Impact of the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice among Health Workers toward Standard Precautions in Omdurman teaching hospital 2023
- Wathba Garelnabi Abdelrahim Safi
- Manal Bilal.Mohamed
- Fathia Komi Koko Ali
- Nour Alhuda Mohamed
- Nagwa Mansour Gamar Elmazal
- Anwer Elsir Mahgoub Sid ahmed
- Hind khaled Altrifee hamad
- Aisha Ibrahim Mohmmed Osman.
- Gamila Mohamed Hamid
- Rowa Hassan Alzubeir ABUALAMA
- Wegdan Adam Ahmed
- 7159-7168
- Sep 23, 2025
- Health
Impact of the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice among Health Workers toward Standard Precautions in Omdurman Teaching Hospital 2023
1Wathba Garelnabi Abdelrahim Safi.2Manal Bilal.Mohamed .3 Fathia Komi Koko Ali 4Nour Alhuda Mohamed. 5Nagwa Mansour Gamar Elmazal.6Anwer Elsir Mahgoub Sid ahmed.7 Hind khaled Altrifee hamad 8Aisha Ibrahim Mohmmed Osman.9 Gamila Mohamed Hamid .10Rowa Hassan Alzubeir ABUALAMA.11Wegdan Adam Ahmed
1Master of science in medical surgical nursing/ phd candidate Uof Kh/ lecturer in medical nursing department , faculty of nursing science, UOFK,
2Associate professor medical nursing Omdurman Islamic University. Medical nursing Department
3Assistant Professor Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing Sciences, University of Bahri, Khartoum, Sudan
4Assistant Professor Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing Sciences, University of Bahri, Khartoum,
5Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing Sciences, AL-Safwaa College of Science and Technology.
6 Lecturer. Batterjee Medical Colleges –Jeddah Critical Nursing
7lectuter University of Khartoum. Community Health Nursing
8 lecturer University of Bhary ,Collage of Nursing Sciences. Medical nursing.
9 Assisstant professor. Medical surgical nursing university of Kordofan
10 lecturer Medical Surgical nursing Omdurman Islamic university.Hemodialysis department Military hospital Khamis Mushayt.
11 lecturer .edical surgical nursing Alneelain University
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.908000592
Received: 18 August 2025; Accepted: 25 August 2025; Published: 23 September 2025
ABSTRACT
The objective was to assess the knowledge level, attitude, and practice of health care workers in Omdurman teaching hospital towards standard precautions, and to identify the related factors. Furthermore, it was attempted to identify the proportion of having the experience of needle stick injuries (NSIs) and associated factors among participants.
Methods
This exploratory cross-sectional hospital-based study was conducted to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of participants regarding standard precautions in the Omdurman Teaching Hospital. The study population .Health care workers who include Doctors, Nurses, lab technicians, and waste handlers .Inclusion criteria: All the above populations, both male and female. Accept to participate in the study Exclusion criteria: Those who are not dealing directly with patient care. The questionnaire included (22) question related knowledge items, (21) practice items, and (14) attitude items. Based on the mean score of each category, responses were grouped Good knowledge 90% -100.Fair knowledge 50%-70% Poor knowledge less than 50%.same score for attitude and practice. Using p value .000 as significant correlation.
Results
The mean age of the participants 1.5286 SD.50008, and 05)37.5%) of them were female 57.5% of the staff had good level of correct knowledge 236(84.3%) had a fair knowledge while fair attitude 270(99.6%) and 140(50%)hand fair practice towards standard precautions. There is significant correlation of knowledge attitude and practice with occupation received training program regarding infection control and years of service respectively
Conclusion
The findings revealed a substandard adherence of standard precautions among participants, which highlighted the necessity of the provision of a periodic, tailored training program based on the occupation and risk exposure.
