Cultural Intelligence and Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions as Global Drivers of Effective Leadership in Multicultural Organizations

Cultural Intelligence and Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions as Global Drivers of Effective Leadership in Multicultural Organizations

George Geli

Adventist University of Africa, Kenya

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.909000485

Received: 10 September 2025; Accepted: 16 September 2025; Published: 15 October 2025

ABSTRACT

In today’s globalized and culturally diverse work environments, leadership effectiveness increasingly depends on a leader’s ability to navigate cultural complexity with intelligence and adaptability. This paper explores the role of Cultural Intelligence (CQ) and Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Model as key frameworks for guiding leadership in multicultural organizations. CQ is presented as a dynamic, learnable capability that enables leaders to interact effectively across cultures, fostering inclusion, collaboration, and innovation. Hofstede’s model complements this by providing a structured lens to understand cultural values and their influence on leadership behaviors and expectations across regions. Drawing on recent empirical studies and practical examples, the paper highlights how culturally intelligent leadership enhances team performance, reduces conflict, and supports strategic decision-making. The paper also outlines practical strategies for developing CQ, including immersive experiences, structured training, reflective practice, and organizational support. It concludes with recommendations for integrating CQ and cultural dimensions into leadership development to strengthen organizational adaptability, inclusiveness, and global competitiveness.

Keywords: Cultural intelligence, cultural competence, communication, global leadership, multicultural, organization

INTRODUCTION

In an increasingly interconnected and multicultural world, effective leadership goes beyond technical skills and traditional management expertise. It requires the ability to navigate complex cultural landscapes—a capacity encapsulated by Cultural Intelligence (CQ). CQ is defined as an individual’s ability to function effectively and adapt successfully within culturally diverse settings (Henson, 2016). Harunavamwe, and Palmer (2020) further defines cultural intelligence as the ability to engage in behaviors that align with the values and attitudes of different cultures, necessitating culturally appropriate skills and conduct. Unlike cultural competence, which primarily emphasizes understanding and appreciating cultural differences, CQ is dynamic; it involves actively applying cultural knowledge to real-world situations, making it a critical asset for leaders operating across global contexts (Livermore, 2015).

Complementing CQ, Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions provide a valuable framework for understanding how cultural values shape behavior and leadership styles across different societies. By examining dimensions such as power distance, individualism versus collectivism, and uncertainty avoidance, leaders gain insight into the underlying cultural factors that influence workplace dynamics and expectations (Hofstede, 1980). Together, CQ and Hofstede’s model serve as global drivers that enable leaders to effectively manage and inspire multicultural teams.

Leadership styles vary widely around the world, influenced by distinct historical, social, and cultural contexts. For example, in many African regions, leadership is often rooted in patriarchal traditions that emphasize hierarchy and male dominance (Botma & Snyman, 2019). These structures can limit inclusive leadership opportunities, particularly for women, who frequently encounter significant barriers to attaining top leadership positions (Omotoyinbo, 2018). Addressing such disparities requires leaders to exercise cultural sensitivity and leverage frameworks like CQ and Hofstede’s dimensions to develop contextually appropriate strategies that promote equity and inclusion.

THEORETICAL FOUNDATION AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Model (2011) serve as conceptual framework for analyzing how core cultural values shape behavior in organizational contexts. For global leaders, the model offers a systematic way to understand and manage cultural differences within their teams. Elements such as Power Distance, Individualism versus Collectivism, and Uncertainty Avoidance play a crucial role in shaping how leadership is perceived, how communication is conducted, and how decisions are made across various cultural settings. Culturally intelligent leaders must recognize that power distance—the extent to which unequal power distribution is accepted—varies significantly across cultures. For example, in high power distance societies like Malaysia, hierarchical inequalities are generally accepted (Hofstede et al., 2019). Conversely, in low power distance cultures such as Denmark, there is a stronger expectation of power equality (Harunavamw & Rahman, 2020). Understanding these differences is crucial for leaders to effectively navigate diverse workplace practices (Rahman, 2020). Chand (2004) observed that Indian software employees tend to accept decisions made by superiors, even when those decisions are autocratic. In contrast, employees in the United States are often encouraged to engage in brainstorming sessions and offer constructive criticism (Hofstede et al., 2019).

