Learning Pathways in General Studies Courses (MPU) in Malaysia: A PLS-SEM Analysis of How Course Impressions, Learning Activities, and Usefulness Shape Overall Learning Impact
Authors
Faculty of Information Science, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)
Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)
Academy of Contemporary Islamic Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)
Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)
Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Sabah Branch (Malaysia)
Faculty of Computer & Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.102100012
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/21 | Page No: 112-136
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-04
Accepted: 2026-07-09
Published: 2026-07-24
Abstract
Malaysian higher educational institutions have introduced general studies courses, known as MPU, since September 2013 to create graduates who are entrepreneurs, holistic, and well-balanced. Although the MPU has the potential to be beneficial, it is perceived as less important than the core courses students must complete due to excessive syllabus, untrained lecturers, and ineffective teaching. This study aims to examine the impact of MPU learning at Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM). Specifically, it investigates students’ perceptions of course impressions, learning activities, and the usefulness of MPU in a hybrid learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic at the end of 2021. Using a dataset of 2,247 responses from UiTM main and branch campuses, the study employs partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to analyse the effects. The findings highlight the positive influence of MPU on overall education and inform recommendations for curriculum improvements. Based on the findings, the MPU syllabus should be amended to include content on national and societal issues. Also, the IT infrastructure must be continually improved to support the blended approach to MPU courses. The next revision of MPU shall recommend a clear, measurable, and sustainable vision for MPU courses to equip graduates with future-ready skills to navigate global challenges. Insights from the study findings could facilitate reforms to education policies that enhance Malaysian identity, unity, and citizenship by aligning MPU education with Malaysia's national educational policies and philosophy.
Keywords
MPU; General Studies Courses; Course Impressions; Learning Activities; PLS-SEM
Downloads
References
1. Alsabawy, A. Y., Aileen Cater-Steel, & Jeffrey Soar. (2016). Determinants of perceived usefulness of e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 843–858. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Awang, M. M., Ahmad, A. R., Bakar, N. A., Ghani, S. A., Yunus, A. N. M., Ibrahim, M. A. H., Ramalu, J. C., Saad, C. P., & Rahman, M. J. A. (2013). Students’ attitudes and their academic performance in nationhood education. International Education Studies, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n11p21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Chao, Y.-L. (2023). General Education Courses Integrated with Character Development Activities: Effectiveness on the Character Development of University Students. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 81(5). https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/23.81.586 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. David, J., Alias, N. A., Said Hashim, K., Mohd Salleh, M. I., Nor Mamat, M., & Ariffin, S. (2022). Issues and Challenges: Teaching and Learning of General Studies in Malaysia. Global Conference on Business and Social Sciences Proceeding, 14(2), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.35609/gcbssproceeding.2022.2(79) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.36863/mds.a.14027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.35.8.982 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Endut, N. A., Amin, R., Mohamad, A. N. A., & Din, H. A. M. (2019). Impak Mata Pelajaran Umum dari kaca mata Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor (Kuis). E-BANGI, 16, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Esa, M. S., Mohd, A., Abang Muis, R., Ationg, R., Othman, I. W., Aidah, S., Lokin, L. @, Mokhtar, S., Darmia, S., & Adam, S. (2021). Keberkesanan pengajaran dan pembelajaran dalam talian bagi kursus penghayatan etika dan peradaban (PEdP): Kajian kes di kalangan pelajar prasiswazah di Universiti Malaysia Sabah . International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 6(23), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJLGC.623004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.02.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Hock, C., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2010). Management of multi-purpose stadiums: Importance and performance measurement of service interfaces. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 14(2–3), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTM.2010.034327 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Department of Higher Education. (2016). General Subject Guidelines (MPU). Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2017). National Education Policy (Fourth Edition). Ministry of Education Malaysia, 53(9). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Kosaretsky, S., Zair-Bek, S., Kersha, Y., & Zvyagintsev, R. (2021). General Education in Russia During COVID-19: Readiness, Policy Response, and Lessons Learned. In Primary and Secondary Education During COVID-19: Disruptions to Educational Opportunity During a Pandemic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81500-4_9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Kwak, E., & Jeong, J. (2022). The Perception, Needs, Satisfaction, and Subject Selection Factor of General Education from the Sudents’ Perspective. The Korean Association of General Education, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2022.16.6.27 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Lee, B.