Keywords: Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice, Health Workers, Standard Precautions, Omdurman teaching hospital 2023
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Healthcare workers (HCWs) play an important role in providing prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and care to people in diverse healthcare settings. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), HCWs are all people who are involved in activities that aim at enhancing health, include those who provide health services such as doctors, nurses, laboratory technicians, pharmacists, and those providing health management and supporting services such waste handlers (WHO.2020).
Hospitals and other health care setting described as risk area for acquiring infections for health care workers (HCWs) worldwide due to the work environment of Health care workers (can be described as potential risk zone due to numerous hazards endemic to the environment .Infection is one of the most important problems in health care services worldwide(David vid OM, Fauria O. (2010) .Health care workers who prone to hospital infections must know the guide line of universal standard precautions guideline so that can protect themselves from hospital infection like blood -borne infections. (Bennett G and Mansell I. (2014). Which acquired by HCWs during clinical and laboratory services such as HIV, HBV, HCV have remained a major issue worldwide, particularly in low income countries where there is high morbidity and mortality associated with such infections. Some of these infectious diseases like HIV and HCV have no available vaccination. (Sadoh WE, Fawole AO, et al (2006)
In any healthcare setting, standard precautions are the basic procedures used to prevent the spread of infectious agents during interactions between healthcare personnel and patients. These precautions include preventing infections from spreading from patients to healthcare personnel or from contaminated environmental surfaces when there is a possibility of coming into contact with bodily secretions. Every healthcare professional must use this for every patient interaction
Belal, S., Ahmed, S et al (2020). A successful Infection Prevention and Control (IPAC) plan must be initiated and implemented in any healthcare facility before an evaluation of the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of standard precautions by healthcare personnel can be conducted. According to their professional group and level of experience, among other things, HCW exhibit variable KAP of standard precautions, according to numerous studies. Improved standard precaution compliance has been linked to increased professional experience, standard precaution knowledge and training, and high risk perception among health professionals. The majority of studies from around the world have shown that healthcare workers are more likely to follow standard precautions
Okechukwu EF et al (2012).Therefore this study aimed to assess knowledge, attitude and practice of health care workers in Omdurman teaching hospital
METHODS
This exploratory cross-sectional hospital-based study was conducted to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of participants regarding standard precautions in the Omdurman Teaching Hospital.
Study area
The study was carried out in the Omdurman Teaching Hospital
Study period: data were collected in the period from April to May 2025
Study population
Health care workers who include Doctors, Nurses, lab technicians, and waste handlers
Inclusion criteria
All the above populations, both male and female
Accept to participate in the study
Exclusion criteria
Those who are not dealing directly with patient care
Data collection tools
A constructed questionnaire formulated according to an IDI guide and an observation Manual. Content analysis was used for the IDIs. (WHO(2010) which consists of four parts: the first part about social data (age, gender, occupation, years of service, and whether vaccinated or not, and whether receiving a training program regarding standard Precautions. The second part, 22 questions regarding basic content and concepts of SP, with 3 possible answers of ‘yes’, ‘no’, and I don’t know a correct answer were scored 1, while a wrong or incorrect answer was scored 0. The maximum score was 22. The respondents’ knowledge was graded as poor, fair, and good based on their score. <50% was graded as poor, 50%-70% was graded as fair while 90% -100%was graded as good. Part 3 used 14 questions to assess attitude response regarding SP 3 possible answers of ‘agree’, ‘neutral’, and disagree using a Likert scale. A Likert Scale range of 1-3 was used, with
1= disagree, 2= disagree, 3=neutral. The maximum score was 14. The respondents’ attitude was graded as poor, fair, or good based on their score. <50% was graded as poor, 50%-70% was graded as fair while 90% -100% was graded as good. Part four used 21questions in their practice responses regarding SP. The maximum score was 21. 3 possible answers of ‘yes’, ‘no’, and I don’t know a correct answer were scored 1, while a wrong or incorrect answer was scored 0; the maximum score was 21. The respondents’ practice was graded as poor, fair, or good based on their score. <50% was graded as poor, 50%-70% was graded as fair, while 90% -100% was graded as good practice of the Standard
The significance level was set at p< 0.05 and a 95% confidence level to correlate the association between their knowledge, attitude, and practice, and also to measure the correlation between their knowledge, attitude, and practice with their demographic data.
