Ascending the Value Chain: Strategic Growth in Malaysia’s Aerospace Sector

Ascending the Value Chain: Strategic Growth in Malaysia’s Aerospace Sector

Mohd Zamri Abu Bakar, Ariff Azly Muhamed, Mohadzlishah Mazli, Mohd Fikri Ishak, Muhammad Faizal Samat

Faculty of Business and Management, University Technology MARA, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.907000118

Received: 27 June 2025; Accepted: 01 July 2025; Published: 02 August 2025

ABSTRACT

This study examines the current landscape, prevailing challenges, and strategic initiatives of Malaysia’s aerospace industry, focusing specifically on infrastructure development, technological and innovation, talent readiness, regulatory support and sustainability initiatives. It seeks to elucidate the industry’s potential growth trajectory, emphasizing the necessity for alignment with international standards and highlighting the pivotal role of government-industry collaboration. The research analyzes academic publications, policy documentation, industry reports, and relevant case studies, synthesizing critical insights to outline key trends, challenges, and opportunities. Findings indicate significant growth opportunities for Malaysia, driven by its advantageous geographic positioning, governmental policies, and infrastructure investments. Several critical challenges emerge, notably the requirement for advanced research and development facilities, cohesive integration within the supply chain, effective technology transfer, and robust talent development initiatives. The study’s insights serve as actionable recommendations for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and educational institutions, providing strategic guidance on enhancing research and development capabilities, reinforcing supply chain robustness, and developing skilled workforce capacities, thereby contributing to the sustainable growth of Malaysia’s aerospace sector.

Keywords: Aerospace, Infrastructure, Technology and Innovation, Talent Development, Sustainability

INTRODUCTION

The aerospace and aviation industry is undergoing a transformative phase in the post-COVID era, marked by accelerated recovery, technological innovation, and evolving market dynamics . Following severe disruptions caused by the pandemic, these sectors are now experiencing substantial resurgence, driven by a sharp increase in demand for air travel, heightened cargo volumes, and notable technological advancements aimed at streamlining operations and enhancing safety measures (Dube et al., 2021; Ibrahim & Fernando, 2023). Governments and industry stakeholders worldwide have responded with significant investments in infrastructure enhancement, comprehensive fleet modernization, and innovative digital solutions designed to boost operational efficiency and elevate passenger experiences (Gössling, 2020). Moreover, sustainability has risen as a critical industry imperative, stimulating substantial investment in the development of alternative fuels, energy-efficient aircraft designs, and environmentally friendly technologies.

Within this evolving landscape, Malaysia holds a prominent position in the Asian aerospace and aviation market, characterized by unique strategic advantages and significant growth potential (Allan, 2025). Its advantageous geographic location, strategically positioned as a crucial aviation and aerospace hub, significantly enhances its capability to connect diverse international markets, thereby fostering robust economic interactions and trade flows. Furthermore, strong governmental support manifested through favorable regulatory frameworks, extensive financial incentives, and targeted industry policies considerably reinforces Malaysia’s competitive edge in the global aerospace sector (MIGHT, 2015). The nation’s robust aerospace manufacturing base, coupled with comprehensive maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) capabilities, further amplifies its readiness to capitalize on post-pandemic growth opportunities.

Despite Malaysia’s growing ambitions to establish itself as a regional aerospace hub under national policies such as the Aerospace Blueprint 2030, the country faces significant structural and strategic challenges in upgrading its position along the global aerospace value chain (Hisan et al., 2024). While prior policy and industry narratives emphasize infrastructure development, sustainability adoption, and talent enhancement, there is limited empirical analysis that correlates these efforts with actual value chain progression and sectoral growth. The absence of a systematic evaluation framework, supported by quantifiable data, undermines the ability to assess whether these strategic interventions yield measurable economic and competitive.