-K. (2020). A Study on Learners’ Response to Online College English Class as General Education Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. The Korean Association of General Education, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2020.14.4.97 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Lowry, P. B. P., & Gaskin, J. (2014). Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: When to choose it and how to use it. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 57(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2014.2312452 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Mak Din, H. A., Mohd Jodi, K. H., & Hussain, F. C. (2018). Pelaksanaan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Kursus Pengajian Malaysia: Kajian Tinjauan Di Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor. Jurnal Community, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.35308/jcpds.v3i2.128 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Malaysian Qualifications Agency. (2024). Malaysian Qualifications Framework (MQF) Second Edition (2024) (2nd ed.). Malaysian Qualifications Agency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Mustapa, N. L., & Abdullah, S. R. (2024). Implementation of MPU courses in Malaysian Institutions of Higher Learning. Journal of Contemporary Social Science and Education Studies, 4(1), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10938162 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Nasir, N. F. M., Ridzuan, M. I. M., Hock, A. T. Y., Pei, O. S., Jamaludin, A. L. H., Hamidi, N. H. A., & Maswan, N. A. M. (2019). Keberkesanan Subjek Matapelajaran Umum (MPU) Dalam Memperkasa Bahasa Melayu: Satu Tinjauan Awal. International Journal of Education, 4(24), 85–96. http://www.ijepc.com/PDF/IJEPC-2019-24-03-09.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Osborne, J. W. (2015). What is rotating in exploratory factor analysis? Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20(2), 1–7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Rabanal, G., & Domondon, C. (2023). Learning experiences of students in a general education course in mathematics. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 14(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2023.14.01.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Razak, A. A., Abd Latif, S. F., Rusdi, F. A. D., Mubarak, M. Z., Daud, B. C., Razak, A. A., Kurniawan, Y., Lukman, Z. M., Ijon, R., Yusuff, N. A., & Mohd Noor, A. L. (2022). Effectiveness of Learning and Teaching the Appreciation of Ethics and Civilization Course from the Perspective of the Educators and Students in the University of Malaysia Kelantan (UMK). International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(9). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.9.19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Rizun, M., & Strzelecki, A. (2020). Students’ acceptance of the COVID-19 impact on shifting higher education to distance learning in Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186468 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Saadeddine, R. (2013). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of general education: a mixed methods approach [Rowan University]. https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/390 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Salleh, M. I. M., Alias, N. A., Ariffin, S., Ibrahim, Z., Ramli, A. R., & Aliman, S. (2023). The sudden transition to remote learning in response to COVID-19: lessons from Malaysia. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2023 10:1, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01751-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Syahruddin, S., Yaakob, M. F. M., Rasyad, A., Widodo, A. W., Sukendro, S., Suwardi, S., Lani, A., Sari, L. P., Mansur, M., Razali, R., & Syam, A. (2021). Students’ acceptance to distance learning during COVID-19: the role of geographical areas among Indonesian sports science students. Heliyon, 7(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Szeto, I., Ng, P. M. L., Wong, W. S. P., & Yip, L. (2021). Perceived benefits of studying general education for undergraduate students in the self-financing institutions in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1791797 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Taherdoost, H., Sahibuddin, S., & Jalaliyoon, N. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis: Concepts and theory. International Conference on Mathematical-Computational and Statistical-Sciences, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Tamuri, A. H., & Hussin, N. H. (2017). Pembelajaran abad ke 21 dalam kepelbagaian budaya: harapan dan cabaran. Seminar Pedagogi Antarabangsa Ke-8 (PEDA8). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Tanner, K. (2018). Survey designs. Research Methods: Information, Systems, and Contexts: Second Edition, 159–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102220-7.00006-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Terania, L., & Cruz, J. D. D. (2024). Correlational Analysis of Academic Performance in General Education Courses During the Digital Learning Space. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(7), 1–1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Thompson, C. A., Eodice, M., & Tran, P. (2015). Student perceptions of general education requirements at a large public university: No surprises? The Journal of General Education, 64(4), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2015.0025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Williams, B., Brown, T., & Onsman, A. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 8(3), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Yusof, N., & Jamaluddin, Z. (2017). Pembangunan kebolehpasaran siswazah: Tindakan universiti dan cabaran yang dihadapi. Jurnal Personalia Pelajar, 20(1), 15–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study