Data analysis:
The data were analyzed using SPSS VERSION 26. Descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation (SD), were performed to describe the characteristics of the study sample. For inferential statistics using bivariate analysis, the Chi-square test is used to find the correlation between knowledge, attitude, and practice with their social data characteristics. P-value. .000 As significant.
Ethical approval:
For ethical approval, the researcher obtained it from the director of Omdurman Teaching Hospital, and verbal consent was also obtained from participants after explaining to them the goal of the study and that there was no hazard for them. And participation in the study was completely voluntary.
RESULTS
Table (1): Shows that 50% of the studied health care workers age was between 30 – 39 years old with a mean age and SD1.5286.5000 8,while175 (62.5%)of them were males and
186(66.4%) were married. Most of them were nurses which represent 113(40.4%).laboratory technician 65(23.2%), doctors 59(21.1%) and the rest were waste handlers
191 (68.2%) their occupation service 5-10 years of them had less than 5 years of experience. Finally, half of them receiving training program regard standard precaution and received total dose of hepatitis vaccine 161(57.5%), 165(58.9%) respectively
Table (2):
Concerning the knowledge regard SP 194(69.3%) they answer by yes for statement hospital-acquired infection can be transmitted by medical equipment such as syringes, needles, catheters, stethoscopes, thermometers, etc., majority of the
HCWs agreed that 182(65%) report with no to the statement Nosocomial infection is the patient’s infection from home. Also they knew Washing your hands with soap or an alcohol-based antiseptic decreases the risk of transmission of hospital-acquired pathogens which is 229(81.8%), on other hand 255(91.1%) knew the use of an alcohol-based antiseptic for hand hygiene is as effective as soap and water if hands are not visibly dirty while,269(96.1%) said If my hands are not visibly dirty, there is no need to wash my hands before patient contact, half of them 135(48.2%) said no need to wash hands before doing procedures that do not involve bodily fluids. Also, majority of the HCWs230 (82.1%) knew with hospital-acquired infection guidelines, also knew and realize that all personnel and patients are possibly infectious 245(87.5%) and how to prevent and control hospital-acquired infections 262(93.6%) finally their mean knowledge were fair regard SP 236(84.3%) and only 44(15.7%)had good knowledge.
Table (3):concerning their attitude towards SP 240(85.7%) agreed that SP can prevent the spread of infectious diseases, while 250(89.3%) disagreed that SP are not really necessary in hospitals .Concerning wearing double hand gloves , Wearing googles/face mask that ,and Wearing gowns/ aprons, Wearing boot/wear 238(85%), 241(86.1%), 226(80%), 253(90.4%) they agreed respectively . their mean attitude were fair regard SP 279( 99.6%) and only 44(15.7%) and one had good knowledge 1 (.4%)
Table (4) : concerning their practice regard SP, all of them said Washing hands before and after caring for a wound and all Supplies necessary for adherence to hand hygiene (e.g., soap, water, paper towels, alcohol-based hand rub) are readily accessible in patient care areas, all of them also said screening of patients is being done to detect colonization even if no evidence of infection, regard hand hygiene 212(75.7%) Washing hands before patient contact, 248(88.6%) Washing hands after Patient Contact, while 223(79.6%) washing hands after removing gloves, 260(92.9%) said yes infection prevention and control program provides infection prevention education to patients, family members, but 216 (77.1%) said personal protective equipment is not always accessible, finally their mean practice toward SP were fair regard SP 139(49.6%) had good practice and the half of them reported fair practice.