Cultural intelligence (CQ) is increasingly recognized as a vital contributor to organizational success, particularly in today’s globalized and diverse work environments (Siripipatthanakul et al., 2023; Keung & Szapkiw, 2013). Leaders who understand and apply cultural dimensions effectively are better positioned to lead across cultural boundaries. As Attar et al. (2019) suggest, leaders with high levels of cultural intelligence are more attuned to the attitudes, needs, and perspectives of their team members—an essential skill, given that cultural contexts fundamentally influence workplace behavior and expectations.

Defined as the ability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings, CQ is a key determinant of success in multicultural organizations (Marr, 2022). Research indicates that organizations with high cultural intelligence enjoy a range of benefits, including stronger team performance, greater adaptability, and increased profitability. Companies that prioritize recruiting and retaining culturally intelligent individuals are often better equipped to navigate the complexities of global markets and manage cross-cultural interactions effectively (Livermore, 2011).

In addition to financial performance, cultural intelligence has been positively associated with smoother cultural adjustment, improved interpersonal networks, and more effective conflict resolution. For instance, Livermore and Soon (2015) found that managers in multinational corporations who exhibit high CQ demonstrate enhanced task performance due to their ability to adapt more readily to new cultural environments.

Furthermore, culturally intelligent leaders are often catalysts for innovation and creativity. Their ability to harness the strengths of a diverse team—while mitigating potential misunderstandings—creates a collaborative environment where new ideas can thrive (Salama, 2018). By promoting inclusivity, psychological safety, and open dialogue, high-CQ leaders facilitate better decision-making and elevate overall team performance. In culturally diverse settings, such collaborative approaches often produce more comprehensive and effective outcomes than those generated through individual effort alone. The aim of this paper is to examine how Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions influence effective leadership in multicultural organizations, and to explore the mediating role of Cultural Intelligence (CQ) in enabling leaders to navigate cultural differences and enhance leadership effectiveness across diverse cultural contexts. Additionally, it examines how CQ enhances the capabilities of global leaders to navigate cultural complexities, foster inclusivity, and promote high performance in diverse, international environments, thereby contributing to the development of effective global leadership. The conceptual framework of the paper is presented in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1: Conceptual Framework

Global Leadership Behavior

The behavior of global leaders is influenced by the dynamic interaction of cultural, contextual, and individual factors. As globalization continues to influence leadership dynamics, understanding these elements is essential for effective leadership in diverse and interconnected environments.

Global leaders must navigate a variety of cultural landscapes that significantly shape their leadership styles and effectiveness. Research indicates that while certain leadership traits—such as integrity or vision—are universally valued, many behaviors are context-specific (Gordon, 2017). Emotional intelligence, for example, has emerged as a critical trait in cross-cultural settings, often surpassing technical expertise in importance. Equally important is cultural intelligence, which includes mental, emotional, and action-oriented aspects. This ability to adapt to different cultural norms and practices is indispensable for effective leadership in diverse environments (Gordon, 2017).

Transformational leadership is particularly well-suited for global leaders, as it extends beyond mere economic or social exchanges (Bass, 1985). This leadership style is grounded in admiration, trust, employee satisfaction, and the cultivation of strong, personalized relationships. It also fosters emotional attachment, loyalty, and mutual respect between leaders and their teams (Bass, 1985). Transformational leaders are often characterized by their charisma and a firm commitment to moral and ethical values (Bass, 1985). These attributes make them especially effective in managing multicultural teams, where emotional intelligence and cultural sensitivity are crucial for success (Gunu, 2009).

Research shows that while many cultures value similar leadership traits—such as inspiration and vision—effective leadership still depends heavily on understanding specific cultural norms and expectations. This means leaders must be flexible and possess strong cultural awareness to succeed in diverse environments (Gordon, 2017).

Moreover, participatory leadership has been identified as global leadership behavior.  Participatory leadership supports sound decision-making by ensuring that all voices are heard and considered (Gunu, 2009). Leaders who adopt this style often prioritize cross-cultural training for their teams, recognizing its importance in diverse work environments. As a democratic approach, participatory leadership values inclusivity, respects cultural differences, and fosters a culturally sensitive atmosphere—essential qualities for leading multicultural teams (Rahman, 2019).

