Evolution of Urban Regeneration in Malaysia

Evolution of Urban Regeneration in Malaysia

Sabariah Eni, Abdul Jalil Omar, Indera Syahrul Mat Radzuan, Nurul Nabila Sulaiman, Zarina Shamsudin

Department of Real Estate Management, Faculty of Technology Management and Business, University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.906000225

Received: 29 May 2025; Accepted: 02 June 2025; Published: 08 July 2025

ABSTRACT 

This study explores the evolution of urban regeneration in Malaysia, tracing its historical context and examining the key drivers and policies that have shaped its development. The research highlights the socio-economic and political factors influencing regeneration efforts by analyzing significant urban growth and transformation periods. Key policies and government initiatives, such as the National Urbanization Policy, are reviewed to understand their impact on urban revitalization. The study includes detailed case studies of successful urban regeneration projects, such as the Kuala Lumpur City Centre (KLCC), illustrating practical applications and outcomes. It also identifies the challenges and barriers faced in urban regeneration, including financial constraints, regulatory hurdles, and community resistance. The research discusses future trends and offers recommendations for sustainable urban development, emphasizing the integration of smart city technologies and innovative planning approaches. This comprehensive analysis aims to provide valuable insights for policymakers, urban planners, and stakeholders to promote inclusive and sustainable urban regeneration in Malaysia.

Keywords: urban studies, real estate, town planning, local planning, Malaysian policy

INTRODUCTION

The historical development of urban areas in Malaysia is marked by significant periods of growth and transformation, deeply influenced by socio-economic and political factors. During the British colonial era, urban planning and development were primarily driven by colonial policies aimed at facilitating administrative control and economic exploitation (Goh, 2018). This period saw the establishment of key urban centers such as Kuala Lumpur and Penang, which were strategically developed to support the colonial economy through the extraction and export of resources (Goh, 2018). Post-independence, Malaysia embarked on a rapid urbanization trajectory, fueled by industrialization and economic growth, which necessitated comprehensive urban regeneration efforts to address the challenges of urban sprawl and infrastructure deficits (Shamsuddin, 2011). The introduction of the New Economic Policy (NEP) in 1971, aimed at restructuring society and reducing poverty, further shaped urban regeneration practices by promoting equitable development and addressing socio-economic disparities (Jomo, 2004). This historical context provides a critical foundation for understanding contemporary urban regeneration policies and practices in Malaysia. Historical Context of Urban Regeneration in Malaysia

In the contemporary era, urban regeneration in Malaysia has evolved to address physical infrastructure and socio-economic and environmental sustainability. Major cities like Kuala Lumpur and George Town have implemented various regeneration projects to revitalize old urban areas, preserve heritage sites, and improve living conditions (Shamsuddin, 2011). For instance, the regeneration of Kuala Lumpur’s historic core has focused on enhancing public spaces, promoting mixed-use developments, and integrating green infrastructure to create a more livable urban environment (Shamsuddin, 2011). Similarly, efforts in George Town have emphasized the conservation of its UNESCO World Heritage sites while fostering economic activities through tourism and creative industries (Jomo, 2004). These initiatives reflect a broader trend towards sustainable urban development, aiming to balance growth with the preservation of cultural and historical assets. By understanding the historical context and contemporary practices, one can appreciate the complexities and achievements of urban regeneration in Malaysia.

Terms in urban development including urban development, urban redevelopment, urban renewal, urban regeneration, and urban rejuvenation

Key Drivers and Policies Influencing Urban Regeneration

Urban regeneration in Malaysia is driven by a confluence of factors, including economic development, population growth, and environmental sustainability. Economic development has been a pivotal driver, with urban regeneration projects often targeting economically stagnant areas to stimulate growth and attract investment (Yuen, 2008). For instance, the revitalization of Kuala Lumpur’s city center has been a critical focus, aiming to transform it into a vibrant economic hub through various redevelopment initiatives (Yuen, 2008). The rapid population growth in urban centers has necessitated the redevelopment of urban areas to meet the increasing demand for housing, infrastructure, and services (Moser, 2016). This growth has led to significant urban sprawl, requiring comprehensive planning and regeneration efforts to ensure sustainable urban development (Moser, 2016). Environmental sustainability has emerged as a critical consideration, with policies promoting the integration of green spaces and sustainable urban practices to enhance the quality of urban life (Tan, 2012). Efforts such as creating urban parks and green corridors are examples of initiatives to improve environmental sustainability in Malaysian cities (Tan, 2012).

