International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science

Submission Deadline- 14th October 2025
October Issue of 2025 : Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline-04th November 2025
Special Issue on Economics, Management, Sociology, Communication, Psychology: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline-17th October 2025
Special Issue on Education, Public Health: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now

Human Resource Management Practices and Employee Commitment: Its Influence on Job Satisfaction of Hotel Personnel

Human Resource Management Practices and Employee Commitment: Its Influence on Job Satisfaction of Hotel Personnel

Raffeq S. Alim*

*College Of Business And Public Administration/Cotabato State University/Cotabato City, Philippines

*Corresponding Author

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.909000292

Received: 01 September 2025; Revised: 03 September 2025; Accepted: 06 September 2025; Published: 09 October 2025

ABSTRACT

The hospitality industry faces persistently high employee turnover, placing critical importance on the development of effective Human Resource Management (HRM) strategies to foster employee commitment and job satisfaction. In the Philippines, particularly Region XII (SOCCSKSARGEN), the hotel sector is rapidly expanding alongside growing tourism demands, heightening the need to retain skilled personnel. This study investigates the influence of HRM practices and employee commitment on the job satisfaction of hotel personnel in Region XII. Utilizing a quantitative, non-experimental correlational research design, data were collected from hotel employees across the region. Results indicate a strong, statistically significant relationship between HRM practices and job satisfaction, while employee commitment shows a moderate correlation. Regression analysis confirmed that HRM practices are the primary predictor of job satisfaction, whereas employee commitment does not independently predict satisfaction but may play a mediating role. The study highlights key HRM factors—such as recruitment, training, and employee relations—as critical in enhancing employee well-being and retention. Findings offer context-specific insights for improving HRM strategies in the regional hospitality industry.

Keywords: Human Resource Management, Job Satisfaction, Employee Commitment, Hospitality Industry, Hotel Sector, Region XII, Philippines

INTRODUCTION

Hospitality industry is characterized by high employee turnover and the critical need for a satisfied and engaged workforce to deliver exceptional customer experiences (Karatepe, 2019; Lundberg et al., 2020). International studies highlight that effective Human Resource Management (HRM) practices significantly influence employee commitment and subsequent job satisfaction, ultimately impacting organizational performance (Guest, 2017; Truss et al., 2018). Nationally, the Philippine hotel sector, a significant contributor to the tourism industry, faces similar challenges in retaining skilled personnel and ensuring high levels of job satisfaction amidst increasing competition and demanding service standards (DOT, 2023). Locally, in Region XII, with its burgeoning tourism industry and growing number of hotels, understanding the specific influence of HRM practices on employee commitment and job satisfaction is crucial for addressing potential issues such as employee attrition, reduced service quality, and hindered organizational growth within the regional context (PSA, 2022).

Investigating the influence of HRM practices and employee commitment on the job satisfaction of hotel personnel in Region XII is of paramount importance for several reasons. High job satisfaction among hotel employees is directly linked to improved service quality, enhanced customer satisfaction, and increased employee retention, all of which are vital for the success and sustainability of hotels (Hussain & Raza, 2019; Karatepe & Olugbade, 2018). Understanding the specific HRM practices that foster employee commitment and subsequently drive job satisfaction within the unique cultural and economic context of Region XII can provide hotel managers with valuable insights for developing effective HR strategies. This knowledge can lead to a more motivated and engaged workforce, resulting in better operational efficiency, improved organizational performance, and a stronger competitive edge for hotels in the region (Bakker & Demerouti, 2017; Jiang et al., 2019).

This study posits a positive and significant relationship between Human Resource Management (HRM) practices (such as recruitment and selection, training and development, compensation and benefits, performance management, and employee relations) and employee commitment (affective, continuance, and normative commitment) as independent variables, and job satisfaction as the dependent variable among hotel personnel in Region XII. It is hypothesized that the effective implementation of HRM practices will foster higher levels of employee commitment, which in turn will lead to greater job satisfaction (Meyer & Allen, 1991; Snape & Redman, 2010). Furthermore, this research will explore the direct influence of HRM practices on job satisfaction, as well as the mediating role of employee commitment in this relationship, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of these dynamics within the specific context of the Region XII hotel industry (Cropanzano & Wright, 2011; Organ & Bateman, 1991).

The urgency of this research stems from the growing importance of the hotel sector in Region XII’s economy and the critical need for hotels to attract, retain, and motivate their workforce to ensure sustainable growth and competitiveness in an increasingly demanding market (DOT Region XII, 2023). A potential research gap exists in the limited empirical studies specifically examining the interconnected influence of various HRM practices and the multidimensional aspects of employee commitment on job satisfaction within the unique cultural and organizational context of hotels in Region XII. This study operates under the assumptions that hotel personnel will provide honest and accurate responses regarding their perceptions of HRM practices, their levels of commitment, and their job satisfaction (Podsakoff et al., 2003). The findings of this research are expected to contribute valuable context-specific insights to the existing body of knowledge on HRM, employee behavior, and organizational psychology within the hospitality industry, particularly in a developing regional context. Practically, this study aims to provide hotel managers and HR practitioners in Region XII with evidence-based recommendations for designing and implementing effective HRM strategies that enhance employee commitment and ultimately lead to higher job satisfaction and improved organizational outcomes.

METHODOLOGY

Research Design

This study utilized a quantitative non-experimental research design. The regression -correlational research design was used to articulate what variables, conditions, and attributes were present. Moreover, the non-experimental research, often called correlational research, sought causes of behavior by looking for correlations among variables. In correlational research, relationships were studied among variables (Meyer & Allen, 1991). Specifically, this study utilized a correlational research statistical tools analysis approach since the study sought to establish the relationship as well as the influence of HRM practices, employee commitment, and job satisfaction on hotel employees in Region XII.

Research Locale

The current investigation explored the relationship between human resource management practices, employee commitment, and job satisfaction within the dynamic and expanding hotel sector of Region XII in the Philippines. This region, encompassing South Cotabato, Cotabato, Sultan Kudarat, Sarangani, and the significant urban center of General Santos City, provided a rich environment to examine the factors influencing employee well-being and organizational success. Data was collected from a total of 16 Department of Tourism-accredited hotels, distributed as follows: 11 in General Santos City, 2 in Sultan Kudarat, 2 in Koronadal City, and 1 in Cotabato. Region XII, an administrative area in southwestern Mindanao, serves as a crucial economic center for the island. Its economy is largely supported by agriculture, fishing, and mining, with the region being a major contributor to the nation’s agricultural output through its production of tuna, pineapples, bananas, and coffee. Furthermore, Region XII has experienced a significant growth in its tourism industry in recent years, fueled by its natural attractions, cultural heritage, and improving infrastructure. This expansion has led to an increased need for skilled labor within the hospitality sector, particularly in hotels.

While Region XII demonstrates considerable economic potential, it also grapples with certain challenges, including infrastructure development that lags behind other parts of the Philippines and ongoing security concerns in some areas that can affect investor confidence. Nevertheless, the region possesses substantial opportunities due to its abundant natural resources, strategic geographical location, and growing workforce, making it an attractive area for investment and development. Both governmental and private stakeholders are actively working to overcome these challenges and capitalize on the region’s inherent strengths. This study, by focusing on Region XII’s hotel industry, offers valuable and context-specific insights into the interplay of human resource management, employee commitment, and job satisfaction, which can inform the development of effective strategies to enhance employee engagement and contribute to the sustainable growth of the region’s hospitality sector.

Research Participants

To select study participants, a simple random technique  was implemented. The researcher acquired a comprehensive list of DOT-accredited hotels operating within the Region XII region by contacting the Business Permit and Licensing Offices of the relevant cities and municipalities. Subsequently, a stratified random sampling technique was employed to ensure adequate representation from each province within the region. A total of 271 employees from these DOT-accredited hotels were randomly chosen to participate in the study. Data collection occurred between October and November 2024. The qualified respondents were employees who had been employed in the said hotels for not less than six (6) months on or before the date of the survey and had Social Security System (SSS) insurance. They were  aged 21 years old and above, and had received management consent to participate in the study.

