et al., 2023).

Ubuntu is expressed in the human being as “being Human”, a spirituality that works for compassion, empathy and communal harmony (Van Breda;2019). It emphasizes the idea that a person’s sense of identity and worth is entwined with their positions, duties, obligations toward providing for society as a whole. Ubuntu does not only recognize personal achievements or individual merit but focuses on the relationships and support of community members (Ngubane & Makua 2021). This philosophy questions the notion of individuality, emphasizing that identity and ethics are produced within social relations. Ubuntu encourages leaders and individuals to prioritize the good and to engage with integrity and fairness in their interactions to foster cohesion and sustainable progress (Ngubane & Makua, 2021). In contemporary discourse Ubuntu serves as a guiding principle across domains such as governance, ethics and social justice. It provides a framework for addressing complex societal issues like corruption. By incorporating Ubuntu principles into governance reforms African nations can leverage its transformative power to improve transparency, accountability and public trust; thus, contributing to sustainable development, throughout the continent (Ewuoso & Hall, 2019).

In western traditions, however, the focus is typically, on individual autonomy highlighting personal accountability and decision making (Eaton & Louw, 2000). On the other hand, African moral philosophy places an emphasis on community values. This perspective does not negate the existence of individual viewpoints in Africa, nor does it imply that communities make decisions on behalf of individuals. Rather, it underscores a viewpoint where individuals are considered inseparable from their community, and vice versa (Bidima, 2002). In this context an individual’s sense of self and wellbeing is intertwined with their roles, relationships and contributions within the community. The strength and unity of the community stem from the involvement and respect shown by its members (Chigangaidze, et al., 2022). This comprehensive outlook emphasizes reciprocity and interdependence in philosophy stressing collective accountability and the shared pursuit of communal welfare.

Ubuntu Principles in Combating Corruption

Table 1.1 below provides a concise overview of how the principles of Ubuntu can be applied to create effective strategies for combating corruption within African societies.

Table 1: Ubuntu in Combating Corruption

Ubuntu, as discussed by Letseka (2011) and Mbigi (1997) emphasizes the importance of values, like compassion, understanding, dignity and collaboration within communities. These values form the core of societies. Have significant implications in addressing issues related to dishonesty (Baken, 2015). Dishonesty undermines the principles of Ubuntu by trust, fairness and the overall wellbeing of communities (Mokhutso, 2022). When individuals partake in practices, they prioritize their interests over the common good disregarding the interconnectedness and duties embedded in Ubuntu philosophy. This violation of Ubuntu principles leads to a breakdown in unity and moral strength. On the other hand, fostering a culture that embraces Ubuntu can act as a remedy against dishonesty. Within settings promoting Ubuntu values among both students and educators fosters a sense of accountability and ethical behaviour. By instilling virtues such as empathy and respect for others through Ubuntu education initiatives individuals are encouraged to consider how their actions impact the community. This approach does not only discourage misconduct but also nurtures a dedication to openness, responsibility and honesty, in governance and public service.

METHODOLOGY

The methodology employed in this study remains true to the exploration of Africanism and Ubuntu principles as instruments in governance reforms for combating corruption on the Continent, combining systematic content analysis with an abductive logic process within a constructivist pedigree (Adom, et al., 2016). Using secondary qualitative data, the research explores Ubuntu philosophy as a core theoretical frame – coupled with Principal-Agent Theory; Institutionalism and Network theory to better comprehend corruption in African societies. It helps illuminate the salient themes and issues of corruption in governance within African milieu that can guide recommendations for future reform.

This synchronises well with the qualitative nature of corruption as it occurs within a broad, African society, and is therefore complemented by Ubuntu philosophy to mesh into theories such as but not limited to Principal-Agent Theory; Institutional theory; Network theory adding substantive value in its analysis. By looking in-depth at how these theoretical posits contest with local cultural norms, QCA foregrounds broader reflections on resilience (in the form of community participation and ethical leadership) as well as integration and legitimacy (interconnectedness and restorative justice), the set being essential components to addressing corruption.