Table (5) revealed a statistical significant relation between nurses’ level of knowledge, attitude and practice to standard precautions and their socio-demographic characteristics (years of service, occupation, received training program regarding infection control)
Table (1) sociodemographic data (no=280)
variable | frequency | percent | Means | SD |
Age in groups by years | ||||
<30 yea | 132 | 47.1 | 1.5286 | .50008 |
30 – 39 years | 148 | 52.9 | ||
Gender | ||||
male | 175 | 62.5 | 1.3750 | .48499 |
female | 105 | 37.5 | ||
Marital Status | ||||
Single | 94 | 33.6 | 1.6643 | .47309 |
Married | 186 | 66.4 | ||
Occupation | ||||
doctors | 59 | 21.1 | 2.3286 | .97601 |
Nurse | 113 | 40.4 | ||
Laboratory technician | 65 | 23.2 | ||
(Waste handlers) | 43 | 15.4 | ||
Years of service | ||||
5-10 years | 191 | 68.2 | 1.3179 | .46648 |
More than 10 years | 89 | 31.8 | ||
Received training program regarding infection control | ||||
yes | 161 | 57.5 | 1.4250 | .49523 |
no | 119 | 42.5 | ||
Received total dose of hepatitis vaccine | ||||
yes | 165 | 58.9 | 1.4107 | .49284 |
No | 115 | 41.1 |
Table (2) Knowledge of Standard Precautions among healthcare workers (no=280)
Item | yes | no | I don’t know |
Hospital-acquired infection can be transmitted by medical equipment such as syringes, needles, catheters, stethoscopes, thermometers, etc. | 194(69.3%) | 42(15.0%) | 44(15.7%) |
Nosocomial infection is the patient’s infection from home. | 52(18.6%) | 182(65%) | 46(16.4%) |
I know the world’s health organization’s ‘5 moments of hand hygiene. | 52(18.6%) | 182(65%) | 46(16.4%) |
Some instruments can be stored in an antiseptic solution for up to36 hours. | 185(66.1%) | 51(18.2%) | 44(15.7%) |
Microorganisms are destroyed by using clean water. | 52(18.6%) | 182(65%) | 46(16.4%) |
Bathing every day is a universal precaution. | 103(36.8%) | 129(46.1%) | 48(17.1%) |
Standard precautions apply to all patients regardless of their diagnosis. | 178(63.6%) | 102(36.4%) | 0 |
Healthcare-associated pathogens can be found on the normal, intact patient skin. | 160((57.1%) | 91(32.5%) | 29(10.4%) |
Washing your hands with soap or an alcohol-based antiseptic decreases the risk of transmission of hospital-acquired pathogens. | 229(81.8%) | 45(16.1%) | 6(2.1%) |
If my hands are not visibly dirty, there is no need to wash my hands before patient contact. | 5(1.8%) | 269(96.1%) | 6(2.1%) |
The use of an alcohol-based antiseptic for hand hygiene is as effective as soap and water if hands are not visibly dirty. (yes) | 255(91.1%) | 20(7.1%) | 5(1.8%) |
Gloves should be worn if blood or body fluid exposure is anticipated. (yes | 237(84.6%) | 43(15.4%) | 0 |
When using alcohol-based antiseptics, I should keep rubbing my hands until dry. (yes) | 170(60%) | 110(39.3%) | 0 |
There is no need to wash hands before doing procedures that do not involve bodily fluids. (no) | 145(51.8%) | 135(48.2%) | 0 |
Hand hygiene should be performed before and after direct patient contact. (yes) | 170(60.7%) | 110(39.3%) | 0 |
I can wear the same pair of gloves for multiple patients as long as there is no visible contamination on the gloves. (no) | 127(45.4%) | 153(54.6%) | 0 |
I am familiar with hospital-acquired infection guidelines. (yes) | 230(82.1%) | 50(17.9%) | 0 |
While working in the hospital, we should be concerned and realize that all personnel and patients are possibly infectious. (yes) | 245(87.5%) | 35(12.5%) | 0 |
You can handle body fluids with bare hands if gloves are not available. (no) | 30(10.7%) | 246(87.9%) | 4(1.4%) |
I know how to prevent and control hospital-acquired infections. (yes) | 262(93.6%) | 14(5%) | 4(1.4%) |
Mean score knowledge | frequency | percent | |
Good knowledge 90% -100 | 44 | 15.7 | |
Fair knowledge 50%-70% | 236 | 84.3 | |