The  demographic characteristics of the hospitality industry workforce in Region XII. A significant gender disparity exists, with women comprising a majority (63.70%) of the employees. The workforce is relatively young, with the largest age group being 21 to 25 years old (28.89%), followed by 26 to 35 years old (25.93%), indicating a strong presence of young adults and recent graduates. In terms of educational attainment, a majority of employees are college graduates (51.1%), highlighting an emphasis on higher education within the industry.

The workforce is primarily composed of rank-and-file employees (79.26%), with a smaller proportion in managerial positions (20.74%), suggesting a hierarchical organizational structure. The length of service data indicates that many employees have been with their organizations for a short period, with the largest group having worked for 2 to 3 years (35.93%), followed by 6 months to 2 years (24.07%). This suggests potential employee retention issues within the Region XII hospitality industry. The study also notes that potential research respondents with less than six months of employment, no SSS insurance, no college enrollment, those under 21, and those without management consent will be excluded, and respondents can withdraw from the study at any time.

Research Instrument

Survey questionnaires were the main instrument used in gathering the data. Each construct was measured using adapted scales from prior studies. The HRM practices scale consisted of 21 items across seven dimensions (e.g., recruitment and selection, performance, training, compensation, retention, health and safety, and wellness). The employee commitment scale comprised 21 items covering seven factors (e.g., attendance and punctuality, quality of work, initiative, productivity, teamwork, organizational values, and work ethics). Job satisfaction was assessed using 21 items across seven indicators (e.g., work environment, ethical practices, rewards, co-workers, promotion, organizational culture, and job security). All items were rated using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). A pilot test with 30 hotel employees yielded Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients of 0.89 (HRM practices), 0.91 (employee commitment), and 0.87 (job satisfaction), establishing internal reliability in this context.

The survey instrument of HRM practices was adapted from the study of Hamza et al 2021., Negash  et al 2014., Ng et al 2021.,  Biason 2020., Adekanbi-Favour, 2016.,Komulainen, R. 2012., Waisiko, C. 2024. The instrument  was designed to measure the HRM practices of hotel as perceived by   employee based on 7 factors, namely recruitment and selection employee performance, training and development, compensation , employee retention,health and safety,  and employee wellness.

The survey instrument measuring employee commitment was adapted from the studies of Hamza et al. (2021), Ismael et al. (2021), and Negash et al. (2014). The instrument measured employee commitment as perceived by employees based on seven factors: attendance and punctuality, quality of work, initiative and accountability, productivity, teamwork and collaboration, respect for organizational values, and work ethics.

The survey instrument of job satisfaction   is adapted from the study of Hafeez et al  2019 and Puah et al 2016.  The instrument will be  designed to measure the job satisfaction  of hotel as perceived by   employee based on 7 factors, namely  working environment and facilities,  ethical practices, rewards, co-workers, promotion, organization structure and job security.

Data Gathering Procedure

The study employed a systematic data gathering procedure to explore the relationships between HRM practices, employee commitment, and job satisfaction among hotel personnel in Region XII. Initially, a survey questionnaire was adapted from existing validated instruments, ensuring that it was contextualized for the specific environment of the hotel industry in the region. This involved careful review by experts in HRM and organizational behavior to establish the validity and reliability of the instrument. A pilot test was conducted with a 30 of hotel employees to further refine the questionnaire based on feedback regarding clarity and readability.

Following the data collection, the gathered information underwent a thorough analysis process. The researchers checked the data for completeness and accuracy before coding it for entry into a statistical software program. Descriptive statistics provided an overview of the sample’s demographic characteristics and the levels of HRM practices, employee commitment, and job satisfaction. Inferential statistics, including correlation and regression analyses, were utilized to investigate the relationships among the variables. The results were interpreted in light of the research questions and compared with existing literature in the field. The study concluded with a discussion of the findings’ implications for hotel management practices in Region XII, along with practical recommendations to enhance HRM practices for improved employee commitment and job satisfaction. Limitations were acknowledged, and suggestions for future research were provided to further investigate this critical area.

Ethical Considerations

This research study consistent with the ethical standards and recommendations of the 1979 Belmont Report study. The 10 pillars of research ethics—social value, informed consent, vulnerability concerns, risk-benefit analysis, information privacy and confidentiality, justice, transparency, researcher qualifications, adequate facilities, and community involvement adhered to in this study.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Table 1. The Level  of  Human Resource Management  Practices  among  Hotel Personnel in SOCCSKSARGEN Region in terms of its  indicators.

Indicators Mean Std. Deviation Interpretation
Recruitment & Selection 4.389 .3293 Always Practiced
Employee Performance 4.308 .3034 Always Practiced
Training & Development 4.300 .4341 Always Practiced
Compensation 4.289 .36.49 Always Practiced
Employee Retention 4.308 .4326 Always Practiced
Health and Safety 4.313 .3780 Always Practiced
Employee Wellness 4.352 .3666 Always Practiced
Grand Mean 4.322 .2326 Always Practiced

Table 1. Shows the  results of a survey on the level of human resource management practices among hotel personnel in Region XII in terms of  of its indicators. The indicator  recruitment and selection  received the highest mean of 4.389 with a description of very high and the standard deviation is .3293   interpreted  as always satisfied while indicators employee wellness, health and safety, employee performance, employee retention and training development  received the section mean of 4.389, 4.352, 4.313, 4.308, 4.308 and 4.300  with a description  of very high and the standard deviation are .3666, .3780, .3034, .4326 and .4341  interpreted as always practiced respectively. Among the indicators, indicator  compensation received the lowest mean of 4.289 with a description  of very high and the standard deviation is .3649 interpreted as always practiced.  The grand  mean is 4.32251 with a description  of very high and the standard deviation is .232633 interpreted as always satisfied.  This indicates a very high level of  practices among hotel personnel in Region XII regarding its indicators.

Contemporary HRM research reflects a significant evolution driven by workforce demographic shifts, globalization, and technological advancements (Chen & Wang, 2020). A key focus is enhancing employee engagement and well-being (Alagaraja & Thirunavukkarasu, 2018; Saks & Grzywacz, 2014), achieved through strategies like performance management, work-life balance initiatives, and employee recognition programs. Alagaraja and Thirunavukkarasu (2018) highlight the positive correlation between employee engagement and organizational performance, emphasizing HRM’s role in fostering positive work environments. The integration of AI and HR technology has revolutionized HR operations, enabling data-driven decision-making and automation (Becker & Huselid, 2016; Ulrich & Brockbank, 2017). Becker and Huselid (2016) showcase the potential of HR analytics for workforce trend analysis. Research links specific HRM practices (talent management, training, compensation) to organizational outcomes like productivity and financial performance, emphasizing the importance of aligning HRM with organizational strategy (Guest, 2017; Colquitt, LePine, & Wesson, 2019). The impact of HRM practices on organizational performance remains a critical area of ongoing investigation.

Table 2. The Level  of  Employee Commitment   among  Hotel Personnel in Region XII in terms of its  indicators.

Indicators Mean Std. Deviation Interpretation
Attendance & Punctuality 4.348 .3468 Always Committed
Quality of Work 4.426 .3285 Always Committed
Initiative & Accountability 4.372 .3628 Always Committed
Productivity 4.421 .3060 Always Committed
Teamwork & Collaboration 4.399 .3127 Always Committed
Organizational Values 4.379 .3471 Always Committed
Work Ethics 4.382 .3231 Always Committed
Grand Mean 4.389 .1823 Always Committed

Table 2.   presents the results of a survey on the level of employee commitment among hotel personnel in Region XII in terms of  its indicators.  The indicator  quality of work received the highest mean of 4.426 with a description of very high and the standard deviation is  .3285 interpreted as always committed while indicators  productivity, teamwork and collaboration, work ethics, organizational values and initiative and collaboration received the mean of 4.421, 4.399, 4.382, 4.379 and  4.372 with a description of very high and the standard deviation are .3060, .3127, .3231, .3471 and .3628  interpreted as always committed respectively.  Among the indicators, indicator attendance and punctuality received the lowest mean of 4.338 with a description of very high and the standard mean is.3468   interpreted as always committed.  The grand mean is 4.389 with a description of very high and the standard deviation is  .182324 interpreted always committed. This indicates a very high level of commitment  among hotel personnel in Region XII regarding its indicators.