The research was attuned to a constructivist paradigm, grounding the knowledge produced within interactions taking place in South Africa’s socio-political and economic context. This methodological approach ensures that findings are data-driven and grounded, with this study providing preliminary insights on how to use indigenous principles such as honesty/integrity/collective responsibility in Africanism or interconnectedness/empathy/common good in Ubuntu to [re]construct notions of transparency/accountability/public trust within the organizational structure/frameworks for local countries. In so doing this methodology allows for systemic explorations of how to combat corrupt practices whilst integrating African values and Ubuntu philosophy – but it also highlights the potential role these culturally resonant approaches could play in generating sustainable development outcomes, inclusive societies across a range of contexts on the continent.

DISCUSSION

Understanding the relationship, between corruption, governance reforms and African Ubuntuism offers insights into promoting integrity and effective governance in African settings. This study summarizes findings from analysing content emphasizing aspects and implications of African governance. The study highlights the importance of citizen involvement and government oversight in shaping social policies that prioritize the wellbeing of the population at large. In Africa systemic corruption has deeply rooted itself in the landscape affecting all levels of society and posing a challenge to democratic principles. This research underscores the importance of incorporating indigenous principles into policy development to foster integrity and effective governance, ultimately contributing to sustainable development and social cohesion in African contexts. By integrating these concepts into governance reforms, a coherent approach can be established that aligns corruption efforts with traditional cultural norms and societal framework. By applying theory this study examines how these structural deficiencies facilitate behaviours while hindering effective governance.

The influence of patronage networks perpetuated by figures and their associates exacerbates corruption issues undermining efforts to promote governance. These networks manipulate recruitment processes and procurement practices within state owned enterprises underscoring the importance of dismantling patronage networks in Favor of advancing merit-based governance practices as discussed through network theory. Within governance frameworks, like government agencies or public institutions principals (elected officials or governmental bodies) assign authority to agents (bureaucrats or civil servants) to carry out tasks and make decisions on their behalf. However, when there’s a lack of information balance and conflicting interests, at play it can result in agency issues. In cases agents may prioritize their benefits, over the principals concerns potentially giving rise to corruption and inefficiencies. The section below, discusses the integration between Africanism and ubuntu policy and further discusses the findings of the systematic review conducted.

Integrating Africanism and Ubuntu in Policy Development

Integrating Africanism and Ubuntu principles into governance reforms offers a culturally resonant and holistic approach to combating corruption in Africa. By emphasizing community participation, ethical leadership, interconnectedness, and restorative justice, these frameworks can enhance transparency, accountability, and public trust in governance. As African countries continue to strive for good governance, these indigenous principles can provide valuable insights and strategies for building corruption-resistant societies. Through a thorough analysis of democracy at each periodical development in Africa, this work aims to identify and advocate for governance models that best reflect the continent’s unique cultural and historical contexts.

By promoting community involvement, Africanism encourages inclusive decision-making processes that reflect the collective interests of society. Ethical leadership, a cornerstone of Ubuntu, fosters a commitment to integrity and responsible governance among public officials. Interconnectedness promotes collaboration and mutual support, essential for fostering solidarity against corruption. Restorative justice principles within Ubuntu emphasize healing and reconciliation, contributing to social cohesion and trust in institutions.

This approach not only aims to strengthen governance structures but also to nurture a governance ethos that is rooted in African values. By integrating Africanism and Ubuntu into policy development, African nations can cultivate environments that are less susceptible to corrupt practices and more conducive to sustainable development. This proactive stance aligns with the continent’s aspirations for inclusive growth, justice, and democratic resilience, as outlined in initiatives such as “The Africa We Want” by the African Union.

Through rigorous analysis and advocacy, this study seeks to contribute to the ongoing discourse on governance reform in Africa, highlighting the relevance of indigenous knowledge and values in shaping effective anti-corruption strategies. By leveraging Africanism and Ubuntu, policymakers can forge paths toward resilient, accountable, and transparent governance systems that uphold the dignity and aspirations of all African citizens.