Poor knowledge less than 50% | 0 | 0 |
Table (3) attitude of Standard Precautions among healthcare workers (no=280)
Item |
Agree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
SP can prevent the spread of infectious diseases | 240(85.7%) | 32(11.4%) | 8(2.9) |
SP are very important approaches in healthcare procedures | 216(77.1%) | 42(15%) | 0 |
Can acquire HIV and hepatitis if you don’t comply with SP | 193(68.9%) | 52(18.6%) | 35(12.5%) |
I do not have to wash my hands if I used gloves. | 33(11.8%) | 226(80.7%) | 21(7.5%) |
Standard precaution are useful in protecting against hazards in workplace | 214(76.4%) | 57(20.4%) | 9(3.2%) |
Standard precaution are not really necessary in hospitals | 18(6.4%) | 250(89.3%) | 12(4.3%) |
They are only necessary for theatre workers | 60(21.4%) | 199(71.1%) | 21(7.5%) |
Standard precaution can prevent spread of
infections so should be observed always |
214(76.4%) | 45(16.1%) | 21(7.5%) |
Standard precaution requires one to recap needles after use to avoid needle injury and infection | 18(6.4%) | 248(88.6%) | 14(5%) |
Management of HIV and HBV positive
patients: the following precautionary measures should be adopted while handling patients with the above viruses |
248(88.6%) | 16(5.7%) | 16(5.7%) |
Wearing double hand gloves | 238(85%) | 30(10.7%) | 12(4.3%) |
Wearing googles/face mask | 241(86.1%) | 21(7.5%) | 18(6.4%) |
Wearing gowns/ aprons | 226(80%) | 36(12.9%) | 18(6.4%) |
Wearing boot/wear | 253(90.4%) | 18(6.4%) | 9(3.2%) |
Mean score attitude | frequency | percent | |
Good attitude 90% -100 | 1 | .4 | |
Fair attitude 50%-70% | 279 | 99.6 | |
Poor attitude less than 50% | 0 | 0 |
Table (4) practice of Standard Precautions among healthcare workers (no-280)
Items | yes | no | I don’t know |
Always wash hands before and after direct contact with the patients | 222(79.3%) | 37(13.2%) | 21(7.5%) |
I always put on a mask and glasses when performing invasive and body fluid procedures | 236(84.3%) | 28(10%) | 16(5.7%) |
Knowledge of infection prevention and control are being monitored in the hospital | 237(84.6%) | 43(15.4%) | 0 |
Surgical operation sites are shaved with razors | 250(89.3%) | 20(7.1%) | 10(2.6%) |
Vaccination is provided to all staff | 105(37.5%) | 142(50.7%) | 33(11.8%) |
Screening of patients is being done to detect colonization even if no evidence of infection | 235(83.9%) | 25(8.9%) | 20(7.1%) |
Washing hands before patient contact | 212(75.7%) | 52(18.6%) | 16(5.7%) |
Washing hands after Patient Contact | 248(88.6%) | 20(7.1%) | 21(4.3%) |
Washing hands if they look or feel dirty | 260(92.9%) | 12(4.3%) | 8(2.9%) |
Washing hands after going to the toilet | 236(84.3%) | 28(10%) | 16(5.7%) |
Washing hands after contact with blood or bodily fluids | 261(93.2%) | 15(5.4%) | 4(1.4%) |
Washing hands before caring for a wound | 280(100%) | 0 | 0 |
Washing hands after caring for a wound | 280(100%) | 0 | 0 |
Washing hands after removing gloves | 223(79.6%) | 43(15.4%) | 14(5%) |
Injection safety ( recap of needle and presence of waste container | 48(16.4%) | 229(81.8%) | 5(1.8%) |
The hospital provides fiscal and human resource support for maintaining the infection prevention and control program | 247(88.2%) | 25(8.9%) | 8(2.9%) |
The infection prevention and control program provides infection prevention education to patients, family members, and other caregivers | 260(92.9%) | 15(5.4%) | 5(1.8%) |
Supplies necessary for adherence to hand hygiene (e.g., soap, water, paper towels, alcohol-based hand rub) are readily accessible in patient care areas | 280(100%) | 0 | 0 |
Adherence to infection prevention guidelines | 266(95%) | 14(5%) | 0 |
Personal protective equipment is always accessible | 57(20.4%) | 216(77.1%) | 7(2.5%) |