Employee commitment, encompassing strong psychological attachment and loyalty to an organization (Chatterjee & Garcia-Morales, 2018), is understood through Allen and Meyer’s (2018) three-component model (affective, continuance, and normative commitment), expanded by research to include calculative (Riketta, 2018) and identification-based commitment (Ashforth & Mael, 2018).  Affective commitment is fostered by positive organizational behavior (Luthans & Avolio, 2018). Leadership and organizational culture significantly influence commitment (Chatterjee & Garcia-Morales, 2018), with transformational leadership linked to affective commitment (Bass & Riggio, 2018) and ethical leadership impacting moral commitments (Brown & Treviño, 2018).  High commitment correlates with better performance, increased organizational citizenship behavior, lower turnover (Mathieu & Zajac, 2018), and improved well-being and job satisfaction (Saks, 2018), although the commitment-performance relationship is complex and context-dependent (Riketta, 2018).

Table 3. The Level  of  job satisfaction   among  Hotel Personnel in Region XII in terms of its  indicators.

Indicators Mean Std. Deviation Interpretation
Working Environment 4.346 .3695 Always Satisfied
Ethical Practices 4.385 .3409 Always Satisfied
Rewards 4.064 .5882 Oftentimes Satisfied
Co-Workers 4.379 .4156 Always Satisfied
Promotion 4.206 .5144 Always Satisfied
Organizational Culture 4.326 .3742 Always Satisfied
Job Security 4.265 .3921 Always Satisfied
Grand Mean 4.281 .2284 Always Satisfied

Table 3.  presents the results of a survey on the level of job satisfaction  among hotel personnel in the SOCCSKSARGEN region in terms of each indicators. Indicator ethical practices received the highest mean of  4.385wit a description of very high and the standard deviation is .3409 interpreted as always satisfied while indicators  co-workers, working environment , organizational culture, job security, and promotion received the mean of 4.379, 4.346, 4.326, 4.265 and 4.206 description of very high and the standard deviation are .4156. .3695, .3742, .39210 and .51449 interpreted as always satisfied respectively .  Among the indicators, rewards  received the lowest mean of  4.064 with a description of high and the standard deviation is .5882 interpreted as oftentimes satisfied.  The grand mean is 4.281 description of very high and standard deviation is  .228492 interpreted as always satisfied. This indicates a high level of job satisfaction among hotel personnel in Region XII in terms of its indicators.

Job satisfaction, a cornerstone of organizational behavior research (Frese & Fay, 2017), is influenced by a complex interplay of factors impacting employee well-being.  Research consistently links job satisfaction to positive job characteristics such as task significance, autonomy, and feedback (Hackman & Oldham, 2019; Deci & Ryan, 2019), and to job crafting initiatives (Wrzesniewski & Dutton, 2019).  Organizational factors, including leadership style, culture, and organizational justice, also significantly influence job satisfaction (Judge et al., 2019; Colquitt et al., 2019), with transformational leadership fostering positive work environments (Bass & Avolio, 2019).  Work-life balance is another key factor, particularly highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on remote work (Greenhaus & Beutell, 2019; Bond et al., 2020).

Table 4.  Relationship between HRM Practices and job satisfaction and relationship between employee commitment and job satisfaction.

Variables paired with Job Satisfaction R P-Value Interpretation
HRM Practices .720 .000 Significant
Employee Commitment .218 .000 Significant

Table 4. present a significant positive relationship between HRM Practices and job satisfaction (R = .720, p < .001), indicating that effective HRM strategies strongly contribute to higher employee job satisfaction. Additionally, the table shows a statistically significant but weaker positive correlation between employee commitment and job satisfaction (R = .218, p < .001), suggesting that while committed employees tend to be more satisfied, the impact is less pronounced than that of well-implemented HRM practices. Overall, the data highlights the crucial role of HRM in fostering a satisfied workforce, with employee commitment playing a less dominant, though still significant, part.

The finding that HRM practices have a significant relationship with job satisfaction aligns with previous research that has consistently demonstrated a strong link between effective HRM practices and job satisfaction (Becker & Huselid, 2016; Guest, 2017). Studies have shown that various HRM strategies, including performance management, work-life balance initiatives, and employee recognition programs, enhance employee engagement and job satisfaction (Alagaraja & Thirunavukkarasu, 2018; Saks & Grzywacz, 2014).

Table 5. The Human Resource Management  Practices  And Employee Commitment best influences the job satisfaction  among hotel employee SOCCSKSARGEN region.

Independent Variables Beta Coefficient T p-value Interpretation
HRM practices .716 6.203 .000 Significant
Employee Commitment .016 .371 .711 Not Significant
r²= 0.519

F=  144.543

p= .000

Table 5. present the regression analysis on the significant influence of HRM  practices  and employee commitment on the job satisfaction of hotels employees in region xii.  The overall results shows that the combined variables, HRM practices and employee commitment   significantly influence the job satisfaction of employee  with an overall p-value of .000.

Regression analysis revealed that HRM practices significantly predicted job satisfaction, while employee commitment did not emerge as a significant predictor. This finding is counterintuitive given prior literature. A possible explanation lies in the contextual dynamics of Region XII’s hospitality industry, where commitment may manifest more as an outcome of satisfaction. Another consideration is measurement limitations, as the items leaned toward behavioral compliance rather than emotional attachment. Finally, strong HRM practices may overshadow the predictive role of commitment.

On a singular capacity, it shows that only HRM practices significantly influence job satisfaction  with  P-value of .000, thus the 3rd   null hypotheses  is rejected. In other hand employee commitment does not significantly  influence   job satisfaction  with  a resulted  p-value of .711, thus the 4th null hypothesis  is rejected.

Furthermore  the R squared  of 0. 519 shows that 51.90 %t of  job satisfaction  can be contributed  by HRM practices  and employee commitment  on the remaining 48.10% can be explained by other factors not covered in  the study.

The finding that HRM practices and employee commitment best influence job satisfaction among hotel employees in the SOCCSKSARGEN region is consistent with the broader literature emphasizing the interconnectedness of these factors. Specifically, the literature review highlights that effective HRM practices, such as training and development, and employee recognition, foster a sense of commitment among employees (Noordin et al., 2021; Rahman & Zaman, 2018), which in turn, leads to higher job satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Despite the workforce’s skills and commitment, as evidenced by high mean scores across multiple indicators, there are areas needing attention, particularly concerning compensation and opportunities for advancement. Recruitment and selection processes are viewed positively, suggesting effective practices that contribute to employee performance and retention. The strong commitment of employees, reflected in high scores for attendance, quality of work, initiative, and teamwork, highlights a dedicated and results-oriented workforce aligned with the organization’s values.

However, the relatively lower score for rewards and recognition indicates a gap in acknowledging employee contributions, which could impact overall job satisfaction. The significant positive correlation between HRM practices and job satisfaction (r = .720) underscores the importance of effective human resource management in fostering a positive work environment. Conversely, the moderate correlation between employee commitment and job satisfaction (r = .218) suggests that while employees are committed, this does not directly translate to high job satisfaction levels.

The findings reveal a skilled and committed workforce facing challenges related to gender balance, career progression, and employee recognition. Addressing these issues through enhanced HRM practices and improved reward systems can further elevate job satisfaction and retention, ultimately benefitting the organization’s operational success.

Additional tests revealed demographic differences. Female employees reported lower satisfaction with rewards than males. Rank-and-file employees expressed lower satisfaction with promotions compared to managerial staff. Longer-serving employees were more critical of compensation fairness. These suggest tailored HR interventions for gender equity, career development, and recognition.

Generally, Human Resource Management practices and employee commitment influence job satisfaction. However, only HRM practices significantly predict job satisfaction. This distinction highlights that while employees demonstrate high levels of commitment (‘Always Committed’), their satisfaction (‘Always Satisfied’) depends more directly on HRM systems and policies. To avoid confusion, terminology was standardized so that HRM practices are described as ‘Always Practiced’ and job satisfaction as ‘Always Satisfied’.