FINDINGS

In examining the intricate dynamics of corruption and governance in Africa, this study reveals compelling insights into three pivotal aspects: Ubuntu philosophy and governance integrity, systemic corruption, and the dynamics of corruption networks. These findings shed light on the multifaceted challenges that Africa faces in its quest for transparent and accountable governance.

Ubuntu Philosophy and Governance Integrity

At the centre of integrity in governance, is Ubuntu philosophy – a humanist approach to understanding humanness that places an emphasis on empathetic societal values such as solidarity and collective responsibility. In terms of qualitative analysis, it is shown that Ubuntu enables a collective-decision-making account while espousing transparency and accountability to the common good. Governance reforms that reflect Ubuntu principles can contribute to legitimacy and effectiveness by making policy consistent with societal values, fighting corruption and supporting inclusive development.

Governance Reforms Based on Ubuntu Principles

Implementing governance changes that reflect Ubuntu principles can greatly improve both credibility and efficiency. These changes can:

• Align Policies, with Community Values; By ensuring that policies align with the standards and cultural values of the community governance becomes more relevant and accepted.
• Fight Against Corruption; The focus on shared responsibility and accountability within Ubuntu fosters an environment where corruption has room to thrive as individuals more likely to prioritize the community’s interests.
• Promote Inclusive Progress; Ubuntu encourages inclusivity ensuring that all perspectives are considered in decision making. This inclusive approach supports development benefiting all segments of society.

Integrating Ubuntu philosophy, into governance not only enhances integrity but also nurtures a fairer and more just society. By emphasizing these values and collective welfare we can establish governance systems deeply rooted in principles that are effective and equitable for all.

Systemic Corruption in Africa

In the African context systematic corruption refers to corrupt practices as an integral part of governmental policies and decision-making processes, thereby being entrenched in a political and economic system. Corruption in Africa is multi-faceted; it has historical, political, economic and social dimensions that are deeply rooted elements of the same socio-economic structure. That demands a whole-of-society response – on several fronts, through time.

The analysis has shed light on a culture of corruption festering in the heart of South Africa’s political system. There are many other stories listed in high-profile cases where corruption has penetrated all parts of society. The results of the audit highlighted that corruption in Africa seems not simply to be a series of isolated incidents here and there but is part of a pervasive governance problem for public administration.

The study provides evidence that anti-corruption and governance reform is urgently required in Africa. Fighting systemic corruption requires not only holding individuals to account for their misdeeds but also tackling the root causes of this corrupt behaviour. These include bolstering impartial institutional frameworks, advocating for open governmental practices and public accountability as well as cultivating a broader culture of transparency throughout government–and across the society at large. It also emphasizes the role of citizens and civil society actors in questioning map designations, government officials, institutions. This finding shed light on the embedded nature of corruption and highlights why joint-action to fight systemic corruption should be long term initiative towards an honest good governance-oriented countries in Africa.

Dynamics of Corruption Networks

This analysis exposes the all-encompassing role of Dynamics of Corruption Networks in sustaining corruption across Africa’s political terrain. These networks of patronage, populated by political elites and their cronies have enormous influence over procurement processes as well as appointments in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and other government agencies. The role of political elites and their cronies in corrupt practices such as interference with procurement awards and appointments confirm the state capture function that patronage networks perform on a continent-wide scale. Operating outside of formal institutions, these networks instead trade on personal connections and political alignment to promote their objectives in a way that sidesteps transparency, accountability or meritocracy.

This study takes on the complex politics of corruption networks embedded in African governance systems. The report illustrates how patronage networks, clientelism and informal power impede reforms by corrupting implementation. The qualitative insights highlight the complex web of social networks and corruption dynamics that must be considered in framing holistic strategies to enable effective governance through engagement with situated – but often overlooked, informal sets of relations as well. This result also highlights that it is high time to break the chain of patronage and put merit-based governance on a firm footing with transparency in South Africa. Widespread patronage can only be addressed through a set of wide-ranging reforms that build institutional capacity, promote oversight and transparency mechanisms, meritocratic recruitment and procurement policies. It also underlines the crucial role that citizen engagement, civil society activism and reform advocacy play in ensuring political elites are held to account for their corrupt practices and urging both policy makers as well systemic reforms to confront corruption at all levels.