According to Yong,   Haffejee, & Corsun   (2017), effective cross-cultural leadership requires several critical skills, including the ability to clearly communicate a concrete vision, initiate strategic and cultural transformations, empower team members, and implement strategies effectively. Furthermore, global leaders need to demonstrate cross-cultural abilities such as engaging with employees from diverse backgrounds, motivating and rewarding personnel, overseeing organizational frameworks, and managing conflict resolution through negotiation (Mead, 1998). Nevertheless, the most suitable leadership approach depends largely on the specific cultural and situational context (Hough & Neuland, 2007).

Over the past century, leadership theory has evolved considerably—from early emphasis on inherent personal traits to more nuanced models that account for context and interpersonal dynamics. Initial perspectives, such as the Great Man Theory, centered on the belief that effective leadership stemmed from inborn qualities. However, more recent theories have shifted focus toward the significance of leader–follower relationships and the influence of situational factors on leadership effectiveness (Perruci, 2022).. This theoretical evolution reflects a growing consensus that effective leadership cannot be confined to a single universal model but must account for the diverse and dynamic contexts in which leaders operate.

In today’s globalized world, a global mindset is critical for effective leadership. This mindset encompasses a set of attitudes and values that shape leaders’ behaviors, particularly in intercultural contexts. Research shows that positive attitudes toward cultural diversity and globalization can predict key leadership behaviors, such as open communication and relationship-building across cultural boundaries (Dekker, 2016). The alignment between mindset and behavior is crucial: leaders who possess a genuinely global outlook are more likely to act in ways that promote collaboration, inclusivity, and cross-cultural understanding (Dekker, 2016).

Communication in Global Leadership

Communication is more than a leadership tool—it is a core competency that enables leaders to inspire, build trust, manage conflict, and drive results in multicultural settings. As Livermore (2015) emphasizes, communication is central to both fostering cultural intelligence and practicing effective leadership. Leaders who understand the nuances of language and communication styles across cultures are better equipped to navigate complex interpersonal dynamics and engage diverse teams meaningfully.

Odine (2018) underscores this by stating that “cross-cultural communication is the glue that holds together global business and international cooperation in the sphere of globalization” (p. 9). In a world marked by increased cultural interdependence, effective cross-cultural communication has become indispensable to organizational success. Without it, global leaders risk misalignment, confusion, and fractured team cohesion.

Blackaby and Blackaby (2011) further assert that no one can be a good leader without being a skilled communicator. This is especially true in multicultural environments, where meanings are conveyed not only through words but also through non-verbal, visual, and symbolic forms of communication. Mokgwane and Gabasiane (2023) highlight that each culture communicates through unique symbolic codes, which must be interpreted accurately to foster mutual understanding and collaboration.

Empirical research reinforces the strategic importance of communication. Abugre and Debrah (2019), in a study conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa, found that expatriate leaders’ ability to communicate cross-culturally significantly impacted team effectiveness and workplace relationships. The study concluded that training in cross-cultural communication enhances leadership outcomes in diverse contexts. Similarly, Zhang (2023) affirms that leaders who develop cultural awareness and communication competence can better manage diversity, contributing to improved organizational performance and competitive advantage.

In today’s global economy, the business case for effective communication is clear. Companies with diverse leadership teams—those who can harness culturally intelligent communication—are not only more innovative but also financially outperform their less diverse peers (Investopedia, 2021). This points to the strategic role of communication in shaping organizational outcomes.

Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has transformed how global leaders communicate. The shift to digital platforms has reduced face-to-face interactions and increased reliance on virtual communication and social media. Mokgwane and Gabasiane (2023) argue that this evolution demands a higher level of cultural intelligence and adaptability. To lead effectively in this landscape, leaders must refine their digital communication skills, remain culturally sensitive, and ensure inclusivity across diverse, often remote, teams.

CHALLENGES IN MULTICULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS

In today’s globalized business environment, multicultural organizations have become increasingly common, bringing together individuals from diverse cultural, ethnic, and linguistic backgrounds. While such diversity can enrich organizations with broader perspectives, innovation, and creativity, it also presents a unique set of challenges that leaders must address to ensure effective collaboration and performance. These challenges include communication barriers, Cultural barriers, ethnocentrism, prejudice and stereotyping.