Moreover, based on the findings of the study, the researcher proposes the following recommendation:

  1. The high HRM practices across all indicators in SOCCSKSARGEN hotels, with a grand mean suggesting widespread effectiveness. However, slight variations in scores, particularly the lower mean for compensation compared to employee wellness, warrant investigation into salary competitiveness and benefits packages to further enhance employee satisfaction and retention. Maintaining these high standards requires ongoing monitoring and evaluation through data-driven assessments, employee feedback mechanisms, and periodic reviews, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative methods to ensure continued effectiveness and address emerging challenges proactively.
  2. Hospitality industry in Region XII should focus on sustaining these positive trends through continued reinforcement of existing practices and proactive measures to address any subtle variations between indicators. Regular monitoring through employee surveys, feedback mechanisms, and performance reviews is crucial to identify and address any emerging challenges or areas for improvement. Further research could explore the specific factors contributing to the observed high commitment levels and investigate whether these translate into optimal organizational outcomes. The high commitment levels should be leveraged to further enhance productivity and organizational performance.
  3. Based on the findings, the hospitality industry in Region XII must maintain competitive reward systems that accurately reflect employee contributions and market standards. This requires a review of salaries, benefits, and performance-based incentives to ensure they remain motivating and competitive. While employee satisfaction with the work environment and colleagues is high, ongoing monitoring and regular feedback mechanisms are essential to sustain this positivity and address any emerging issues. A holistic strategy focusing on reward systems, while preserving positive aspects of other job satisfaction factors, will foster a more productive and fulfilling work environment.
  4. Hospitality industry  in the Region XII should prioritize both strengthening their HRM practices and fostering employee commitment to enhance job satisfaction, as both factors demonstrate a statistically significant positive relationship with it; however, given the stronger correlation observed between HRM practices and job satisfaction compared to employee commitment and job satisfaction , organizations should particularly focus on developing and implementing effective HRM strategies encompassing recruitment, training, performance management, and compensation to yield the most substantial positive impact on employee contentment.
  5. Hospitality industry  in the Region XII should prioritize strategically investing in and enhancing their HRM practices, as the strong and significant positive relationship observed indicates this will be the most impactful approach to increasing employee job satisfaction; in contrast, employee commitment did not show a significant influence on job satisfaction in this model, suggesting that focusing resources on optimizing recruitment, training, performance management, compensation, and employee relations will yield the greatest returns in fostering a more satisfied workforce and likely contributing to improved organizational outcome.