Regulatory Failures

In Africa the analysis of regulatory frameworks and enforcement mechanisms demonstrates serious defects that have kept corruption alive. This lax oversight, poor enforcement and loopholes in the laws let it happen. Failures in regulatory control One of the root causes of these failures is our failure to distinguish safe practices: there are no effective controls over how public officers and corporate entities behave. Existing regulatory bodies, which serve as regulators across sectors-bound to enforce the laws and regulations- have largely failed in this regard due to high level political interference; resource constraints; competence including institutional weaknesses.

Not to mention an inconsistent and selective enforcement of anti-corruption laws and prosecution against corrupt persons. Impunity has for the most part prevailed because of corruptibility within law enforcement agencies, lack of expertise in investigating sophisticated financial crimes and ineffectiveness by the judiciary. Obvious Government Policy Gaps in the procurement process and implementation of financial, administrative, banking laws and regulations as well as guidelines like conflict-of-interests systems through regulatory frameworks. The propensity for fragmentation of regulatory authorities and the apparent dearth of consultation has led to monumental failures, exposing weaknesses in combating corruption. This lack of coherent regulatory framework is a major obstacle to the successful fight against corruption and erosion on public confidence in state institutions. These regulatory failures must be addressed through a wide range of reforms that bolster oversight mechanisms; improve enforcement capacity; close legal loopholes and increase transparency, which can only happen with more accountable governance. At a minimum, we must strengthen the autonomy and capacity of regulatory bodies; ensure that law enforcement agencies collaborate closely with one another on complex financial crimes cases; and promote integrity in all public- as well as private-sector institutions.

But key to anti-corruption strategies must be more comprehensive governance reforms that are home-grown and imbued with African values, principles of Ubuntu. Reforms that emphasize community participation and ethical leadership should take precedence. Incorporating these indigenous paradigms will bolster accountability and transparency in governance systems hence minimizing incidences of corruption Africanism has community values built into it predicated on honesty, integrity and group effort; these are well in line with the principles of good governance. So, Ubuntu also suggests that leaders should relate with other humans and think of the consequences their actions can have on them all (common good) which means they will be forced to make choices for what is best at large so scratch away insecurity due fraudulent practices.

The measures required to eliminate corruption at the systemic level would not only implicate regulatory and legal reforms, but also a shift in culture towards values which are based on benefits for society rather than self-interests or undue influence. This comprehensive strategy corresponds to the cultural norms of each locality, which increases fairness and maintainability in the measure against corruption.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REFORM AND ACTION

To effectively combat systematic corruption, this paper recommends that policy development should integrate Africanism and Ubuntu principles:

1. Ensure the policies reflect the cultural sensitivity: in this case, it means ensuring the policies in place resonate with the cultural values and traditions of the people. It will ensure the community appreciates and accepts the measures put in place to counter corruption.
2. Integration of capacity building: it can be the training of public servants which encompasses ethical leadership, community participation, and cultural sensitivity. Dealing with corruption in the context of cultural norms might ensure the effectiveness of the measures put in place.
3. Building collaborative partnerships. Constructive partnerships between the government, traditional leaders, civil society, and even international organizations may eliminate corruption. Therefore, it is vital for the homegrown contextual values to form part of the collaboration destined for fighting against graft.

The measures can only be achieved through a combined effort from the government, civil society, the private sector, and the international partners. Targeting the system for ultimate good while at the same time ensuring its principles are strengthened will see South Africa rid of corruption and develop a culture of transparency, accountability, and integrity in governance. Such a move will be critical not only in reviving the public trust but also in enacting long-term economic returns that will sustain development and promote inclusive growth for all citizens.

Integrating Africanism and Ubuntu Principles in Governance Reforms Framework

The framework developed in this study integrates Africanism and Ubuntu principles into governance reforms to combat systemic corruption in South Africa. It emphasizes core values such as community participation, ethical leadership, interconnectedness, and restorative justice.