The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive and analytical overview of Malaysia’s aerospace industry, examining its current state, strategic growth initiatives, and the challenges it faces. It aims to identify the key drivers and barriers to growth within the industry, including infrastructure development (ID), technology  innovation (TI), talent development (TD), regulatory support (RS) and sustainability initiatives (SI). This paper integrates information from diverse sources, such as academic literature, industry reports, policy papers, and case studies. By doing this, it provides a comprehensive perspective of the industry and identifies important factors that promote or hinder its progress. The comprehensive examination of strategic initiatives implemented by the Malaysian government and industry participants provides valuable information on successful policy measures and business practices that may be applied to other developing aerospace markets.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Infrastructure Development (ID)

Malaysia has embarked on extensive and targeted infrastructure development initiatives to strengthen its aerospace industry (Liangrokapart & Sittiwatethanasiri, 2022). These initiatives encompass significant enhancements to existing facilities to ensure compliance with international standards of quality, safety, and environmental sustainability, alongside the establishment of specialized aerospace parks designed explicitly to encourage innovation, collaboration, and industry synergies (Florida et al., 2015). Infrastructure projects include KLIA Aeropolis, dedicated to extensive MRO operations, logistics, aerospace manufacturing, and aviation services; Subang Aerotech Park, strategically positioned as an aerospace engineering and MRO hub with proximity to key transport nodes; Senai Aerospace Park, benefiting from close access to major Asian aviation centers; Serendah High Value Manufacturing Park, specifically tailored to high-value aerospace components manufacturing; and Kulim Hi-Tech Park, supporting a broad spectrum of high-tech industries, including aerospace, with advanced infrastructure and integrated facilities.

Strategic infrastructure investments significantly lower operational costs, enhance operational efficiencies, and elevate Malaysia’s attractiveness as a destination for international aerospace investments (Mandirola et al., 2022). These developments foster broader economic growth through the creation of aerospace clusters, which promote synergies, accelerate innovation, encourage the sharing of best practices, and generate substantial employment opportunities (Peneda et al., 2011). By nurturing these clusters, Malaysia aims to cultivate a robust aerospace ecosystem that reinforces its global competitive standing and sustainably contributes to national economic development. These spatially concentrated aerospace clusters generate agglomeration effects that accelerate technological diffusion, enhance supplier specialization, and reduce transaction costs across the supply chain (Hisan et al., 2024). Furthermore, such clusters act as platforms for collaboration and knowledge exchange, enabling Malaysian firms to access international certifications, adopt advanced manufacturing techniques, and participate in sustainable aviation fuel (SAF)-related pilot projects—thereby reinforcing Malaysia’s positioning as a sustainable and competitive aerospace hub.

Malaysia’s infrastructure development strategy represents both a foundational pillar and a transformative driver of its broader aerospace ambitions. The deliberate deployment of integrated, sustainable, and technologically advanced infrastructure not only strengthens the country’s regional positioning but also signals its readiness to compete in an increasingly complex and environmentally conscious global aerospace marketplace. This infrastructure strategy supports core industrial functions such as aerospace manufacturing, maintenance, logistics, and sustainable fuel operations, while enabling knowledge transfer, research and development (R&D), innovation, and workforce training through proximity to academic and industrial stakeholders (MIDA, 2022). Malaysia’s ability to deliver a future-ready aerospace infrastructure ecosystem will be a key determinant of its competitiveness and leadership within the regional and global aerospace sectors. As such, coordinated governance, agile policy execution, and continuous benchmarking against global best practices will be essential to sustaining momentum and achieving long-term strategic outcomes.

Technology and Innovation (TI)

Technology and innovation serve as foundational pillars of the aerospace industry, significantly enhancing operational efficiency, safety, and environmental sustainability (Castillon-Barraza et al., 2018). The industry’s commitment to technological advancement underscores its drive toward maintaining global competitiveness and fostering sustainable long-term growth. Rapid advancements in areas such as materials science, propulsion systems, avionics, and digital technologies are continually reshaping the aerospace landscape, necessitating proactive adaptation by industry stakeholders (Büyükozkan et al., 2020). Embracing these technological innovations is crucial for ensuring efficiency improvements, safety enhancements, and reduced environmental impacts, thereby positioning organizations strategically within a competitive global market.

Malaysia’s aerospace industry is actively integrating technology and innovation into its strategic growth initiatives, with a focused emphasis on research and development (R&D) activities (Allan, 2025). Collaboration with academic institutions and key industry players, has been instrumental in creating an environment conducive to sustained technological advancement and innovation (MIDA, 2022). This collaborative ecosystem is pivotal in addressing critical areas such as advanced materials, avionics systems, and sustainable aviation fuels—each integral to the modernization and long-term sustainability of the aerospace industry (Ansell, 2023). Malaysia’s aerospace R&D landscape has matured significantly over the 2020–2025 period, characterized by multi-stakeholder collaboration, policy-aligned innovation, and early sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) breakthroughs (Bernama, 2025). These developments reflect a deliberate strategy to convert national resources into technological capabilities. Looking ahead, continued investment in commercialization pathways, intellectual property protection, and cross-border collaboration will be essential to translating R&D into sustainable economic and environmental impact.