REFERENCES

  1. Abayomi, O. A., & Ziska, F. (2014). Compensation Management and Employee Job Satisfaction: A Case of Nigeria.
  2. Abdullah, N. N., & Othman, M. (2016). The contribution of human capital investment in the growth of East Asian economy–A l iterature review. Journal of Economic and Business Research, 22(1), 190-203.
  3. Adari, T., & Satyanarayana, G. (2018). Impact of compensation on employee performance. Compensation Management, 1(2), 20-32.
  4. Adekanbi-Favour, A. A. (2016). An Investigation into the Impact of Leadership Styles on Employee Retention: Identifying which Leadership Style best encourages Employee Retention in the Nigerian Banking Sector. A Case study of Zenith Bank Plc.,    Nigeria.
  5. Agarwal, U. A., & Sajid, A. (2019). The influence of job satisfaction, work environment, job characteristics and organizational culture on organizational commitment: Evidence from banking sector of Pakistan. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1677636.
  6. Ahmad, S., & Schroeder, R. G. (2019). The importance of training and development in employee performance and organizational effectiveness: A study of the public sector in Kuwait. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(2), 113-125.
  7. Akhigbe, O. J., & Obomeghie, A. (2021). Quality of Work-Life and Employee Commitment of Micro Finance Banks in Rivers State,    The International Journal of  Business & Management,          9(3). https://doi.org/10.24940/theijbm/2021/v9/i3/BM2103-040
  8. Alagaraja, M. (2018). The impact of employee commitment on job satisfaction: A study on the manufacturing industry in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(5), 119-130.
  9. Alagaraja, M., & Thirunavukkarasu, C. (2018). Impact of employee engagement on organizational performance: A literature review. International Journal of Management and Commerce Insights, 6(2), 223-232.
  10. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the      Journal of occupational psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
  11. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (2018). The measurement and antecedents of organizational commitment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
  12. Aloumedjo, Z.T. (2018). Punctuality, attendance policy and organizational performance.International Journal of Research Science & Management, 5(8), 20-39.
  13. Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2011). The Oxford handbook oforganizational culture and leadership. Oxford University Press.
  14. Ampomah, P., & Cudjor, S. K. (2015). The Effect of Employee Turnover on Organizations (Case Study of Electricity Company of Ghana, Cape Coast). Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, 2(1), 21–24.
  15. Anderson, C., & Clark, D. (2021). Behavioral interviews: A review of research and best practices. Journal of Management, 47(3), 456-
  16. Angelliza Chantica, J., Cahyani, R., & Romadhon, A. (2022). Peranan Manajemen Pengawasan: Komitmen, Perencanaan, Kemampuan Karyawan (Literature Review Msdm). Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan,3(3), 247–256.
  17. Anwar, K. (2017). Analyzing the conceptual model of service quality and its relationship with guests’ satisfaction:a study of hotels in The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, 25(2), 1-16
  18. Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2020). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page Publishers.
  19. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (2018). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-40.
  20. Ashraf, T., & Siddiqui, D. A. (2020). The Impact of Employee Engagement on Employee Retention: The Role of Psychological Capital, Control at Work,General Well-Being and Job Satisfaction. Human Resource Research, 4(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.5296/hrr.v4i1.16477
  21. Avolio, B. J., Reichard, R. J., Hannah, S. T., Walumbwa, F. O., & Chan, (2018).  Leadership is a resource for organizational             effectiveness: An integrating conceptual framework.  The Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 1-19.
  22. Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2018). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 1, 43-79.
  23. Azeez, R. O. (2015). The influence of employees’ job satisfaction and turnover intention on organizational commitment: a case study of Lagos State University. Lagos State University Press.
  24. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.
  25. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2019). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Organizational            Behavior, 40(1), 70-85.
  26. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next?. Personality and Performance, 9(1), 5-30.
  27. Bashkirova, A., Compagner, A., Henningsen, D.M. and Treur, J. (2023), “An adaptive modelling approach to employee burnout in the context of the big five personality traits”, Cognitive Systems Research, Vol. 79, pp. 109-125, doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2022.12.010
  28. Becker, G., DeGroot, M. & Marschak, J., (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9, 226–
  29. Bond, F. H., Galinsky, A. D., & Polychronopoulos, V. (2020). The  COVID-19 crisis and the future of work: Implications for organizations, individuals, and society. Harvard Business Review, 98(4), 80-92.
  30. Borte, R., Lehner, F., & Lobinger, M. (2017). The impact of e-learning on employee performance: Evidence from a quasi-experiment in    a retail service firm. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 39, 144-153.
  31. Brown, D., & Jones, M. (2022). Organizational culture and its influence on job satisfaction: A qualitative study. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30(4), 158-172.
  32. Brown, D., & Jones, S. (2021). Building trust through teamwork: A qualitative study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 40(2), 87-101.
  33. Brown, D., & Martinez, P. (2019). Facilities and employee satisfaction: A comprehensive review. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,    30(3), 132-147.
  34. Brown, D., & Nguyen, L. (2022). Linking ethical practices to employee retention: A case study. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(3), 132-147.
  35. Brown, D., Lee, S., & Garcia, M. (2020). Fostering a sense of belonging through organizational values. Journal of Organizational            Behavior, 30(4), 158-172.
  36. Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2018). Ethical leadership: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 32(6), 818-855.
  37. Brown, M., & Peterson, T. (2019). Job satisfaction and employee commitment: A meta-analysis. Human Relations, 72(1), 23-43.
  38. Brutus, S., & Donia, M. B. L. (2018). When and why accountability promotes unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 153, 565-583.
  39. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Jossey-Bass.
  40. Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. M. (2015). The modeling and assessment of work performance.  Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 47-74.
  41. Cappelli, P., & Hamori, M. (2020). The future of work: How the new order of business will shape your organization, your     management style, and your life. Harvard Business Review Press.
  42. Cappelli, P., & Keller, J. R. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making.         California Management Review, 61(4), 58-80.
  43. Carter, M., & Smith, J. (2019). Reducing bias in recruitment: A review of best practices. Personnel Psychology, 72(4), 789-812.
  44. Cascio, W. F. (2018). Managing human resources: Productivity, quality of work life, profits.McGraw-Hill Education
  45. Chang, J., Morrison, A. M., Lin, S. H.-H. & Ho, C.-Y. (2021). How do food consumption motivations and emotions affect the experiential values and well-being of foodies?. British Food Journal, 123(2), 627-648. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04- 2020-   0355
  46. Chang, L., & Martinez, P. (2023). The influence of compensation on employee morale and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(4), 158-172.
  47. Chang, L., & Smith, A. (2023). The influence of co-worker dynamics on employee job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(2), 87-101.Chatzifotiou, S., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). The role of organizational culture in employee engagement: A review and agenda for future Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S15-S37…
  48. Chen, C., Huang, J., & Wang, L. (2023). Employee engagement and initiative-taking behavior: A cross-sectional study. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 35(1), 45-58.
  49. Chen, C., Huang, J., & Wang, L. (2023). The impact of employee engagement on work quality: A cross-sectional study. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 35(1), 45-58.
  50. Chen, H., et al. (2020). Job satisfaction and its influence on employee morale and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 40(2), 87-101.
  51. Chen, X., & Wang, Y. (2020). The impact of social media on recruitment: A systematic review. Journal of Management Studies, 57(3), 542-568.
  52. Chernyak-Hai, Y., & Rabenu, E. (2018). The impact of social media on employee engagement: A review of the literature. *Journal of Business Research*, *88*, 244-252.
  53. Chiekezie, O. M., Emejulu, G., & Nwanneka, A. (2017). Compensation management and employee retention of selected commercial   banksinAnambra State, Nigeria. Archives of Business Research,5(3)
  54. Chua, J., & Ayoko, O. B. (2021). Employees’ self-determined motivation, transformational  leadership and work engagement.    Journal of Management & Organization, 27(3), 523–543.
  55. Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2019). Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm               performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management   46(6), 740-751.
  56. Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2019). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  57. Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high- performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel psychology, 59(3), 501-528.
  58. Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high- performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their           effects on organizational performance. Personnel psychology, 59(3), 501-528.
  59. Cooper-Thomas, H., & Morrison, R. (2019). The future of work: A review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review*, *29*(1),        1-15.
  60. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. *Journal of Management*, *31*(6), 874-
  61. Cropanzano, R., & Wright, T. A. (2011). The happy-productive worker thesis: Psychological well-being is a cause of workplace productivity. In K. S. Cameron & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 175– 194). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  62. Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., & Bobocel, D. R. (2017). Social exchange theory: A review and extension. *Annual Review of        Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior*, *4*, 1-26.
  63. Davis, A., & Evans, J. (2022). Video interviews in the remote work era: A review of research. Journal of Human Resources, 57(2), 345-
  64. De Grip, A., Bosma, H., Willems, D., & Van Boxtel, M. (2020). Job polarization and skill biasedtechnological change: Evidence from the European working conditions survey. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 26(1), 5-23.
  65. De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity,      monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3),   535-549.