Communication Barriers

Language differences remain among the most significant obstacles in global leadership. Although English is commonly regarded as the global business language, many employees—especially non-native speakers—may have limited proficiency, leading to miscommunication and misunderstanding (Fallahchay, 2020). Furthermore, the use of technical jargon and industry-specific terminology can add layers of confusion when people from different linguistic and professional backgrounds collaborate (Fallahchay, 2020). To address these issues, leaders should implement strategies such as offering language training, simplifying communication, and providing glossaries of key terms to ensure clarity and mutual understanding within their teams.

Ethnocentrism

One of the primary obstacles in multicultural environments is ethnocentrism—the belief that one’s own culture is superior to others. This mindset can hinder effective communication by fostering biases and stereotypes about other cultures (Carlo, 2020). Shori (2023) explains that ethnocentric thinking leads individuals to judge other cultures by their own standards, making meaningful dialogue and mutual understanding difficult. As noted by Young, Haffejee, and Corsun (2017), cultivating cultural intelligence is key to mitigating the negative effects of ethnocentrism. When leaders and team members learn to recognize and appreciate cultural differences, they reduce the rigidity associated with the belief that their way is the only “right” way. Ethnocentrism hampers flexibility, collaboration, and mutual respect. Effective cross-cultural leadership, by contrast, is rooted in openness, empathy, and a willingness to engage with diverse perspectives.

Prejudice and Stereotyping

Prejudice and stereotyping are also significant challenges in multicultural organizations. Kwon and Yoo (2017) define prejudice as a viewpoint that is mistaken as factual but is actually rooted in misunderstanding and misinformation. Such biases are often reinforced by distorted media portrayals and cultural conditioning that normalize stereotypes. Sahadevan and Sumangala (2021) argue that stereotyping arises when individuals interpret others exclusively through their own cultural lens, leading to generalizations about entire groups. Mokgwane and Gabasiane (2023) further emphasize that these attitudes result in poor communication, as one group may see itself as inherently superior while dismissing the perspectives of others—creating “noise” that obstructs meaningful dialogue. To enhance cross-cultural communication and leadership, it is essential for leaders to actively challenge these biases and cultivate an inclusive atmosphere that values diverse identities, mitigates marginalization, and encourages mutual understanding and respect.

Cultural Contexts in Global Leadership

The diverse cultural landscapes across the globe necessitate a high level of cultural intelligence in leadership (Mokgwane & Gabasiane, 2023). Unsurprisingly, this diversity provides fertile ground for cultivating cultural intelligence, a key component in enhancing effective global leadership (Alsalminy & Omrane, 2023; Alon & Higgins, 2005). Each region of the world exhibits distinct leadership styles shaped by its cultural heritage. For example, African leadership tends to be predominantly patriarchal (Botma & Snyman, 2019). A study by Omotoyinbo (2018) reveals that women in Africa often face significant challenges in ascending to top leadership positions. Addressing such disparities requires culturally sensitive strategies that not only promote equity but also engage and educate local communities to foster transformational change.

Similarly, leadership styles vary significantly across other regions. Asian cultures are generally more hierarchical in nature (de Guzman et al., 2023), whereas Western cultures emphasize individualism (Nurmatovich, 2023) and persuasive communication. Aguilera-Barchet (2015) describes this persuasive approach as “soft power”—the ability to influence through integrity and effective communication, rather than coercion. Geert Hofstede’s Cultural

Cultural Intelligence and Effective Global Leadership

A study conducted by Ahmad and Saidalavi (2019) demonstrates that cultural intelligence (CQ)—comprising motivational, cognitive, metacognitive, and behavioral dimensions—plays a significant role in enhancing global leadership effectiveness within the workplace. This finding highlights the vital importance of cultivating CQ among leaders operating in diverse, multicultural environments.