Industry stakeholders have responded robustly to these government-led initiatives, making substantial investments in research and development (R&D) projects aimed at enhancing product offerings and optimizing operational efficiencies (MIDA, 2022). Companies within the aerospace sector are actively researching advanced materials designed to deliver superior performance and enhanced durability, crucial for aerospace components (Drouot et al., 2018). Ongoing development and adoption of carbon-fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) have significantly enhanced aircraft strength-to-weight ratios, improving fuel efficiency and structural resilience (Kasim et al., 2021). Concurrently, significant investments are being directed towards next-generation avionics systems, designed to maximize aircraft efficiency, safety, and reliability (Gkotsis & Vezzani, 2022). Furthermore, there is a pronounced industry-wide focus on developing sustainable aviation fuels, reflecting a commitment to reducing environmental footprints and aligning technological innovation with broader sustainability objectives.

Talent Development (TD)

The aerospace industry’s rapid evolution necessitates a workforce that is not only skilled in current technologies but also adaptable to future innovations (MIGHT, 2015). Strategic initiatives in education, vocational training, and continuous professional development are therefore integral to this vision (Fullingim, 2018). Institutions such as University Putra Malaysia (UPM) and University Kuala Lumpur (UniKL) offer comprehensive academic programs and applied research opportunities in aerospace engineering. These institutions serve as incubators for future aerospace professionals and play a pivotal role in fostering innovation through academic-industry partnerships. Additionally, the Aerospace Malaysia Innovation Centre (AMIC), a collaborative initiative between government, academia, and industry, exemplifies the country’s commitment to integrating research and talent development as key pillars of industrial advancement (MIDA, 2022). AMIC has also facilitated joint research initiatives in advanced aerospace technologies and provided platforms for student-industry engagement through innovation challenges and project-based learning.

Malaysia’s focus on vocational education is manifested through the establishment of a robust Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) system (Tanrıverdi, 2020). These TVET institutions offer targeted programs that confer certifications and diplomas in critical aerospace-related fields, including maintenance, machining, avionics, quality inspection, and systems operations. These programs are frequently updated to incorporate technological advancements and are tailored to address industry-specific workforce demands. Furthermore, many of these institutions are equipped with industry-standard simulation labs, digital training platforms, and access to global certification schemes, enhancing the quality and portability of qualifications (Baharuddin, 2025). The integration of TVET within specialized aerospace parks—such as training centers embedded in Subang Aerotech Park—creates synergies between education, industry, and research. These hubs serve as testing grounds for industry-relevant training and offer direct pathways to employment within the aerospace sector. Not only does this reduce the skills mismatch often observed in high-tech industries, but it also strengthens Malaysia’s capacity to support localized supply chains and innovation ecosystems.

Regulatory Support (RS)

In the context of a competitive and technologically intensive global aerospace market, a robust regulatory framework coupled with strategic incentives plays a pivotal role in fostering a business environment conducive to investment, innovation, and sustainable industrial growth (Arnaldo et al., 2019). Regulatory alignment with international standards and the provision of targeted fiscal and non-fiscal incentives not only serve to attract foreign direct investment but also empower local enterprises to enhance their capabilities, deepen technological absorption, and integrate more effectively into complex global value chains. These frameworks are instrumental in ensuring consistent safety, quality, and compliance benchmarks, while simultaneously enhancing Malaysia’s global competitiveness and investment appeal.

The Malaysian government, spearheaded by the Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) and supported by agencies such as the Malaysian Investment Development Authority (MIDA), has demonstrated a proactive stance in institutionalizing policies aimed at the advancement of the aerospace sector (MITI, 2017). A cornerstone of this strategy is the Malaysian Aerospace Industry Blueprint 2030, which articulates a comprehensive long-term vision for the sector’s development. The blueprint emphasizes enhancing regulatory clarity, modernizing approval and certification processes, and reinforcing institutional capacity to manage industrial transformation. Malaysia has been working to harmonize its regulatory standards with those of leading aerospace nations and international bodies such as the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (MIGHT, 2015). This harmonization not only facilitates market access for Malaysian companies but also boosts investor confidence.