  66. De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity,      monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3),   535-549.
  67. De Leon, J., & De Guzman, J. (2017). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment among Filipino workers: The moderating effects of job insecurity. Philippine Management Review, 24(1), 1-17.
  68. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-          American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
  69. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The” what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
  70. Department of Tourism (DOT). (2023). National tourism development plan 2023-2028.
  71. Department of Tourism Region XII. (2023). Regional tourism statistics and highlights.
  72. Department of Tourism Region XII. (2023). SOCCSKSARGEN Tourism
  73. Dessler G., 2015, Human Resource Management, Global Edition (14 ), Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
  74. Dessler, G., & Varrkey, B. (2015). Human resource management (15th ). Pearson Education Mumbai.
  75. Di Martino, V. (2018). Workplace health promotion: Evidence and practice. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 11(1), 52-74.
  76. Diestel, S., Wegge, J., & Schmidt, K-H. (2018). The impact of employee personality on voluntary absenteeism: The moderating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(1), 150-173.
  77. Dina, T. & Olowosoke, G. O. (2018). The Effect of Motivation and Job Performance on Library Personnel Effectiveness in University   Libraries in Nigeria. Library Philosophy & Practice.
  78. Efin Shu, 2024 Enhancing Employee Retention Through Talent Management Practices: A Semi-Systematic Literature Review
  79. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support*. Journal of Applied Psychology,    71(3), 500-507.
  80. Eisenberger, R., Malone, G. P., & Presson, W. D. (2020). Optimizing organizational culture to foster employee engagement and productivity: The moderating role of employee personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(9), 960–974.
  81. Eldor, L., & Harpaz, I. (2016). A process model of employee engagement: The relations between communication, perceived         organizational support, and employee engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(2), 273-300.
  82. Elloso, J. P., & Ylagan, A. D. (2024). Psychological empowerment, work engagement and job satisfaction among hotel employees in CALABARZON: Basis for human resource management framework. International Journal of Research Studies in Management, 12, 103-118.
  83. Fibriadi, H., Yusuf, M., & Abduh, M. R. (2022). The effect of compensation and workenvironment on employee performance. Al-Amwal: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi danPerbankan Syariah,14(2), 197-210.
  84. Fletcher L, Alfes K, Robinson D (2018) The relationship between perceived training and development and employee retention: the mediating role of work attitudes. International  Journal  Human Resource Management  29(18):2701–2728
  85. Ford, M. T., & Butts, M. M. (2017). Relationships between physical and psychological health and work–family conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 149-166.
  86. Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2017). Personal initiative (PI): The theoretical concept and empirical findings. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Sutton   (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 133-187).           JAI Press.
  87. Fubara, B. J., & Needorn, R. S. (2023). Extrinsic reward systems and employees’ commitment to deposit money banks in Port   Harcourt, Rivers State. Scholarly Journal of Management Sciences Research, 2(1), 79–98.
  88. Karthiga, Dr. R. Karthi andMs.P. Balaishwarya, Recruitment and Selection process, IJSR publications, Volume 5, Tamil Nadu, India, 2015, P 1- 2.
  89. Gamage, A. S. (2014). Recruitment and selection practices in manufacturing SMEs in Japan: An analysis of the link with business performance. Ruhuna Journal of Management and Finance, 1(1), 37-52
  90. Gamiao, J. S., & Viado, M. S. (2020). Structural Equation Model on Employee Engagement of Restaurants in Region XII.
  91. Garcia, E., & Martinez, A. (2022). Organizational culture and employee commitment to quality work: A case study in the healthcare industry.International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 14(3), 263 277..
  92. Garcia, M., (2021). Ethical practices and employee engagement: A qualitative analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 158-172.
  93. Garcia, S., & Nguyen, R. (2019). Organizational values and employee well-being: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied           Psychology, 35(1), 45-59..
  94. Ghous, M. G., Nizami, H., & Hamid, H.( 2023). Effects of Work Environment Facilities on Employee Performance
  95. Global Workplace Analytics. (2020). Latest Work-at-Home/Telecommuting/Mobile Work/Remote Work Statistics. .
  96. Gomez, M., & Perez, A. (2023). Leadership impact on employee job satisfaction: A comprehensive analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 45-58.
  97. Goodridge, D. (2016). Relationships between transformational and transactional leadership with the motivation of subordinates. Concordia University
  98. Grant, A. M. (2017). The impact of job design on work performance,   wellbeing and job satisfaction: Evidence and practical            In The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Well-Being (pp. 261-282). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  99. Grant, A. M., & Ginnett, R. C. (2020). Principles of organizational behavior. McGraw-Hill Education.
  100. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (2019). Sources of work and family conflict: A theoretical analysis. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76-85.
  101. Guest, D. E. (2017). Human resource management and employee well-being: Towards a new analytic framework. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 22–
  102. Gutierrez, J. (2019). Hotel employee turnover: A critical analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 78, 123-135.
  103. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2), 250-279.
  104. Hafeez, I., Yingjun, Z., Hafeez, S., Mansoor, R., & Rehman, K. U. (2019). Impact Of Workplace Environment On             Employee Performance: Mediating Role Of Employee Health.
  105. Hale, A. R., & Hovden, J. (2019). Management and culture in occupational health and safety. In The Routledge Companion to Health and Safety at Work (pp. 134-148). Routledge
  106. Hameed, A. A., & Anwar, K. (2018). Analyzing theRelationship between Intellectual Capital and Organizational Performance: A Study of       Selected Private Banks in Kurdistan. International Journal of Social Sciences& Educational Studies, 4(4), 39.
  107. Hammer, L. B., Akkermans, J., & Wijnhoven, A. G. (2022). Work-life balance: A review of its antecedents, consequences, and      Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(1), 3-28..
  108. Hamza, P. A., Othman, B. J., Gardi, B., Sorguli, S., Aziz, H. M., Ahmed, A., Sabir, B. Y., Ismael, N. B., Ali, B. J., & Anwar, G. (2023) .      Recruitment and Selection: The Relationship between Recruitment and Selection with Organizational Performance. Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(2), 45-62.
  109. Hanaysha, J., & Tahir, P. R. (2016). Examining the effects of employee empowerment, teamwork, and employee training on job
  110. Hansson, B. (2019). Training and development: A key to organizational success. Journal of European Industrial Training, 43(2), 142-155.
  111. Harris, M., & Johnson, B. (2018). Candidate experience: A critical factor in talent acquisition. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(3), 321-338.
  112. Harter, J. (2021). The Great Resignation: Why Workers Say They Quit. Gallup Workplace.
  113. Henry, O., & Temtime, Z. (2009). Recruitment and selection practices in SMEs: Empirical evidence from a developing country            Advances in Management, 3(2), 52-58.
  114. Hewlett Packard Enterprise. (2023). Time & Attendance Management Johns, G. (2019). Presenteeism in the workplace: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior,33(4), 519-542.
  115. Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of    the work design literature. Journal of applied psychology, 92(5),
  116. Hussain, S., & Raza, S. H. (2019). Impact of employee job satisfaction on customer satisfaction: Evidence from the hotel industry. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management, 7(1), 23–31.
  117. Ibrahim, A. M. (2020). Organizational commitment and job satisfaction: A case of Soccsksargen, Philippines lodging employees.
  118. International Labour Organization. (2021). The Safety and Health at Work and the Future of Work.
  119. Ismael, N. B., Othman, B. J., Gardi, B., Hamza, P. A., Sorguli, S., Aziz, M., Ahmed, S. A., Sabir, B. Y., Ali, B. J., & Anwar, G. (2021).       The role of training and development on organizational effectiveness.
  120. Ismael, N. B., Othman, B. J., Gardi, B., Hamza, P. A., Sorguli, S., Aziz, M., Ahmed, S. A., Sabir, B. Y., Ali, B. J., & Anwar, G. (2021).       The role of training and development on organizational effectiveness.
  121. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of        Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
  122. Jiang, J. Y., Wang, S., & Zhao, S. (2012). Does job design matter? A multilevel investigation of the job characteristics model in the    Chinese context. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(3), 713-734.
  123. Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Han, K., Hong, Y., Kim, A., & Winkler, A. (2019). Clarifying the construct of human resource systems:          Relating human resource management to employee performance.          Human Resource Management Review, 29(2), 265-276.
  124. Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2019). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation      of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264–
  125. Johns, G. (2010). Presenteeism in the workplace: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior31(4), 519– 542
  126. Johnson, E., & Lee, S. (2019). Enhancing decision-making through effective collaboration: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 35(1), 45-58.
  127. Johnson, E., & Lee, S. (2021). Job satisfaction and employee well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(4), 201-215.
  128. Johnson, E., & Smith, A. (2018). The impact of organizational values on employee job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(2), 87-101.
  129. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2021). Job satisfaction: The state of the science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 38, 3-28
  130. Kadakol,. Kundaragi, P., ( 2016 ) Level of Job Satisfaction of Working Employees: A Study on Co-Operative Societies In Belagavi District
  131. Kakkos, N., & Trivellas, P. (2011). Investigating the link between motivation, work stress and job performance. Evidence from the      banking industry. 8th International Conference on Enterprise Systems, Accounting and Logistics, 408–428.
  132. Kalleberg, A. L. (2020). Precarious Lives: Job Insecurity and Well-Being in Rich Democracies. Polity.
  133. Karatepe, O. M. (2019). Antecedents and outcomes of frontline hotel employees’ work engagement. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(1), 145–162.
  134. Karatepe, O. M., & Olugbade, O. A. (2018). The effects of job insecurity and organizational justice on hotel employees’ job outcomes: The mediating role of work engagement. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 75, 132–
