Online Collaborative Teaching in Higher Education: A Conceptual Paper

Online Collaborative Teaching in Higher Education: A Conceptual Paper

Norwati Roslim, Aishah Baharudin

Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Negeri Sembilan, Kampus Rembau, Malaysia

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.906000413

Received: 10 June 2025; Accepted: 20 June 2025; Published: 21 July 2025

ABSTRACT

This conceptual paper explores the literature on online collaborative teaching in higher education, focusing on its theoretical underpinnings, advantages, and implementation challenges. Anchored in constructivist theory, the paper proposes a model highlighting the key components of online collaborative teaching: pedagogical alignment, technological integration, and institutional support. Literature suggests that this approach can enhance both student and lecturer experiences by promoting flexibility, accessibility, and active engagement. However, challenges persist, including logistical issues, instructional design complexities, and technological integration gaps. To address these, higher education institutions should invest in targeted professional development programs that equip educators with the necessary skills and strategies for effective implementation.

Keywords: Online Collaborative Teaching, Higher Education, Constructivism Theory

INTRODUCTION

Online collaborative teaching in higher education is an evolving pedagogical approach that leverages digital tools to facilitate group learning and interaction among students and lecturers. Grounded in constructivist theory, this method posits that learners actively construct knowledge through experiences and social interactions, rather than passively receiving information (Wen et al., 2021; Lam et al., 2019; Kay and Volkers, 2007).

This approach promotes active learning and provides opportunities for meaningful discussions and problem-solving activities (Alberti and de Fátima, 2023; Wen et al., 2023; Knopf et al., 2021). Additionally, it fosters professional development for educators by encouraging innovation and knowledge exchange among peers (Alberti and de Fátima, 2023; Romeu, 2016). The use of digital collaborative platforms enhances the learning experience, mirroring real-world professional practices (Knopf et al., 2021; Yaman, 2010).

Despite its benefits, online collaborative teaching presents several challenges. Instructors must design and manage collaborative activities to ensure effective engagement (Robinson et al., 2017; Yaman, 2010). The lack of face-to-face interaction may lead to isolation and reduced motivation, necessitating adequate support for learners (Robinson, 2017; Manna et al., 2021). Implementing this method requires considerable time, effort, and reliable digital infrastructure (West, 2024; Noguera, 2022).

This paper analyzes the constructivist theory underpinning online collaborative teaching, examines its benefits and challenges, and introduces a conceptual model for its effective implementation in higher education.

Theoretical Foundation

Constructivist theory emphasizes the active construction of knowledge through social interaction and collaboration. In online learning, this approach supports learner-centered environments and aligns with adult learning and experiential learning models (Morales, 2009; Kaye and Volkers, 2007). Vygotsky’s perspective underscores the importance of online learning communities where meaningful interactions foster knowledge construction (Kaye and Volkers, 2007). Web-based collaborative platforms such as discussion forums enhance interpersonal interaction, essential for successful collaborative learning (Moxi, 2013). Constructivist instructional designs promote active participation and deeper understanding through inquiry-based, hands-on activities and social engagement (Ruey, 2010; Maina et al., 2016).

While constructivism serves as the primary lens, alternative perspectives such as socio-cultural theory and connectivism could further enrich this conceptual framework. Socio-cultural theory emphasizes the role of cultural tools and community in learning, while connectivism highlights networked knowledge and the role of technology in shaping learning experiences.

Benefits of Online Collaborative Teaching in Higher Education

Online collaborative teaching enhances the educational experience for both students and lecturers. It offers increased flexibility and accessibility, enabling geographically dispersed learners to participate in discussions and group activities across time zones (Roberts, 2005). This adaptability proved essential during disruptions like the COVID-19 pandemic (Knopf et al., 2021).

Collaborative platforms foster active learning and engagement (Lam et al., 2019), while digital technologies help overcome time and space constraints, creating a connected and interactive learning environment (Wieser and Seeler, 2018). These methods support deeper learning and encourage the development of critical thinking, communication, and teamwork skills.

Challenges of Online Collaborative Teaching in Higher Education

Implementing online collaborative teaching poses several challenges. Logistical issues related to time coordination and student availability may hinder effective collaboration (Posey and Lyons, 2009). Maintaining meaningful student interaction is also difficult without immediate feedback, which can reduce engagement and participation (Faza et al., 2024; Muuro et al., 2014).