A central institutional mechanism supporting this agenda is the National Aerospace Industry Coordinating Office (NAICO). NAICO plays a multifaceted role in coordinating aerospace development efforts, streamlining regulatory mandates, and aligning Malaysia’s policies with global aviation standards (MITI, 2023). NAICO’s efforts in harmonizing regulatory requirements with international bodies such as the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)-have been pivotal in building investor confidence and facilitating export market access (MIGHT, 2015). This regulatory harmonization mitigates certification barriers, fosters operational transparency, and enables Malaysian firms to qualify for participation in high-value aerospace projects globally (Bakar, 2024). Parallel to regulatory advancement, Malaysia’s incentive regime plays a decisive role in shaping the investment ecosystem.

Sustainable Initiatives (SI)

Malaysia’s alignment with international climate governance frameworks is further reinforced through its voluntary participation in the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA), administered by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) (ICAO, 2025). CORSIA promotes a basket of measures, including sustainable aviation fuels (SAF), operational improvements, and market-based emissions offsets. Malaysia’s engagement in this program not only supports its national emission reduction targets but also signifies its role in upholding global environmental governance and achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13 on climate action (ICAO, 2023). Malaysia Aviation Group (MAG), through its flagship carrier Malaysia Airlines, has launched a voluntary carbon offsetting program in collaboration with CHOOOSE, a Norway-based climate technology company (TTGMICE, 2024). This initiative allows passengers to estimate the environmental impact of their air travel and opt into offsetting programs that support verified climate mitigation projects.

The integration of such programs into the reservation system reflects a growing trend of consumer-driven environmental responsibility and the airline’s strategic alignment with CORSIA’s broader framework for industry decarbonisation (Malaysia Airlines, 2022). Efforts to improve aircraft fuel efficiency are concurrently being implemented. MAG’s adoption of the Airbus A350-900 aircraft—engineered with composite materials, improved aerodynamics, and next-generation avionics—has delivered measurable benefits, including an 11% reduction in fuel usage and reduced emissions of nitrogen oxides and particulate matter. These aircraft are also quieter, supporting broader goals related to noise pollution reduction and sustainable airport operations (Benama, 2025). Integrating such technological advancements into the airline fleet is an essential component of the nation’s sustainable aviation strategy.

Beyond equipment upgrades, Malaysia has intensified efforts to integrate SAF into its long-term aviation strategies. SAF, derived from renewable sources such as biomass, municipal solid waste, and agricultural residues, is projected to reduce lifecycle CO2 emissions by up to 65% relative to conventional jet fuels (IATA, 2024). The alignment of this initiative with CORSIA’s mandatory compliance phase reinforces Malaysia’s readiness to fulfill its international obligations while catalyzing domestic innovation in green fuel technologies (Malaysia Airline, 2022). Collectively, these sustainability initiatives demonstrate Malaysia’s holistic, multi-stakeholder approach to decarbonising aviation. By integrating technological innovation, market-based mechanisms, strategic partnerships, and policy instruments, Malaysia is actively laying the foundation for a low-carbon aviation future that aligns with national climate ambitions and contributes meaningfully to global decarbonisation efforts

Figure1 illustrates the proposed framework for a Malaysia’s Aerospace Growth

CONCLUSION

Malaysia’s aerospace industry is positioned at a critical inflection point, supported by its strategic geographical location within the burgeoning Asia-Pacific aviation corridor. As the regional aviation market experiences significant expansion in air passenger traffic, cargo movement, and regional connectivity, Malaysia is well-placed to serve as a central hub for aerospace manufacturing, maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) services, and sustainable aviation initiatives. This locational advantage is further enhanced by the country’s comprehensive infrastructure and connectivity, which enable access to major markets across Southeast Asia, East Asia, and the Pacific Rim. However, in an increasingly competitive landscape shaped by rapid technological change, geopolitical uncertainties, and evolving global sustainability norms, Malaysia’s continued relevance will depend on its ability to foster resilience, innovation, and strategic agility.

Efforts to date have demonstrated a multi-pronged commitment from both the public and private sectors. Government-led policy instruments such as the Aerospace Industry Blueprint 2030 and the National Energy Transition Roadmap (NETR) have outlined clear visions and actionable targets to support the decarbonisation of aviation and position Malaysia as a leader in green aerospace technologies. These policies are reinforced by compliance with international frameworks, including the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and its associated Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). Through strategic alignment with these frameworks, Malaysia has actively pursued pathways that integrate regulatory harmonization, carbon offsetting mechanisms, sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) adoption, and low-carbon infrastructure development.