As Harunavamwe and Palmer (2020) assert, cultural competence is essential for managing diversity and promoting intercultural cohesion. Leadership, by its very nature, is a relational process rooted in human interaction and the ability to influence others toward shared objectives (Skansi, 2000). In culturally diverse settings, this relational dynamic becomes increasingly complex and nuanced. According to Kanwal et al. (2017), effective leadership in such environments demands high levels of intelligence—particularly cultural intelligence. Unlike static cultural competence, CQ is a dynamic, evolving capability that involves the intentional application of cultural awareness in real-world interactions (Livermore, 2015). Leaders with high CQ are not only aware of cultural differences but are also able to adapt their behavior and communication styles to bridge those differences effectively (Henson, 2016).

Scholars such as Alon and Higgs (2005) emphasize that CQ is critical to success in global organizations. To lead effectively across cultures, leaders must cultivate empathy, self-awareness, strong communication skills, and strategic thinking. These attributes enable them to manage diverse teams with both cultural sensitivity and confidence. Richard-Eaglin (2021) further contends that cultural intelligence strengthens inclusion by fostering humility, awareness, and cultural sensitivity—qualities that contribute to environments in which individuals from diverse backgrounds feel seen, respected, and valued. Leaders who embody these traits are not only more effective at reducing conflict, but also more capable of building cohesion and trust within their teams.

Thomas (2015) and Rahman (2019) argue that leaders with high CQ are especially adept at managing intercultural tensions and motivating teams across cultural boundaries. Their ability to recognize and navigate culturally driven attitudes, behaviors, and values enhances both team dynamics and overall organizational performance.

Beyond interpersonal effectiveness, cultural intelligence is also a strategic driver of innovation, creativity, and competitive advantage. High-CQ leaders foster environments that support psychological safety and encourage open dialogue—conditions that empower teams to approach complex challenges with greater flexibility and originality. Azevedo (2018) supports this perspective, noting that culturally intelligent leaders build trust more rapidly, promote clearer communication, and consistently achieve higher levels of team performance and innovation.

Strategies for Enhancing Cultural Intelligence

To apply cultural intelligence (CQ) effectively in diverse settings, both individuals and organizations must adopt intentional, targeted strategies that nurture the development of all four CQ dimensions—metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. CQ development goes beyond surface-level knowledge of cultural customs; it requires a sustained and structured approach through education, reflection, real-world experience, and leadership support.

Training and Development                                                            

Organizations should invest in well-designed programs specifically tailored to cultivate cultural intelligence. These programs should comprehensively address all four CQ dimensions through methods such as interactive workshops, cultural simulations, immersion experiences, and experiential learning activities. Such approaches help build a deep understanding of cultural dynamics and develop practical intercultural skills (Wiley, 2020).

Effective CQ training often incorporates experiential elements like role-playing, simulated intercultural scenarios, and cultural immersion exercises. These activities expose individuals to real-world challenges in cross-cultural interactions, encouraging empathy, self-awareness, adaptability, and critical reflection—core components of cultural intelligence (Mullins, 2008). Immersive experiences such as international assignments, cultural exchange programs, and working within globally diverse teams further enhance learning by requiring individuals to navigate authentic intercultural contexts.

Self-Assessment and Feedback                                                                              

Tools like the Cultural Intelligence Scale (CQS) allow individuals to evaluate their current CQ levels and pinpoint specific areas for growth. Regular self-reflection and feedback from peers or mentors enhance cultural self-awareness and support continuous personal development (Wiley, 2020). These assessments also serve as benchmarks for progress in long-term CQ development efforts.

Mindfulness and Adaptability

Mindfulness is essential in intercultural interactions, as it allows individuals to stay conscious of their assumptions, emotions, and cultural filters. Practicing mindfulness promotes thoughtful and respectful engagement, while adaptability enables individuals to adjust their communication style and behavior in response to cultural cues and norms. Together, these skills form the basis of successful cross-cultural engagement (Devinney et al., 2010).

Relationship Building

Building genuine relationships with individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds fosters mutual understanding and empathy. Initiatives such as mentoring programs, cross-cultural team projects, and international collaboration create opportunities for meaningful cultural exchange and learning. These engagements not only deepen cultural insight but also break down stereotypes and promote inclusivity (Marr, 2022).