  135. Karatepe, O. M., Yorganci, I. E., & Hamurcu, M. (2018). Work engagement, career satisfaction, and turnover intentions: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 35, 121-129.
  136. Karatepe, Osman M. 2013b. High-performance work practices, work social support and their effects on job embeddedness and      turnover intentions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 25: 903–21.
  137. Karatepe, Osman M., and Olusegun A. Olugbade. 2016. The mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between high-performance work practices and job outcomes of employees in Nigeria. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 28: 2350–71
  138. Katz, S. (2015). Enhancing selfefficacy of elementary school students to learn mathematics. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 4(1), 42-55. doi: 10.5430/jct.v4n1p42.
  139. Kawiana, I. G. P.a, Dewi, L. K. C.b, Martini, L. K. B.c, & Suardana, I. B. R. (2018). The Influence of Organizational Culture, Employee Satisfaction, Personality, and Organizational Commitment towards Employee Performance
  140. Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2021). AI-powered recruitment: A review of its applications and challenges. Human Resource Management Review, 31(2), 123-138.
  141. Kim, W. G., & Park, S. (2020). The effects of perceived organizational support and organizational justice on organizational commitment and turnover intention among hotel employees. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 84, 102302.
  142. Kim, Y. (2020). The impact of supportive co-worker relationships on job satisfaction. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 158-172.
  143. Kim, Y., & Park, J. (2019). The link between job satisfaction and employee retention: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 18(3), 122-135.
  144. Kim, Y., et al. (2020). Job security and job satisfaction: A longitudinal Human Resource Management Review, 18(3), 122-135.
  145. Kim, Y.,(2020). Rewards and job satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Human Resource Management Review, 18(3), 122-135.
  146. Kimura, T., Bande, B., & Fernandez-Ferrín, P. (2018). Work overload and intimidation: Themoderating role of resilience. European   Management Journal, 36(6), 736–745.doi:10.1016/j.emj.2018.03.002
  147. Klopotan, I., Mjeda, T. & Kurečić, P. (2018). Exploring the Motivation of Employees in a Firm: A Case-Study. Business Systems Research Journal. 9(1), 151–60. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj2018-0012.
  148. Komulainen, R. (2012). The Perception of Employee Wellness in the Hospitality Industry: A survey research among hotel employers in   the Black Forest, Germany.
  149. Koslowsky, M., Kluger, A. N., & Reich, M. (2017). Workplace Absenteeism and Attendance: New Insights, Conceptual Trends,     and Research Directions. In APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 2: Selecting and developing        members for the organization (pp. 211–234). American Psychological Association.
  150. Kossek, E. E., & Thompson, R. J. (2021). Work-Life Flexibility for Who? The Diverse Needs of Diverse Employees. Oxford University Press.
  151. Kurdi, B. Al, Alshurideh, M., & Alnaser, A. (2020). The impact of employee satisfaction on customer satisfaction: Theoretical and empirical underpinning. Management Science Letters, 10(15), 3561–3570. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.6.038
  152. Kurniawan, R. (2020). The Influence of Work Motivation and Work Environment on Employee Performance with Job Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable at PT PLN (PERSERO) UP3 KUALA KAPUAS CENTRALKALIMANTAN. Jurnal Syntax Transformation, 1(7).
  153. Lu, “Enhancing Organizational Performance: Unveiling the Dynamics of Performance Management and Employee Engagement,” Acad. J. Bus. \&amp; Manag., 2023
  154. Lee, C.-C., Wu, Y.-Y., Chen, Y.-L., Kao, P.-F., & Feng, W.-K. (2014). The impact ofwork-family conflicts, coworker relationships, and salary levels on turnover intention: using real estate brokers as examples. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 35(2), 143–166.
  155. Lee, H., & Kim, S. (2021). Leadership and employee commitment: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(2), 297-310.
  156. Lee, K., & Martinez, P. (2021). Organizational values and ethical decision-making: A qualitative study. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(3), 132-147.
  157. Lee, K., (2021). Work environment design and employee engagement: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(4), 201-215.
  158. Lee, S. (2020). Promotions and job satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Human Resource Management Review, 18(3), 122-135.
  159. Lee, S., & Brown, D. (2018). Co-workers and job satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 112-129.
  160. Lee, S., & Kim, Y. (2020). Ethical leadership and employee job satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 87-101.
  161. Lin, Y., Huang, W., Yang, C., & Chiang, M. (2018). Work–leisure conflict and its associations with well-being: The roles of social support, leisure participation and job burnout. Tourism Management, 45, 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.04.004.
  162. Lundberg, C., Gudmundsson, A., & Andersson, T. D. (2020). Herzberg’s two-factor theory of job satisfaction: Empirical validation in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(1), 1–26.
  163. Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2018). Positive organizational behavior: Developing the human strengths of your organization. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 57-73.
  164. Lyons, S., & Scott, S. G. (2012). Homeomorphic reciprocity: A new perspective on social exchange theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, *97*(6), 1134-1144.
  165. Arwab, J. A. N. Ansari, M. Azhar, and M. A. Ali, “Exploring the influence of training and development on employee’s performance: Empirical evidence from the Indian tourism industry,” Manag. Sci. Lett., 2022
  166. Mahanta, D. (2022). Factors Affecting Employee Retention: A Study with Special Reference to IT Sector. International Research         Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 4(4),           1820-1832.
  167. Malik, M. E., Danish, R. Q., & Munir, Y. (2012). The Impact of Pay and Promotion on Job Satisfaction: Evidence from Higher Education        Institutes of Pakistan
  168. Malvern W.,C., Michael O,.S., and Crispen C., (2019). An examination of employee retention strategy in aprivae organisation in            Zimbabwe Managers, “Open Journal of Business and Management”, 5(4).
  169. Mangale, N. M. (2017). The Effects of Compensation on Employee Productivity: A Case Study of Kenya Literature Bureau, South C Nairobi (Undergarduate thesis).University of Africa, Lusaka.
  170. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
  171. Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2016). Human Resource Management : PersonnelHuman Resource Management. In Harvard Business Review(Vol. 13, IssueJanuary 2019).
  172. Mattke, S., Liu, H., Caloyeras, J. P., Huang, C. Y., Van Busum, K. R., Khodyakov, D., & Shier, V. (2017). Workplace wellness programs Rand Health Quarterly, 6(2).
  173. Mavis Adu-Darkoh, Employee Recruitment and selection practices, School of Business, KNUST, 2014, P 1-3.
  174. Messersmith, J. G., Lee, S. A., & Guthrie, J. P. (2020). High- performance human resource practices and employee well-being:      A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(12), 1390-1413.
  175. Messersmith, J. G., Patel, P. C., Lepak, D. P., & Gould-Williams, J. S. (2020). Unlocking the black box: Exploring the link between high-performance work systems and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(1), 1.
  176. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–
  177. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. *Human resource management review*, 1(1), 61-89.
  178. Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2017). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 395-407.
  179. Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (2002). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of applied psychology, 78(4), 538-551.
  180. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the                  organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of vocational behavior, 61(1), 20-52.
  181. Mishra, K., Boynton, L., & Mishra, A. (2014). Driving employee engagement: The expanded role of internal communications.         International Journal of Business Communications, 51, 183– 202.
  182. Mishra, M., & Garg, K. (2016). The Relationship between Compensation Components and Employee Retention among Medical Representatives of Pharmaceutical Sector. International    Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 6(5), 31–43.
  183. Mishra, P. (2017). Green human resource management: A framework for sustainable organizational development in an emerging         International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(5),          762–788
  184. Morin, A.J.S., Gillet, N., Blais, A.-R., Comeau, C. and Houle, S.A. (2023), “A multilevel perspective on the role of job demands, job   resources, and need satisfaction for employees’ outcomes”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 141, doi:             1016/j.jvb.2023.103846
  185. Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (2019). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic Press.
  186. Murtiningsih, R. S. (2020). The Impact of Compensation, Training &Development, and Organizational Culture on Job Satisfaction and Employee Retention. Indonesian Management and Accounting Research, 19(1), 33–50.
  187. Nabila Fariha ( 2022) Impact of Attendance Management on improving employee’s performance: focusing on Acorn Infrastructure Service
  188. National Economic and Development Authority. (2018). SOCCSKSARGEN Regional Development Plan 2017-2022.
  189. Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2020). Safety climate and safety at work.   Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational            Behavior, 7, 15-34.
  190. Negash, R., Zewude, S., & Megersa, R. (2014). The effect of compensation on employees’ motivation: In Jimma University academic staff.
  191. Ng, E. C. H., Rahman, A., Hao, L. Z., Rahman, A., & Kumar, R. (n.d.). An Effectiveness of Human Resource Management Practices on       Employee Retention in Institute of Higher Learning: A Regression Analysis.
  192. Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2015). A meta-analysis of the relationships of age and tenure with innovation-related             Journal of Occupational and Organizational             Psychology, 87(3), 521-536
  193. Noe, R. A, Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B. & Wright, P. M. (2006). Human Resources Management: Gaining A Competitive 5th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  194. Noordin, F., Othman, A. K., & Ghaleb, F. A. (2021). Human resource management practices and employee commitment: The       mediating role of organizational culture. International Journal of Business and Management, 16(1), 1-13.
  195. Nururly, S., Butarbutar, I. P., Simatupang, S., & Silalahi, M. (2022). Organizational Culture, Work Discipline and TheirEffect on             Employee Performance. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 6(3).
  196. Oc, B. (2018). The impact of leadership styles on employee Business and Management Studies, 4(1), 135-142.
  197. Ofori, D., & Aryeetey, M. (2011). Recruitment and selection practices in small and medium enterprises. International Journal of        Business Administration, 2(3):45-60