Figure 3: Integrating Africanism and Ubuntu Principles in Governance Reforms to Combat Corruption

CONCLUSION

This paper has endeavoured to give a detailed review of corruption and governance in Africa, including the deep-rooted factors that enable corrupt practices; as well as, how embezzlement is continuing due to systemic issues in certain African regions. Utilising qualitative content analysis and an inductive reasoning approach, the study showed that corruption is entrenched in the political landscape of South Africa – from a societal to institutional level -woven through different sectors which ultimately undermine democratic principles. The findings revealed several key aspects, including the impact that powerful forms of nepotism and legal disrepair – which allows for corruption to spread freely. Apart from harming the institutional frameworks, these systemic weaknesses also seriously undercut public trust and undermines development of social economy. The paper noted that the Ubuntu philosophy could help to entrench accountability and transparency, facilitate socially relevant policies to align with societal principles for the greater good. Governance reforms that put Ubuntu at heart, can improve legitimacy and transparency in governance which has been pillared by corruption to promote inclusive development.

Henceforth important efforts to reform must place an emphasis on eradicating networks of patronage, assuring leadership is conducted in an ethical manner and increasing institutional resistance to corrupt practices. We cannot reform corruption without the collaboration of state, civil society private and international actors to create political games deep rooted in inclusive democratic values and standards. In the final analysis, systemic corruption must be tackled not simply to renew popular confidence in institutions but also for us all as South Africans to move forward with equitable socio-economic progress that serves sustainable development. This opens more avenues for global discourse on governance and anti-corruption, thus provides a compass to tackle similar corruption challenges in South Africa.

This view highlights interconnectedness, reciprocal respect and restorative justice in a way providing for fully culturally sensitive strategies how to promote integrity as well as good governance. Increased transparency, accountability and stakeholder participation can be channelled as a tool for building trust in institutions across African nations to deliver more inclusive &generative outcomes. In pursuit of realizing the ideals of Agenda 2063, this paper argues that a firm commitment to good governance will continue to be essential for Africa as it works towards harnessing its immense possibilities and empowering her populace.