Leveraging Digital and Virtual Platforms

With the rise of global remote work, digital platforms offer new and scalable opportunities for CQ development. Online training modules, multicultural virtual team projects, and real-time global collaboration allow individuals to practice and refine intercultural skills in dynamic environments. Longitudinal studies indicate that participating in multicultural virtual teams leads to sustained improvements in cultural intelligence, with lasting effects beyond the training period (Erez et al., 2013). As organizations continue to operate in increasingly virtual and globalized spaces, these digital experiences are becoming a vital part of CQ training.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

In conclusion, Cultural Intelligence (CQ) and Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Model serve as foundational pillars for effective leadership in multicultural organizations. Hofstede’s model provides a critical framework for understanding the diverse cultural values and behaviors that influence leadership perceptions, communication styles, and decision-making processes across global contexts. Meanwhile, CQ acts as the essential capability that enables leaders to interpret, adapt, and respond effectively to these cultural differences. Leaders with high CQ foster inclusive environments, promote collaboration, and drive innovation by leveraging cultural diversity as a strategic asset. Together, these frameworks empower global leaders to navigate complexity with cultural sensitivity, ultimately enhancing team performance and organizational success in an increasingly interconnected world.

To maximize leadership effectiveness in multicultural settings, it is recommended that organizations prioritize the development of Cultural Intelligence (CQ) among their leaders and employees. This can be achieved through targeted training programs, immersive cross-cultural experiences, and ongoing self-assessment initiatives that comprehensively address all four dimensions of CQ: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Furthermore, organizations should utilize Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions as a diagnostic tool to better understand the cultural contexts in which they operate, enabling the tailoring of leadership strategies accordingly. By fostering cultural awareness and adaptability, organizations can cultivate inclusive leadership practices that not only reduce intercultural misunderstandings but also enhance innovation, employee engagement, and global competitiveness.