Significant policies, such as the National Urbanization Policy and various local government initiatives, have played a crucial role in shaping urban regeneration projects by implementing zoning laws, financial incentives, and public-private partnerships (Malaysia Ministry of Housing and Local Government, 2006). The National Urbanization Policy, introduced in 2006, provides a strategic framework for managing urban growth and promoting balanced regional development (Malaysia Ministry of Housing and Local Government, 2006). Local government initiatives, such as the Penang Structure Plan, have also been instrumental in guiding urban regeneration efforts by setting clear guidelines for land use and development (Malaysia Ministry of Housing and Local Government, 2006). Public-private partnerships have been particularly effective in mobilizing resources and expertise for large-scale urban regeneration projects, facilitating the redevelopment of key urban areas while ensuring community involvement and benefit (Yuen, 2008).

These policies and initiatives collectively contribute to the dynamic and multifaceted approach to urban regeneration in Malaysia.

National Urbanization Policy (NUP)

• Overview: The NUP was launched in 2006 to guide Malaysia’s urbanization in a sustainable, inclusive, and balanced manner. With rapid urbanization, the policy seeks to ensure that cities grow in a way that benefits both the economy and society while protecting the environment.
• Key Focus Areas:

• • Balanced Regional Growth: Promotes the development of smaller cities and towns to reduce congestion in major urban centers.
  • Land Use Efficiency: Encourages mixed-use developments and efficient land use to reduce urban sprawl.
  • Public Transport: Emphasizes expanding and improving public transportation networks to reduce reliance on private vehicles and alleviate traffic congestion.
  • Socio-Economic Inclusion: Aims to reduce disparities between urban and rural populations, ensuring that all Malaysians can access quality services, infrastructure, and job opportunities.

Malaysia Smart City Framework

• Overview: Developed by the Ministry of Housing and Local Government, the Malaysia Smart City Framework outlines a vision for creating smart, resilient, and sustainable cities nationwide. It provides guidelines for cities to leverage digital technologies to improve urban management and enhance residents’ quality of life.
• Key Focus Areas:

• • Smart Transportation: Promotes solutions like real-time traffic monitoring, intelligent transportation systems, and improved public transit networks.
  • Waste Management: Supports smart waste collection and recycling systems to minimize landfill use and encourage eco-friendly practices.
  • Energy Efficiency: Encourages the use of IoT-enabled devices to manage and optimize energy use, promoting the use of renewable energy sources and green buildings.
  • Public Safety and Services: Utilizes data analytics and IoT to improve public safety, emergency response times, and the provision of services to residents.

National Housing Policy (DPN)

• Overview: The National Housing Policy ensures access to affordable, quality housing, particularly for low- and middle-income groups. Housing affordability is a critical challenge in Malaysia, especially in urban areas where demand is high.
• Key Focus Areas:

• • Affordable Housing Supply: Aims to provide sufficient affordable housing units by incentivizing public and private sectors to build cost-effective homes.
  • Quality Housing Standards: Promotes using sustainable and durable materials in housing construction and encourages safe, comfortable living conditions.
  • Inclusivity in Urban Housing: Supports a balanced distribution of affordable housing within urban areas to prevent the concentration of poverty and ensure social integration.
  • Financial Assistance: Offers support for first-time homebuyers, rental assistance, and other financial programs to make homeownership more accessible.