REFERENCES

1. Adom, D., Akwasi, Y. & Ankrah, A. K., 2016. CONSTRUCTIVISM PHILOSOPHICAL PARADIGM: IMPLICATION FOR. Global Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(10), pp. 1-9.
2. Aguilera, R., Aragon-Correa, J., Marano, V. & Tashman, P., 2021. The Corporate Governance of Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Proposal for More Integrated Research.. Journal of Management.
3. Annan, K., 2003. Implementation of the United Nations Millennium Declaration: Report of the Secretary-General. , l.: United Nations.
4. Apata, G. O., 2018. Corruption and the postocolonial state: how the west invented African corruption. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 37(1), p. 43–56.
5. APR Forum of Heads of State and Government, 2023. Africa Governance Report 2023: Unconstitutional Changes of Government in Africa. , l.: African Peer Review Mechanism. .
6. Aras, G. & Crowther, D., 2008. Governance and Sustainability: An Investigation into the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Corporate Sustainability.. Management Decision. , 433-448..
7. Azizuddin, M., 2016. Reforms and Governance. In: Farazmand, A. (Eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance.. Springer, Cham.
8. Bachelard, J. Y., 2010. The Anglo-Leasing corruption scandal in Kenya: the politics of international and domestic pressures and counter-pressures. Review of African Political Economy, 37(124), p. 187–200.
9. Baken, L., 2015. The African Philosophy of Ubuntu in South African Education.. Studies in Philosophy and Education., 1(15).
10. Batibo, H., 2015. The classical laws and rules in Bantu languages: How plausible are they?. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 33(3), p. 247–260..
11. Bernhold, T. & Wiesweg, N., 2021. PRINCIPAL-AGENT THEORY Perspectives and practices for effective workplace solutions. In: A Handbook of Management Theories and Models for Office Environments and Services . London : Routledge, pp. 117-128.
12. Bronstein, V. & Katzew, J., 2018. Safeguarding the South African public broadcaster: governance, civil society and the SABC. ournal of Media Law, 10(2), pp. 244-272.
13. Brown, L. & Jones, M., 2020. Promoting Well-being Through Sustainable Governance: A Focus on Socio-economic and Environmental Challenges.. Environmental Policy Review, , 221-235..
14. Budhram, T. & Geldenhuys, N., 2018. COMBATING CORRUPTION IN SOUTH AFRICA: ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF INVESTIGATING AND PROSECUTING AGENCIES..
15. Cheeseman, N., 2015. Democracy in Africa: Successes, Failures, and the Struggle for Political Reform. ISBN: 9780521138420.
16. Chigangaidze, R. K., Matanga, A. A. & Katsuro, T. R., 2022. Ubuntu Philosophy as a Humanistic–Existential Framework for the Fight Against the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 62(3), pp. 319-333.
17. Chowdhury, D., 2021. Institutional Theory. a chapter in Knowledge and Competitiveness in Elite Institutions in Bangladesh: Implications for Governance, Bangladesh University Grants Commission, 2015.
18. Creswell, J. W., 2013. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Dlamini-Zuma, N., 2021. Agenda 2063: The AFRICA We Want FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT, Addis Ababa: The African Union Commission.
20. Eaton, L. & Louw, J., 2000. Culture and Self in South Africa: Individualism-Collectivism Predictions. The Journal of social psychology, Volume 140, pp. 210-7.
21. el Kouiri, K., 2023. Exploring the Development of Agency Theory: Review of theory. مجلة ابن خلدون للدراسات والأبحاث., Volume 3.
22. Engel, U., 2019. The 2007 African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance: Trying to Make Sense of the Late Ratification of the African Charter and Non-Implementation of Its Compliance Mechanism. Africa Spectrum, 54(2), pp. 127-146.
23. Ewuoso, C. & Hall, S., 2019. Core aspects of ubuntu: A systematic review.. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 12(93).
24. Fagbadebo, O., 2005. Political leadership, corruption, and the crisis of governance in Africa. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 1(2), p. 28–37..
25. Fagbadebo, O., 2019. Corruption and the challenge of accountability in the post-colonial African states: a discourse. Journal of African Union Studies, 8(1), pp. 9-32.
26. Fernandez, S., Malan, L., Holtzhausen, N. & Tshiyoyo, M. M., 2023. To what extent does corruption erode trust? Evidence of reputational spillovers from ten countries in the Southern African Development Community. sia Pacific Journal of Public Administration , 1- 25.
27. Gcaleka, K., 2024. Phala Phala Report , Pretoria: Report of the Public Protector.