REFERENCES

1. Abugre, J. B., & Debrah, Y. A. (2019). Assessing the impact of cross-cultural communication competence on expatriate business operations in multinational corporations of a Sub-Saharan African context. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 19(1), 85–104.
2. Aguilera-Barchet, B. (2015). Europeans: Don’t be afraid of your culture! European View, 14(2), 181.
3. Alon, I., & Higgins, J. M. (2005). Global leadership success through emotional and cultural intelligence. Business Horizons, 48(6), 501–512.
4. Alsalminy, B. M. K., & Omrane, A. (2023). The effects of emotional intelligence on leadership effectiveness: A prospective case study of three industrial companies in Iraq. Journal of Positive Psychology and Wellbeing, 7(2), 988–1006.
5. Azevedo, A. (2018). Cultural intelligence: Key benefits to individuals, teams and organizations. American Journal of Economic and Business Administration.
6. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
7. Blackaby, H., & Blackaby, R. (2011). Spiritual leadership. B&H Publishing Group.
8. Botma, G. J., & Snyman, R. (2019). Leadership, patriarchy, and transformation in Africa: A contextual analysis. African Journal of Leadership Studies.
9. Botma, Y., & Snyman, S. (2019). Africa Interprofessional Education Network (AfrIPEN). Journal of Interprofessional Care, 33(3), 274–276.
10. Carlo, P. (2020). Medical English. Zanichelli Editore. https://www.perlego.com/book/2696598
11. de Guzman, R. B., Chua, M. L., Goldstein, D., Aung, S., Eaton, V., & Park, K. (2023). ASCO’s Leadership Development Program: Focusing on the next generation of leaders in Asia Pacific. JCO Global Oncology, 9, e2200313. https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.22.00313
12. Dekker, W. den. (2016). Global mindset and cross-cultural behavior. Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.perlego.com/book/3490358
13. Devinney, T. M., Pedersen, T., & Tihanyi, L. (Eds.). (2010). The past, present and future of international business and management. Emerald Group Publishing. https://www.perlego.com/book/387641
14. Erez, M., Lisak, A., Harush, R., Glikson, E., Nouri, R., & Shokef, E. (2013). Going global: Developing management students’ cultural intelligence and global identity in culturally diverse virtual teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(3), 303–325.
15. Ersoy, A., et al. (2014). The role of cultural intelligence in cross-cultural leadership effectiveness: A qualitative study in the hospitality industry. Journal of Yasar University, 9(35), 6099–6108.
16. Fallahchay, S. A. (2020). Communication in everyday life. Society Publishing. https://www.perlego.com/book/2076448
17. Gordon, G. (2017). Leadership through trust. Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.perlego.com/book/3496338
18. Gunu, O. M. (2009). Qualities of leading global multicultural teams: Leadership in global business environment. http://knol.google.com/k/osman-masahudu-gunu/qualities-of-leadingglobal/1kietb77pgwru/21
19. Harunavamwe, M., & Palmer, V. (2020). Exploring cultural intelligence in the South African working context. Journal for New Generation Sciences, 18(2).
20. Härtel, C. E. J., Zerbe, W. J., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (Eds.). (2009). Emotions in groups, organizations and cultures. Emerald Group Publishing. https://www.perlego.com/book/387255
21. Henson, R. (2016). The role of cultural intelligence in global leadership. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management.
22. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications.
23. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.
24. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
25. Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2019). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
26. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., & Dorfman, P. W. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage.
27. Hough, J., & Neuland, E. (2007). International management and leadership. In Global business: Environments and strategies – Managing for global competitive advantage (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press Southern Africa.
28. Jung, P. J. (2023). Matrix: A Journal for Matricultural Studies, 3(1).
29. Kanwal, S., et al. (2017). Impact of leaders’ emotional and cultural intelligence on leadership effectiveness: Mediating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Business and Management Research, 4(2), 2519–7924.
30. Kwon, Y. S., & Yoo, E. K. (2017). The research on concept development: Prejudice. International Information Institute (Tokyo), Information, 20(3A), 1785–1794.
31. Livermore, D. (2011). The cultural intelligence difference – Special eBook Edition. AMACOM. Available at: https://www.perlego.com/book/
32. Livermore, D. (2015). Leading with cultural intelligence: The new secret to success. AMACOM.
33. Marr, B. (2022). Future skills: The 20 skills and competencies everyone needs to succeed in a digital world. Wiley. https://www.perlego.com/book/3566727
34. Mead, R. (1998). International management (2nd ed.). Blackwell Business Publishers.
35. Mokgwane, P. E., & Gabasiane, O. O. (2023). Hofstede’s cultural dimension model and cultural intelligence: A global imperative for the contemporary church leader. Pan-African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4(2), 30–41.
36. Mullins, J. (2008). Library management and marketing in a multicultural world (1st ed.). De Gruyter Saur. https://www.perlego.com/book/651941
37. Nurmatovich, A. Z. (2023). Exploring cultural values: An axiological study of Western and Eastern narratives. Open Access Repository, 4(3), 1152–1155.
38. Odine, M. (2018). Cross-cultural communication for business in the era of globalization. Studies in Media and Communication, 6(1), 53–62.
39. Omotoyinbo, F. R. (2018). Modern African women versus traditional African women: A reply to Simphiwe Sesanti’s “African philosophy for African women’s leadership.” The Journal of Pan African Studies, 11(4), 166–176.
40. Perruci, G. (2022). The study and practice of global leadership. Emerald Publishing. https://www.perlego.com/book/2852099
41. Rahman, A. (2020). Leadership for multicultural teams: The challenges in managing cross-cultural conflict. ResearchGate.
42. Richard-Eaglin, A. (2021). The significance of cultural intelligence in nurse leadership. Nurse Leader. https://www.nurseleader.com
43. Sahadevan, S., & Sumangala, K. (2021). Barriers to effective cross-cultural communication in global organizations. International Journal of Business Communication, 58(3), 455–473.
44. Salama, M. (2018). Principles of sustainable project management. Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers. https://www.perlego.com/book/868872
45. Skansi, D. (2000). Relation of managerial efficiency and leadership styles: Empirical study in Hrvatska elektroprivreda. Management, 5(2).
46. Thomas, C. D. (2015). Cultural intelligence. International Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom060051
47. Wiley. (2020). The Wiley encyclopedia of personality and individual differences: Clinical, applied, and cross-cultural research (Vol. 4). Wiley. https://www.perlego.com/book/2786146
48. Young, C. A., Haffejee, B., & Corsun, D. L. (2017). The relationship between ethnocentrism and cultural intelligence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 58, 31–40.
49. Zhang, Y. (2023). Leaders’ cultural awareness, sensitivity, and competence: Implications for managing cultural diversity and enhancing organizational outcomes. Journal of Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 42(2), 34–47.