Instructional design and technological integration must be carefully planned. Instructors often struggle to choose and implement appropriate tools for communication and coordination, leading to poor learning experiences (Knopf et al., 2021; Posey and Lyons, 2009). Uneven student participation and unclear collaborative guidelines can result in frustration and disengagement (Donelan & Kear, 2024).

Sustaining student motivation and providing adequate scaffolding are time-intensive tasks for instructors (Robinson et al., 2017). Despite these barriers, thoughtful planning and institutional support can significantly enhance the effectiveness of online collaborative teaching (Alksnis and Ahuja, 2022).

METHODOLOGY

This study employs a structured literature review methodology to analyze and synthesize existing research on online collaborative teaching in higher education. Relevant articles were sourced from the Scopus AI database using the keyword “online collaborative teaching in higher education.” The search, conducted on June 4, 2025, included peer-reviewed sources published in English.

Inclusion criteria focused on studies discussing collaborative learning, digital integration, and pedagogical strategies in higher education contexts. Studies unrelated to higher education or lacking a collaborative component were excluded. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify recurring concepts, challenges, and strategies relevant to the conceptual model proposed in this paper.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Constructivist theory provides a foundational framework for understanding and achieving the objectives of online collaborative teaching. It emphasizes the construction of knowledge through shared experiences and social interaction.

For online collaborative teaching to be effective, digital tools and platforms must support this process. A robust technological infrastructure facilitates flexibility and sustains collaboration, however it must be aligned with pedagogical goals to enhance, rather than hinder, the learning experience.

In addition, institutional support plays a crucial role. This includes professional development opportunities, administrative policies, and technical assistance. Effective planning must also ensure equitable participation and structured interaction. Without adequate institutional support, both lecturers and students may feel demotivated to engage in online collaborative teaching.

The proposed conceptual model for Online Collaborative Teaching in Higher Education (Figure 1) outlines three core components:

Figure 1. Online Collaborative Teaching in Higher Education Model

Based on Figure 1, the conceptual diagram outlines the essential components of online collaborative teaching in higher education. It categorizes the concept into three primary elements: pedagogical alignment, technological infrastructure, and institutional support.

Pedagogical alignment emphasizes the integration of constructivist principles and the establishment of collaborative learning objectives to promote active, student-centered learning. Technological infrastructure refers to the use of reliable tools and platforms that facilitate interaction and ensure effective content delivery. Institutional support underscores the importance of professional development, administrative policies, and technical assistance in creating a supportive environment for both lecturers and students.

Together, these components form a comprehensive framework for implementing effective online collaborative teaching practices in higher education.

CONCLUSION

This paper examined online collaborative teaching in higher education through a constructivist lens, exploring its benefits, challenges, and practical applications. While this approach holds significant potential to enrich teaching and learning, its successful implementation requires thoughtful planning and robust institutional support.

It is recommended that higher education institutions prioritize professional development to equip educators with the necessary strategies for effective online collaborative teaching. Such programs should include training on digital tools, group dynamics, assessment techniques, and inclusive teaching practices. Clear guidelines and strong institutional support are essential to foster a culture of collaboration and innovation.

Furthermore, future research should focus on empirically validating the proposed model across diverse educational contexts and incorporating additional theoretical perspectives to deepen the conceptual framework.

Declaration of AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

During the preparation of this work, the authors used Scopus AI to improve readability and language. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and took full responsibility for the content of the publication.