National Policy on Climate Change (2009)

• Overview: The National Policy on Climate Change provides a framework for Malaysia’s response to climate change, emphasizing sustainable development practices across various sectors, including urban planning. This policy seeks to mitigate the impact of urban growth on the environment and enhance resilience against climate-related risks.
• Key Focus Areas:

• • Green Building Standards: Promotes green building certifications and encourages the construction of energy-efficient, eco-friendly buildings.
  • Urban Green Spaces: Supports the development of parks, green corridors, and open spaces in urban areas to mitigate urban heat islands and improve residents’ well-being.
  • Sustainable Land Use Planning: Advocates for urban planning practices that consider flood risks, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable resource management.
  • Climate Adaptation and Resilience: Emphasizes the need for cities to prepare for climate-related impacts, such as flooding and extreme weather, by investing in resilient infrastructure and early warning systems.

Greater Kuala Lumpur/Klang Valley (GKL/KV) National Key Economic Area (NKEA)

• Overview: The Greater Kuala Lumpur/Klang Valley NKEA is part of Malaysia’s Economic Transformation Program, designed to boost the economic development of the Kuala Lumpur and Klang Valley regions. This policy aims to transform the area into a world-class urban region that attracts both talent and investment, enhancing its position as an economic hub in Southeast Asia.
• Key Focus Areas:

• • Public Transportation Infrastructure: Focuses on large-scale projects such as the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) and Light Rail Transit (LRT) expansions to ease traffic congestion and promote sustainable mobility.
  • Green Spaces and Recreational Areas: Aims to create more parks, riverfronts, and recreational facilities to improve the quality of life and make the city more attractive to residents and tourists alike.
  • Economic Competitiveness: Promotes Kuala Lumpur as a business hub by improving its infrastructure, reducing bureaucratic barriers, and creating attractive living conditions for international and local talent.
  • Sustainable Urban Development: Encourages eco-friendly developments, green buildings, and infrastructure projects that consider environmental sustainability and urban resilience against climate change.

Evolution of Malaysia Plan for Urban Development Since 1960

Since 1960, Malaysia’s urban development plans have adapted to manage rapid urbanization. Each plan has addressed the socio-economic and political needs of its time, aiming to transform urban areas, improve infrastructure, and enhance residents’ quality of life. Initially focused on basic infrastructure and industrialization, recent plans prioritize sustainable and inclusive growth. This evolution highlights the government’s commitment to balanced regional development, economic resilience, and integrating innovative technologies to create vibrant, livable cities.

First Malaysia Plan (1966-1970)

The First Malaysia Plan focused on developing basic infrastructure and improving living conditions, particularly in rural areas. Urban development efforts included upgrading district hospital facilities and establishing medical subcentres in urban areas to narrow the healthcare gap between rural and urban regions. The plan also aimed to reduce unemployment and address income disparities between rural and urban areas by promoting industrialization and modernizing agriculture.

Second Malaysia Plan (1971-1975)

The Second Malaysia Plan introduced the New Economic Policy (NEP) to restructure society and reduce poverty. Urban development was a key component, with efforts to increase Malay participation in the economy and reduce the dominance of Chinese and foreign interests. The plan emphasized industrialization, with the establishment of new industrial estates on the east coast to curb rural-urban migration and promote balanced regional development.

Third Malaysia Plan (1976-1980)

The Third Malaysia Plan continued the goals of the NEP, focusing on reducing poverty and restructuring society. Urban development initiatives included increasing Malay presence in urban sectors and improving urban infrastructure. The plan aimed to diminish the concentration of employment in traditional agriculture and increase urban employment opportunities for Malays.

Fourth Malaysia Plan (1981-1985)

The Fourth Malaysia Plan aimed to further the objectives of the NEP by eradicating poverty and restructuring society. Urban development efforts included improving urban infrastructure, such as roads, bridges, and utilities, to support economic growth and enhance the quality of life. The plan also focused on regional development to reduce disparities between urban and rural areas.