Furthermore, the collaboration between industry stakeholders, government agencies, academic institutions, and international partners is indicative of a broader transformation toward ecosystem-based innovation. Malaysia’s focus on strengthening research and development (R&D) capacities, fostering public-private partnerships, and expanding vocational and technical training opportunities illustrates a systemic approach to talent and technology development. Initiatives such as the establishment of the Aerospace Malaysia Innovation Centre (AMIC), SAF offtake agreements, and carbon offset programs launched by national carriers reflect growing institutional maturity and environmental accountability. The adoption of fuel-efficient aircraft, investment in SAF production infrastructure, and participation in regional aviation forums collectively contribute to Malaysia’s competitive differentiation within the ASEAN aviation landscape.

Nonetheless, significant challenges remain. Chief among them are the persistent gaps in localized high-value aerospace R&D, limitations in upstream supply chain integration, and barriers to scaling sustainable fuel technologies due to feedstock availability and production costs. Moreover, while Malaysia’s policy frameworks are robust, successful implementation requires rigorous monitoring, adaptive governance, and the ability to incorporate feedback from dynamic market and technological conditions. A critical determinant of success will be the extent to which Malaysia can bridge the divide between policy ambition and on-the-ground execution—particularly in mobilizing capital, incentivizing innovation, and accelerating knowledge transfer through international collaboration.

The findings of this study contribute important insights into Malaysia’s aerospace transition; however, it is essential to acknowledge the constraints posed by the reliance on secondary data. These include potential biases, publication lags, and the omission of confidential or proprietary industry information. Furthermore, the rapid evolution of sustainable aviation technologies suggests that some strategies evaluated in this paper may require future revision or recalibration. The specificity of the Malaysian context shaped by its regulatory environment, resource endowments, and developmental stage also limits the generalizability of the conclusions drawn to other emerging markets. As such, future research should prioritize primary data collection, particularly through in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, case studies of regional aerospace clusters, and comparative analyses across ASEAN member states.

In conclusion, Malaysia’s trajectory in the aerospace industry reflects a deliberate and strategically coordinated effort to elevate its global standing while contributing to broader sustainability and economic development goals. With continued policy coherence, targeted investment in green technologies, and deeper international engagement, Malaysia has the potential to emerge as both a regional aerospace powerhouse and a proactive contributor to global aviation decarbonisation. By fostering a resilient, inclusive, and innovation-driven aerospace ecosystem, Malaysia can transform present challenges into catalysts for long-term competitive advantage and sustainable industrial transformation.