REFERENCES

1. Alberti, R., & de Fátima, J. (2023). Development of an online collaborative learning project. Collaborative work and Information and Communication Technologies. The Perspective of Internationalization.
2. Alksnis, N., & Ahuja, Y. (2022). From workplace to classroom and back again: Integrating online collaboration tools in higher education. In The future of online education (pp. 151–164). Scopus.
3. Cela, K. L., Sicilia, M. Á., & Sánchez, S. (2015). Comparison of collaboration and performance in groups of learners assembled randomly or based on learners’ topic preferences. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 287-298.
4. Donelan, H., & Kear, K. (2024). Online group projects in higher education: persistent challenges and implications for practice. Journal of computing in higher education, 36(2), 435-468.
5. Faza, A., Santoso, H. B., & Putra, P. O. H. (2024). Navigating online learning challenges and opportunities: Insights from small group of lecturers during pandemic. Procedia Computer Science, 234, 1164-1174.
6. Kaye, C., & Volkers, E. (2007). Constructivism online: Vygotskian applications for 21st century learning in higher education. In Online education for lifelong learning (pp. 99-121). IGI Global.
7. Knopf, T., Stumpp, S., & Michelis, D. (2021, July). How online collaborative learning leads to improved online learning experience in higher education. In 8th Eur. Conf. Soc. Media, ECSM 2021 (No. July, pp. 119-127).
8. Lam, W. W., Xie, H., Liu, D. Y., & Yung, K. W. (2019, November). Investigating online collaborative learning on students’ learning outcomes in higher education. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Education and E-Learning (pp. 13-19).
9. Maina, E. M., Wagacha, P. W., & Oboko, R. O. (2015). A model for improving online collaborative learning through machine learning. In Models for improving and optimizing online and blended learning in higher education (pp. 204-219). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
10. Manna, S. K., Sheikholeslami, G., Richmond-Fuller, A., Ishaq, R., & Nortcliffe, A. (2021). Adaptive and flexible online learning during covid-19 lockdown. In The 17th CDIO International Conference–2021.
11. Morales, C. R. (2010). Constructivist instructional design: A blueprint for online course design. In Handbook of Research on Human Performance and Instructional Technology (pp. 24-42). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
12. Moxi, S. (2013, June). The interpersonal interaction in computer supported collaborative learning environment. In International Journal on E-Learning (Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 329-351). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
13. Muuro, M. E., Wagacha, W. P., Kihoro, J., & Oboko, R. (2014). Students’ perceived challenges in an online collaborative learning environment: A case of higher learning institutions in Nairobi, Kenya. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6), 132-161.
14. Noguera, I. (2022). Moving forward in social constructivist theories through agile learning in the digital age. In Agile learning and management in a digital age (pp. 107-125). Routledge.
15. Oeste-Reiß, S., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. (2023). Collaborative Work Practices for Management Education: Using Collaboration Engineering to Design a Reusable and Scalable Collaborative Learning Instructional Design.
16. Pineda, J. L. D., & Ramos, R. R. S. (2024). Infusing Collaborative Online Teaching Towards Enhanced Instruction Among Graduate School Students. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 1-12.
17. Posey, L., & Lyons, L. (2011). The instructional design of online collaborative learning. Journal of Education Research, 5.
18. Prendes-Espinosa, M. P., Gutiérrez-Porlán, I., & García-Tudela, P. A. (2020). Collaborative work in higher education: Tools and strategies to implement the e-assessment. In Workgroups e-assessment: Planning, implementing and analysing frameworks (pp. 55-84). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
19. Roberts, T. S. (2005). Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education. In Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education (pp. 1-18). IGI global.
20. Robinson, H., Kilgore, W., & Warren, S. (2017). Care, communication, support: Core for designing meaningful online collaborative learning. Online Learning Journal, 21(4).
21. Romeu, T., Guitert, M., & Sangrà, A. (2016). Teacher collaboration network in Higher Education: reflective visions from praxis. Innovations in education and teaching international, 53(6), 592-604.
22. Ruey, S. (2010). A case study of constructivist instructional strategies for adult online learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 706-720.
23. Wang, S. M., Hou, H. T., & Wu, S. Y. (2017). Analyzing the knowledge construction and cognitive patterns of blog-based instructional activities using four frequent interactive strategies (problem solving, peer assessment, role playing and peer tutoring): A preliminary study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 301-323.
24. Wen, Y., Zhou, L., & Wu, X. (2021, May). Application of Blended Teaching Mode Based on Constructivism Theory. In 2021 International Conference on Computers, Information Processing and Advanced Education (CIPAE) (pp. 38-41).
25. West, H., Hill, J., Abzhaparova, A., Cox, W., & Alexander, A. (2024). Pandemic pedagogies: Reflecting on online learning using the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 48(2), 157-176.
26. Wieser, D., & Seeler, J. M. (2018). Online, not distance education: The merits of collaborative learning in online education. In The disruptive power of online education (pp. 125-146). Emerald Publishing Limited.
27. Yaman, S. (2010). Technology supported learning platform: Moodle integrated academic course. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(2), 146-160.
28. Yussiff, A. S., Ahmad, W. F. W., & Mustapha, E. E. (2015). A constructivist didactics framework for e-collaboration through social media. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 20(3), 310-324.