Fifth Malaysia Plan (1986-1990)

The Fifth Malaysia Plan emphasized economic resilience and competitiveness. Urban development initiatives included upgrading urban infrastructure and promoting industrial growth in urban areas. The plan also aimed to improve urban living conditions and reduce urban poverty through targeted development programs.

Sixth Malaysia Plan (1991-1995)

The Sixth Malaysia Plan focused on sustaining rapid economic growth and promoting balanced regional development. Urban development efforts included enhancing urban infrastructure, such as transportation and utilities, to support industrial and commercial activities. The plan also aimed to improve urban living standards and promote sustainable urban development.

Seventh Malaysia Plan (1996-2000)

The Seventh Malaysia Plan continued to emphasize balanced development and social equity. Urban development initiatives included expanding urban infrastructure, such as roads, public transportation, and utilities, to support economic growth and improve urban living conditions. The plan also focused on providing affordable housing and improving urban services.

Eighth Malaysia Plan (2001-2005)

The Eighth Malaysia Plan aimed to enhance competitiveness and economic resilience. Urban development efforts included improving urban infrastructure, such as transportation, utilities, and public amenities, to support economic activities and enhance the quality of life. The plan also focused on promoting sustainable urban development and addressing urban poverty.

Ninth Malaysia Plan (2006-2010)

The Ninth Malaysia Plan aimed to achieve a stronger and more value-added economy while addressing socio-economic issues. Urban development initiatives included enhancing urban infrastructure, such as transportation, utilities, and public services, to support economic growth and improve urban living conditions. The plan also focused on promoting balanced regional development and reducing urban-rural disparities.

Tenth Malaysia Plan (2011-2015)

The Tenth Malaysia Plan focused on transforming Malaysia into a high-income nation. Urban development efforts included developing vibrant and liveable cities, improving urban infrastructure, and enhancing connectivity between urban and rural areas. The plan also aimed to promote sustainable urban development and improve the quality of urban life.

Eleventh Malaysia Plan (2016-2020)

The Eleventh Malaysia Plan aimed to achieve inclusive and sustainable growth. Urban development initiatives included enhancing urban infrastructure, promoting smart cities, and improving urban services to support economic activities and enhance the quality of life. The plan also focused on addressing urban poverty and promoting balanced regional development.

Twelfth Malaysia Plan (2021-2025)

The Twelfth Malaysia Plan focuses on achieving a “Prosperous, Inclusive, Sustainable Malaysia.” Urban development efforts include promoting green and smart cities, enhancing urban infrastructure, and improving urban living conditions. The plan also aims to address urban poverty, promote balanced regional development, and ensure sustainable urban growth.

Case Studies of Successful Urban Regeneration Projects

Detailed case studies of notable urban regeneration projects in Malaysia provide practical insights into the strategies and outcomes of these initiatives. The Kuala Lumpur City Centre (KLCC) project stands out as a prominent example, transforming a central area into a vibrant mixed-use development that includes commercial, residential, and recreational spaces (Bunnell, 2004). The project’s objectives were to create a world-class business and commercial hub, leveraging strategic planning and investment to achieve its goals. Another significant example is the George Town World Heritage Site, where urban regeneration efforts have focused on preserving cultural heritage while promoting tourism and economic development (Khoo, 2009). These case studies illustrate the practical applications of urban regeneration, highlighting the implementation strategies, outcomes, and lessons learned from each project.

1. Kuala Lumpur River of Life (ROL) Project

• Overview: The River of Life is one of the largest urban regeneration projects in Malaysia, aiming to transform the Klang and Gombak rivers into a vibrant waterfront.
• Objectives: It seeks to beautify and improve the water quality of the rivers, turning them into attractive urban spaces. The project also includes the revitalization of adjacent heritage areas and improved infrastructure to attract more visitors and businesses.
• Impact: Since its implementation, parts of the river area have become popular tourist and recreational spots, helping to spur economic growth and support local businesses, while also improving the local environment and providing green space for city residents.