  198. Okolie, U. C., & Ochei, J. O. (2020). Employee empowerment and continuence commitment in the nigerian manufacturing industry. International Journal of New             Economics and Social Sciences, 11(1), 209–222.
  199. Paulin, D., & Griffin, B. (2016). The relationships between incivility, team climate forincivility and job-related employee well-being: a          multilevel  Work & Stress, 30(2), 132–151.
  200. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and             recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
  201. Rahman, W., & Zaman, H. M. (2018). Impact of human resource management practices on organizational commitment: A case study of hotel industry in Lahore, Pakistan. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management, 6(1), 1-11.
  202. Ratnasari, S. L., & Lestari, L. (2020). Effect of leadership style, workload, and job insecurity on turnover intention. International Journal of Innovation, Creativityand Change, 11(12), 299–313.
  203. Rhee J, Zhao X, Kim C (2014) Effects of HRM practices on Chinese firms’ organizational performance: The moderating effect of CEO support. Asian Soc Sci 10(13):210–221.
  204. Riketta, M. (2018). Commitment in organizations: A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(3), 257-287.
  205. Rodriguez, M., & Lopez, P. (2024). Employee training and development opportunities as predictors of commitment to quality work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(2), 189-203.
  206. Rosemberg, M., Li, Y., McConnell, D., McCullagh, M., & Seng, J. (2019). Stressors, allostatic load, and health outcomes among women hotel housekeepers: A pilot study. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 16(3), 206-217
  207. Saks, A. M. (2018). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
  208. Saks, A. M., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2014). Making work better: Employee engagement and well-being. Psychology of Work and Organizations, 7(1), 3-10.
  209. Sarwono, R. and Bernarto, I. (2020), “Leading millennials to 4.0 organization”, Management Science Letters, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 733-740.
  210. satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 87-101.
  211. Satyendra (2020). Organizational culture and employee behaviour. Available online: https://www.ispatguru.com/organizationalculture-and-employee-behaviour/ (accessed on 6 July 2024).
  212. Segbenya, M., & Yeboah, E. (2022). Effect of occupational health and safety on employeeperformance in the Ghanaian Construction Sector. Environmental Health Insights, 16,117863022211372
  213. Selahattin K., and Omer S., 2020. An empirical research on relationship quality of work life and work Engagement.
  214. Shamim, Saqib, Shuang Cang, and Hongnian Yu. 2017. Supervisory orientation, employee goal orientation, and knowledge management among front line hotel employees. International Journal of Hospitality Management 62: 21–32.
  215. Sharafi, T., & Shahrokh, Z. D. (2012). The Relationship Between Family-to-Work Conflict of Employees and Coworkers’ Turnover Intention
  216. Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Ehrhart, K. H., & Singh, G. (2018). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 44(1), 308-342.
  217. Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Ehrhart, K. H., & Singh, G. (2018). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 44(1), 308-342.
  218. Singh, D. (2019). A Literature Review on Employee Retention with Focus on Recent Trends. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 6(1), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.32628/ijsrst195463
  219. Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chierici, R., & Graziano, D.(2020). Green innovation and environmental performance:The role of green transformational leadership and greenhuman resource management. Technological Forecastingand Social Change, 150, 119762
  220. Smith, A., & Brown, D. (2018). The impact of ethical practices on employee job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(3), 112-129.
  221. Smith, A., & Kim, J. (2022). Promotions and employee performance: A comprehensive review. Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 122-135.
  222. Smith, A., Johnson, B., & Lee, C. (2018). The impact of teamwork on innovation: A literature review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 112-129.
  223. Smith, D. G. (2017, February 28). Work environment more important to employees. Business Know How, p. http://www.businessknowhow.com.
  224. Smith, J. (2022). Adaptability in hospitality: The key to flexible hotel management. Fictional Publishing House
  225. Smith, J., & Brown, M. (2022). Leadership influence on promoting respect for organizational values. Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 301-315.
  226. Smith, L., & Johnson, R. (2020). The impact of perceived organizational support on employee commitment to quality work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(4), 378-392.
  227. Smith, L., & Johnson, R. (2020). The impact of perceived organizational support on employee accountability. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(4), 378-392.
  228. Snape, E., & Redman, T. (2010). HRM practices, organizational citizenship behaviour, and performance: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Management Studies,             47(7), 1219–1247.
  229. Stanfast, B. S., & Stanfast, S. I. (2023). Intrinsic reward systems and employees’ commitment to deposit money banks in Port Harcourt, Rivers State. Scholarly Journal of Management Sciences Research, 2(1), 120–137.
  230. Subramony, M., & Pugh, S. D. (2015). Services management research review, integration, and future directions. Journal of Management, 41(1), 349–373.
  231. Syptak, M. J., Marshland, D. W. & Ulmer, D. (1999). Job Satisfaction: Putting Theory into Practice. American Academy of Family Practices: News and Publications. Retrieved on July 24, 2024. Available at: http://www.aafp.org/fpm/991000fm/26.html.
  232. Tan, J. D., Supratikno, H., Pramono, R., Purba, J. T., & Bernarto, I. (2019). Nurturing transgenerational entrepreneurship in ethnic Chinese family SMEs: exploring Indonesia. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 13(2), 294–325.
  233. Taylor, A., & Ramirez, L. (2022). The impact of inclusive hiring practices on organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(1), 123-142.
  234. Tirta, A. H., & Enrika, A. (2020). Understanding the impact of reward and recognition, work-life balance, on employee retention with job satisfaction as mediating variable on millennials in Indonesia. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 14(3), 88–98.
  235. Tongkachok, K., Garg, S., Balakrishnan, S., & Vijayalakshmi, N. S. (2022). Impact of transformational leadership on organizational performance through employee motivation. ECS Transactions, 107(1), 12873.
  236. Truss, C., Mankin, D., & Kelliher, C. (2018). Strategic human resource management (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  237. Tsang, M. C., Rumberger, R. W., & Levin, H. M. (1991). The impact of surplus schooling on worker productivity. Industrial Relations, 30(2), 209-228.
  238. Tsaur, S., & Yen, C. (2018). Work–leisure conflict and its consequences: Do generational differences matter? Tourism Management, 69, 121–131.
  239. Ulrich, D., & Brockbank, W. (2017). The future of HR: Reinventing the HR function for the next generation. Harvard Business Review Press.
  240. Visanh, P., & Xu, H. (2018). Factors affecting organizational commitment of employees of Lao Development Bank. Sociology International Journal, 2(6).
  241. Vizano, N. A., Sutawidjaya, A. H., & Endri, E. (2021). The effect of  compensation and career on turnover intention: Evidence from            The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 471–478.
  242. Waisiko, C. (2024). Effect of remote working on employee wellness  among Non-Governmental Organizations in Nairobi City County, Kenya. [Unpublished master’s thesis].
  243. Wang, X., & Kim, S. (2018). The impact of work ethics on employee job Journal of Business Ethics, 30(2), 87-101.
  244. Wang, X., & Lee, S. (2018). Compensation and rewards impact on employee job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior,        25(2), 87-101.
  245. Wang, X., & Liu, Y. (2018). The impact of job satisfaction on employee motivation and commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(3),           112-129.
  246. Wang, X., & Patel, S. (2018). The impact of promotions on employee job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(2), 87-101.
  247. Wang, Y., Guan, Y., & Liu, Y. (2018). The relationship between person– organization fit and job satisfaction. Journal of Vocational             Behavior, 109, 56-67.
  248. Weller, I., & Helliwell, J. F. (2020). The quality of work index: A tool for prioritizing better work over more work. Review of Income and Wealth,            66(3), 545-572.
  249. Wenny, D. F., & Indra, S. (2023). Analysis of work environment, attitude, coaching, and servant leadership on job satisfaction      mediated by career development (Literature review study).
  250. Wenny, D. F., & Indra, S. (2023). The influence of workload,  organizational commitment, and job satisfaction on employee performance. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 10(3), 1093-1101.
  251. Williams, K., Smith, J., & Brown, M. (2020). The impact of  collaboration on employee satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Human Resource Management Review, 18(2), 76-89.
  252. Wood, A. M., & Winston, B. E. (2018). Toward a new understanding of leader accountability: Defining and differentiating responsibility, answerability, and liability in leadership contexts. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(1), 3-14.
  253. World Health Organization. (2022). Mental health and well-being in the workplace: A WHO handbook for employers and managers. World        Health Organization.
  254. Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2003). Crafting a job: Using self-management to improve work experiences. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 173-194.
  255. Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2019). Crafting jobs: Using discretionary behavior to shape work. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 728-752.
  256. Xu, S., & Cao, Z. C. (2019). Antecedents and outcomes of work-nonwork conflict in hospitality: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31, 3919– https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2018-0897
  257. Xuecheng, W., Iqbal, Q., & Saina, B. (2022). Factors affecting employee’s retention: Integration of situational leadership with social exchange theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–13.
  258. Yang, C.-L., & Hwang, M. (2017). Personality traits and simultaneous reciprocal influences between job performance and job            Chinese Management Studies, 8(1), 6-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-09-2011-0079
  259. Yashika, S., Mannu, G., & Ashima, B. (2020). Impact of compensation management on employees’ performance. International Journal of Management IT & Engineering, 10(5), 200–209.
  260. Zhang, Y., Sun, L.-Y., Qi, J., & Liu, C. (2020). How does perceived organizational support affect organizational commitment? The mediating roles of psychological capital and job satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1144.

Article Statistics

Track views and downloads to measure the impact and reach of your article.

0

PDF Downloads

0 views

Metrics

PlumX

Altmetrics

Paper Submission Deadline

Track Your Paper

Enter the following details to get the information about your paper

GET OUR MONTHLY NEWSLETTER