28. Godinho, C. & Hermanus, L., 2018. (Re) Conceptualising State-Capture: With a Case Study of South African Power Company Escom. Conference Paper prepared for the Public Affairs Research Institute’s State Capture and Its Aftermath: Building ResponsivenessThrough State Reform. Johannesburg, Public Affairs Research Institute.
29. Harrison, G., 2011. The African presence in global governance.. London : Cambridge University Press.
30. haydaroğlu, C., 2020. Corruption, Institutions And Economic Growth In Sub-Saharan Africa..
31. Heimstädt, M. & Dobusch, L., 2020. Transparency and Accountability: Causal, Critical and Constructive Perspectives. Organization Theory , 1(4).
32. Heywood, M., 2021. Economic Policy and the Socio-Economic Rights in the South African Constitution, 1996–2021: Why Don’t They Talk to Each Other?. Constitutional Court Review, 11(1).
33. Hill, L., 2006. Adam Smith and the Theme of Corruption. The Review of Politics, Volume 68, pp. 636 – 662.
34. IEC, S., 2024. IEC Election Results Portal. [Online] Available at: https://results.elections.org.za/home/ [Accessed 1 June 2024].
35. Kanakulya, D., 2015. Governance and Development of the East African Community: Ethical Sustainability Framework. Department of Culture and Communication 2015.
36. Karanja, K. C., 2016. Africana Studies, African-centered Knowledge Production and the Essentiality of the African Worldview: Disciplinary Perspective, Research Methodology and Pedagogical Practice.
37. Klijn, E. h. & Koppenjan, J., 2012. Governance Network Theory: Past, Present and Future. Policy & Politics, Volume 40, pp. 587-606.
38. Kotzé, D., 1996. The New (Final) South African Constitution.. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 8(2), pp. 133-157..
39. Kuznets, S., 2019. Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The Gap between Rich and Poor.
40. Laloo, E., 2022. “Ubuntu Leadership – An explication of an Afrocentric leadership style. The Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 15(2), pp. 1-11.
41. Letseke, M., 2011. In Defence of Ubuntu. Stud Philos Educ, Volume 31, p. 47–60.
42. Lynsey, C., 2024. New York Times. [Online] Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/30/world/africa/south-africa-election-anc.html [Accessed 30 May 2024].
43. M&G, O. R., 2024. Mail & Guardian: Africa’s Better Future. [Online] Available at: https://mg.co.za/news/2024-06-01-live-coverage-south-africa-elections-2024/ [Accessed 1 June 2024].
44. Malachi, I. G., 2018. A Pragmatic Progression of Changes in African Governance System.
45. Manyaka, R. K. & Nkuna, N., 2014. The Phenomenon of Corruption in the South African Public Sector: Challenges and Opportunities. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 5, pp. 1572-1580.
46. Masenya, M. & Mthombeni, A., 2023. Governance, Ethics and Public Service Delivery: The Ramifications Of Corruption. Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability, Volume 3, pp. 40-49.
47. Mkhize, N., Moyo, S. & Mahoa, S., 2024. African solutions to African problems: a narrative of corruption in postcolonial Africa. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1).
48. Mlambo, D., 2019. Governance and Service Delivery in the Public Sector: The Case of South Africa under Jacob Zuma (2009 – 2018).. African Renaissance. , Volume 16, pp. 203-220.
49. Mlambo, D. N., Mubecua, M. A. & Mlambo, V. H., 2023. Post-colonial Independence and Africa’s Corruption Conundrum: A Succinct South African Critique Post-democratisation.. Insight on Africa, 184-202..
50. Mlambo, V. H., Masuku, M. M. & Mthembu, Z., 2024. The new scramble for Africa in a post-colonial era and the challenges of inclusive development: a semi-systematic literature review. Development Studies Research, 11(1).
51. Mokhutso, J., 2022. Ubuntu is under siege: a reflection on the challenges of South Africa then and now.. Pharos Journal of Theology. , Volume 103.
52. Mosala, S. J., Venter, J. C. M. & Bain, E. G., 2017. South Africa’s Economic Transformation since 1994: What Influence has the National Democratic Revolution (NDR) Had?. The Review of Black Political Economy, 44(3-4), pp. 327-340.
53. Mugumbate, J. R. et al., 2023. Understanding Ubuntu and its contribution to social work education in Africa and other regions of the world. Social Work Education,, 1–17..
54. Mulinge, M. & Lesetedi, G., 1998. Interrogating Our Past: Colonialism and Corruption in Sub-Saharan Africa. Africa Journal of Political Science, Volume 3.
55. Mupfumi, J., 2017. CIVIL SOCIETY’S ROLE IN SHAPING ZIMBABWE’S DIAMOND GOVERNANCE.. South African Institute of International Affairs.
56. Nasong’o, W. S., 2019. The Palgrave Handbook of African Politics, Governance, and Development. London : Palgrave Macmillan..
57. Ngubane, N. & Makua, M., 2021. Ubuntu pedagogy – transforming educational practices in South Africa through an African philosophy: from theory to practice. Inkanyiso, 13(12).