2. Medan Pasar and Kampung Baru Redevelopment

• Overview: Medan Pasar, a historic district in the heart of Kuala Lumpur, and Kampung Baru, one of the oldest Malay neighborhoods in the city, have been targets for urban regeneration.
• Objectives: These projects aim to modernize while preserving cultural heritage. For Medan Pasar, the focus has been on restoring historical buildings, promoting arts and culture, and improving the pedestrian experience. Kampung Baru’s redevelopment is more complex, balancing modernization with the preservation of traditional Malay village characteristics.
• Impact: Medan Pasar has been enhanced with new public spaces, creative art installations, and improved accessibility, though Kampung Baru’s redevelopment is ongoing and poses challenges regarding community interests and heritage conservation.

3. George Town, Penang: Heritage and Cultural Preservation

• Overview: George Town, Penang, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, has been undergoing careful urban regeneration with a focus on preserving its rich colonial and multicultural heritage.
• Objectives: The project emphasizes heritage conservation, sustainable tourism, and infrastructure improvements that maintain the unique character of the area. Initiatives have included building restoration, pedestrian-friendly streets, and the promotion of heritage businesses.
• Impact: The regeneration of George Town has contributed to a vibrant tourism industry while retaining cultural identity. However, it has also faced challenges related to gentrification and the rising cost of living for local residents.

4. Iskandar Malaysia in Johor Bahru

• Overview: Iskandar Malaysia is a large-scale development project aiming to transform Johor Bahru into an economic hub. It includes several urban regeneration initiatives to modernize infrastructure, improve urban living standards, and attract investment.
• Objectives: The project aims to create a thriving economic region that integrates residential, commercial, and industrial spaces, while also prioritizing green spaces, public transportation, and sustainable development practices.
• Impact: Iskandar Malaysia has attracted significant foreign and local investment, boosting Johor Bahru’s economy. However, the rapid development has raised concerns about environmental sustainability and affordability for local residents.

5. PJ Old Town, Petaling Jaya Regeneration

• Overview: The regeneration of PJ Old Town focuses on revitalizing a historic commercial area in Petaling Jaya with improvements to public amenities, traffic management, and community facilities.
• Objectives: The aim is to improve the living environment, attract small businesses, and preserve the character of this historical area while making it more accessible and pedestrian-friendly.
• Impact: Upgrades to the town’s infrastructure have improved public facilities and walkability. However, as with many regeneration projects, maintaining the balance between modernization and preserving the area’s local charm remains a challenge.

6. Taman Tugu Project, Kuala Lumpur

• Overview: Taman Tugu is an urban park regeneration project that transforms 66 acres of forest land near the city center into a public green space for recreational activities and environmental conservation.
• Objectives: The project aims to create a sustainable urban forest park for Kuala Lumpur, enhancing biodiversity and offering an escape from the city’s urban density.
• Impact: Taman Tugu has provided a much-needed green space for Kuala Lumpur residents, promoting environmental awareness and sustainable urban living. It’s part of a broader effort to make Kuala Lumpur a more livable city with access to nature within the urban core.

Challenges and Barriers to Urban Regeneration

Urban regeneration efforts in Malaysia face a myriad of challenges and barriers that hinder their successful implementation. Financial constraints are a significant barrier, with limited funding available for large-scale regeneration projects, often leading to delays or scaled-down initiatives (Hamid, 2014). This financial limitation is exacerbated by the high costs associated with land acquisition, construction, and infrastructure development, which can strain public budgets and deter private investment (Hamid, 2014). Additionally, the reliance on traditional funding sources, such as government allocations and bank loans, may not be sufficient to meet the extensive financial demands of comprehensive urban regeneration projects (Hamid, 2014). Innovative financing mechanisms, such as public-private partnerships and international funding, are essential to overcome these financial barriers and ensure the successful implementation of regeneration initiatives.