Screening of patients is being done to detect colonization even if no evidence of infection | 280(100%) | 0 | 0 |
Mean score practice | frequency | percent | |
Good practice 90% -100 | 139 | 49.6 | |
Fair practice 50%-70% | 140 | 50 | |
Poor practice less than 50% | 1 | .4 |
Table (5) Correlation between knowledge, attitude and practice level among health staff and their social data
item | Social data | P value |
knowledge | Age | .157 |
Years of service | .002 | |
occupation | .0000 | |
Received training program regarding infection control | .0000 | |
attitude | Age | 1.70 |
Years of service | .0000 | |
occupation | .0000 | |
Received training program regarding infection control | .0005 | |
practice | Age | .1 |
Years of service | .0000 | |
occupation | .0000 | |
Received training program regarding infection control | .0005 |
DISCUSSION
Most of the respondents knew that HIV and HBV are transmitted by NSSI. Studies conducted in Ethiopia (Kasse T, ET AL(2024).( Malaysia(Cheah .(2024),reported similar findings. However, a lesser proportion of the HCWs knew that HCV is transmitted by NSSIs. The findings indicate that HCWs were well informed about HIV and HBV but ignorant about HCV which could lead to a risk for themselves and their patients. The poor knowledge regard HCV is blood borne can be transmitted to patients through wrong and incorrect information from HCWs especially with blood donation and disease transmission our participants repot good that prevent them from acquiring theses disease. A report from the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS) [Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and S a f e t y ( C C O H S ) reported that the risk of transmitting HCV through NSI ranges from 0.1- 7%. It is also known that the risk of contracting HBV can be significantly reduced if HCWs receive HBV immunization but no such immunization presently exists for prevention of HCV. This calls for more awareness in order to increase HCWs knowledge of HCV and hence reduce its transmission. Majority of the HCWs 178(63.6%) knew that SP is applicable to all patients irrespective of their diagnostic status. This finding is comparable to similar studies in Nigeria (Okechukwu EF et al (2012)
.and Ugand. (Gordon M, Afayo R. (2007). but higher than the findings in a study in North East Nigeria(Abdulraheem IS, ET AL(2012). Once more, the demonstrated favorable attitude 279(99.6%) may be the result of their trust in standard precaution (SP), as the SP policy is a solid package intended to stop the spread of nosocomial diseases and guarantee the safety of HCWs while at work. Wearing of PPE was optimally practiced, which is positive because it is essential for infection management in addition to being a key element of SP. This is consistent with a prior study (Punia S., et al. (2014) It might be assumed that the respondents’ great familiarity with standard precautions prompted them to view them favorably.
In this study, the respondents 238(85%) have a good attitude toward wearing gloves, a mask, aprons, and boots although in an another study, only 34% of respondents reported wearing gloves and coveralls on a regular basis. The primary explanations for this poor PPE use included sporadic access to PPEs, a lack of time to wear them, and the fact that doing so interferes with clinical duties [Mukherjee S., et al(2012).. This demonstrated the need for management and HCWs to work together as closely as possible to implement Standard precaution completely which is inconsistently with our participants report. Secondly, the management should establish an enabling atmosphere by routinely providing PPEs and other necessary resources and supervising their use, while the HCWs should guarantee complete compliance by adhering to established protocols and constantly utilizing resources.