58. NPC, 2012. National Development Plan 2030 , Pretoria: South African Government.
59. Oko Elechi, O., Morris, S. V. C. & Schauer, E. J., 2010. Restoring Justice (Ubuntu): An African Perspective. International Criminal Justice Review, 20(1), pp. 73-85..
60. Osuigwe, C., 2023. The African Pre-colonial Social, Political, and Economic Development. In: Leadership and Economic Development Challenges in Post-Colonial Africa.. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Palgrave Macmillan.
61. Pakenham, T., 1991. The Scramble for Africa: White Man’s Conquest of the Dark Continent from 1876 to 1912.. New york City : Random House.
62. Panda, B. & Leepsa, N., 2017. Agency theory: Review of Theory and Evidence on Problems and Perspectives. Volume 10, pp. 74-95.
63. Parashar, S. & Schulz, M., 2021. Colonial legacies, postcolonial ‘selfhood’ and the (un)doing of Africa.. Third World Quarterly, 42(5), p. 867–881..
64. Pillay, S., 2004. Corruption – The challenge to good governance: A South African perspective.. International Journal of Public Sector Management. , Volume 17, pp. 586-605.
65. Prasad, M., Martins da Silva, M. & Nickow, A., 2019. Approaches to Corruption: a Synthesis of the Scholarship. St Comp Int Dev 54, 96–132.
66. Prinsloo, F., 2013. Good Governance in South Africa: A Critical Analysis.. Technical Report, Development and Environment, 1-9.
67. Robb, G., 1992. White-collar Crime in Modern England. London: Cambridge: University Press.
68. SARB, 2024. South African Reserve Bank (SARB): Media Release: Phala Phala Investigation. [Online] Available at: https://www.resbank.co.za/content/dam/sarb/publications/media-releases/2023/phala-phala-2023/South%20African%20Reserve%20Bank%20Phala%20Phala%20Report%20media%20release.pdf [Accessed 14 August 2024].
69. Schoeman, M., 2013. The african concept of Ubuntu and restorative justice. Reconstructing Restorative Justice Philosophy, Volume 14, pp. 291-310.
70. Sefa Dei, G., 2020. Elders’ Cultural Knowledges and African Indigeneity. The Palgrave Handbook of African Education and Indigenous Knowledge. In: Abidogun, J., Falola, T. (eds) ed. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
71. Sharma, S., 2024. Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want..
72. Shava, G. et al., 2021. Qualitative content analysis.. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 5(7), pp. 2454-6186.
73. Sithole, M. P., 2010. Modernity and ‘traditionality’ in African governance : conceptual and pragmatic issues. Africa Insight, 39(4).
74. Stupak, I., Mansoor, M. & Smith, C., 2021. Conceptual framework for increasing legitimacy and trust of sustainability governance.. Energy, Sustainability and Society,.
75. Swartz, E. & Davies, R., 1997. Ubuntu – The spirit of African transformation management – A review.. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Volume 18, pp. 290-294.
76. The Socratic Method , n.d. Abraham Lincoln: ‘Government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the Earth.’. [Online] Available at: https://www.socratic-method.com/quote-meanings-and-interpretations/abraham-lincoln-government-of-the-people-by-the-people-for-the-people-shall-not-perish-from-the-earth
77. Tshishonga, N. & Sithole, M., 2022. Traditional Governance Systems and Reform: Dynamics and Opportunities for Africa’s Development. nterdisciplinary Approaches to the Future of Africa and Policy Development, 40-57.
78. Tshishonga, N. & Sithole, M., 2022. Traditional Governance Systems and Reform: Dynamics and Opportunities for Africa’s Development. Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Future of Africa and Policy Development, 40-57.
79. Tshishonga, N. & Sithole, M., 2022. Traditional Governance Systems and Reform: Dynamics and Opportunities for Africa’s Development. Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Future of Africa and Policy Development, 40-57.
80. UN, U. N., 2023. Salvaging the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and Agenda 2063: the Africa we want, of the African Union, l.: Economic Commission for Africa.
81. Van Breda, A., 2019. Developing the concept of ubuntu as African theory for social work practice. Social work, Volume 55, pp. 439-450.
82. Van Norren, D. E., 2022. African Ubuntu and Sustainable Development Goals: seeking human mutual relations and service in development. Third World Quarterly, 43(12), p. 2791–2810..
83. Wang, Y. & Dickson, B. J., 2018. How corruption investigations undermine regime support. Comparative Political Studies, 51(3), p. 329–363.
84. Zakari, M. & Button, M., 2021. Confronting the Monolith: Insider Accounts of the Nature and Techniques of Corruption in Nigeria. Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime, Volume 3.