Regulatory hurdles, including complex approval processes and bureaucratic inefficiencies, pose additional challenges, complicating the execution of regeneration plans (Yusoff, 2015). The regulatory framework governing urban regeneration in Malaysia often involves multiple agencies and layers of approval, leading to delays and increased project costs (Yusoff, 2015). Bureaucratic red tape can hinder timely decision-making and create uncertainties for developers and investors, further complicating the regeneration process (Yusoff, 2015). Streamlining regulatory procedures and enhancing inter-agency coordination are critical to reducing these barriers and facilitating smoother project implementation. Moreover, clear and consistent policies are needed to provide a stable and predictable environment for urban regeneration efforts.

Community resistance, particularly from residents affected by regeneration projects, can impede progress and necessitate extensive stakeholder engagement and negotiation (Ismail, 2013). Residents may resist regeneration efforts due to concerns about displacement, loss of community identity, and potential increases in living costs (Ismail, 2013). Effective communication and inclusive planning processes are essential to address these concerns and build community support for regeneration projects (Ismail, 2013). Engaging residents early in the planning process and ensuring their voices are heard can help mitigate resistance and foster a sense of ownership and cooperation. Additionally, providing adequate compensation and support for displaced residents can alleviate some of the negative impacts of regeneration and promote social equity.

Future Trends and Recommendations for Sustainable Urban Development in Malaysia

In the Malaysian context, sustainable urban development faces unique challenges and opportunities shaped by the nation’s rapid urbanization, diverse cultural landscape, and environmental vulnerabilities. Looking ahead, future trends in urban regeneration will likely be influenced by emerging technologies, innovative planning approaches, and the evolving socio-economic fabric of Malaysia’s urban areas.

1. Integration of Smart City Technologies: Malaysia has shown strong commitment toward developing smart cities through initiatives like the Malaysia Smart City Framework. Technologies like the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), and data analytics are expected to be increasingly utilized to enhance urban management and improve the quality of life in cities like Kuala Lumpur, Penang, and Johor Bahru. These technologies can help streamline traffic management, waste management, energy usage, and public safety, making urban spaces more efficient, responsive, and sustainable (Chong, 2018).
2. Innovative and Inclusive Planning Approaches: The adoption of innovative planning practices, such as participatory planning and community-driven development, is gaining traction across Malaysia. For example, the Iskandar Malaysia development and Kuala Lumpur City Plan have included participatory elements to engage citizens in shaping their urban environments. This approach ensures that diverse community voices are heard and that development initiatives meet the needs of all stakeholders, especially in multi-ethnic and multi-cultural Malaysian cities (Tan, 2019).
3. Adapting to Evolving Socio-economic Conditions: As Malaysia continues to urbanize rapidly, socio-economic factors such as population growth, migration, and an aging demographic profile will influence urban regeneration strategies. For instance, urban areas will need to address housing affordability, access to green spaces, and infrastructure resilience to ensure they are well-prepared for shifting demographic and economic realities.

Recommendations for Sustainable Urban Development in Malaysia

To address these challenges and leverage future trends, several recommendations are essential for policymakers, urban planners, and stakeholders in Malaysia:

• Promoting Sustainable and Inclusive Development: Encourage green building practices and low-carbon transportation options to reduce environmental impact. Policies should support equitable access to public services, housing, and green spaces, promoting inclusivity across ethnic, socio-economic, and age groups.
• Enhancing Public-Private Partnerships: Collaborations between the government, private sector, and community organizations can enhance urban regeneration efforts. Public-private partnerships can be instrumental in mobilizing resources, fostering innovation, and implementing large-scale sustainable development projects.
• Leveraging Technology for Resilience and Livability: Cities can enhance resilience to climate change

and environmental challenges through smart infrastructure and data-driven decision-making. Technologies such as real-time environmental monitoring and AI-powered predictive analytics could help mitigate urban heat islands, improve disaster preparedness, and ensure cleaner urban environments (Malaysia Ministry of Housing and Local Government, 2020).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the historical context and evolving policies of urban regeneration in Malaysia illustrate a complex and dynamic approach to addressing the challenges posed by rapid urbanization, economic development, and environmental sustainability. From colonial-era beginnings to post-independence modernization and the emergence of large-scale regeneration projects, Malaysia’s urban landscape reflects both growth and an ongoing commitment to equitable and sustainable development. The integration of community perspectives, the balancing of modernization with heritage preservation, and the strategic emphasis on sustainable practices are all key features that have shaped Malaysia’s approach to urban regeneration over time.