This study shows that standard precaution is highly practiced in our participants. Over 261(93.2%)of the respondents asserted that whenever there is spill of blood or body fluid, such is cleaned immediately with either of antiseptic, use of soap and water
This is a better standard precaution as detaching and capping after use 229(81.8%) may dispose a health worker to infections. This practice is in line with research conducted by (Tobin EA., et al. (201320-27).where respondents some of the respondents confirmed that they do not recap needle after use and detach needles from syringe after use
CONCLUSION
The findings revealed a substandard adherence of standard precautions among participants, which highlighted the necessity of the provision of a periodic, tailored training program based on the occupation and risk exposure
RECOMMENDATION
In order to promote good standard precaution and mitigate the risk of hospital acquired infections, it is necessary for health authorities tot make it compulsory to establish IPAC (infection control and prevention) committees in all hospitals. Such policies should also outline measures that ensure that IPAC resources are made routinely available and that knowledge and practice of standard precautions are improved through regular IPAC training of hospital staff, with special emphasis on newly qualified health workers such as house officers and staff nurses.
REFERENCES
- Abdulraheem IS, ET AL(2012). Knowledge, awareness and compliance with standard precautions among health workers in North Eastern Nigeria. J Comm. Med Health Edu.2:131
- Belal, S., Ahmed, S et al (2020). In-services Education Program for Improving Nurses’ Performance Regarding Infection Control Measures in a Rural Hospital. Egyptian Journal of Health Care, 11(2), 702-718.
- Bennett G and Mansell I. (2014): “Universal precautions: a survey of community nurses’ experience and practice”. International Journal of Clinical Nursing 1.2 : 20-27
- Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and S a f e t y ( C C O H S ) . Av a i l a b l e a t https://www.ccohs.ca [Accessed 6/6/18] reported
- David OM, Fauria O. (2010) .Towards effective management of nosocomial infections in Nigerian hospitals- a review. Academic arena. 2(5): 1-7
- Gordon M, Afayo R. (2007). Adherence to universal M, Afayo R. Adherence to universal safety in the context of infection prevention and control trainers guide FMOH and JSI/MMIS Nigeria, 1-126
- Kasse T, ET AL(2024). Awareness and infection prevention practices of hepatitis B virus among informal caregivers in public hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2024. Front Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 20;4:1492579. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2024.1492579. PMID: 39759841; PMCID: PMC11695325
- Malaysia[Cheah YK, Suleiman A, Ramly M. HIV Knowledge and Its Associated Sociodemographic Factors among Female Sex Workers in Malaysia. Malays J Med Sci. 2024 Jun;31(3):160-172. doi: 10.21315/mjms2024.31.3.12. Epub 2024 Jun 27. PMID: 38984243; PMCID: PMC11229571
- Mukherjee S., et al(2012). “Knowledge and practice of standard precautions and awareness regarding post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV among interns of a medical college in West Bengal, India”. International Journal of Infection Control 15 (2012): 1-7
- Okechukwu EF et al (2012): “Knowledge and practice of standard precautions in public health facilities in Abuja, Nigeria”. International Journal of Infection Control 8:1-7
- Punia S., et al.(2014) “Healthcare workers and standard precautions perceptions and determinants of compliance in the emergency and trauma triage of a tertiary care hospital in South India”.
- International School of Research Notices : 5
- Sadoh WE, Fawole AO, et al (2006). Practice of Universal Precautions among health care workers. J of the National Medical Association. May; 98(5): 722-6
- Tobin EA., et al. (2013)“Knowledge and practice of infection control among health workers in a tertiary hospital in Edo State, Nigeria”. Direct Research Journal of Health Pharmacy 1.2
- WHO Guidelines on hand hygiene in healthcare. First global patient safety challenge. Clean Care is Safe Care. 2010. Available at http://www.who.int/patientsafety/en/. [Accessed 29/3/17
- -World Health Organization (WHO). Health workers. Geneva Switzerland: World Health Orgaization; 2020