REFERENCES

1. Allan, K. (2025). A look at Malaysia’s emergence as a business aviation hub in the Asia Pacific region. https://www. businessairportinternational.com/features/a-look-at-malaysias-emergence-as-a-business-aviation-hub-in-the-asia-pacific-region.html.
2. Ansell, P.J. (2023). Review of sustainable energy carriers for aviation: Benefits, challenges, and future viability. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 141, 100919.
3. Arnaldo-Valdes, R. M., Burmaoglu, S., Tucci, V., Braga da Costa Campos, L. M., Mattera, L., & Gomez Comendador, V. F. (2019). Flight path 2050 and ACARE goals for maintaining and extending industrial leadership in aviation: a map of the aviation technology space. Sustainability, 11(7), 2065.
4. Baharuddin, S., Zulhasni, N., Iqbal, M.S., & Ibrahim, N. (2025). TVET education for community education 5.0 in Malaysia. Semarak International Journal of Innovation in Learning and Education, 4(1), 27–41.
5. Bakar, M.Z.A., Jaafar, J., Muhamed, A.A., Rahman, A.A., & Rasedee, A.F.N. (2024). Leveraging the industrial collaboration program for Malaysia’s aerospace industry. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal 11(1), 199–207.
6. Bernama (2025). Airbus, Malaysian centre to advance sustainable-aviation-fuel supply chain research in APAC. https://theedgemalaysia.com/node/751015.
7. Büyükozkan, G., Havle, C. A., & Feyzioglu, O. (2020). A new digital service quality model and its strategic analysis in aviation industry using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy AHP. Journal of Air Transport Management, 86, 101817.
8. Castillon-Barraza, A., Gonzalez-Angeles, A., Lara-Chavez, F., & Mendoza-Munoz, I. (2018). Tools to measure the technological capabilities of the aerospace industry. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(4), 769-775.
9. Drouot, A., Zhao, R., Irving, L., Sanderson, D., & Ratchev, S. (2018). Measurement assisted assembly for high accuracy aerospace manufacturing. IFAC-Papers Online, 51(11), 393–398.
10. Dube, K., Nhamo, G., & Chikodzi, D. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic and prospects for recovery of the global aviation industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 92, 102022.
11. Florida, R., Mellander, C., & Holgersson, T. (2015). Up in the Air: The role of airports for regional economic development. The Annal of Regional Science, 54, 197–214.
12. Fullingim, J.F. (2018). The marketability of higher education aviation graduates as perceived by regional airline pilots. The Collegiate Aviation Review International, 29 (1).
13. Gkotsis, P., Vezzani, A., (2022). The price tag of technologies and the ‘unobserved’ R&D capabilities of firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 31 (5), 339–361.
14. Gössling, S. (2020). Risks, resilience, and pathways to sustainable aviation: A COVID-19 perspective. Journal of Air Transport Management, 89, 101933.
15. Hisan, H., Badruddin, N.A., & Yusof, K.H. (2024). A review of Malaysia’s aerospace manufacturing post-COVID19 pandemic using Michael Porter’s Five Competitive Forces model. E3S Web of Conferences, 477, 00048.
16. Ibrahim, A., & Fernando, Y. (2023). Blockchain technology to improve aerospace supply chains. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 15, 2.
17. ICAO, International Civil Aviation Organization (2025). The carbon offsetting and reduction scheme for international aviation (CORSIA). https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/CORSIA/Documents/CORSIA_Newsletter_Apr%202025.pdf.
18. IATA, International Air Transport Association. (2024). SAF will provide about 65% of the mitigation needed for airlines to achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2050. https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2024-releases/ 2024-06-02-03/
19. Kasim, M.S., Izamshah, R., Mohamad, W.N.F.W., & Sundi, S.A. (2021). Analysis of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites delamination during vibration assisted Trimming using historical data design, Malaysian Journal on Composites Science and Manufacturing 6, (1),1-13.
20. Liangrokapart, J., & Sittiwatethanasiri, T (2022). Strategic direction for aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul hub after crisis recovery. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28, 81-89
21. Malaysia Airlines. (2022). Be part of history: Travel on Malaysia airlines’ first passenger flight powered by sustainable aviation fuel. https://www.malaysia airlines.com/sg/en/mh-media-centre/news-releases/2022/be-part-of
22. Mandirola, M., Casarotti, C., Peloso,S., Lanese,I., Brunesi, E., & Senaldi, I. (2022), Use of UAS for damage inspection and assessment of bridge infrastructures, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 72, 102824
23. MIDA, Malaysia investment performance report 2013, (2013). http://www. mida.gov.my/env3/ uploads/ Performance Report /2013/IPR2013.
24. MIDA, Malaysia investment performance report 2022 (2022). https://www.mid.gov.my/wp-content/ uploads /2023/03/MIPR-2022.pdf
25. MIGHT, Malaysian aerospace strategy, (2007). http://www.might.org.my/ Aironline / Publication / Open Forum LIMA 07/MIGHT.pdf.
26. MIGHT, Malaysian aerospace blueprint 2030, (2015). http://www.might.org.my /en/ Event Documents/ Aero Bluetrint.MIGHT @ LIMA’15 Open Forum.pdf.
27. MITI, Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry (2023). New industrial master plan 2030 aerospace industry. https://www.nimp 2030.gov.my/ nimp2030 /modules_resources/bookshelf/e-01-Sectoral_NIMP-Aerospace_Industry/e-01-Sectoral_NIMP-Aerospace_Industry.pdf.
28. MITI, Malaysian aerospace industry report 2016/2017, (2017). http://www. miti.gov.my/miti/ resource/ NAICO/ MITI_Aerospace_Industry_Report_2016- 2017.pdf.
29. Peneda, M.J.A., Reis, V.D., & Macário, M.R., (2011) Critical factors for development of airport cities. Journal of Transport. Research Board, 2214 (1) 1–9.
30. Tanrıverdi, G., Bakır, M., & Merkert, R., (2020). What can we learn from the JATM literature for the future of aviation post Covid-19? – a bibliometric and visualization analysis. Journal Air Transport Management, 89, 101916.
31. TTGMICE (2024). Malaysia airlines’ corporate carbon programme takes flight | TTGmice. https://www.ttgmice. com/2024/03/ 11/malaysia-airlines-corporate-carbon-programme-takes-flight/.