Moving forward, sustainable urban development in Malaysia will depend on a combination of innovative technologies, inclusive planning, and adaptive strategies to socio-economic shifts. Integrating smart city technologies, fostering public-private partnerships, and prioritizing inclusive, environmentally conscious practices will be essential to creating resilient and livable urban spaces. As Malaysia continues to navigate the complexities of urban growth, policymakers and stakeholders must stay responsive to the needs of diverse communities and the pressing challenges of climate resilience, ultimately supporting a balanced and sustainable future for Malaysian cities.

REFERENCES

1. Bunnell, T. (2004). Malaysia, Modernity and the Multimedia Super Corridor: A Critical Geography of Intelligent Landscapes. Routledge.
2. Chong, H. Y. (2018). Smart Cities in Malaysia: A Framework for Development. Journal of Urban Technology, 25(2), 1-19.
3. Goh, B. L. (2018). Urban Growth and Development in Malaysia.
4. Goh, B. L. (2018). Urban Planning in Malaysia: History, Assumptions and Issues. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 55(1), 1-20.
5. Hamid, A. R. (2014). Financial Constraints in Urban Regeneration Projects.
6. Hamid, A. R. (2014). Financing Urban Regeneration: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 32(5), 1-15.
7. Ismail, R. (2013). Community Resistance in Urban Regeneration Projects: A Case Study of Kuala Lumpur. Urban Studies, 50(10), 1-20.
8. Ismail, R. (2013). Community Resistance in Urban Regeneration.
9. Jomo, K. S. (2004). The New Economic Policy and Interethnic Relations in Malaysia. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
10. Khoo, S. N. (2009). George Town World Heritage Site: A Case Study of Urban Regeneration. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 4(3), 1-15.
11. Malaysia Ministry of Housing and Local Government. (2006). National Urbanization Policy.
12. Malaysia Ministry of Housing and Local Government. (2020). Sustainable Urban Development Framework.
13. Moser, C. (2016). Urban Regeneration and Population Growth.
14. Moser, S. (2016). Transforming Urban Landscapes: The Case of Kuala Lumpur. Cities, 55, 1-10.
15. Said, S. Y. (2018). Urban Regeneration and Conservation of Historic Areas in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Behavioural Studies (AjBeS), 3(11), 201-210.
16. Shamsuddin, S. (2011). Urbanization and Urban Growth in Malaysia: A Historical Perspective. Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 84(1), 1-20.
17. Shamsuddin, S. (2011). Urban Regeneration to Transform Kuala Lumpur Metropolitan Region.
18. Tan, P. Y. (2012). Environmental Sustainability in Urban Regeneration.
19. Tan, P. Y. (2012). Green Spaces and Urban Sustainability in Malaysia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(1), 1-10.
20. Tan, W. H. (2019). Participatory Planning in Urban Regeneration: Lessons from Malaysia. Planning Practice & Research, 34(2), 1-15.
21. Yuen, B. (2008). Economic Development and Urban Regeneration.
22. Yuen, B. (2008). Urban Regeneration in Asia: A Comparative Study of Singapore and Malaysia. Urban Studies, 45(3), 1-20.
23. Yusoff, M. (2015). Regulatory Challenges in Urban Regeneration: The Malaysian Experience. International Journal of Law and Management, 57(2), 1-15.
24. Yusoff, N. (2015). Regulatory Challenges in Urban Regeneration.